Management of chronic kidney disease for Maori in Aotearoa New Zealand: a summary of clinical practice guidelines.

AIMS: The kaupapa of the Caring for Australians and New Zealanders with Kidney Impairment (CARI) Clinical practice guidelines for management of chronic kidney disease for Maori in Aotearoa New Zealand is to provide whanau-centred and evidence-based recommendations to healthcare systems, healthcare providers and healthcare workers. The guidelines include screening, identification, management and system-level responses to chronic kidney disease (CKD) to deliver best practice care to Maori affected by CKD across community, primary and secondary services. METHODS: The guidelines are funded by the Ministry of Health - Manatu Hauora and are written by a panel of Maori and non-Maori clinicians and literacy experts across Aotearoa New Zealand from Kaupapa Maori organisations, general practice and nephrology units using standardised methods. The guidelines methodology included consultation with whanau Maori with lived experience of CKD and primary and secondary care practitioners. Additional guideline development would be required to inform management of CKD for non-Maori in Aotearoa New Zealand. RESULTS: The guidelines provide recommendations about equity, governance and accountability, cultural safety, case management, information systems, social determinants of equity and wellbeing and screening. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations to health services for Maori with CKD are based on giving effect to Te Tiriti o Waitangi and best practice care to prevent CKD, delaying its progression, treating kidney failure through timely transplantation, delivering in community and providing high-quality symptom management.

Repeat prescribing safety survey.

INTRODUCTION Repeat prescribing is an accepted part of general practice activities in New Zealand and in many developed countries. However, there has been little research on how this service is used in New Zealand, or on clinicians' attitudes towards it. AIM To discover the opinions of vocationally registered general practitioners (GPs) and general practice registrars regarding repeat prescribing, availability of practice policy and mechanisms for issuing such prescriptions. METHODS A survey was developed by an expert group and shared through the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners' (the College) weekly newsletter, epulse, inviting members to participate in the survey. The survey was also emailed to registrars. RESULTS In total, 144 vocationally registered GPs and 115 registrars responded (n=259), giving a response rate of 3.2% for GPs and 12.7% for registrars. Patient convenience and time efficiency for the practice were the most commonly cited reasons for repeat prescribing. Registrars had low awareness of practice policy on repeat prescribing and only one-quarter of practices had an orientation pack that contained advice on repeat prescribing. DISCUSSION Better practice systems are likely to improve the safety profile of repeat prescribing and should be addressed. There is substantial unwanted variability currently in these practice systems.

General Practice care of enduring mental health problems: an evaluation of the Wellington Mental Health Liaison Service.

AIMS: To describe the development and evaluation of a primary care service for a population of mental health consumers who had previously been predominantly cared for by a specialist service. METHODS: Consumers were interviewed at regular intervals after entry to the programme. The Health of the Nation Outcomes Scale (HoNOS) and the Life Skills Profile (LSP) outcomes measures were used with consumers at intervals of 0,3,6,12 and 18 months after entry to the programme. A cost comparison was made between services provided to consumers in the year before entry to the programme, and after entry. RESULTS: Consumers reported no deterioration in their clinical condition while under the care of general practitioners, and they were largely satisfied with general practitioner care. Consumers' LSP scores were stable after entry to the programme. General practitioners were initially ambivalent about the programme, but were more supportive after 12 months had elapsed. The education provided to general practitioners, nurses, and receptionists was strongly welcomed. CONCLUSIONS: With carefully designed training and support, general practice can provide high-quality community-based mental healthcare for consumers with enduring mental health disorders, and it can support the introduction of integrated mental health care initiatives.