Infrarenal versus supraceliac aorto-hepatic arterial revascularisation in adult liver transplantation: multicentre retrospective study.

When the standard arterial reconstruction is not feasible during liver transplantation (LT), aorto-hepatic arterial reconstruction (AHAR) can be the only solution to save the graft. AHAR can be performed on the infrarenal (IR) or supraceliac (SC) tract of the aorta, but the possible effect on outcome of selecting SC versus IR reconstruction is still unclear. One hundred and twenty consecutive patients who underwent liver transplantation with AHAR in six European centres between January 2003 and December 2018 were retrospectively analysed to ascertain whether the incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) was influenced by the type of AHAR (IR-AHAR vs. SC-AHAR). In 56/120 (46.6%) cases, an IR anastomosis was performed, always using an interposition arterial conduit. In the other 64/120 (53.4%) cases, an SC anastomosis was performed; an arterial conduit was used in 45/64 (70.3%) cases. Incidence of early (≤ 30 days) HAT was in 6.2% (4/64) in the SC-AHAR and 10.7% (6/56) IR-AHAR group (p = 0.512) whilst incidence of late HAT was significantly lower in the SC-AHAR group (4.7% (3/64) vs 19.6% (11/56) - p = 0.024). IR-AHAR was the only independent risk factor for HAT (exp[B] = 3.915; 95% CI 1.400-10.951; p = 0.009). When AHAR is necessary at liver transplantation, the use of the supraceliac aorta significantly reduces the incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis and should therefore be recommended whenever possible.

Update on liver transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma : a review of the recent literature.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) represent 3% of all gastrointestinal tumours and can be classified anatomically in 3 types: intrahepatic (ICC), perihilar (PCC) and distal (DCC) cholangiocarcinomas. Resection is the treatment of choice but is only achieved in a few cases (<20%) because of invasion of the biliary tract and/or vascular structures. The outcome of advanced CC is poor with an overall survival (OS) of maximum 15 months with chemotherapy. In the 1990s, CC was regarded as a contraindication for liver transplantation (LT). LT has recently been proposed as potentially curative option for ICC and PCC. Careful patient selection has changed OS. This article provides an update on current status of LT for patients with unresectable CC.

Knowledge and attitude of the Flemish primary care physician toward organ donation and transplantation.

PURPOSE: Primary care physicians (PCP) might play an important role in the acceptance of organ donation (OD) in the population. This would require both a positive attitude and a good basic knowledge about the organ donation and transplantation (ODT) process. Studies on this subject are very limited however. The objectives of this study are to determine the knowledge and attitude of the PCP towards OD in Flanders. METHODS: Three-hundred twenty-seven Flemish PCPs completed an electronic questionnaire, comprising 6 sections: demographic factors, practical experience, knowledge, education, attitude and potential role in the ODT process. RESULTS: Eighty-seven percent of the Flemish PCP agree with the implementation of heart-beating organ donation. Ninety-four percent would agree to donate the organs of their own child. 80% know that even without explicit consent the prelevation of the organs and tissues of each potential Belgian donor will take place. Although they are aware of the current legislation, their knowledge regarding donor criteria showed significant gaps. A minority of the PCP's know that donors can be little brain-dead children (53%) or elderly above 70 years (45%). Only 61% of PCPs know that brain dead is associated with irreversible damage to the brain and only 28% know that more than one physician is involved in making the diagnosis. A majority (91%) is willing to play a role in the ODT process. But about two-thirds (61%) of them doubt their ability to answer questions of patients on this subject. 82.5% of this group would find it useful to participate in a specific training. When they are offered different choices to play a role in the process, the most accepted (84%) one is informing the transplant centre about the donor's medical history and risk behavior. CONCLUSIONS: The Flemish PCP has a positive attitude towards ODT. He is willing to play a role in the ODT process. However, our study clearly documents deficits in the knowledge about brain death and the need for postgraduate training in the field of ODT. Correcting these deficits may be an important factor in improving the acceptance of organ donation.

Laparoscopic liver resection compared to open approach in patients with colorectal liver metastases improves further resectability: Oncological outcomes of a case-control matched-pairs analysis.

AIMS: Liver resection is considered the standard treatment of colorectal metastases (CRLM). However, to date, no long term oncological results and data regarding repeat hepatectomy after laparoscopic approach are known. The aim of this study is to analyze single center long-term surgical and oncological outcomes after liver resection for CRLM. METHODS: A total of 57 open resections (OR) were matched with 57 laparoscopic resections (LR) for CRLM. Matching was based mainly on number of metastases, tumor size, segmental position of lesions, type of hepatectomy and type of resection. RESULTS: Morbidity rate was significantly less in the LR group (p = 0.002); the length of hospital stay was 6.5 ± 5 days for the LR group and 9.2 ± 4 days for the OR group (p = 0.005). After a median follow up of 53.7 months for the OR group and 40.9 months for the LR group, the 5-y overall survival rate was 65% and 60% respectively (p = 0.36) and the 5-y disease free survival rate was 38% and 29% respectively (p = 0.24). More patients in the LR group received a third hepatectomy for CRLM relapse than in the OR group (80% vs. 14.3% respectively; p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic resection for CRLM offers advantages in terms of reduced blood loss, morbidity rate and hospital stay. It provides comparable long-term oncological outcomes but can improve further resectability in patients with recurrent disease.

Pure laparoscopic full-left living donor hepatectomy for calculated small-for-size LDLT in adults: proof of concept.

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A2ALDLT) is an accepted mode of treatment for end-stage liver disease. Right-lobe grafts have usually been preferred in view of the higher graft volume, which lowers the risk of a small-for-size syndrome. However, donor left hepatectomy is associated with less morbidity than when it is compared to right hepatectomy. Laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (LDH) has been considered almost exclusively in pediatric transplantation. The results of laparoscopic left-liver graft procurement for calculated small-for-size A2ALDLT in four donors are presented. The graft-to-recipient body weight ratio was <0.8 in all recipients. The mean portal vein flow and the pressure and hepatic artery flows were measured at 190 ± 56 mL/min/100 g, 13 ± 1.4 mm/Hg and 109 ± 19 mL/min, respectively. No early postoperative donor complications were recorded. One graft was lost due to intrahepatic abscesses. Asymptomatic stenosis of a right posterior duct was treated with a Roux-en-Y loop 4 months later in one donor. We show that LDH of the full-left lobe is feasible. LDH is a very demanding operation, potentially decreasing donor morbidity. Standardization of this procedure, making it accessible to the growing number of experienced laparoscopic liver surgeons, could help renewing the interest for A2ALDLT in the Western world.

Infected large pore meshes may be salvaged by topical negative pressure therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of negative pressure therapy for superficial and deep mesh infections after ventral and incisional hernia repair by a prospective monocentric observational study. METHODS: During a 6-year period, 724 consecutive open ventral and incisional hernia repairs were performed. Pre- and intraoperative data as well as postoperative complications were prospectively recorded. In case of wound infection, negative pressure therapy (NPT) was our primary treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (8.7 %) were treated using negative pressure therapy after primary ventral and incisional hernia repair. Infectious complications needing NPT occurred in 54 patients in the retromuscular group (54/523; 10.3 %), none when laparoscopically treated and in 9 patients (9/143; 6.3 %) treated by an open intraperitoneal mesh technique. Considering outcome, all meshes were completely salvaged in the retromuscular mesh group after a median of 5 dressing changes (range, 2-9), while in the intraperitoneal mesh, group 3 meshes needed complete (n = 2) or partial (n = 1) excision. Mean duration to complete wound closure was 44 days (range, 26-63 days). CONCLUSION: NPT is a useful adjunct for salvage of deep infected meshes, particularly when large pore monofilament mesh is used.

Pathophysiology and management of post resection liver failure.

Post resection liver failure (PRLF) is defined by the occurrence of jaundice, coagulopathy and encephalopathy after liver resection. When PRLF is present, it has a high morbidity and mortality. The incidence of PRLF ranges between 0-30%. For having a healthy regeneration of the liver remnant an adequate number of hepatocytes and nonparenchymal cells, a normal functional and regenerative capacity and also a good accommodation of haemodynamic changes without congestion are needed. To avoid the presence of PRLF ongoing parenchymal damage after the liver resection should be avoided. So, ischemia reperfusion injury should be minimalized, infection and sepsis should be treated immediately and small for size syndrome should be avoided.

The Eurotransplant donor risk index in liver transplantation: ET-DRI.

Recently we validated the donor risk index (DRI) as conducted by Feng et al. for the Eurotransplant region. Although this scoring system is a valid tool for scoring donor liver quality, for allocation purposes a scoring system tailored for the Eurotransplant region may be more appropriate. Objective of our study was to investigate various donor and transplant risk factors and design a risk model for the Eurotransplant region. This study is a database analysis of all 5939 liver transplantations from deceased donors into adult recipients from the 1st of January 2003 until the 31st of December 2007 in Eurotransplant. Data were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models. From 5723 patients follow-up data were available with a mean of 2.5 years. After multivariate analysis the DRI (p < 0.0001), latest lab GGT (p = 0.005) and rescue allocation (p = 0.007) remained significant. These factors were used to create the Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index (ET-DRI). Concordance-index calculation shows this ET-DRI to have high predictive value for outcome after liver transplantation. Therefore, we advise the use of this ET-DRI for risk indication and possibly for allocation purposes within the Eurotrans-plant region.

[Current developments in liver transplantation in Germany: MELD-based organ allocation and incentives for transplant centres]. / Aktuelle Entwicklungen der Lebertransplantation in Deutschland: MELD-basierte Organallokation und "incentives" für Transplantationszentren.

Liver transplantation represents a successful and well-established therapeutic concept for patients with advanced liver diseases. Organ donor shortage continues to pose a significant problem. To ensure fair and transparent allocation of too few post-mortem grafts, the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD)-based allocation was implemented in December 2006. This has decreased waiting list mortality from 20 to 10 % but at the same time has reduced post OLT survival (1-year survival from almost 90% to below 80%), which is largely due to patients with a labMELD score > 30. Following MELD introduction the regular allocation threshold has increased from a matchMELD of initially 25 to meanwhile 34. At the same time the quality of donor organs has seen a continuous deterioration over the last 10 - 15 years: 63% of organs are "suboptimal" with a donor risk index of > 1.5. Moreover, the numbers of living-related liver transplantations have decreased. In Germany incentives for transplant centres are inappropriate: patients with decompensated cirrhosis, high MELD scores and high post-transplant mortality as well as marginal liver grafts are accepted for transplantation without the necessary consideration of outcomes, and against a background of the still absent publication and transparency of outcome results. The outlined development calls for measures for improvement: (i) the increase of donor grafts (e. g., living donation, opt-out solutions, non-heart beating donors), (ii) the elimination of inappropriate incentives for transplant centres, (iii) changes of allocation guidelines, that take the current situation and suboptimal donor grafts into account, and (iv) the systematic and complete collection of transplant-related data in order to allow for the development of improved prognostic scores.

Early arterial revascularization after hepatic artery thrombosis may avoid graft loss and improve outcomes in adult liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) represents a devastating complication after liver transplantation (LT), occurring in 1.6%-9.2% of adult recipients. Treatments of HAT include thrombectomy and thrombolysis (with or without redo of the arterial anastomosis), percutaneous thrombolysis through an angiogram, liver retransplantation, and clinical observation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 739 adult LTs between January 1992 and September 2009. HAT was classified as early (E-HAT), when occurring within the first 30 days after LT, or late HAT (L-HAT), when diagnosed from the 2nd month onward. HAT suspected clinically was confirmed by Doppler ultrasound and angiography in all cases. Attempted revascularization was defined as early (ER) if performed within the first 2 weeks after LT and late (LR) if performed between 15 and 30 days. RESULTS: After a median follow-up (FU) of 62 months (range, 1-227 months), HAT occurred in 31/739 grafts (4.3%). E-HAT was recorded in 25/31 cases (3.4%) and L-HAT in 11/31 cases (0.8%). ER was performed in 20/31 patients (65%) leading to 62% graft salvage; it was 81% when the revascularization was performed within the first week after LT (P = ns). LR was unsuccessful in all cases (P = .08). The overall incidence of BC among rescued grafts was 54% without graft loss during FU. Graft survival was 79% versus 71%; and 50% versus 50% at 1 and 3 years for E-HAT and L-HAT, respectively (P = ns). CONCLUSIONS: Urgent revascularization in cases of early HAT may decrease graft loss, especially when performed within the first week after LT, with improved overall outcomes.

Prospective evaluation of intraoperative hemodynamics in liver transplantation with whole, partial and DCD grafts.

The interaction of systemic hemodynamics with hepatic flows at the time of liver transplantation (LT) has not been studied in a prospective uniform way for different types of grafts. We prospectively evaluated intraoperative hemodynamics of 103 whole and partial LT. Liver graft hemodynamics were measured using the ultrasound transit time method to obtain portal (PVF) and arterial (HAF) hepatic flow. Measurements were recorded on the native liver, the portocaval shunt, following reperfusion and after biliary anastomosis. After LT HAF and PVF do not immediately return to normal values. Increased PVF was observed after graft implantation. Living donor LT showed the highest compliance to portal hyperperfusion. The amount of liver perfusion seemed to be related to the quality of the graft. A positive correlation for HAF, PVF and total hepatic blood flow with cardiac output was found (p = 0.001). Portal hypertension, macrosteatosis >30%, warm ischemia time and cardiac output, independently influence the hepatic flows. These results highlight the role of systemic hemodynamic management in LT to optimize hepatic perfusion, particularly in LDLT and split LT, where the highest flows were registered.

Laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy for pediatric liver transplantation.

Living donor liver transplantation is a well established modality, especially for pediatric transplantation with excellent early graft function and long-term results. Left lateral sectionectomy through open approach is a well-standardized procedure. Considering our acquired experience in both laparoscopic liver resection and standard open surgery for live donation in pediatric and adult patients, we decided to offer, for the first time in Belgium, a laparoscopic approach for the left lateral sectionectomy to a young mother. The patient was a child 6-months old,affected by biliary atresia and rapidly deteriorating while waiting on a deceased donor liver graft. Surgical technique and key-points of this procedure in the living donor are hereby discussed.

Improved results for adult split liver transplantation with extended right lobe grafts: could we enhance its application?

OBJECTIVE: Split liver transplantation (SLT) allows grafting of 2 recipients with 1 allograft. Results of adult SLT have improved since its first introduction. Children benefit most from SLT, while among some adult liver transplanters there are concerns about splitting a liver, turning a good quality graft into a marginal one. We performed a single center retrospective review to address this issue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2001 and August 2008, we performed 22 extended right liver graft (eRLG) transplantations in 21 adult patients. RESULTS: Eleven donors (50%) did not meet the Eurotransplant criteria for optimal donors. Forty-one percent of eRLG donors showed hemodynamic instability at the time of harvest. Eighteen (82%) splitting procedures were performed ex situ. The main indications for transplantation were alcoholic liver cirrhosis (32%), hepatitis C-related cirrhosis (18%), and acute liver failure (18%). Mean recipient age was 54 years (range, 17-69 years); median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 15 (range, 7-40). Patients were followed for a median of 16 months (range, 4-92 months) following transplantation. We observed 5 (23%) vascular and 3 (14%) biliary complications. Overall patient survival was 84% at 3 years; overall graft survival was 79%. For the 11 patients who had undergone transplantation after 2007, we observed a 100% patient and graft survival. CONCLUSION: After an initial learning curve and provided careful selection, exceptions to classical donor criteria for splitting can be accepted with successful outcomes comparable to those after whole liver transplantation.

Improved results for adult split liver transplantation with extended right lobe grafts: could we enhance its application?

OBJECTIVE: Split liver transplantation (SLT) allows grafting of 2 recipients with 1 allograft. Results of adult SLT have improved since its first introduction. Children benefit most from SLT, while among some adult liver transplanters there are concerns about splitting a liver, turning a good quality graft into a marginal one. We performed a single center retrospective review to address this issue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2001 and August 2008, we performed 22 extended right liver graft (eRLG) transplantations in 21 adult patients. RESULTS: Eleven donors (50%) did not meet the Eurotransplant criteria for optimal donors. Forty-one percent of eRLG donors showed hemodynamic instability at the time of harvest. Eighteen (82%) splitting procedures were performed ex situ. The main indications for transplantation were alcoholic liver cirrhosis (32%), hepatitis C-related cirrhosis (18%), and acute liver failure (18%). Mean recipient age was 54 years (range, 17-69 years); median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 15 (range, 7-40). Patients were followed for a median of 16 months (range, 4-92 months) following transplantation. We observed 5 (23%) vascular and 3 (14%) biliary complications. Overall patient survival was 84% at 3 years; overall graft survival was 79%. For the 11 patients who had undergone transplantation after 2007, we observed a 100% patient and graft survival. CONCLUSION: After an initial learning curve and provided careful selection, exceptions to classical donor criteria for splitting can be accepted with successful outcomes comparable to those after whole liver transplantation.

Induction of tolerance in solid organ transplantation: the rationale to develop clinical protocols in liver transplantation.

Minimization or withdrawal of immunosuppressive treatments after organ transplantation represents a major objective for improving quality of life and long-term survival of grafted patients. Such a goal may be reached under some clinical conditions, particularly in liver transplantation, making these patients good candidates for tolerance trials. In this context in liver transplantation, the central questions are (1) how to promote the natural propensity of the liver graft to be accepted, (2) which type of immunosuppressive drug should be used for induction and maintenance, and (3) which biomarkers could be used to discriminate tolerant patients from those requiring long-term immunosuppression. Induction therapies using aggressive T-cell-depleting agents may favor graft acceptance. However, persistent and/or rapidly reemerging cell lines, such as memory-type cells or CD8(+) T cells, could represent a significant barrier for induction of tolerance. The type of maintenance drugs also remains questionable. Calcineurin inhibitors may be eventually deleterious in the context of tolerance protocols, through inhibitory effects on regulatory T cells, that are not observed with rapamycin. In conclusion, significant efforts must be made to achieve reliable strategies for immunosuppression minimization or withdrawal after organ transplantation into the clinics.

Hepatic metastasectomy for soft-tissue sarcomas: is it justified?

BACKGROUND: Except for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), systemic chemotherapy in patients with liver metastasis of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is not effective. Therefore, all patients with resectable liver metastases underwent surgical therapy. We present our experience with this approach during the last 13 years. METHODS: All patients (n=45) with liver metastasis of STS undergoing surgical therapy were prospectively analyzed. Clinical and histopathological parameters as well as the postoperative course were recorded. Survival data were analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 45 patients with liver metastasis underwent hepatic resection; 59% of these patients had a solitary metastasis, 22% had two metastases, and 18% had three or more metastatic nodules. The surgical perioperative mortality was 7%. The median survival was 44 (range, 1-123) months, and the 5-year survival was 49%. Repeated resection for recurrent tumor was performed in eight patients, which yielded a median survival of 76 months. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have hepatic metastases that are functionally and technically resectable should be considered for surgery because this treatment offers the chance for long-term survival (>5 years).

Liver transplantation for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a German survey.

BACKGROUND: The present study reports a German survey addressing outcomes in nonselected historical series of liver transplantation (OLT) for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We sent to all 25 German transplant centers performing OLT a survey that addressed (1) the number of OLTs for HL and the period during which they were performed; (2) the incidence of HL diagnosed prior to OLT/rate of incidental HL (for example, in primary sclerosing cholangitis); (3) tumor stages according to Union Internationale Centre le Cancer; (4) patient survival; and (5) tumor recurrence rate. RESULTS: Eighty percent of centers responded, reporting 47 patients who were transplanted for HL. Tumors were classified as pT2 (25%), pT3 (73%), or pT4 (2%). HL was diagnosed incidentally in 10% of cases. A primary diagnosis of PSC was observed in 16% of patients. Overall median survival was 35.5 months. When in-hospital mortality (n = 12) was excluded, the median survival was 45.4 months, corresponding to 3- and 5-year survival rates of 42% and 31%, versus 31% and 22% when in-hospital mortality was included. HL recurred in 34% of cases. Three- and 5-year survivals for the 15 patients transplanted since 1998 was 57% and 48%, respectively. Median survival ranged from 20 to 42 months based on the time period (P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: The acceptable overall survival, the improved results after careful patient selection since 1998, and the encouraging outcomes from recent studies all suggest that OLT may be a potential treatment for selected cases of HL. Prospective multicenter randomized studies with strict selection criteria and multimodal treatments seem necessary.