RESUMEN
Trichodynia is the sensation of pain in the scalp, which, in most cases, is associated with certain types of alopecia. Despite being a term coined by Rebora back in 1996 to described patients with diffuse alopecia consistent with telogen effluvium, this symptom has currently been reported in other entities. Androgenic alopecia, scarring alopecia, alopecia areata, trichotillomania, and chemotherapy-induced alopecia are common causes of trichodynia. Similarly, its association with psychiatric comorbidities, including depression, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder and somatoform disorders has been reported with a higher prevalence among women. Although its pathogenesis is still to be elucidate, some factors involved are substance P, psychiatric comorbidities and perifollicular inflammation. Clinically it exhibits pain or discomfort of the scalp, almost always in association with hair los. The sensation of pain can occur throughout the scalp or locally in some specific areas. Diagnosis is clinical and one of exclusion. Regarding treatment, there are no specific therapies for trichodynia. However, the use of botulinum toxin A, antidepressants, neuromodulators, propanolol, topical corticosteroids, oral corticosteroids and topical cannabinoids are therapeutic alternatives that should be taken into consideration. Since treatment of trichodynia is still therapeutically challenging for dermatologists more prospective studies are needed to evaluate new therapies.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The effect of the sodium-glucose 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors on microvascular complications remains uncertain. We performed a systematic review to determine the efficacy of the SGLT-2 inhibitors on microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed using Ovid, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to May 2019. Randomized trials comparing SGLT-2 inhibitors with placebo or other medication for type 2 diabetes for ≥ 4 weeks were included. Diabetes-related microvascular complications such as nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy, and peripheral vascular disease were evaluated. A random-effect model using mean differences for continuous outcomes and risk ratio for dichotomous outcomes was used to synthesize data. PROSPERO (CRD 42017076460). RESULTS: A total of 40 RCTs with overall moderate quality of evidence were included. SGLT-2 inhibitors reduced the risk of renal-replacement therapy (0.65; 95% CI 0.54-0.79), renal death (0.57; 95% CI 0.49-0.65), and progression of albuminuria (0.69; 95% CI 0.66-0.73). Conversely, they appeared ineffective in maintaining eGFR (0.33; 95% CI - 0.74 to 1.41) or reducing serum creatinine (- 0.07; 95% CI - 0.26 to 0.11), whereas urine albumin-creatinine ratio (- 23.4; 95% CI - 44.6 to - 2.2) was reduced. Risk of amputation was non-significant (1.30; 95% CI 0.93-1.83). No available data were found regarding neuropathy and retinopathy to perform a quantitative analysis. CONCLUSION: SGLT-2 inhibitors may reduce the risk of renal patient-important outcomes but fail to improve surrogate outcomes. Apparently, no increased risk of amputations was observed with these medications. No data were available regarding other microvascular complications.
