Weight Loss and Glycemic Control After Bariatric Surgery in Adolescents With Severe Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: Bariatric surgery is regarded as a valuable treatment option for adolescents with severe obesity. However, high-quality evidence of its superiority over prolonged conservative treatment with multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention (MLI) is limited. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of bariatric surgery in adolescents without sufficient weight loss after MLI for severe obesity. METHODS: A two-group randomized controlled trial was designed to assess one-year health effects of bariatric surgery in adolescents with severe obesity. The participants were referred by pediatricians after completing MLI without sufficient effects. Eligible for participation were adolescents aged 14-16 years with severe obesity (age- and sex-adjusted body mass index (BMI) using the International Obesity Task Force cutoffs: BMI ≥40 kg/m2, or ≥35 kg/m2 in combination with comorbidity). Participants were assigned to MLI combined with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (n = 29) versus only MLI (n = 30). Participants were included from 2011 to 2019. Main outcomes were weight change and sex- and age-specific BMI loss. Additionaly, glucose metabolism, blood pressure and lipid profile were analysed. RESULTS: 53 patients completed the 12-months follow-up (89.8%). Mean (±standard deviation [SD]) weight loss in the surgery group was 11.2 ± 7.8% after 12 months, compared to a weight gain of 1.7 ± 8.1% in the control group. The fasting insulin, insulin resistance score and lipid profile improved significantly in the surgery group. DISCUSSION: Bariatric surgery was associated with substantial weight loss and improvements in glucose and lipid metabolism after 12 months compared to conservative treatment in adolescents with severe obesity.

Bariatric Surgery in Youth: the Perspective of Dutch Pediatricians, Parents, and Adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have indicated that bariatric surgery is effective for the treatment of youth with severe obesity. The attitudes of pediatricians, parents, and adolescents regarding this topic remain unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the current thoughts and beliefs of Dutch pediatricians, parents, and adolescents regarding bariatric surgery in youth. METHODS: An online survey containing twenty questions on bariatric surgery in youth was distributed to pediatricians of the Dutch Society of Pediatrics. Parents and adolescents who participated in an interdisciplinary care program for overweight, obesity, and severe obesity filled out an online survey of twelve questions. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one pediatricians, 49 parents, and 19 adolescents completed the surveys. Seventy-two pediatricians (59.5%) considered bariatric surgery to be an effective treatment for youth with severe obesity when conventional treatment fails, and intend to refer patients for bariatric surgery. The most frequently suggested conditions for bariatric surgery were a minimum age of 16 years (n = 59, 48.7%), a BMI threshold of 40 kg/m2 (n = 51, 42.2%), and a minimum Tanner stage of IV (n = 59, 48.8%). Thirty parents (61.2%) and fourteen adolescents (73.7%) responded that bariatric surgery should become available for youth with severe obesity. CONCLUSION: Dutch pediatricians, parents, and adolescents increasingly accept bariatric surgery as a treatment modality in youth with severe obesity who do not respond successfully to lifestyle intervention. Whether pediatricians will actually refer youth for bariatric surgery remains to be seen when this treatment option will be implemented in the Netherlands.

Left Ventricular Geometrical Changes in Severely Obese Adolescents: Prevalence, Determinants, and Clinical Implications.

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is independently associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in adults. Adiposity is a risk factor for LVH, independent of blood pressure. Potential causes of this nonhemodynamic pathogenesis identified in adults include adverse body fat distribution, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA). In severely obese adolescents, the determinants of obesity-induced changes in left ventricular structure are poorly characterized. Cardiac ultrasonographic, demographic, anthropometric, and comorbidity-related data were prospectively collected in adolescents with severe obesity refractory to conservative treatment who presented for surgical therapy. Differences between adolescents with LVH and without LVH were evaluated using independent samples t, chi-square, or Fisher's exact test. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate associations with left ventricular structural changes, corrected for body mass index (BMI) z score. Forty-three patients entered analysis, of whom 24 (55.8%) showed LVH. The most common geometrical change was eccentric LVH (eLVH), occurring in 21 subjects (48.8%). Demographic and anthropometric variables did not differ between patients with and without LVH. Independent of BMI z score, left ventricular mass index was significantly associated with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (regression parameter B = 0.8; 95% CI 0.3 to 1.2). Interventricular septum thickness (IVST) was significantly associated with HOMA-IR values (B = 0.1; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.2), HDL-cholesterol (B = - 1.2; 95% CI - 2.2 to 0.1), and triglyceride levels (B = 0.5; 95% CI 0.001 to 0.9). LVH, especially eLVH, is highly prevalent amongst severely obese adolescents. Adverse changes in cardiac structure, increased IVST in particular, are independently associated with several nonhemodynamic comorbidities that are common in this population, namely OSA, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia.

Obstructive sleep apnea in obese adolescents referred for bariatric surgery: association with metabolic and cardiovascular variables.

BACKGROUND: obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) is a well-described disease entity in adults, with a higher prevalence in severely obese individuals, while at the same time associated with several comorbidities independently of BMI. Literature regarding OSA in severely obese adolescents is qualitatively and quantitatively limited, possibly resulting in suboptimal diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: polysomnographic, demographic, anthropometric, and comorbidity-related data were prospectively collected in 56 adolescents with morbid obesity refractory to conservative treatment who presented for surgical therapy. Differences between adolescents with no/mild (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) 0-4.9) and moderate/severe OSA (AHI ≥ 5.0) were evaluated using independent-samples t, chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association of several variables with AHI, corrected for BMI z-score. RESULTS: of the 53 included subjects, 48 (90.6%) showed some degree of sleep disordered breathing and 20 (37.7%) had moderate/severe OSA. Patients with moderate/severe OSA had on average a higher neck circumference (42.4 versus 40.1 cm, p = 0.008), higher BMI z-score (3.7 versus 3.4, p = 0.003), higher plasma triglyceride level (2.2 versus 1.5 mmol/L, p = 0.012), and lower IGF (29.6 versus 40.2 mmol/L, p = 0.010) than those with no/mild OSA. BMI z-score and plasma triglyceride levels were independently related to AHI. CONCLUSIONS: OSA is highly prevalent amongst morbidly obese adolescents and is strongly associated with BMI z-score. Elevated plasma triglyceride levels are associated with AHI, independent of BMI z-score.

Current Opinions and Practices of Bariatric Surgery in Adolescents: A Survey among Pediatric Surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery is performed at increasing rate in severely obese adolescents who do not respond to conservative treatment. In the United States, this treatment is generally accepted, yet in Europe, surgeons are more reluctant because of concerns regarding safety and (long-term) efficacy. We evaluated in which (European) countries bariatric surgery is allowed and performed, and the opinion of the members of the European Paediatric Surgeons' Association (EUPSA) regarding bariatric surgery in adolescents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Information was obtained with an online questionnaire sent to all EUPSA members. RESULTS: A total of 108 pediatric surgeons (PSs) from 33 countries (of which 25 European) completed the survey. Sixty-two PSs (57.4%) from 22 countries stated that bariatric surgery in adolescents was allowed in their country. In only 14 countries, the costs were (partially) covered by health care insurances. Overall, 65.7% of the surgeons (n = 71) believed bariatric surgery may offer a valuable contribution to obtain substantial long-term weight loss in severely obese adolescents. Fifty-one (47.2%) reported that these procedures should be performed by a combination of a bariatric and a PS, while 20 (18.5%) and 16 (14.8%) preferred that these procedures should be performed solely by a PS or bariatric surgeon, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although allowed in most European countries, bariatric surgery in adolescents is only practiced on a small scale, and the treatment is often excluded from regular health care reimbursement. The majority of PSs acknowledge the value of bariatric surgery, which should be performed by a combination of PS and bariatric surgeon.

Effect of the EndoBarrier Device: a 4-Year Follow-up of a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term effect of the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) on weight loss and glycemic control. BACKGROUND: Data on the long-term effect of DJBL treatment is still missing. METHODS: From 2010 to 2012, 29 patients were treated with the DJBL at center A and center B, as part of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Prior to implantation and after removal of the DJBL, all patients underwent standardized physical examination and blood sampling. Four years after removal of the DJBL, included patients underwent standardized physical examination and blood sampling as previously performed during the initial study. RESULTS: Out of the 29 patients, 15 patients were eligible for follow-up with a median duration of 42 months. Five patients had successfully received additional bariatric surgery. Four years after explantation of the DJBL, median weight in these 15 patients was 102.0 kg (IQR 94.0-124.6), which was not statistically significantly different from the 106.1 kg at baseline (IQR 99.0-128.4). Median BMI changed from 33.1 kg/m2 (IQR 32.3-38.5) at baseline to 33.7 kg/m2 (IQR 31.2-36.9) after follow-up. Patients had a TWL of 2.2% (IQR - 1.3-5.6) compared to baseline weight. None of the parameters were significantly different after follow-up compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of weight reduction of initial DJBL treatment seems to be diminished after 4 years of follow-up. However, larger prospective studies with long-term follow-up need to be conducted in the future.

Hurdles to Take for Adequate Treatment of Morbidly Obese Children and Adolescents: Attitudes of General Practitioners Towards Conservative and Surgical Treatment of Paediatric Morbid Obesity.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is regarded as the most effective treatment of morbid obesity in adults. Referral patterns for bariatric surgery in adults differ among general practitioners (GPs), partially due to restricted knowledge of the available treatment options. Reluctance in referral might be present even stronger in the treatment of morbidly obese children. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the current practice of GPs regarding treatment of paediatric morbid obesity and their attitudes towards the emergent phenomenon of paediatric weight loss surgery. METHODS: All GPs enlisted in the local registries of two medical centres were invited for a 15-question anonymous online survey. RESULTS: Among 534 invited GPs, 184 (34.5%) completed the survey. Only 102 (55.4%) reported providing or referring morbidly obese children for combined lifestyle interventions. A majority (n = 175, 95.1%) estimated that conservative treatment is effective in a maximum of 50% of children. Although 123 (66.8%) expect that bariatric surgery may be effective in therapy-resistant morbid obesity, only 76 (41.3%) would consider referral for surgery. Important reasons for reluctance were uncertainty about long-term efficacy and safety. The opinion that surgery is only treatment of symptoms and therefore not appropriate was significantly more prevalent amongst GPs who would not refer (58.3% vs. 27.6%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a potential for undertreatment of morbidly obese adolescents, due to suboptimal knowledge regarding guidelines and bariatric surgery, as well as negative attitudes towards surgery. This should be addressed by improving communication between surgeons and GPs and providing educational resources on bariatric surgery.

Effect of Vagus Nerve Injury on the Outcome of Antireflux Surgery: An Extensive Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Vagus nerve injury (VNI) is a feared complication of antireflux surgery (ARS). The impact of VNI on the functional outcomes of ARS has not yet been evaluated systematically. The aim of this review was to evaluate the impact of VNI on functional and clinical outcome of ARS. METHODS: A systematic search was performed until March 2015, using the following online databases: MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Clinical Trials. Eight studies remained available for assessment. Articles were divided into 2 groups: (a) one with unintended, accidental VNI and (b) one group comparing ARS with and without intended vagotomy. RESULTS: The prevalence of unintended, accidental VNI ranged from 10 to 42% after ARS. No clear differences were seen in outcome for reflux control between the VNI and vagus nerve intact group. A higher prevalence of diarrhea, nausea and vomiting was observed in the VNI group. CONCLUSION: VNI is a feared but neglected complication of ARS. Larger prospective studies that objectively assess vagus nerve integrity before and after ARS are needed.

Structural Endoscopic Techniques to Treat Obesity: A Review.

The prevalence of overweight and obesity increased significantly during the past decades, affecting now approximately 30% of people worldwide. Bariatric surgery has proven to be the most effective treatment modality for obesity in the long term. However, current surgical procedures are accompanied by a substantial risk of complications. Several endoluminal techniques have been developed to achieve weight loss in obese patients and claim to be as effective as surgery but safer. The aim of this review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic bariatric procedures that provide structural changes in anatomy and physiology of the gastrointestinal tract. A comprehensive search was conducted using online databases and the references of the selected articles. All studies included in this review show excess weight loss in the short-term to medium-term, which ranges from 24% to 58%. Seven serious adverse events were reported. Therefore, we conclude that endoscopic bariatric procedures providing structural changes show relatively low complication rates and promising short-term weight loss and effect on obesity-related comorbidities. Long-term results in large study populations are necessary before these techniques can be incorporated in the standard treatment of obesity.