CT-based comparison of porcine, ovine, and human pulmonary arterial morphometry.

To facilitate pre-clinical animal and in-silico clinical trials for implantable pulmonary artery pressure sensors, understanding the respective species pulmonary arteries (PA) anatomy is important. Thus, morphological parameters describing PA of pigs and sheep, which are common animal models, were compared with humans. Retrospective computed tomography data of 41 domestic pigs (82.6 ± 18.8 kg), 14 sheep (49.1 ± 6.9 kg), and 49 patients (76.8 ± 18.2 kg) were used for reconstruction of the subject-specific PA anatomy. 3D surface geometries including main, left, and right PA as well as LPA and RPA side branches were manually reconstructed. Then, specific geometric parameters (length, diameters, taper, bifurcation angle, curvature, and cross-section enlargement) affecting device implantation and post-interventional device effect and efficacy were automatically calculated. For both animal models, significant differences to the human anatomy for most geometric parameters were found, even though the respective parameters' distributions also featured relevant overlap. Out of the two animal models, sheep seem to be better suitable for a preclinical study when considering only PA morphology. Reconstructed geometries are provided as open data for future studies. These findings support planning of preclinical studies and will help to evaluate the results of animal trials.

In-silico enhanced animal study of pulmonary artery pressure sensors: assessing hemodynamics using computational fluid dynamics.

To assess whether in-silico models can be used to predict the risk of thrombus formation in pulmonary artery pressure sensors (PAPS), a chronic animal study using pigs was conducted. Computed tomography (CT) data was acquired before and immediately after implantation, as well as one and three months after the implantation. Devices were implanted into 10 pigs, each one in the left and right pulmonary artery (PA), to reduce the required number of animal experiments. The implantation procedure aimed at facilitating optimal and non-optimal positioning of the devices to increase chances of thrombus formation. Eight devices were positioned non-optimally. Three devices were positioned in the main PA instead of the left and right PA. Pre-interventional PA geometries were reconstructed from the respective CT images, and the devices were virtually implanted at the exact sites and orientations indicated by the follow-up CT after one month. Transient intra-arterial hemodynamics were calculated using computational fluid dynamics. Volume flow rates were modelled specifically matching the animals body weights. Wall shear stresses (WSS) and oscillatory shear indices (OSI) before and after device implantation were compared. Simulations revealed no relevant changes in any investigated hemodynamic parameters due to device implantation. Even in cases, where devices were implanted in a non-optimal manner, no marked differences in hemodynamic parameters compared to devices implanted in an optimal position were found. Before implantation time and surface-averaged WSS was 2.35±0.47 Pa, whereas OSI was 0.08±0.17, respectively. Areas affected by low WSS magnitudes were 2.5±2.7 cm2, whereas the areas affected by high OSI were 18.1±6.3 cm2. After device implantation, WSS and OSI were 2.45±0.49 Pa and 0.08±0.16, respectively. Surface areas affected by low WSS and high OSI were 2.9±2.7 cm2, and 18.4±6.1 cm2, respectively. This in-silico study indicates that no clinically relevant differences in intra-arterial hemodynamics are occurring after device implantation, even at non-optimal positioning of the sensor. Simultaneously, no embolic events were observed, suggesting that the risk for thrombus formation after device implantation is low and independent of the sensor position.