RESUMEN
UroLift is a novel, minimally invasive surgical technique used to treat bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). UroLift was granted US FDA approval in 2013, and so far, it has gained acceptance and popularity worldwide. In this case report, we present a 69-year-old male patient that developed a pelvic hematoma with subacute clinical manifestations two months following UroLift. The patient was managed conservatively, resulting in the complete resolution of the hematoma. As more surgeons are trained, and the caseload increases, we expect to see more complications related to this novel technique. Surgeons should be aware of this procedure's potential short- and long-term complications.
RESUMEN
Wiedemann-Steiner syndrome (WDSTS) is an autosomal dominant disorder that is caused by mutations in the KMT2A gene. This case reports a two-year-old male's diagnosis of WDSTS via a heterozygous variant of uncertain significance (VUS) (c.11735G>A(p.Cys3912Tyr). The patient's phenotypic presentation was remarkable for hypertrichosis, intellectual disability, intermittent aggressive behavior, developmental delay, failure to thrive, low weight, and the distinct facial features of long eyelashes, telecanthus, corrected strabismus, down-slanting palpebral fissures, and a wide nasal bridge with a broad tip. The importance of this case report stands on the principle of genetic evaluation in patients with ambiguous clinical presentations. In the future, molecular analysis of VUS with pathogenic clinical features can lead to targeted medical management and counseling.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Even if the use of stent as bridge to surgery (BTS) for obstructive colon cancer was described long ago, there is still much controversy on their use. Patient recovery before surgery and colonic desobstruction are just some of the reasons to defend this management that can be found in several available articles. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study, including patients with obstructive colon cancer treated between 2010 and 2020. The primary aim of this study is to compare medium-term oncological outcomes (overall survival, disease-free survival) between stent as BTS and ES groups. The secondary aims are to compare perioperative results (in terms of approach, morbidity and mortality, and rate of anastomosis/stomas) between both groups and, within the BTS group, analyze whether there are any factors that may influence oncological outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 251 patients were included. Patients belonging to the BTS cohort presented a higher rate of laparoscopic approach, required less intensive care management, less reintervention, and less permanent stoma rate, when comparing with patients who underwent urgent surgery (US). There were not significant differences in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival between the two groups. Lymphovascular invasion negatively affected oncological results but was not related with stent placement. CONCLUSION: The stent as a bridge to surgery is a good alternative to urgent surgery, which leads to a decrease in postoperative morbidity and mortality without significantly worsening oncological outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Obstrucción Intestinal , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias del Colon/complicaciones , Stents/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Indocyanine green (ICG) was introduced as a promising diagnostic tool to provide real-time assessment of intestinal vascularization. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether ICG could reduce the rate of postoperative AL. The objective of this study is to assess its usefulness and to determine in which patients is most useful and would benefit the most from the use of ICG for intraoperative assessment of colon perfusion. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a single center, including all patients who underwent colorectal surgery with intestinal anastomosis between January 2017 and December 2020. The results of patients in whom ICG was used prior to bowel transection were compared with the results of the patients in whom this technique was not used. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to compare groups with and without ICG. RESULTS: A total of 785 patients who underwent colorectal surgery were included. The operations performed were right colectomies (35.0%), left colectomies (48.3%), and rectal resections (16.7%). ICG was used in 280 patients. The mean time since the infusion of ICG until detection of fluorescence in the colon wall was 26.9 ± 1.2 s. The section line was modified in 4 cases (1.4%) after ICG due to a lack of perfusion in the chosen section line. Globally, a non-statistically significant increase in anastomotic leak rate was observed in the group without ICG (9.3% vs. 7.5%; p = 0.38). The result of the PSM was a coefficient of 0.026 (CI - 0.014 to 0.065, p = 0.207). CONCLUSIONS: ICG is a safe and useful tool to assess the perfusion of the colon prior to performing the anastomosis in colorectal surgery. However, in our experience, it did not significantly lower the anastomotic leakage rate.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Colorrectal , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Verde de Indocianina , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Fuga Anastomótica/diagnóstico , Colectomía/métodos , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Angiografía con Fluoresceína/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute care surgery decreased during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To study the evolution of acute care surgery and its relationship with the pandemic severity. METHOD: Retrospective cohort study which compared patients who underwent acute care surgery during the pandemic to a control group. RESULTS: A total of 660 patients were included (253 in the control group, 67 in the first-wave, 193 in the valley, and 147 in the second wave). The median daily number of acute care surgery procedures was 2 during the control period. This activity decreased during the first wave (1/day), increased during the valley (2/day), and didn't change in the second wave (2/day). Serious complications were more common during the first wave (22.4%). A negative linear correlation was found between the daily number of acute care surgery procedures, number of patients being admitted to the hospital each day and daily number of patients dying because of COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Acute care surgery was reduced during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, increased during the valley, and returned to the pre-pandemic level during the second wave. Thus, acute care surgery was related to pandemic severity, with fewer surgeries being performed when the pandemic was more severe.
ANTECEDENTES: La cirugía urgente disminuyó durante la primera ola de la pandemia de COVID-19. OBJETIVO: Estudiar la evolución de la cirugía urgente y su relación con la gravedad de la pandemia. MÉTODO: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo que compara los pacientes intervenidos de forma urgente durante la pandemia con un grupo control. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 660 pacientes (253 en el grupo control, 67 en primera ola de la pandemia, 193 en el periodo valle y 147 en la segunda ola). La mediana del número de cirugías urgentes fue de 2 (intervalo intercuartílico: 1-3) durante el periodo control, disminuyó durante la primera ola (1/día), aumentó durante el valle (2/día) y no se modificó en la segunda ola (2/día). Las complicaciones mayores fueron más comunes durante la primera ola (22.4%). Se encontró una correlación lineal negativa entre el número de procedimientos quirúrgicos urgentes diarios y el número de ingresos hospitalarios y fallecimientos diarios por COVID-19. CONCLUSIONES: La cirugía urgente se redujo durante la primera ola, aumentó durante el periodo valle y volvió a niveles prepandémicos durante la segunda ola. Además, la cirugía urgente se relaciona con la gravedad de la pandemia, ya que se realizaron menos cirugías urgentes durante el periodo de mayor gravedad de la pandemia.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Hospitales , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Cardiomyopathy, also known as a pathology with a cardiovascular cause, can be further differentiated into multiple categories including genetic. Strong correlations between genetic mutations in sarcomeric proteins and presentation of cardiomyopathies have been made. This case report describes the clinical diagnosis of my late-onset hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, which was brought upon by symptoms of chest pain and palpitations that started approximately two years ago and had mostly gone unnoticed during this period. As a geneticist, I decided to undergo genetic test upon diagnosis. These tests found a heterozygous variant of uncertain significance (VUS) in the ALPK3 gene, c.399dup (p.Gly134ArgfsTer30), and a heterozygous c.7552G>A (p.Val2518Ile) VUS in the desmoplakin (DSP) gene. This autobiographical case report hopes to shed light on the importance of genetic screening in the search for the etiology of clinical symptoms.
RESUMEN
The black esophagus is a rare clinical entity, down to 0.2% in autopsy series and 0.001-0.2% in series of endoscopies. Although it is an entity that has already been reported in the literature, its etiopathogenesis is not completely known. Different theories have been proposed to clarify their cause. One of these theories makes a hypothesis of a viral infection as the underlying cause; this theory can be seen in the literature extensively, but only two cases were reported. The first case is a case with histopathological confirmation of Herpes virus infection. The second is a case in which vascular deterioration has been the main cause of esophageal necrosis. In both cases, diabetes is the factor that determines a bad evolution of the disease.