Clinicopathological and Molecular Study of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Associated with Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma.

To retrospectively characterize the molecular features of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinomas (NSCLC) with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), clinicopathological data of 12 patients diagnosed with NSCLC and PC between 2007 and 2016 were collected. Immunohistochemistry and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) were performed on cases with available material. PC was the initial presentation of NSCLC in 17% of the cases. Overall, patients with PC displayed a poor median survival of 12 weeks. Histology was adenocarcinoma in 11 cases. 37.5% of cases showed PD-L1 immunostaining positivity (50% cut-off). ALK and ROS1 immunostainings were negative. Using NGS, we identified 17 molecular alterations in 9 genes (TP53, KRAS, STK11, BRAF, EGFR, DDR2, ERBB4, SMAD4, CTNNB1) in 88.9% of adenocarcinomas. To the best of our knowledge, 5 of these variants are not referenced in the literature. In conclusion, PC might be the initial presentation of NSCLC. Molecular profiling of our cases did not find any effective targetable alteration, except from high PD-L1 expression.

Metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapies: A Renal Cross Channel Group study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains controversial despite several recent prospective studies of targeted therapies (TT). Often Vascular Endothelial growth Factor (VEGF) and Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are used, extrapolating the data from use of these agents in clear cell RCC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective data analysis within the Renal Cross Channel Group to determine metastatic chromophobe RCC (mChRCC) outcomes in the TT era. The end-points were overall response, overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF). The two latter were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: 91 mChRCC patients from 26 centres were included. Median follow-up from the date of first metastasis was 6.1 years (range: 0-13.9). Median OS was 37.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.4-46.8) from the diagnosis of metastatic disease. Among the 61 patients who received TT, 50 (82%) were treated with anti-angiogenic (AA) and 11 with mTOR inhibitors. Median TTF and OS in patients receiving a first line of AA was 8.7 months (95% CI: 5.2-10.9) and 22.9 months (95% CI: 17.8-49.2) versus 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.0-6.0) and 3.2 months (95% CI: 2.3-not evaluable) with mTOR inhibitors, respectively. A stratified log-rank test was used to compare AA and mTOR inhibitors TT, while controlling the effect of the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk group and no significant difference between AA and mTOR inhibitors was observed for TTF (p = 0.26) or for OS (p = 0.55). CONCLUSION: We report the largest retrospective cohort of patients with mChRCC treated with TT and no significant difference between AA and mTOR inhibitors was observed for TTF and OS.

[Life after uterine cancer]. / La vie après un cancer de l'utérus.

This overview focuses on the follow up after uterine cervix and corpus cancers. At early stage, both are associated with good prognosis. Screening for recurrence is mainly based on clinical examination. Screening for a second cancer after endometrial cancer is already planned according to the French recommendations for systematic breast and colon cancer screening. Screening for a second cancer after cervical cancer requires a close examination of organs close to the cervix receiving high doses of radiations and HPV exposed (anus, vulva, vagina and perineum). Late chemotherapy related toxicity after both cancers is rarely encountered and mainly comprise neurological peripheral effects. Late surgical and/or radiation related side effects are more frequent. However, no more than 10% of patients are affected and in such cases, digestive, urinary and lymphatic systems are impaired. Prevalence of sexual dysfunction in patients with uterine cancers is particularly high but the radiotherapy related anatomical modifications (vaginal stenosis for example) might not be the sole reason. Fertility preservation is possible for uterine cancers but requires a rigorous selection of candidates and should be coordinated by specialized team.

Phase I safety and pharmacodynamic of inecalcitol, a novel VDR agonist with docetaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I multicenter trial in naïve metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients with escalating inecalcitol dosages, combined with docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Inecalcitol is a novel vitamin D receptor agonist with higher antiproliferative effects and a 100-fold lower hypercalcemic activity than calcitriol. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Safety and efficacy were evaluated in groups of three to six patients receiving inecalcitol during a 21-day cycle in combination with docetaxel (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) and oral prednisone (5 mg twice a day) up to six cycles. Primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) defined as grade 3 hypercalcemia within the first cycle. Efficacy endpoint was ≥30% PSA decline within 3 months. RESULTS: Eight dose levels (40-8,000 µg) were evaluated in 54 patients. DLT occurred in two of four patients receiving 8,000 µg/day after one and two weeks of inecalcitol. Calcemia normalized a few days after interruption of inecalcitol. Two other patients reached grade 2, and the dose level was reduced to 4,000 µg. After dose reduction, calcemia remained within normal range and grade 1 hypercalcemia. The maximum tolerated dose was 4,000 µg daily. Respectively, 85% and 76% of the patients had ≥30% PSA decline within 3 months and ≥50% PSA decline at any time during the study. Median time to PSA progression was 169 days. CONCLUSION: High antiproliferative daily inecalcitol dose has been safely used in combination with docetaxel and shows encouraging PSA response (≥30% PSA response: 85%; ≥50% PSA response: 76%). A randomized phase II study is planned.

Could we expect to improve survival in small cell lung cancer?

Despite the very good response rate of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) to many anti-cancer agents, survival remains disappointing, particularly in extensive-stage (ES) disease. Many potentially beneficial regimens have achieved a median survival of less than 12 months in clinical trials, and so the standard regimen has remained cisplatin plus etoposide. Trials have shown that 3- and 4-drug regimens are no better than 2-drug regimens; alternating agents, dose-dense and high-dose regimens do not improve outcome, and non-platinum-based regimens are not superior to platinum-based regimens. A recent phase II trial demonstrated that pemetrexed/platinum-based doublets are active in ES-SCLC in the first-line setting. In combination with cisplatin or carboplatin, pemetrexed demonstrated a favourable toxicity profile. The ease of administration and convenient schedule of pemetrexed make these regimens attractive. Although further follow-up of patients in this trial is necessary to define response durability and survival, results so far have led to the initiation of phase III trials of pemetrexed-based regimens in ES-SCLC.

Preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with primary surgery in resectable stage I (except T1N0), II, and IIIa non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) could improve survival in resectable stage I (except T1N0), II, and IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized trial compared PCT to primary surgery (PRS). PCT consisted of two cycles of mitomycin (6 mg/m(2), day 1), ifosfamide (1.5 g/m(2), days 1 to 3) and cisplatin (30 mg/m(2), days 1 to 3), and two additional postoperative cycles for responding patients. In both arms, patients with pT3 or pN2 disease received thoracic radiotherapy. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-five eligible patients were randomized. Overall response to PCT was 64%. There were two preoperative toxic deaths. Postoperative mortality was 6.7% in the PCT arm and 4.5% in the PRS arm (P =.38). Median survival was 37 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 26.7 to 48.3) for PCT and 26.0 months (95% CI, 19.8 to 33.6) for PRS (P =.15). Survival differences between both arms increased from 3.8% (95% CI, 1.3% to 25.1%) at 1 year to 8.6% (95% CI, 2.64% to 24.4%) at 4 years. A quantitative interaction between N status and treatment was observed, with benefit confined to N0 to N1 disease (relative risk [RR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.96; P =.027). After a nonsignificant excess of deaths during treatment, the effect of PCT was significantly favorable on survival (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.99; P =.044). Disease-free survival time was significantly longer in the PCT arm (P =.033). CONCLUSION: Although impressive differences in median, 3-year, and 4-year survival were observed, they were not statistically significant, except for stage I and II disease.