Biologics in severe asthma: A pragmatic approach for choosing the right treatment for the right patient.

The development of monoclonal antibody therapies targeting specific components of the pathways relevant to asthma pathophysiology has revolutionized treatment of severe asthma both in adults and children and helped to further unravel the heterogeneity of this disease. However, the availability of multiple agents, often with overlapping eligibility criteria, creates a need for pragmatic guidance for specialists undertaking care of patients with severe asthma. In this review, we provide an overview of the data supporting the clinical efficacy of biologics in distinct asthma phenotypes/endotypes. We also focus on the role of biomarkers and treatable traits, including comorbidities, in the choice of asthma biologics, highlight which treatments have been demonstrated to be steroid sparing in corticosteroid dependent asthma, and provide practical guidance that can drive shared decision making on treatment choice with patients. In addition, we summarize what is known to date regarding long-term safety of these drugs, and lastly, discuss future directions in biologics research.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and asthma: What we have learned and what is still unknown.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has brought new insights into the immunologic intricacies of asthma. In this review, we discuss the epidemiology of asthma in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and the risk of severe infection. Type 2 inflammation had an overall protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 infection by various mechanisms summarized in this review. Asthma, intranasal, and inhaled corticosteroids decreased the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor, an important receptor for SARS-CoV-2 entry into host cells. We summarize the nuances of the treatment of type 2 inflammation despite its underlying protective effects. Research to date has shown that patients on various allergen immunotherapies and biologics do benefit from being vaccinated.

Comprehension by Caregivers and Adolescents of Clinical Trial Information Delivered via Multimedia Video Versus Conventional Practice: Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Research participants often misunderstand the required elements of informed consent information, whether provided in written or oral format. Informed consent instruments with embedded evidence-based learning theory principles administered in multimedia electronic formats may improve comprehension and retention. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine whether study information comprehension and retention using an interactive multimedia video consent process was noninferior to comprehension and retention after an in-person face-to-face interaction with a conventional written consent document for caregivers and adolescents enrolled in a clinical trial. METHODS: Participants were caregivers and children aged 12 to 17 years who were enrolled in a clinical trial of asthma treatment. Consent information was presented as a multimedia web-based video consent interaction or as a conventional written consent document with in-person interaction between the prospective participants and the study staff. The trial used a parallel nonrandomized noninferiority design that compared the 2 consent methods. Caregivers and adolescents completed a 17-item open-ended comprehension questionnaire (score range 17-51) at enrollment and at the end of the study 20 weeks later. Comprehension and retention were compared between the consent formats. Noninferiority was established if the 95% CI upper bound of the difference in scores (conventional format minus web-based) was less than the noninferiority margin of 2.4; superiority was established if the upper bound of the CI was <0. RESULTS: In total, 54 caregiver and adolescent dyads completed the interactive multimedia web-based video consent, and 25 dyads completed the conventional consent. Overall, 33% (26/79) of all adolescents were Black, 57% (45/79) were male, and 61% (48/79) had a household income of

Efficacy and tolerability of zinc acetate for treatment of chronic refractory cough: pilot randomised futility trial.

Background: Cough is the most reported symptom in the United States, with chronic refractory cough representing significant morbidity to patients. Zinc acetate may have beneficial effects in the cough reflex pathway. We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of zinc acetate in the management of chronic refractory cough. Study design and methods: This was a randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-design pilot trial of individuals with chronic refractory cough. The effects of 6 weeks of zinc acetate versus placebo on quality of life and symptoms as measured by the Cough Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (CQLQ), Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), cough visual analogue score (C-VAS) and Global Assessment of Change in Cough (GACC) scores were evaluated. A futility analysis plan with a one-sided 80% confidence interval was used to compare treatment effect to published minimum clinically important differences (MCID) for each outcome. Results: 34 participants, 17 in each group, were enrolled and randomised. Participants were primarily white females with moderate-severe cough. Participants assigned to zinc acetate had a significant increase in serum zinc levels after 6 weeks, while those assigned to placebo did not. Both groups showed improvement in CQLQ, LCQ, C-VAS and GACC scores, but the treatment effects of zinc acetate versus placebo were small with confidence intervals that did not include the MCIDs. Interpretation: We observed no benefit of zinc therapy over placebo on cough symptoms or quality of life and conclude that larger trials of zinc for chronic cough are not warranted.

Age of asthma onset does not impact the response to omalizumab.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: These studies were conducted before clinical trial registration was required; therefore, clinical trial registration numbers are not available.

Dupilumab reduced impact of severe exacerbations on lung function in patients with moderate-to-severe type 2 asthma.

BACKGROUND: Severe asthma exacerbations increase the risk of accelerated lung function decline. This analysis examined the effect of dupilumab on forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ) in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma and elevated type 2 biomarkers from phase 3 LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST (NCT02414854). METHODS: Changes from baseline in pre- and post-bronchodilator (BD) FEV1 and 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) scores were assessed in patients with elevated type 2 biomarkers at baseline (type 2-150/25: eosinophils ≥150 cells/µl and/or fractional exhaled nitric oxide [FeNO] ≥25 ppb; type 2-300/25: eosinophils ≥300 cells/µl and/or FeNO ≥25 ppb), stratified as exacerbators (≥1 severe exacerbation during the study) or non-exacerbators. RESULTS: In exacerbators and non-exacerbators, dupilumab increased pre-BD FEV1 by Week 2 vs placebo; differences were maintained to Week 52 (type 2-150/25: LS mean difference (LSMD) vs placebo: 0.17 L (95% CI: 0.10-0.24) and 0.17 L (0.12-0.23); type 2-300/25: 0.22 L (0.13-0.30) and 0.21 L (0.15-0.28)), in exacerbators and non-exacerbators, respectively (p < .0001). Similar trends were seen for post-BD FEV1 . Dupilumab vs placebo also showed significantly greater improvements in post-BD FEV1 0-42 days after first severe exacerbation in type 2-150/25 (LSMD vs placebo: 0.13 L [0.06-0.20]; p = .006) and type 2-300/25 (0.14 L [0.06-0.22]; p = .001) patients. ACQ-5 improvements were greater with dupilumab vs placebo in both groups. CONCLUSION: Dupilumab treatment led to improvements in lung function independent of exacerbations and appeared to reduce the impact of exacerbations on lung function in patients who experienced a severe exacerbation during the study.

Roflumilast May Increase Risk of Exacerbations When Used to Treat Poorly Controlled Asthma in People with Obesity.

Rationale: People with obesity often have severe, difficult-to-control asthma. There is a need to develop better treatments for this population. One potential treatment is roflumilast, a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, as it is reported to have efficacy for the treatment of asthma and can promote weight loss. Objectives: To investigate the potential efficacy of roflumilast for the treatment of poorly controlled asthma in people with obesity. Methods: A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial of 24 weeks of roflumilast versus placebo for the treatment of poorly controlled asthma in people with obesity (body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or higher). The primary outcome was a change in ACT (Asthma Control Test) score. Results: Twenty-two people were randomized to roflumilast and 16 to placebo. Roflumilast had no effect on change in the ACT (increased by 2.6 [interquartile range (IQR), 0.5-4.4] in those on roflumilast vs. 2.0 [IQR, 0.7-3.3] in those on placebo). Participants assigned to roflumilast had a 3.5-fold (relative risk [RR] 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-9.4) increased risk of an episode of poor asthma control and an 8.1-fold (RR 95% CI, 1.01-65.0) increased risk of an urgent care visit for asthma. Ten participants (56%) assigned to roflumilast required a course of oral corticosteroids for asthma exacerbations, and none in the placebo group. Participants losing 5% or more of their body weight experienced a clinically and statistically significant improvement in asthma control (ACT increased by 4.4 [IQR, 2.5-6.3] vs. 1.5 [IQR, 0.0-3.0] in those who lost less than 5%). Conclusions: Roflumilast had no effect on asthma control. Of concern, roflumilast was associated with an increased risk of exacerbation in obese individuals with poorly controlled asthma. These results highlight the importance of studying interventions in different subpopulations of people with asthma, particularly people with obesity and asthma who may respond differently to medications than lean people with asthma. Weight loss of at least 5% was associated with improved asthma control, indicating that interventions other than roflumilast promoting weight loss may have efficacy for the treatment of poorly controlled asthma in people with obesity. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03532490).

An omics approach to delineating the molecular mechanisms that underlie the biological effects of physical plasma.

The use of physical plasma to treat cancer is an emerging field, and interest in its applications in oncology is increasing rapidly. Physical plasma can be used directly by aiming the plasma jet onto cells or tissue, or indirectly, where a plasma-treated solution is applied. A key scientific question is the mechanism by which physical plasma achieves selective killing of cancer over normal cells. Many studies have focused on specific pathways and mechanisms, such as apoptosis and oxidative stress, and the role of redox biology. However, over the past two decades, there has been a rise in omics, the systematic analysis of entire collections of molecules in a biological entity, enabling the discovery of the so-called "unknown unknowns." For example, transcriptomics, epigenomics, proteomics, and metabolomics have helped to uncover molecular mechanisms behind the action of physical plasma, revealing critical pathways beyond those traditionally associated with cancer treatments. This review showcases a selection of omics and then summarizes the insights gained from these studies toward understanding the biological pathways and molecular mechanisms implicated in physical plasma treatment. Omics studies have revealed how reactive species generated by plasma treatment preferentially affect several critical cellular pathways in cancer cells, resulting in epigenetic, transcriptional, and post-translational changes that promote cell death. Finally, this review considers the outlook for omics in uncovering both synergies and antagonisms with other common cancer therapies, as well as in overcoming challenges in the clinical translation of physical plasma.

Bronchodilators in Tobacco-Exposed Persons with Symptoms and Preserved Lung Function.

BACKGROUND: Many persons with a history of smoking tobacco have clinically significant respiratory symptoms despite an absence of airflow obstruction as assessed by spirometry. They are often treated with medications for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but supporting evidence for this treatment is lacking. METHODS: We randomly assigned persons who had a tobacco-smoking history of at least 10 pack-years, respiratory symptoms as defined by a COPD Assessment Test score of at least 10 (scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms), and preserved lung function on spirometry (ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] to forced vital capacity [FVC] ≥0.70 and FVC ≥70% of the predicted value after bronchodilator use) to receive either indacaterol (27.5 µg) plus glycopyrrolate (15.6 µg) or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was at least a 4-point decrease (i.e., improvement) in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score (scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse health status) after 12 weeks without treatment failure (defined as an increase in lower respiratory symptoms treated with a long-acting inhaled bronchodilator, glucocorticoid, or antibiotic agent). RESULTS: A total of 535 participants underwent randomization. In the modified intention-to-treat population (471 participants), 128 of 227 participants (56.4%) in the treatment group and 144 of 244 (59.0%) in the placebo group had at least a 4-point decrease in the SGRQ score (difference, -2.6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -11.6 to 6.3; adjusted odds ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.37; P = 0.65). The mean change in the percent of predicted FEV1 was 2.48 percentage points (95% CI, 1.49 to 3.47) in the treatment group and -0.09 percentage points (95% CI, -1.06 to 0.89) in the placebo group, and the mean change in the inspiratory capacity was 0.12 liters (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.18) in the treatment group and 0.02 liters (95% CI, -0.03 to 0.08) in the placebo group. Four serious adverse events occurred in the treatment group, and 11 occurred in the placebo group; none were deemed potentially related to the treatment or placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled dual bronchodilator therapy did not decrease respiratory symptoms in symptomatic, tobacco-exposed persons with preserved lung function as assessed by spirometry. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; RETHINC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02867761.).

Effectiveness of a Digital Inhaler System for Patients With Asthma: A 12-Week, Open-Label, Randomized Study (CONNECT1).

BACKGROUND: The albuterol Digihaler (albuterol 90 µg/dose) transmits data wirelessly to a smart device application, which synchronizes with a Digital Health Platform to store and transfer data to a web-based Dashboard. The Reliever Digihaler System (RDS) comprises the albuterol Digihaler, application, Digital Health Platform and Dashboard. This allows patients and health care professionals to review reliever inhaler usage and inhalation quality to aid clinical decision making. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the effectiveness, as measured by change in asthma control, of the RDS compared with standard of care. METHODS: In this 12-week study, participants aged 13 years or older with suboptimal asthma control (Asthma Control Test [ACT] score < 19) were randomized to use either RDS or standard of care albuterol reliever inhalers. The health care professionals were recommended at study start to check each participant's inhalation data (including inhalation quantity and quality parameters) 1 or more times per week. Primary outcome was the proportion of participants achieving clinically meaningful improvement in asthma control (ACT score ≥ 20 at week 12 and/or increase ≥ 3 units from baseline). Bayesian statistical analysis provided a posterior probability distribution for odds ratios with corresponding credible intervals. RESULTS: Participants using the RDS (n = 167) had an 85.3% probability of greater odds of clinically meaningful asthma control improvements than those using SoC (n = 166) after 3 months (mean odds ratio 1.33; 95% credible interval 0.813-2.050). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, participants using the RDS had greater odds of clinically meaningful improvements in asthma control versus SoC after 3 months. Further investigation of the potential of the RDS to help improve asthma management is warranted.

Comparison and validation of algorithms for asthma diagnosis in an electronic medical record system.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is one of the most common chronic health conditions, and to leverage the wealth of data in the electronic medical record (EMR), it is important to be able to accurately identify asthma diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the rule-based algorithm with the most balanced performance for sensitivity and positive predictive value of asthma diagnosis. METHODS: We performed a diagnostic accuracy study of multiple rule-based algorithms intended to identify asthma diagnosis in the EMR. Algorithm performance was validated by manual chart review of 795 charts of patients seen in a multisite, tertiary-level, pulmonary specialty clinic using explicit diagnostic criteria to distinguish asthma cases from controls. RESULTS: An asthma diagnosis anywhere in the medical record had a 97% sensitivity and a 77% specificity for asthma (F-score 80) when tested on a validation set of asthma cases and nonasthma respiratory disease from a pulmonary specialty clinic. The most balanced performance was seen with asthma diagnosis restricted to an encounter, hospital problem, or problem list diagnosis with a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 85% (F-score 84). High sensitivity was achieved with the modified Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set criteria and high specificity was achieved with the NUgene algorithm, an algorithm developed for identifying asthma cases by EMR for genome-wide association studies. CONCLUSION: Asthma diagnosis can be accurately identified for research purposes by restricting to encounter, hospital problem, or problem list diagnosis in a pulmonary specialty clinic. Additional rules lead to steep drop-offs in algorithm sensitivity in our population.

Radiation responses of cancer and normal cells to split dose fractions with uniform and grid fields: increasing the therapeutic ratio.

PURPOSE: Radiation treatment of cancer is usually delivered in a prescribed sequence of dose fractions within which the dependence of dose on time is determined by the treatment plan. New techniques, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) have been introduced with the motivation of improving therapeutic outcomes, with the consequence that the time dependence of the dose within a fraction is modified. Here, we test whether an increased toxicity to cancer cells arises when a radiation treatment fraction is delivered in two equal parts, allowing time for the expression of factors, for example, RONS and cytokines, in response to the first dose which may sensitize cells to the second dose. A medium time delay between 15 and 60 minutes is proposed to allow factors to be expressed before repair takes place. A grid field is used to enhance diffusion of the factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cell lines used in the study were two prostate cancers (LNCaP and DU 145), a normal prostate (PNT1A), a non-small cell lung cancer (NCI-H460), and a glioma (Hs 683). Uniform or spatially modulated grid fields, delivering the same mean dose, were used. The results for the clonogenic survival fractions were grouped into a 'short' delay (under 10 minutes) and a 'medium' delay (between 15 and 60 minutes). RESULTS: The medium delay with a grid field yielded a significant increase in toxicity for the four cancer cell lines. The medium delay with a uniform field gave a significant increase in toxicity for the two prostate cancer cell lines. A highly significant increase was found in the therapeutic ratio, defined as the ratio of the survival of prostate normal to prostate cancer cells. CONCLUSIONS: The findings show that the intra-fractional dose schedule with medium time delay offers an opportunity to increase the toxicity of radiation to cancer cells, relative to a single radiation delivery. For all cancer cell lines, a grid field gives a greater toxic effect than a uniform field. The split dose treatment offers an increase in cancer toxicity while preserving normal cells, improving the outcomes of a treatment.

Ambient Air Pollutants and Traffic Factors Were Associated with Blood and Urine Biomarkers and Asthma Risk.

The UK Biobank (UKBB) is a large population-based cohort that provides a unique opportunity to study the association between environmental exposure and biomarkers and to identify biomarkers as potential instruments for assessing exposure dose, health damage, and disease risks. On 462 063 participants of European ancestry, we characterized the relationship of 38 disease-relevant biomarkers, asthma diagnosis, ambient pollution, traffic factors, and genetic background. The air pollutant exposure on the UKBB cohort was fairly low (e.g., mean PM2.5 concentration at 10.0 µg/m3). Nevertheless, 30 biomarkers were in association with at least one environmental factor; e.g., C-reactive protein levels were positively associated with NO (padj = 2.99 × 10-4), NO2 (padj = 4.15 × 10-4), and PM2.5 (padj = 1.92 × 10-6) even after multiple testing adjustment. Asthma diagnosis was associated with four pollutants (NO, NO2, PM2.5, and PM10). The largest effect size was observed in PM2.5, where a 5 µg/m3 increment of exposure was associated with a 1.52 increase in asthma diagnosis (p = 4.41 × 10-13). Further, environmental exposure and genetic predisposition influenced biomarker levels and asthma diagnosis in an additive model. The exposure-biomarker associations identified in this study could serve as potential indicators for environmental exposure induced health damages. Our results also shed light on possible mechanisms whereby environmental exposure influences disease-causing biomarkers and in turn increases disease risk.

Cancer of the vagina: 2021 update.

Diagnosis of a primary vaginal cancer is rare, as most vaginal tumors are metastatic from another primary site. Although cancer of the vagina is more common in postmenopausal women, an increase in young women being diagnosed with primary vaginal cancer has been reported, especially in countries with a high HIV prevalence. This is associated with persistence of high-risk HPV infection. The emphasis should be on primary prevention with prophylactic HPV vaccination. Once there is a suspicion of a primary vaginal cancer, this should be confirmed histologically with biopsy. Staging has been done clinically, as with cervical cancer; however, there is a role for imaging in assisting with staging as this is often a difficult assessment. Treatment should be individualized and depends on stage as well as histologic subtype. It is prudent to refer cases to centers of excellence with experience in dealing with this rare gynecological cancer.

Cancer of the vulva: 2021 update.

Vulvar cancer is an uncommon gynecological malignancy primarily affecting postmenopausal women. There is no specific screening and the most effective strategy to reduce vulvar cancer incidence is the opportune treatment of predisposing and preneoplastic lesions associated with its development. While vulvar cancer may be asymptomatic, most women present with vulvar pruritus or pain, or have noticed a lump or ulcer. Therefore, any suspicious vulvar lesion should be biopsied to exclude invasion. Once established, the most common subtype is squamous cell carcinoma. Treatment of vulvar cancer depends primarily on histology and surgical staging. Treatment is predominantly surgical, particularly for squamous cell carcinoma, although concurrent chemoradiation is an effective alternative, particularly for advanced tumors. Management should be individualized and carried out by a multidisciplinary team in a cancer center experienced in the treatment of these tumors.

Asthma and COVID-19: lessons learned and questions that remain.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases worldwide. As a disease of the respiratory tract, the site of entry for the SARS-CoV-2 virus, there may be an important interplay between asthma and COVID-19 disease. AREAS COVERED: We report asthma prevalence among hospitalized cohorts with COVID-19. Those with non-allergic and severe asthma may be at increased risk of a worsened clinical outcome from COVID-19 infection. We explore the epidemiology of asthma as a risk factor for the severity of COVID-19 infection. We then consider the role COVID-19 may play in leading to exacerbations of asthma. The impact of asthma endotype on outcome is discussed. Lastly, we address the safety of common asthma therapeutics. A literature search was performed with relevant terms for each of the sections of the review using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Medline. EXPERT OPINION: Asthma diagnosis may be a risk factor for severe COVID-19 especially for those with severe disease or nonallergic phenotypes. COVID-19 does not appear to provoke asthma exacerbations and asthma therapeutics should be continued for patients with exposure to COVID-19. Clearly much regarding this topic remains unknown and we identify some key questions that may be of interest for future researchers.[Figure: see text].

Managing Corticosteroid-Related Comorbidities in Severe Asthma.

Oral corticosteroid (OCS) use in severe asthma remains all too common despite advances in asthma treatment. Use of OCS is associated with significant toxicity that can have a lasting adverse impact on a patient's overall health. Monoclonal antibodies have been developed that reduce both the rate of occurrence of OCS-treated exacerbations and the OCS requirements in patients with oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma. This article describes strategies to prevent and best manage endocrine complications associated with OCS use and provides guidance on OCS dose management after the introduction of steroid-sparing therapies. (1) We identify OCS-dependent patients and assess for comorbidities including bone health, glycemic control, and adrenal function; (2) we begin attempts at OCS dose optimization before or soon after introducing a steroid-sparing biologic therapy; (3) we taper OCS, using explicit criteria for asthma control; (4) we assess hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis integrity once a physiologic dose of OCS is achieved to guide further the rate of OCS taper; and (5) we manage corticosteroid-related comorbidities as detailed in this article.

Impact of corticosteroids in hospitalised COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids are a potential therapeutic agent for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. The RECOVERY (Randomised Trials in COVID-19 Therapy) trial provided data on the mortality benefits of corticosteroids. The study aimed to determine the association between corticosteroid use on mortality and infection rates and to define subgroups who may benefit from corticosteroids in a real-world setting. METHODS: Clinical data were extracted that included demographic, laboratory data and details of the therapy, including the administration of corticosteroids, azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab and anticoagulation. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) admission and invasive mechanical ventilation. Outcomes were compared in patients who did and did not receive corticosteroids using the multivariate Cox regression model. RESULTS: 4313 patients were hospitalised with COVID-19 during the study period, of whom 1270 died (29.4%). When administered within the first 7 days after admission, corticosteroids were associated with reduced mortality (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.97, p=0.03) and decreased transfers to the ICU (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.11, p=0.02). This mortality benefit was particularly impressive in younger patients (<65 years of age), females and those with elevated inflammatory markers, defined as C reactive protein ≥150 mg/L (p≤0.05), interleukin-6 ≥20 pg/mL (p≤0.05) or D-dimer ≥2.0 µg/L (p≤0.05). Therapy was safe with similar rates of bacteraemia and fungaemia in corticosteroid-treated and non-corticosteroid-treated patients. CONCLUSION: In patients hospitalised with COVID-19 pneumonia, corticosteroid use within the first 7 days of admission decreased mortality and ICU admissions with no associated increase in bacteraemia or fungaemia.