Mid-term pulmonary sequelae after hospitalisation for COVID-19: The French SISCOVID cohort.

BACKGROUND: Even though COVID-19 clinical features, pathogenesis, complications, and therapeutic options have been largely described in the literature, long-term consequences in patients remain poorly known. METHODS: The French, multicentre, non-interventional SISCOVID study evaluated lung impairment three (M3) and six months (M6) after hospital discharge in patients recovered from COVID-19. Evaluation was based on clinical examination, pulmonary function tests, and chest computed tomography (CT-scan). RESULTS: Of the 320 included patients (mean age: 61 years; men: 64.1%), 205 had had a severe form of COVID-19, being hospitalised in an intensive care unit (ICU), and requiring high flow nasal cannula, non-invasive ventilation, or invasive mechanical ventilation. At M6, 54.1% of included patients had persistent dyspnoea (mMRC score ≥1), 20.1% severe impairment in gas diffusing capacity (DLCO <60% pred.), 21.6% restrictive ventilatory pattern (total lung capacity <80% pred.), and 40% a fibrotic-like pattern at CT-scan. Fibrotic-like pattern and restrictive ventilatory pattern were significantly more frequent in patients recovered from severe than non-severe COVID-19. Improved functional and radiological outcomes were observed between M3 and M6. At M6, age was an independent risk factor for severe DLco impairment and fibrotic-like pattern and severe COVID-19 form was independent risk factor for restrictive ventilatory profile and fibrotic-like pattern. CONCLUSION: Six months after discharge, patients hospitalised for COVID-19, especially those recovered from a severe form of COVID-19, frequently presented persistent dyspnoea, lung function impairment, and persistent fibrotic-like pattern, confirming the need for long-term post-discharge follow-up in these patients and for further studies to better understand long-term COVID-19 lung impairment.

Corticotropic insufficiency in a monocentric prospective cohort of patients with lung cancer treated with nivolumab: Prevalence and etiology.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer therapy has greatly progressed in the past few years, due to development of immune checkpoint proteins. These immunotherapies, when applied to eligible patients, have significantly reduced mortality but are prone to induce immune side-effects, including pituitary disorder and low adreno-corticotropic hormone (ACTH) and cortisol levels. We aimed to assess the prevalence and etiology of corticotropic insufficiency through a systematic screening of cortisol and ACTH levels in patients with lung cancer treated with nivolumab perfusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients from our Center with indications for nivolumab treatment for pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma resistant to chemotherapy were successively included and underwent cortisol and ACTH assay before each nivolumab perfusion. When cortisol was below normal without ACTH elevation, we screened for pituitary metastasis, hypophysitis or corticosteroid treatment that could explain the corticotropic insufficiency. RESULTS: Data from 75 patients (80.0% men, 20.0% women) showed 10.7% asymptomatic corticotropic insufficiency, with a mean cortisol level of 2.76±1.27µg/dl. Diagnosis was made during the first 2 months of nivolumab treatment in 88% of cases. Corticosteroid treatment explained the low cortisol level in 25.0% of cases. No pituitary metastases were found. Hypophysitis was suspected in 75.0% of cases. CONCLUSION: In a 75-patient cohort with non-small cell lung cancer treated with the PD1 antibody nivolumab and systematically screened for cortisol abnormalities, 10.7% of patients showed asymptomatic corticotropic insufficiency. Excluding corticotropic insufficiency secondary to corticosteroid treatment, 8.0% of patients presented cortisol level<5µg/dl attributed to hypophysitis. Cortisol screening enables hydrocortisone replacement treatment to be prescribed if necessary, preventing risk of adrenal crisis.

Phenotypes of asthma revisited upon the presence of atopy.

Immunological studies claimed that atopic and non-atopic asthma share more similarities than differences. However, these two phenotypes of asthma are considered to be distinguishable upon distinct clinical patterns, which were not systematically assessed before in a large population. We studied characteristics discriminating atopic from non-atopic asthma among 751 asthmatic patients and 80 factors were analysed in univariate and multivariate analysis. Age, age of onset of asthma, female/male ratio were higher in non-atopic (n=200) than in atopic (n=551) asthmatics. Familial asthma, seasonal symptoms, rhinitis, conjunctivitis, allergen-triggered symptoms, improvement in altitude, exercise-induced asthma were associated with atopy. Non-atopic asthmatics displayed lower FEV(1) and FVC. Smoking was more frequent and asthma was more severe in these patients. Younger age, early onset, male sex, rhinitis and smoking were independent factors discriminating atopic from non-atopic asthma. This study establishes in a large population of asthmatics that although similarities exist between atopic and non-atopic asthma, two clinical phenotypes can still distinguish both kinds of asthma.