Moral Distress in Radiation Oncology: Insights From Residents in Germany.

Purpose: Being challenged by circumstances that force one to act in discordance with one's moral compass can lead to moral distress. The phenomenon has been widely investigated among nurses. This study was designed to shed some light on the situation of resident physicians in radiation oncology. Methods and Materials: To gain insight into moral distress among residents in radiation oncology, a web-based questionnaire was developed and distributed throughout Germany. Participants were asked to evaluate possible burdensome situations and different options for relief. To outline the main issues of moral distress, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted. Relief options were examined by frequencies. Results: The factor analysis yielded lack of time, contradiction between patient request and indication, nonmedical interests, and decisions between curative treatment and best supportive care as main issues for the 84 participants. Support from supervisors and senior physicians, as well as exchanges with resident colleagues were indicated as forms of relief. Professional support, such as ethics consultations, structured conversation groups (Balint), or psychological case supervisions, were rated as less helpful, although most participants reported a lack of experience with these. Conclusions: The results are in accordance with existing assumptions that moral distress among physicians is mainly due to uncertainty. Regarding radiation oncology residents in particular, moral distress seems to be related to uncertainty in decisions and conflicts about treatment options. Although senior physicians and supervisors present important role models in dealing with moral distress, professional services such as ethics consultations offer an opportunity for relief that can still be expanded.

[Time-limited trials (TLT) in the intensive care unit : Recommendations from the ethics section of the DIVI and the ethics section of the DGIIN]. / Zeitlich begrenzter Therapieversuch ("time-limited trial", TLT) auf der Intensivstation : Handlungsempfehlung der Sektion Ethik der DIVI und der Sektion Ethik der DGIIN.

The rise in intensive care treatment procedures is accompanied by an increase in the complexity of decisions regarding the selection, administration and duration of treatment measures. Whether a treatment goal is desirable in an individual case and the treatment plan required to achieve it is acceptable for the patient depends on the patient's preferences, values and life plans. There is often uncertainty as to whether a patient-centered treatment goal can be achieved. The use of a time-limited treatment trial (TLT) as a binding agreement between the intensive care unit (ICU) team and the patient or their legal representative on a treatment concept over a defined period of time in the ICU can be helpful to reduce uncertainties and to ensure the continuation of intensive care measures in the patients' best interest.

Ethisch begründet entscheiden in der Intensivmedizin.

The process recommendations of the Ethics Section of the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI) for ethically based decision-making in intensive care medicine are intended to create the framework for a structured procedure for seriously ill patients in intensive care. The processes require appropriate structures, e.g., for effective communication within the treatment team, with patients and relatives, legal representatives, as well as the availability of palliative medical expertise, ethical advisory committees and integrated psychosocial and spiritual care services. If the necessary competences and structures are not available in a facility, they can be consulted externally or by telemedicine if necessary. The present recommendations are based on an expert consensus and are not the result of a systematic review or a meta-analysis.

[Changes in the routine work and moral distress in psychiatric care during the COVID-19 pandemic : A survey among physicians active in inpatient care in Germany]. / Änderungen des Arbeitsalltags und Moral Distress in der psychiatrischen Versorgung während der COVID-19-Pandemie : Eine Umfrage unter stationär tätigen Ärzt*innen in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic a number of ethical challenges have arisen in the healthcare system. A psychological response to moral challenges is termed moral distress (MD). OBJECTIVE: Identification of causes of MD in inpatient psychiatric care in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A survey was conducted using a self-administered non-validated online questionnaire as part of a cross-sectional study, in which 26 items about the experience of MD were examined and open questions about the handling of the pandemic and its effects on everyday work were posed. Physicians who worked in inpatient psychiatric care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany were surveyed anonymously with a convenience sample. The data acquisition took place between 17 November 2020 and 6 May 2021. RESULTS: A total of 141 participants were included. They indicated multiple pandemic-related changes in their daily work partly resulting in MD. CONCLUSION: MD is a neglected potential burden of inpatient psychiatric care under pandemic conditions (and beyond), which requires further research and an adequate handling. These results include implications for decision makers in crisis teams as well as a need for support services such as clinical ethics consultation services.

Radiosurgery for ventricular tachycardia (RAVENTA): interim analysis of a multicenter multiplatform feasibility trial.

BACKGROUND: Single-session cardiac stereotactic radiation therapy (SBRT) has demonstrated promising results for patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, the full safety profile of this novel treatment remains unknown and very limited data from prospective clinical multicenter trials are available. METHODS: The prospective multicenter multiplatform RAVENTA (radiosurgery for ventricular tachycardia) study assesses high-precision image-guided cardiac SBRT with 25 Gy delivered to the VT substrate determined by high-definition endocardial and/or epicardial electrophysiological mapping in patients with refractory VT ineligible for catheter ablation and an implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Primary endpoint is the feasibility of full-dose application and procedural safety (defined as an incidence of serious [grade ≥ 3] treatment-related complications ≤ 5% within 30 days after therapy). Secondary endpoints comprise VT burden, ICD interventions, treatment-related toxicity, and quality of life. We present the results of a protocol-defined interim analysis. RESULTS: Between 10/2019 and 12/2021, a total of five patients were included at three university medical centers. In all cases, the treatment was carried out without complications. There were no serious potentially treatment-related adverse events and no deterioration of left ventricular ejection fraction upon echocardiography. Three patients had a decrease in VT episodes during follow-up. One patient underwent subsequent catheter ablation for a new VT with different morphology. One patient with local VT recurrence died 6 weeks after treatment in cardiogenic shock. CONCLUSION: The interim analysis of the RAVENTA trial demonstrates early initial feasibility of this new treatment without serious complications within 30 days after treatment in five patients. Recruitment will continue as planned and the study has been expanded to further university medical centers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03867747 (clinicaltrials.gov). Registered March 8, 2019. Study start: October 1, 2019.

Teaching communication skills in medical education : Best practice example of an interdisciplinary seminar in radiation oncology.

BACKGROUND: Communication with patients is challenging, especially in radiation oncology. Therefore, radiation oncology is particularly suited to sensitize medical students for this topic and to train them competently. We report on experiences with an innovative teaching project for fourth- and fifth-year medical students. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The course, funded as an innovative teaching project by the medical faculty, was offered as an optional course for medical students in 2019 and again in 2022 after a pandemic-related break. The curriculum and evaluation form were developed through a two-stage Delphi process. The course consisted of, first, participation during counselling of patients prior to radiotherapy, mainly on topics with shared decision-making, and, second, a 1-week interdisciplinary block seminar with practical exercises. The topics covered a broad spectrum of the competence areas defined in the National Competence-Based Learning Objectives Catalog for Medicine (NKLM). The number of participants was limited to approximately 15 students because of the practical components. RESULTS: So far, 30 students (all at least in the seventh semester or higher) have participated in the teaching project. The most frequent reasons for participation were the desire to acquire competence in breaking bad news and confidence in talking to patients. The overall evaluation of the course was very positive, with a grade of 1.08 + 0.28 (on a scale of 1 = totally agree to 5 = totally disagree) plus German grade 1 (very good) to 6 (very bad). Notably, participants' expectations regarding specific competencies (e.g., breaking bad news) were also met. CONCLUSION: Although the evaluation results cannot be generalized to the entirety of medical students due to the limited number of voluntary participants, the very positive evaluation shows the need for such projects among students and can also be seen as an indication that radiation oncology as a patient-centered discipline is particularly well suited to teach medical communication.

[Ethical aspects of mechanical resuscitation in a child : Results of an expert workshop within the BMBF project CLAIRE-Children's Automated Intelligent Resuscitation]. / Ethische Aspekte mechanischer Reanimationshilfen beim Kind : Ergebnisse eines Expertenworkshops im Rahmen des BMBF-Projekts CLAIRE ­ Children's Automated Intelligent Resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: While the use of mechanical resuscitation devices can be considered for adult resuscitation, the European Resuscitation Council guidelines do not yet mention their use for pediatric resuscitation. Only one device has been partially approved for use in children; further pediatric appliances are currently being used off-label. Ethical considerations arising from the use of mechanical resuscitation devices have not yet been presented in a structured way. OBJECTIVE: To elaborate ethical considerations in the development phase of mechanical resuscitation devices for children. METHODS: Based on several fictitious case reports, an interdisciplinary expert focus group discussion was conducted. This was followed by a moderated discussion, summarizing the results. Guiding principles and research desiderata were formulated using these results as well as existing literature. RESULTS: According to the group of experts, ethical considerations regarding mechanical resuscitation devices in pediatrics predominantly concern the subject of indication and discontinuation criteria. Ethical aspects concerning psychosocial impacts on affected families and intervention teams cannot be generalized and need to be analyzed on a case-by-case basis. CONCLUSION: The considerations presented regarding the use of mechanical resuscitation devices in the pediatric context, which is still in its developmental stage, could also have practical implications for adult out-of-hospital resuscitation decisions. Concerning ethical aspects of out-of-hospital resuscitation decisions, especially using mechanical resuscitation devices, the need for accompanying empirical research is substantial.

[Further Development of Maturity Levels of Quality and Risk Management System at the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein]. / Weiterentwicklung der Reifegrade des Qualitäts ­ und Risikomanagementsystems am Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein.

INTRODUCTION: Following upon our publication "Maturity Levels of Quality and Risk Management at the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein" in 2018, we present the further development of the maturity model. Quality and risk management in hospitals is not only required by law but also plays a significant role in an optimized patient- and process-oriented health care. METHODS: A questionnaire-based self-assessment was carried out by 46 clinical units of the UKSH (location Kiel and Lübeck) for the analysis of nine quality criteria overall. Four of these criteria (quality assurance (QS), critical incident reporting system (CIRS), complaint management (BM) and process management (PM)) were already analysed in 2016 and were extended to the five new aspects, namely audits and on-site inspections, responsibilities, morbidity and mortality conferences, hygiene training and surgical safety checklist. Every quality item was graded into four categories from "A" (fully implemented) to "D" (not implemented at all). RESULTS: The comparison of the results for quality criteria QS, CIRS, BM, PM and the overall maturity level between 2016 and 2020 demonstrated statistically significant improvements in 2020 concerning the criteria QS (p=0.013), CIRS (p=0.026), PM (p=0.000) and the overall maturity levels (p=0.019). The criteria BM did not show any statistically significant improvement. The five newly added quality criteria demonstrated maturity levels "A" (fully implemented) and "B" (largely implemented) the following: audits and on-site inspections (100%), responsibilities (95.6%), morbidity and mortality conferences (65.2%), hygiene training (95.6%), and surgical safety checklist (100%). CONCLUSION: An integrated quality and risk management has already been a firm element of UKSH for years. Nevertheless, review of effectiveness of the initiated targeted measures is still a challenge. This is the reason why it is necessary to develop effective and resource-saving approaches for the evaluation of measures and the identification of potential for improvement. The recognised potential for improvement should be risk-prioritized and completely exploited using sustainable measures. Following this principle, we designed a qualitative model of maturity levels for the evaluation of our quality and risk management system at the UKSH in 2016, whose further development we demonstrate here.

Transparent entscheiden im moralischen Dilemma: Ethische Entscheidungsempfehlungen zu Besuchsregelungen im Krankenhaus während der COVID-19-Pandemie.

Visitation restrictions in hospitals during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic led to great psychological burden for patients, their relatives and employees. For hospitals, they represent a complex organizational challenge with respect to ethics. The present recommendations are intended to support decision-making at the meso- and microlevels.

[Dealing with coercion in intensive care medicine : Recommendations from the Ethics Section of the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI) in collaboration with the Ethics Section of the German Society for Internal Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DGIIN)]. / Umgang mit Zwang in der Intensivmedizin : Empfehlung der Sektion Ethik der Deutschen Interdisziplinären Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI) unter Mitarbeit der Sektion Ethik der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin (DGIIN).

The treatment situation in intensive care is characterised by a specific asymmetry in the relationship between patients and the team: Patients are particularly dependent on their environment and often show impaired consciousness and capacity to consent. This facilitates the use of coercion or enables and/or provokes it. The aim of this recommendation is to show ways to recognise patients with their wishes and needs and to integrate them into treatment concepts in the intensive care unit in order to reduce and avoid coercion whenever possible. The recommendation shows the variety of possible forms of coercion and discusses the moral standards to be considered in the ethical weighing process as well as legal conditions for justifying its use. It becomes obvious that treatment measures which may involve the use of coercion always require a careful and self-critical review of the measures in relation to the indication and the therapeutic goal. The recommendation's intention therefore is not to disapprove the use of coercion by interprofessional teams. Instead, it aims to contribute to a sensitive perception of coercion and to a critical and caring approach to formal and especially informal (indirect) coercion.

[Ad hoc ethical decision-making in clinical acute and emergency medicine : Position paper of the Ethics Section of the German Interdisciplinary Association of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI) in collaboration with the Ethics Section of the German Society of Medical Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DGIIN)]. / Ethische Ad-hoc-Entscheidungsfindung in der klinischen Akut- und Notfallmedizin : Positionspapier der Sektion Ethik der Deutschen Interdisziplinären Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI) unter Mitarbeit der Sektion Ethik der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin (DGIIN).

Decisions with considerable medical and ethical implications are made in emergency departments every day. Despite time pressure and high workloads, they have to be arrived at in an expert manner in all dimensions. For immediate ethical decisions, structuring the decision-making process in the form of standard procedures can be helpful, provided that they are trained and practiced in an interdisciplinary and interprofessional manner. The support for ad hoc ethical decisions presented here recommends an "ethical team time out" for the evaluation of treatment choices, in a framework where the patient's will and medical indication are examined and completed in a structured manner. Further experts (ideally, an ad hoc clinical ethics consultation) should be consulted if the treatment measure is of questionable medical benefit and/or of questionable patient consent.

Clinical Priority Setting and Decision-Making in Sweden: A Cross-sectional Survey Among Physicians.

BACKGROUND: Priority setting in healthcare that aims to achieve a fair and efficient allocation of limited resources is a worldwide challenge. Sweden has developed a sophisticated approach. Still, there is a need for a more detailed insight on how measures permeate clinical life. This study aimed to assess physicians' views regarding (1) impact of scarce resources on patient care, (2) clinical decision-making, and (3) the ethical platform and national guidelines for healthcare by the National Board of Health and Welfare (NBHW). METHODS: An online cross-sectional questionnaire was sent to two groups in Sweden, 2016 and 2017. Group 1 represented 331 physicians from different departments at one University hospital and group 2 consisted of 923 members of the Society of Cardiology. RESULTS: Overall, a 26% (328/1254) response rate was achieved, 49% in group 1 (162/331), 18% in group 2 (166/923). Scarcity of resources was perceived by 59% more often than 'at least once per month,' whilst 60% felt less than 'well-prepared' to address this issue. Guidelines in general had a lot of influence and 19% perceived them as limiting decision-making. 86% professed to be mostly independent in decision-making. 36% knew the ethical platform 'well' and 'very well' and 64% NBHW's national guidelines. 57% expressed a wish for further knowledge and training regarding the ethical platform and 51% for support in applying NBHW's national guidelines. CONCLUSION: There was a need for more support to deal with scarcity of resources and for increased knowledge about the ethical platform and NBHW's national guidelines. Independence in clinical decision-making was perceived as high and guidelines in general as important. Priority setting as one potential pathway to fair and transparent decision-making should be highlighted more in Swedish clinical settings, with special emphasis on the ethical platform.

[Apps on Prescription in the Medical Office, but how? A Case-based Problem Outline of Medical-ethical Implications of DHA Usage]. / Apps auf Rezept in der Arztpraxis, aber wie? Fallbasierter Problemaufriss medizinethischer Implikationen bei der Nutzung von DiGA.

BACKGROUND: Since the approval of the digital care law (Digitale-Versorgung-Gesetz-DVG) on 19.12.2019, physicians have been able to prescribe digital health applications (DHA). Patients are now entitled to such applications. The present article sets out to clarify how physicians should integrate DHAs into patient care and the ethical responsibilities they have in this process. METHODS: Based on an adapted principle-oriented case analysis, three hypothetical case scenarios are discussed. The argumentative-analytical approach is based on four established principles of medical ethics (following Beauchamp and Childress), namely autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice, as well as on the Model Professional Code of Conduct for Physicians working in Germany (MBO-Ä). RESULTS: When prescribing DHAs, physicians need to give patients additional information on the specific risks that result from such applications. Special attention must be paid to patients' digital health literacy. Furthermore, DHAs should not replace personal contact, but complement and support guideline-based treatment. To enable patients to use DHAs more independently, we recommend an 'app anamnesis'. CONCLUSION: Beauchamp's and Childress's principles as well as the MBO-Ä are instructive for handling DHAs in patient care. The Dos and Don'ts presented must be complemented by further guidance providing orientation for physicians on how to integrate DHAs in patient care in a responsible way.

Risk Disclosure in Prodromal Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Impressive progress in the understanding of the prodromal phase of Parkinson's disease (PD) in recent years has enabled the generation of disease prediction models. However, a remaining diagnostic uncertainty and lack of therapeutic options for affected individuals has resulted in a variety of ethical issues that have not to date been addressed sufficiently. Moreover, differences in the specificity of prodromal symptoms and possible subtypes of PD, especially the presence of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD), may have an important impact on prognostic counseling. OBJECTIVES: To derive a guideline for risk disclosure in prodromal PD based on the current literature and expert opinion. METHODS: We performed (1) a literature review on prognostic counseling in PD and (2) consulted with international experts on prodromal PD using a semi-structured questionnaire based on a Delphi approach to evaluate recommendations for risk disclosure in PD. RESULTS: The literature research revealed only 11 publications addressing prognostic counseling, with only two studies directly addressing affected individuals and most studies focusing on risk disclosure in RBD. The expert survey revealed the importance of distinguishing between individuals with and without RBD in prognostic counseling. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current literature and expert recommendations, a guideline for risk disclosure in prodromal PD for clinical care and research could be elaborated. Prognostic counseling should include differentiation between individuals with and without RBD, taking into account the high uncertainty of risk calculation in RBD-negative prodromal PD. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Ethik First - extracurricular support for medical students and young physicians facing moral dilemmas in hospital routine.

Introduction: Moral value conflicts play an increasingly central role in everyday hospital life. Clinical ethics, however, is only marginally represented in the compulsory curriculum for human medicine and the additional education regulations. The aim of the Ethik First project at the University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel is to close this gap with an extracurricular offer and to support medical students from the fifth clinical semester onward and during their practical year as well as assistant doctors in dealing with moral dilemmas in everyday hospital life. The project has taken the concomitant learning objectives from the national competency-based learning objective catalog for medicine. According to the target group, the address in particular, showed higher taxonomy levels. Project description: The multimodal concept is based on three pillars: In monthly principle-based case conferences, participants practice ethical reflection and moral judgment primarily on the basis of concrete cases introduced by them using the methods of problem-based learning and consideration-based deliberation. If participants do not bring forth a case, they discuss ethical aspects of current political relevance. Moreover, there is an annual public speaker event. Results: Since the project began in 2017, ~20 students and interns have taken part in Ethik First one or more times. In a web-based interim evaluation (N=13), all respondents fully agreed that they considered the format helpful for dealing with ethical questions at the clinic. They rated the relevance for their later profession as high. There is evidence for support in moral dilemma situations. Discussion: The first evaluation results of the voluntary extracurricular offer show the acceptance of the selected format, which goes beyond pure teaching in its conception in that it addresses moral stress as well and strengthens the participants' individual resilience. Conclusion: Ethik First reinforces the role of ethical aspects in the training of (prospective) doctors and focuses on reflecting on cases they have experienced firsthand. We formulate a desideratum for appropriate advanced training concepts both in medical studies and in advanced medical training such that the training and development of comparable projects at medical faculties and at medical associations with student participation can be discussed.

[Recommendations for ethical decision making regarding hospital visitation during the COVID-19 pandemic]. / Ethische Entscheidungsempfehlungen zu Besuchsregelungen im Krankenhaus während der COVID-19-Pandemie.

Visitation restrictions in hospitals during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic led to great psychological burden for patients, their relatives and employees. For hospitals, they represent a complex organizational challenge with respect to ethics. The present recommendations are intended to support decision-making at the meso- and microlevels.

Enhancing patient safety by integrating ethical dimensions to Critical Incident Reporting Systems.

BACKGROUND: Critical Incident Reporting Systems (CIRS) provide a well-proven method to identify clinical risks in hospitals. All professions can report critical incidents anonymously, low-threshold, and without sanctions. Reported cases are processed to preventive measures that improve patient and staff safety. Clinical ethics consultations offer support for ethical conflicts but are dependent on the interaction with staff and management to be effective. The aim of this study was to investigate the rationale of integrating an ethical focus into CIRS. METHODS: A six-step approach combined the analysis of CIRS databases, potential cases, literature on clinical and organizational ethics, cases from ethics consultations, and experts' experience to construct a framework for CIRS cases with ethical relevance and map the categories with principles of biomedical ethics. RESULTS: Four main categories of critical incidents with ethical relevance were derived: (1) patient-related communication; (2) consent, autonomy, and patient interest; (3) conflicting economic and medical interests; (4) staff communication and corporate culture. Each category was refined with different subcategories and mapped with case examples and exemplary related ethical principles to demonstrate ethical relevance. CONCLUSION: The developed framework for CIRS cases with its ethical dimensions demonstrates the relevance of integrating ethics into the concept of risk-, quality-, and organizational management. It may also support clinical ethics consultations' presence and effectiveness. The proposed enhancement could contribute to hospitals' ethical infrastructure and may increase ethical behavior, patient safety, and employee satisfaction.

[Overtreatment in intensive care medicine-recognition, designation, and avoidance : Position paper of the Ethics Section of the DIVI and the Ethics section of the DGIIN]. / Überversorgung in der Intensivmedizin: erkennen, benennen, vermeiden : Positionspapier der Sektion Ethik der DIVI und der Sektion Ethik der DGIIN.

Despite social laws, overtreatment, undertreatment, and incorrect treatment are all present in the German health care system. Overtreatment denotes diagnostic and therapeutic measures that are not appropriate because they do not improve the patients' length or quality of life, cause more harm than benefit, and/or are not consented to by the patient. Overtreatment can result in considerable burden for patients, their families, the treating teams, and society. This position paper describes causes of overtreatment in intensive care medicine and makes specific recommendations to identify and prevent it. Recognition and avoidance of overtreatment in intensive care medicine requires measures on the micro-, meso- and macrolevels, especially the following: (1) frequent (re-)evaluation of the therapeutic goal within the treating team while taking the patient's will into consideration, while simultaneously attending to the patients and their families; (2) fostering a patient-centered corporate culture in the hospital, giving priority to high-quality patient care; (3) minimizing improper incentives in health care financing, supported by reform of the reimbursement system that is still based on diagnose-related groups; (4) strengthening of interprofessional co-operation via education and training; and (5) initiating and advancing a societal discourse on overtreatment.

Ethics in times of physical distancing: virtual training of ethical competences.

Ethics teaching in medicine, nursing and other health care professions does not only consist of knowledge transfer that can be easily implemented digitally. Rather, it focuses on specific ethical competences (such as arguing and articulating one's own moral position) and attitudes (such as empathic patient orientation, critical self-reflection, and ambiguity tolerance), for whose development interactive formats are superior. Competence-oriented ethical learning goals are important for the development of professionalism, but require time, space and personal exchange. Due to contact restrictions and the widespread cancellation of (face-to-face) courses in the wake of the corona pandemic, ethics teaching was forced to keep its distance in many places, which posed great challenges. This article is based on an exchange of experiences from members of the working group ethik learning of the Academy for Ethics in Medicine about ethics teaching in times of physical distancing. Recommendations will be given on how ethical competence can be successfully taught in the context of exclusively digital teaching. Starting with the question what is at risk of being lost in digital teaching, the potentials of digital formats are explored and illustrated with concrete practical examples. Beyond ethics teaching, the article also aims to provide ideas and suggestions for other specialist and cross-sectional areas where interactive formats are central.