Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
HPB Surg ; 2009: 829020, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19606252

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute biliary diseases during pregnancy have been classically managed conservatively. Advances in minimally invasive surgery and the high recurrence rate of symptoms observed changed this management. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study. Initial management was medical. Unresponsive patients were treated with minimally invasive techniques including gallbladder percutaneous aspiration or cholecystostomy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, depending on the pregnancy trimester and underlying diagnosis. RESULTS: 122 patients were admitted. 69 (56.5%) were unresponsive to medical treatment. Recurrent gallbladder colic was the most frequent indication for minimally invasive intervention, followed by acute cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, and acute biliary pancreatitis. 8 patients were treated during the first trimester, 54 during the second, and 7 during the last trimester. There was no fetal morbidity or mortality. Maternal morbidity was minor with no mortality. CONCLUSION: Acute biliary tract diseases during pregnancy may be safely treated with minimally invasive procedures according to the underlying diagnosis and to the trimester of pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Vías Biliares/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/cirugía , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Enfermedades de las Vías Biliares/diagnóstico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
Obes Surg ; 18(5): 566-8, 2008 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18343977

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and its indications are currently being evaluated. The objective of this study was to show the preliminary results obtained with this technique indicated as an alternative to gastric bypass in patients with multiple intraabdominal adhesions, therefore preserving the benefits of the laparoscopic approach. METHODS: An analysis of all patients who underwent a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for the above indication was done. Data included demographics, number of previous surgeries, operative time, morbidity, mortality, and %EWL at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Fifteen patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an alternative to gastric bypass because of multiple intraabdominal adhesions. No patient required conversion to an open procedure; morbidity was 6% with no mortality. %EWL at 3 months was 41% and at 6 months was 44%. Mean follow-up was 6 months. CONCLUSION: In our initial experience, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy proved to be a safe and effective alternative to gastric bypass for patients with multiple intraabdominal adhesions.


Asunto(s)
Abdomen/patología , Gastrectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía , Adulto , Femenino , Derivación Gástrica , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adherencias Tisulares
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...