Drug Promotions Between Ethics, Regulations, and Financial Interests.

BACKGROUND: The promotion of the latest medicines produced by the pharmaceutical industry is an important issue both from an ethical point of view (the level of accessibility, the way research is carried out) and from the point of view of marketing and especially from the lobbying issues raised. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: The ethical dilemmas raised by the promotion of new drugs revolve between the need to discover new molecules important for treating a wide range of diseases and the need to establish a battery of ethical rules, absolutely necessary for regulations in the field to be compliant with all ethical principles. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted through PubMed, MEDLINE, Plus, Scopus, and Web of Science (2015-2023) using combinations of keywords, including drugs, medical publicity, and pharma marketing plus ethical dilemma. ETHICS AND THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES: The promotion of medicines is governed by advertising laws and regulations in many countries, including at EU level, based on the need for countries to ensure that the promotion and advertising of medicines is truthful, based on information understood by consumers. The ethical analysis of the issues raised is more necessary and complex as the channels used for promotion are more accessible to the population, and the information, easier to obtain, can be the cause of increased self-medication and overeating. Large amounts of money invested in the development of new molecules, but also the risk of scientific fraud through manipulation of data during clinical trials, selective or biased publication of information can have repercussions on the health of the population. CONCLUSIONS: The development of new pharmaceutical molecules is necessary to intervene and treat as many conditions as possible, but marketing must not neglect the observance of ethical principles. The promotion of medicines should be the attribute especially of the medical staff, which should also be a mandatory part of the mechanism for approving the marketing methods and means used by the pharmaceutical companies.

Ethical Dilemmas of Using Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is considered the fourth industrial revolution that will change the evolution of humanity technically and relationally. Although the term has been around since 1956, it has only recently become apparent that AI can revolutionize technologies and has many applications in the medical field. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: The ethical dilemmas posed by the use of AI in medicine revolve around issues related to informed consent, respect for confidentiality, protection of personal data, and last but not least the accuracy of the information it uses. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted through PubMed, MEDLINE, Plus, Scopus, and Web of Science (2015-2022) using combinations of keywords, including: AI, future in medicine, and machine learning plus ethical dilemma. ETHICS AND THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES: The ethical analysis of the issues raised by AI used in medicine must mainly address nonmaleficence and beneficence, both in correlation with patient safety risks, ability versus inability to detect correct information from inadequate or even incorrect information. The development of AI tools that can support medical practice can increase people's access to medical information, to obtain a second opinion, for example, but it is also a source of concern among health care professionals and especially bioethicists about how confidentiality is maintained and how to maintain cybersecurity. Another major risk may be related to the dehumanization of the medical act, given that, at least for now, empathy and compassion are accessible only to human beings. CONCLUSIONS: AI has not yet managed to overcome certain limits, lacking moral subjectivity, empathy, the level of critical thinking is still insufficient, but no matter who will practice preventive or curative medicine in the next period, they will not be able to ignore AI, which under human control can be an important tool in medical practice.

The Nocebo Effect: A Bias in Clinical Practice-An Ethical Approach.

BACKGROUND: The nocebo effect is often disregarded in medical practice and is certainly much less known than the placebo effect, although, in reality, both can influence therapeutic decision making and the quality of life of patients. However, the nocebo effect raises a number of issues not only of a practical nature related to clinical activity but also ethical dilemmas related to the observance of the patient's autonomy, nonmaleficence, or informed consent and the information on which it is based. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: The ethical dilemmas raised by the nocebo effect revolve around how informed consent can be achieved, the accuracy and volume of information that is transmitted to the patient, and how to report negative side effects of therapeutic treatment. DATA SOURCES: In September 2023, a narrative analysis of the literature was conducted using a combination of keywords such as nocebo, placebo, ethics, therapeutic relationship from PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and so on, as well as from official documents developed at an international level (World Health Organization), for a period of 10 years (2012-2021). RESULTS: Analyzing the articles that remarked upon the significant impact of ethics in nocebo research or in the therapeutic relationship, we can state that the existence of several relevant issues of interest have been detected regarding the ethical use of nocebo and its impact in research or in clinics and thus the need for proper knowledge and management of the impact of nocebo effects. The ethical paradox of obtaining informed consent with the 2 goals, first, the need for complete information and second, the preservation of the autonomy of the patient, respectively, that of "primum non-nocere" and of avoiding unnecessary harm by revealing probable adverse effects is a point of interest for numerous studies. The potential for a nocebo effect is present when we inform patients about the risks and benefits of treatment, there being a clear link between the moral and ethical duty to inform patients and the need to avoid situations that increase the nocebo impact on how the disease or the adverse effects of the treatment are perceived. Adapting information about the side effects of medicines should focus on ensuring a balance between transparency and caution, especially in patients with a high potential for nocebo effect. CONCLUSIONS: The nocebo effect had for a long time been unknown or denied, although it can interfere with the results of the treatment used. As the nocebo phenomenon becomes increasingly known in medical practice, the clinical and ethical implications are identified by medical staff, and nocebo's adverse responses are no longer ignored.

Can Medication be a Factor that Can Negatively Affect the Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Depression?

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in patients with depression and whether concurrent psychotropic medication use negatively affects the treatment outcome of TMS. Patients' characteristics, predictors of treatment response, the relationship between demographics, and the selection of TMS as a treatment modality were also analyzed. STUDY QUESTION: Can psychotropic medication be a factor that can negatively affect the efficacy of TMS in patients with depression? STUDY DESIGN: This pilot-controlled study included 40 subjects from Romanian clinical practice who were treated with pharmacological treatment and TMS for major depressive disorder. The severity of depression and anxiety symptoms was measured using validated scales at baseline (day 1) and follow-up (day 30). DATA SOURCES: All patients' characteristics and information were collected manually from the clinic's medical records, deidentified, and then introduced into an electronic database for analysis. LIMITATIONS: Conducting the study in a clinical routine practice, it was not possible to include an active and/or sham control group. In addition, because TMS is not used as a monotherapy in this type of practice, we could not evaluate its safety and efficacy without concomitant pharmacological treatment. The study sample is small; therefore, the results cannot be generalized. RESULTS: Sixty percentage of patients (n = 24) included in this study obtained a clinical response, and 30% of patients (n = 12) obtained remission of depression. The group with pharmacological treatment obtained clinical responses in 80% of patients (n = 16) and remission of depression in 45% of patients (n = 9). The group with pharmacological treatment and TMS obtained clinical responses in 40% of patients (n = 8) and remission of depression in 15% (n = 3) of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The study results show a lack of efficacy for TMS as an adjunctive therapy to pharmacological treatment for patients with depression. In addition, a negative impact of psychotropic medication on TMS efficacy is observed in our study sample.

Pharmacological Management of Cholera: A Century of Expert Opinions in Cecil Textbook of Medicine.

BACKGROUND: Cholera is a potentially lethal diarrheal disease produced by Vibrio cholerae serotypes O1 El Tor and O139. Known since antiquity, the condition causes epidemics in many areas, particularly in Asia, Africa, and South America. Left untreated, the mortality may reach 50%. The crucial therapeutic intervention is intravenous or oral rehydration and correction of acidosis, dyselectrolytemia, and renal impairment. Antibiotic use represents the main pharmacological intervention. STUDY QUESTION: What are the milestones of the antibiotics use recommended by experts for the pharmacological management of cholera in the past century? STUDY DESIGN: To determine the changes in the experts' approach to the management of cholera and particularly the use of antibiotics as presented in a widely used textbook in the United States. DATA SOURCES: The chapters describing the management of cholera in the 26 editions of Cecil Textbook of Medicine published from 1927 through 2020. RESULTS: Sulfonamides were recommended in 1947, followed by the introduction of tetracyclines, chloramphenicol, and furazolidone in 1955. The options were restricted in 2000 to doxycycline. In the past decade, patients infected with strains known to have a degree a resistance to tetracyclines were treated with azithromycin or ciprofloxacin. Antibiotic use decreases the volume of stool and the duration of diarrhea but has not been considered lifesaving. Drugs with antimotility, antiemetic, or antisecretory properties are not useful. CONCLUSIONS: The utility of antibiotic use in cholera has been endorsed by experts, but only as an adjunct to rapid and complete fluid and electrolyte replacement.

The New Mythology of the Body and the Transformation of the Therapeutic Space.

BACKGROUND: The history of medicine has flowed in the wake of knowledge and social perceptions about the body and corporeality. There is no idea of health without reference to the notion of body (although "health" can have other meanings, figuratively). Considering the same history, the body was the subject of numerous segregations and categorizations due to which it was and is a "social object" and a "political object." In turn, the spatial and cultural framework was the environment and determinant of the medicine development which is not only a science but also an inter-human interactive practice. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: In this article, we will analyze the current social (re)construction of the notions of body and space by referring to the technological and structural changes that are manifested in medicine and society and their ethical implications. DATA SOURCES: A review of the specialized literature was performed in June-July 2023, using keywords like human enhancement, therapeutic enhancement, transhumanist medicine, ethics from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, and official documents issued at the international level (World Health Organization, European Commission). ETHICS AND THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES: This literature review suggests that few practical solutions to human enhancement, both curative and preventive, whether cognitive or physical, have been approached entirely from an ethical point of view. The historical evolution of the concept of human enhancement has led to debates between "transhumanists" and "bioconservatives" depending on how they relate to the improvement of the human condition without or with reticence interventions to improve human capabilities being related to various interventions, from pharmacological, surgical ones to those in the field of genetics, nanomedicine, or cybernetics. In addition to the technical aspects, which are often the major concern of researchers and those applying new technologies, there are also ethical and legislative aspects, to better understand the impact that the dynamics and diffusion of these processes have on the evolution of the human species. CONCLUSIONS: In interference with these technologies, the body is exposed to possibilities of change and evolution with colossal (expected) social impact that can change norms and values that have been stable for centuries. Social space and place are also proving to be "processes in the making'" for which we need to detect what developments are possible or have already imposed themselves as a trend in the social and medical world.

Bed Rest After Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Century of Expert Opinions in Cecil Textbook of Medicine.

BACKGROUND: Complete bed rest has been a component of the management of acute myocardial infarction, which was first diagnosed in the United States in 1912. The prescribed duration of bed rest has been progressively shortened in the past century. STUDY QUESTION: What are the milestones of the changes in the expert approach to the duration of bed rest for patients with acute myocardial infarction? STUDY DESIGN: To determine the changes in the experts' approach to the duration of bed rest after a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, as presented in a widely used textbook in the United States. DATA SOURCES: The chapters presenting the management of myocardial infarction in the 26 editions of Cecil Textbook of Medicine published from 1927 through 2020. RESULTS: Complete rest for 2-6 weeks was recommended by the Cecil's experts from 1927 through 1967. The practice was questioned since the early 1950s, but the recommended duration of bed rest was decreased to 3-4 days only in 1971, after most US hospitals opened coronary care units. The required time in bed was further decreased to 1 day in 1992 and to 12 hours in 2004. By 2007, the literature contained data from 15 trials with a total of 1471 patients kept in bed "longer" and 1487 patients who had been prescribed bed rest for "shorter" periods after an acute uncomplicate myocardial infarction and there was no difference between the groups regarding reinfarction, cardiac mortality, or all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The duration of bed rest after acute myocardial infarction recommended by experts in the United States has had a downward trend with an inflection point in the early 1970s. The change reflected experts' opinion, rather than evidence produced by randomized controlled trials.

Reimplantation of Implantable Cardiac Devices-An Ethical Controversy?

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases are an important public health problem, the main cause of death in both men and women, with a continuous increasing prevalence and consequences upon morbidity in economic, physical, and psychological terms.The new technology have made possible the development of innovative devices, which have increased the possibility of therapeutic interventions today, extending the life of the population with cardiovascular pathology, transforming the patient care, and providing a complex, personalized therapeutic approach. FIELDS OF UNCERTAINTY: The aim of the study was to evaluate from an ethical perspective the need, feasibility, and safety of reusing cardiac pacemakers to revise the legal terms and requirements.In recent years, the problem of accessibility to cardiovascular drugs has been increasingly accompanied by the accessibility to technology, interventional cardiology advancing recently, and becoming an increasingly important standard of care. DATA SOURCES: A review of the specialized literature was performed in March 2023, using keywords such as implantable cardiac devices, reuse, ethics from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, as well as official documents issued at the international level (World Health Organization). ETHICS AND THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES: An ethical analysis assesses the extent to which a medical act (PM reimplantation) is covered by the 4 universally accepted principles: nonmaleficence, beneficence, autonomy (respect for the person), and social justice, the analysis addressing to the risk-benefit ratio based on studies that analyzed the phenomenon over the past 50 years. The ethical analyzed issues start from the fact that although 80% of pacemakers, most of them working perfectly, with a battery life of more than 7 years are buried with their owners, while approximately 3 million patients die annually due to the lack of access to these devices in undeveloped and developing countries.But beyond the ethical issues, legal practice has meant that in many countries, reusing of these devices is prohibited, mostly being single-use devices. Low-income countries continue to accept this practice as the only one economically accessible to them, considering the prohibition of reusing them to be an economic rather than a medical issue. CONCLUSIONS: Reusing implantable cardiac devices is of great interest because of the costs, being in certain situations, the only possibility that certain people can have access to a therapeutic method that ensures their health recovery and increases their quality of life. But this is not possible without clear procedures, without clear criteria on how sterilization should be performed, how the technique should be performed, without obtaining a truly informed consent, and especially without a proper patient's follow-up.

Against Authority: The Bioethics of Ivermectin Use for COVID-19 Infection.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought new ethical challenges to both health care professionals and the general public. Among the ethical problems amplified during this period were the making of medical decisions to quickly introduce some drugs into therapeutic practice with unproven or insufficiently proven effects (such as ivermectin), the validity of drug testing, and the allocation of limited resources. FIELDS OF UNCERTAINTY: The COVID-19 pandemic brought to the attention of the entire scientific world a new problem, which exceeded the guidelines and rules known until then. Out of the desire to quickly solve this medical problem, a series of measures were taken, however not sufficiently validated in scientific terms; the recommendations regarding the use of drugs known for their properties to treat a greater number of conditions, such as ivermectin, was tried. DATA SOURCES: A narrative review of the specialized literature was carried out using keywords such as COVID-19, ivermectin, ethics, and off-label medication from Scopus and Google Scholar but also of official documents developed at the international level (World Health Organization). ETHICS AND THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES: The off-label use of ivermectin alone or in combination with other medications during COVID pandemic raised problems related to the demonstration of its effectiveness, but also to ethics, starting from the expectations that both the medical staff and the population had of it. Ivermectin therapy was also evaluated by analyzing the behavior of ivermectin based on ethical principles (nonmaleficence, beneficence, and respect for one's autonomy) or on justice. Even in times of pandemic, exceptionalism must not triumph, and finding an effective treatment must be done through studies that respect ethical standard. CONCLUSIONS: The failures or rather lack of success in decision making during the pandemic showed that alongside scientific knowledge and the development of health policies, it is necessary to constantly evaluate the measures and decisions from an ethical point of view, and the prevention of slippages and abuses is not only necessary but even mandatory.

Advances in Genetic Editing of the Human Embryo.

BACKGROUND: Genetic engineering has allowed a major development of research in this field, with specialists attempting to edit the human genome, after the successful editing of the genomes of plants and animals. However, human gene editing technologies are at the center of ethical debates around the world. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: Ethical concerns about genetic editing of the human embryo raise several issues that can be viewed through the prism of optimism and reluctance leading to a number of recommendations regarding the acceptance of what may soon become a reality. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted through PubMed, MEDLINE, Plus, Scopus, and Web of Science (2015-2022) using combinations of keywords, including: human genome or gene editing plus ethics. ETHICS AND THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES: Gene therapy is seen by researchers as a way to solve congenital diseases, multifactorial diseases in general or specific diseases such as cystic fibrosis, muscular dystrophy, or can increase resistance to HIV infection. Genome editing technologies, germline gene editing, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats gene editing technology, technologies such as zinc finger nucleases are not only advanced gene therapies that require solving technical problems, but also techniques that require complex and complete analysis of ethical problems. Genetic engineering raises many ethical concerns such as: safety concerns especially the risk of off-target effects; autonomy of the individual-with the limitation of the future generations to consent for an intervention over their genome; social justice-keeping in mind the costs of the procedures and their availability to the general population. Discussions can go further from questions such as "How can we do this?" to questions such as "Should we do this?" or "Is society ready to accept this technology and is it able to manage it rationally?" CONCLUSIONS: The ethics of biomedical research should be based on global dialogue, on the involvement of experts and the public, to achieve a broad social consensus. The fundamental review of the ethics of genetics is a desire and an opportunity of the current period.

Pharmacological Management of Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Century of Expert Opinions in Cecil Textbook of Medicine.

BACKGROUND: Advances in drug therapy for pulmonary tuberculosis have had an extraordinary impact on the incidence of tuberculosis in the United States in the past century, which has decreased from 113/100,000 persons in 1920 to 2.2/100,000 in 2020. Modern treatments have contributed to a remarkable decrease in hospitalizations and mortality and have had a significant impact on the duration and severity of illness, quality of life, and work potential of affected persons. STUDY QUESTION: What are the milestones of the changes in the expert approach to the pharmacological management of pulmonary tuberculosis in the past century? STUDY DESIGN: To determine the changes in the experts' approach to the management of pulmonary tuberculosis, as presented in a widely used textbook in the United States. DATA SOURCES: The chapters describing the management of pulmonary tuberculosis in the 26 editions of Cecil Textbook of Medicine published from 1927 through 2020. RESULTS: In the preantibiotic era (1927-1943), the Cecil authors emphasized rest, good food, and fresh air as the treatment pillars for pulmonary tuberculosis. The modern era (1947-1971) recorded the discovery of all the drugs that are still used for the initial treatment, in the following order: streptomycin, para-aminosalicylic acid, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, cycloserine, kanamycin, ethionamide, capreomycin, and rifampin. In the postmodern era (1975-2020), therapeutic advances continued with trials of many drug combinations aimed at ameliorating the duration of treatment, drug resistance adverse effects, and poor the recent addition of fluoroquinolones, bedaquiline, and clofazimine. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacological management of tuberculosis has remained archaic until the middle of the 20th century. Fundamental progress occurred in a very short period (1947-1971) and was because of the recognition of the antituberculous effect of many antibiotics and chemotherapy agents. The challenges created by mycobacterial infections resistant to multiple drugs remain and have prompted the addition of new drugs in the past decade.

Pharmacological Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Century of Expert Opinions in Cecil Textbook of Medicine.

BACKGROUND: Advances in drug therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis (UC)] have contributed to a decrease in the severity of these chronic and disabling conditions. STUDY QUESTION: What are the milestones of the changes in the expert approach to the pharmacological management of IBD in the past century? STUDY DESIGN: To determine the changes in the experts' approach to the management of regional ileitis and UC, as presented in a widely used textbook in the United States. DATA SOURCES: The chapters presenting the management of IBD in the 26 editions of Cecil Textbook of Medicine published from 1927 through 2020. RESULTS: No specific interventions existed from 1927 through 1942. The pharmacological management of IBD has had 3 slightly overlapping eras starting in 1943. During the first period (1943-1951), the medical management relied on antibiotics, primarily sulfonamides and chloramphenicol. In the second (1955-75), experts recommended the use of adrenocorticotropic hormone or corticosteroids and 5-aminosalicylate. In the third era, which commenced in 1979 and is continuing to date, the pharmacological interventions have been expanded and refined to include 5 main drug classes, 5-aminosalicylates (sulfasalazine, mesalamine, and olsalazine), corticosteroids (prednisone and budesonide), immunomodulators (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, cyclosporine, and tofacitinib), biologics (infliximab adalimumab certolizumab pegol, and natalizumab), and antibiotics (metronidazole and ciprofloxacin). A consensus exists that the monoclonal antibodies again tumor necrosis factor alpha are cost-effective for induction and maintenance of clinical remission in both UC (golimumab) and Crohn disease (certolizumab pegol). The newer agents ustekinumab (a monoclonal antibody to the interleukin p40 subunit) and vedolizumab (a monoclonal antibody to the homing receptor integrin complex) have also performed well. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacological management of IBD has been the focus of intense research and development in the past 60 years. The pillars of drug treatment have been 5-aminosalicylates and corticosteroids. Recent pharmacological innovations (immunomodulators and biologicals) constitute an encouraging paradigm shift in the treatment of UC and Crohn disease.

Pharmacological Management of Obesity: A Century of Expert Opinions in Cecil Textbook of Medicine.

BACKGROUND: Innovations in drug therapy for obesity have had a limited impact on the body mass index, prevalence of medical complications, quality of life, and work potential of a substantial majority of affected persons. STUDY QUESTION: What are the milestones of the changes in the expert approach to the pharmacological management of obesity in the past century? STUDY DESIGN: To determine the changes in the experts' approach to the management of obesity, as presented in a widely used textbook in the United States. DATA SOURCES: The primary sources were chapters describing the management of obesity in the 26 editions of Cecil Textbook of Medicine published from 1927 through 2020. Secondary sources were publications retrieved from Medline that clarified technical issues related to the development, regulatory approval, and use of the drugs mentioned in the Cecil Textbook of Medicine. RESULTS: Pharmacological interventions aimed at increasing caloric expenditures through thermogenesis were recommended from 1927 through 1943. Thyroid extracts were prescribed even in the absence of demonstrated hypothyroidism or decreased basal metabolic rate throughout this period. Dinitrophenol was mentioned in 1937, but was banned soon thereafter. Appetite suppression with amphetamine was considered useful from 1943 through 1988, after which the drug was replaced with other centrally acting molecules, such as fenfluramine in 1988, sibutramine in 2000, and rimonabant in 2008, which were in turn withdrawn because of major adverse effects. In the past decade, obesity has been treated with the appetite suppressants phentermine-topiramate, bupropion-naltrexone, lorcaserin, and liraglutide, and with orlistat, a drug promoting fat malabsorption. The change in weight produced by these drugs is generally modest and transient. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacological management of obesity has remained frustratingly inefficient. The reasons for the relative lack of success may reside in the ever-growing access to dense, palatable, and relatively inexpensive food, coupled with the decrease in energy expenditure created by a sedentary lifestyle.

Prehospital Care of Coronary Artery Disease and Its Major Risk Factors in Geropsychiatric Inpatients.

BACKGROUND: Older adults with serious mental illness have a high prevalence of coronary artery disease and of its major risk factors, that is, arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus. The prevalence and clinical control of these conditions have not been compared in geropsychiatric inpatients with dementia versus those with mood or psychotic disorders. STUDY QUESTION: What is the prevalence and acuity of coronary artery disease, arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus among patients with dementia, mood, and psychotic disorders admitted for geropsychiatric care? STUDY DESIGN: Patients 65 years of age or older were identified in a cohort of 1000 patients consecutively admitted over a 3-year period to the geropsychiatric unit of a 200-bed mental health hospital in suburban New York. All patients had a structured clinical and laboratory evaluation within 72 hours of admission. DATA SOURCES: Primary psychiatric diagnoses, medical history, the frequency of poorly controlled cardiometabolic comorbidity requiring an immediate change in the management plan, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). RESULTS: The 65 years and older patient sample (N = 689) had a mean age of 74.8 years, and 58.8% of the subjects were women. The 205 patients with dementia were older ( P < 0.001) than the 337 patients with mood disorders and the 147 patients with psychotic syndromes. The numbers of medical conditions and the CCI after exclusion of dementia were similar in patients with dementia versus patients without dementia. A substantial number of patients had poorly controlled arterial hypertension (51.2%), dyslipidemia (25.4%), diabetes (24.2%), and coronary artery disease (15.4%). Patients with dementia had a lower prevalence of poorly controlled dyslipidemia ( P = 0.0006), diabetes ( P = 0.0089), and coronary artery disease ( P = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with mood or psychotic disorder, a diagnosis of dementia with behavioral disturbance seemed to be associated with better control of coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus in geropsychiatric inpatients.

Pharmacological Management of Primary Arterial Hypertension: A Century of Expert Opinions in Cecil Textbook of Medicine.

BACKGROUND: Advances in drug therapy for primary (or essential) arterial hypertension have contributed to a significant decrease in the frequency and severity of strokes, coronary artery disease and heart failure, and chronic renal insufficiency. STUDY QUESTION: What are the milestones of the changes in the expert approach to the pharmacological management of arterial hypertension in the past century? STUDY DESIGN: To determine the changes in the experts' approach to the management of arterial hypertension, as presented in a widely used textbook in the United States. DATA SOURCES: The chapters presenting the management of arterial hypertension in the 26 editions of Cecil Textbook of Medicine published from 1927 through 2020. RESULTS: The pharmacological management of arterial hypertension has had 3 overlapping eras in the timeframe subject to our investigation. In the empiric era (1927-1947), experts were recommending nonspecific interventions for sedation. The premodern era (1955-1963) relied on ganglion blockers, sympathetic blockers, and direct vasodilators. The modern era (1967-2020), which includes drugs used in current clinical practice, saw the introduction of diuretics (1967), beta-blockers (1971), alpha-blockers (1982), calcium channel blockers (1985), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (1985), angiotensin receptor blockers (2000), and direct renin inhibitors (2008). CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacological management of arterial hypertension has been the focus of intense and successful research and development in the second half of the 20th century.

Pharmacological Management of Heroin Withdrawal Syndrome: A Century of Expert Opinions in Cecil Textbook of Medicine.

BACKGROUND: Opioid use disorder continues to have a significant impact on public health morbidity and mortality throughout the United States and elsewhere. Managing opioid withdrawal is a critical treatment goal in individuals entering treatment with an active opioid use. STUDY QUESTION: What are the milestones of the changes in the expert approach to the pharmacological management of heroin withdrawal syndrome in the past century? STUDY DESIGN: To determine the changes in the expert approach to the management of heroin withdrawal syndrome, as presented in a widely used textbook in the United States. DATA SOURCES: The chapters on opioid dependence in the 26 editions of Cecil Textbook of Medicine published from 1927 through 2020. RESULTS: Opioid replacement taper with morphine (1927-1947), codeine (1931-1943), and methadone (1951-present) administered for 3-10 days has remained the main intervention. The anticholinergic drugs, scopolamine and atropine, were recommended from 1927 to 1943, but their use has never been backed by scientific evidence. Newer approaches relied on clonidine, an alpha-2 receptor agonist used since 1982, and buprenorphine, an opioid agonist/antagonist endorsed for the treatment of heroin withdrawal in 2000. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacological management of heroin withdrawal syndrome in the past century has progressed from the introduction of methadone to the utilization of clonidine and buprenorphine. More recent advances in treating opioid use disorder have changed the goals of opioid withdrawal management to achievement of abstinence from all opioids to facilitation of long-term treatment with medications for opioid use disorder.

Pharmacological Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Century of Expert Opinions in Cecil Textbook of Medicine.

BACKGROUND: Advances in drug therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) have had a significant impact on the quality of life of a substantial majority of affected persons, which has contributed to a remarkable decrease in the frequency and severity of thromboembolic complications, hospitalizations, and mortality. STUDY QUESTION: What are the milestones of the changes in the expert approach to the pharmacological management of AF in the past century? STUDY DESIGN: To determine the changes in the experts' approach to the management of AF, as presented in a widely used textbook in the United States. DATA SOURCES: The chapters presenting the management of AF in the 26 editions of Cecil Textbook of Medicine published from 1927 through 2020. RESULTS: AF was consistently described in Cecil Textbook of Medicine as the most common sustained arrhythmia in adults. The authors emphasized its thromboembolic complications and potential for hemodynamic deterioration. Rate control with digitalis and rhythm control with quinidine were the standard in 1927. The pharmacological advances have focused on atrioventricular nodal blocking for rate control, conversion to and maintenance of sinus rhythm, and preventive anticoagulation. The first new class of drugs for rate control was beta-adrenergic receptor blockers, starting with propranolol which was introduced in 1979, followed by the calcium channel blocker verapamil in 1988. Rhythm control with amiodarone, a potassium channel blocker, has been recommended since 2004, and the sodium channel blockers propafenone and flecainide became part of standard therapy in 2008. Anticoagulation with warfarin was recommended starting in 2000, followed by the introduction of direct thrombin inhibitor in 2012 and factor Xa inhibitors in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacological management of AF was unchanged for more than 50 years (1927-1979), a period during which the devastating effects of thromboembolic complications were not addressed. The major therapeutic advance is represented by preventive anticoagulation with the newer, safer, and more user-friendly direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors.

Pharmacological Management of Myasthenia Gravis: A Century of Expert Opinions in Cecil Textbook of Medicine.

BACKGROUND: Advances in drug therapy for myasthenia gravis have had a significant impact on the quality of life and work potential of a substantial majority of affected persons and has contributed to a remarkable decrease in the frequency and severity of complications, hospitalizations, and mortality. STUDY QUESTION: What are the milestones of the changes in the expert approach to the pharmacological management of myasthenia in the past century? STUDY DESIGN: To determine the changes in the experts' approach to the management of myasthenia gravis, as presented in a widely used textbook in the United States. DATA SOURCES: The chapters presenting the management of myasthenia gravis in the 26 editions of Cecil Textbook of Medicine published from 1927 to 2020. RESULTS: Adequate feeding, absolute rest in bed, and "tonics" were the only interventions recommended for the care of patients with myasthenia gravis in 1927. Ephedrine and glycine were used in the early 1930s. Treatment with the anticholinesterases physostigmine and neostigmine was recommended in 1937, 3 years after Mary Walker discovered it in the United Kingdom. Immunosuppressant pharmacological interventions with prednisone and azathioprine have been considered the standard since 1975, and intravenous immune globulin was added to usual care in 1996. The newer immunosuppressant drugs mycophenolate, cyclosporine, and tacrolimus have expanded the arsenal since 2008, and the monoclonal antibodies rituximab and eculizumab have been mentioned in the textbooks published in 2012-2020. The first randomized clinical trial of drug therapy for myasthenia gravis was published in 1987. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacological management of myasthenia gravis was revolutionized by the epiphany of an astute clinician in the 1930s. Immunosuppressant treatment was a logical step once the autoimmune nature of the condition was established. The major therapeutic advances highlight the values of empiricism and persistent attention to detail in treating relatively rare chronic disorders.

Pharmacological Management of Peptic Ulcer: A Century of Expert Opinions in Cecil Textbook of Medicine.

BACKGROUND: Advances in drug therapy for peptic ulcer have had a significant impact on quality of life and work potential of many millions of affected persons and have contributed to a remarkable decrease in the prevalence of the disease, frequency and severity of complications, hospitalizations, and mortality. STUDY QUESTION: What are the milestones of the changes in the expert approach to the pharmacological management of peptic ulcer in the past century? STUDY DESIGN: To determine the changes in the experts' approach to the management of peptic ulcer, as presented in a widely used textbook in the United States. DATA SOURCES: The chapters presenting the management of peptic ulcer in the 26 editions of Cecil Textbook of Medicine published from 1927 through 2020. RESULTS: Acid neutralization with alkalies was the only pharmacological intervention recommended in the textbooks published from 1927 to 1975. Atropine and other antimuscarinic agents were mainly used to relieve pain and acid secretion according to the paradigm "no acid no ulcer." The shift to the acid suppression paradigm started with the introduction of the histamine-2 receptor antagonist cimetidine in 1979, the proton-pump inhibitor omeprazole in 1988, and the prostaglandin agonist misoprostol in 1992. Finally, the eradication of Helicobacter pylori was codified in 1996. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacological management of peptic ulcer has remained archaic well into the 20th century. Fundamental progress occurred in a very short period (1979-1996) and was due to paradigm shifts from acid neutralization to acid suppression and later the recognition of the role of H. pylori infection.

Pharmacological Management of Heart Failure: A Century of Expert Opinions in Cecil Textbook of Medicine.

BACKGROUND: Drug therapy for heart failure influences quality of life and work potential of affected persons and has contributed to decrease in hospitalizations and cardiovascular mortality. The current approach is the result of incremental progress in understanding the pathophysiology of the syndrome, introduction of new molecules, and repurposing existing drugs. STUDY QUESTION: What are the milestones of the changes in the expert clinicians' approach to the pharmacological management in the past century? STUDY DESIGN: To determine the changes in the experts' approach to the management of heart failure, as presented in a widely used textbook in the United States. DATA SOURCES: The chapters on the management of heart failure in the 26 editions of Cecil Textbook of Medicine published from 1927 through 2020. RESULTS: In 1927, heart failure was treated with powdered leaf or tincture of digitalis, mercury chloride, and theophylline. Patients with acute pulmonary edema received injections of atropine, adrenaline, and ouabain. The therapeutic milestones in heart failure were the introduction of loop diuretics and aldosterone antagonists (1971), vasodilator treatment with hydralazine and nitroglycerine (1979-1985), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and selective beta-adrenergic blockers (1992-2000), and sacubitril-valsartan (2016). For acute pulmonary edema, the durable milestone was the treatment with morphine and furosemide (1971). CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacological management of heart failure in the past century has progressed in fits and starts, with latent periods between significant advances lasting 8-40 years. In chronological order, the major advances were efficient diuresis, afterload reduction, and blunting the neurohormonal response to hemodynamic stress and cardiac remodeling.