Tenapanor: A Phosphate Absorption Inhibitor for the Management of Hyperphosphatemia in Patients with Kidney Failure.

Because of increased risks of cardiovascular disease and death, patients with hyperphosphatemia receiving maintenance dialysis are advised to limit phosphorus consumption and are prescribed phosphate binders in an effort to better control serum phosphate concentrations. Because of large pill size, pill burden, and tolerability issues, phosphate binder adherence is relatively poor. On ingestion, phosphate is absorbed from the intestine via transcellular or paracellular transport. Data show that inhibiting sodium-hydrogen exchanger 3 modulates paracellular phosphate absorption (the predominant pathway in humans). Tenapanor is a first-in-class, minimally absorbed, phosphate absorption inhibitor that selectively inhibits sodium-hydrogen exchanger 3, with a mechanism distinct from, and complementary to, that of phosphate binders. In phase 3 and postregistrational studies, tenapanor conferred statistically significant and clinically meaningful reductions in serum phosphate in patients receiving maintenance dialysis with hyperphosphatemia. Here, we review the available preclinical and clinical data on the effects of tenapanor on controlling intestinal phosphate absorption.

Effectiveness of tenapanor for treating hyperphosphatemia in patients receiving dialysis: a plain language summary of the OPTIMIZE study.

What is this summary about?This summary provides a review of the OPTIMIZE study, the results of which were published in Kidney360 in February 2024. The OPTIMIZE study looked at how well tenapanor tablets work to treat patients receiving dialysis who have high levels of phosphate in their blood, a condition called hyperphosphatemia. In the OPTIMIZE study, researchers wanted to understand if tenapanor would decrease phosphate levels in the blood to the target range. They also tested different ways of starting tenapanor treatment in patients.In the human body, kidneys are organs that filter blood and remove waste products. In chronic kidney disease, sometimes referred to as CKD, a patient's kidneys do not work as well at filtering their blood and removing waste products. This can allow phosphate to build up in the blood. Phosphate levels may remain high despite patients receiving treatment such as dialysis, using pills that keep phosphate in the intestines (called phosphate binders) to prevent phosphate from being absorbed into the blood, and eating a low-phosphate diet. Phosphate levels may remain high despite these treatments because they can be difficult to follow. Most people receiving dialysis take 7­8 phosphate binder pills every day, and over half of those people have reported skipping at least one dose in the past month. Additionally, low-phosphate diets can be difficult to follow and people often struggle to meet their other nutritional needs.What are the key takeaways?Tenapanor used in combination with phosphate binders led to lower phosphate levels in the blood with the use of fewer phosphate-lowering pills. Tenapanor also lowered phosphate levels in patients who were not previously on phosphate binders but needed phosphate-lowering treatment.What were the main conclusions reported by the researchers?Tenapanor can help patients receiving dialysis better control their hyperphosphatemia.[Box: see text]Link to original article here.

An Overview of the Effects of Tenapanor on Visceral Hypersensitivity in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation.

Background: Patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) experience persistent abdominal pain, a common symptom leading to greater healthcare utilization and reports of treatment non-response. Clinically significant improvements in abdominal pain were observed in clinical trials of tenapanor, a first-in-class inhibitor of sodium/hydrogen exchanger isoform 3 (NHE3), for the treatment of IBS-C in adults. Aim: This narrative review reports the current knowledge about visceral hypersensitivity as a mechanism for abdominal pain in patients with IBS-C and explores the published evidence for hypothesized mechanisms by which tenapanor may reduce visceral hypersensitivity leading to the observed clinical response of decreased abdominal pain. Findings: Abdominal pain is experienced through activation and signaling of nociceptive dorsal root ganglia that innervate the gut. These sensory afferent neurons may become hypersensitized through signaling of transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1 (TRPV1), resulting in reduced action potential thresholds. TRPV1 signaling is also a key component of the proinflammatory cascade involving mast cell responses to macromolecule exposure following permeation through the intestinal epithelium. Indirect evidence of this pathway is supported by observations of higher pain in association with increased intestinal permeability in patients with IBS. Tenapanor reduces intestinal sodium absorption, leading to increased water retention in the intestinal lumen, thereby improving gastrointestinal motility. In animal models of visceral hypersensitivity, tenapanor normalized visceromotor responses and normalized TRPV1-mediated nociceptive signaling. Conclusion: By improving gastrointestinal motility, decreasing intestinal permeability and inflammation, and normalizing nociception through decreased TRPV1 signaling, tenapanor may reduce visceral hypersensitivity, leading to less abdominal pain in patients with IBS-C. Therapies that have demonstrated effects on visceral hypersensitivity may be the future direction for meaningful abdominal pain relief for patients with IBS-C.

NHE3 inhibitor tenapanor maintains intestinal barrier function, decreases visceral hypersensitivity, and attenuates TRPV1 signaling in colonic sensory neurons.

The pathogenesis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is multifactorial, characterized in part by increased intestinal permeability, and visceral hypersensitivity. Increased permeability is associated with IBS severity and abdominal pain. Tenapanor is FDA-approved for the treatment of IBS with constipation (IBS-C) and has demonstrated improvements in bowel motility and a reduction in IBS-related pain; however, the mechanism by which tenapanor mediates these functions remains unclear. Here, the effects of tenapanor on colonic pain signaling and intestinal permeability were assessed through behavioral, electrophysiological, and cell culture experiments. Intestinal motility studies in rats and humans demonstrated that tenapanor increased luminal sodium and water retention and gastrointestinal transit versus placebo. A significantly reduced visceral motor reflex (VMR) to colonic distension was observed with tenapanor treatment versus vehicle in two rat models of visceral hypersensitivity (neonatal acetic acid sensitization and partial restraint stress; both P < 0.05), returning VMR responses to that of nonsensitized controls. Whole cell voltage patch-clamp recordings of retrogradely labeled colonic dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons from sensitized rats found that tenapanor significantly reduced DRG neuron hyperexcitability to capsaicin versus vehicle (P < 0.05), an effect not mediated by epithelial cell secretions. Tenapanor also attenuated increases in intestinal permeability in human colon monolayer cultures caused by incubation with proinflammatory cytokines (P < 0.001) or fecal supernatants from patients with IBS-C (P < 0.005). These results support a model in which tenapanor reduces IBS-related pain by strengthening the intestinal barrier, thereby decreasing permeability to macromolecules and antigens and reducing DRG-mediated pain signaling.NEW & NOTEWORTHY A series of nonclinical experiments support the theory that tenapanor inhibits IBS-C-related pain by strengthening the intestinal barrier. Tenapanor treatment reduced visceral motor responses to nonsensitized levels in two rat models of hypersensitivity and reduced responses to capsaicin in sensitized colonic nociceptive dorsal root ganglia neurons. Intestinal permeability experiments in human colon monolayer cultures found that tenapanor attenuates increases in permeability induced by either inflammatory cytokines or fecal supernatants from patients with IBS-C.

Abdominal Symptom Improvement During Clinical Trials of Tenapanor in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation: A Post Hoc Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy of tenapanor on abdominal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. Abdominal symptoms assessed included pain, discomfort, bloating, cramping, and fullness. METHODS: The abdominal symptom data were pooled from 3 randomized controlled trials (NCT01923428, T3MPO-1 [NCT02621892], and T3MPO-2 [NCT02686138]). Weekly scores were calculated for each abdominal symptom, and the Abdominal Score (AS) was derived as the average of weekly scores for abdominal pain, discomfort, and bloating. The overall change from baseline during the 12 weeks was assessed for each symptom weekly score and the AS. The AS 6/12-week and 9/12-week response rates (AS improvement of ≥2 points for ≥6/12- or ≥9/12-week) were also evaluated. The association of weekly AS response status (reduction of ≥30%) with weekly complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) status (=0 and >0) was assessed. RESULTS: Among 1,372 patients (684 tenapanor [50 mg twice a day] and 688 placebo), the least squares mean change from baseline in AS was -2.66 for tenapanor vs -2.09 for placebo ( P < 0.0001). The 6/12-week AS response rate was 44.4% for tenapanor vs 32.4% for placebo ( P < 0.0001), and for 9/12-week AS, 30.6% for tenapanor vs 20.5% for placebo ( P < 0.0001). A significant association between weekly CSBM status and weekly AS response status was observed each week ( P < 0.0001), with a greater proportion achieving an AS reduction in patients with >0 CSBMs in a week. DISCUSSION: Tenapanor significantly reduced abdominal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, particularly pain, discomfort, and bloating measured by AS, compared with placebo.

Long-term safety of tenapanor in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation in the T3MPO-3 study.

BACKGROUND: Tenapanor, a first-in-class, minimally systemic inhibitor of intestinal sodium/hydrogen exchanger isoform 3 (NHE3), is approved for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) in adults based on two randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III studies (T3MPO-1 [NCT02621892], T3MPO-2 [NCT02686138]). The open-label T3MPO-3 extension study (NCT02727751) enrolled patients who completed these studies to investigate long-term safety and tolerability of tenapanor. METHODS: Patients who completed T3MPO-1 (16 weeks) or T3MPO-2 (26 weeks) were eligible for enrollment in T3MPO-3. Patients in T3MPO-3 received open-label tenapanor 50 mg twice a day for up to an additional 39 (T3MPO-1) or 26 (T3MPO-2) weeks. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated in the entire T3MPO-3 safety population and in patients who received a total of ≥52 weeks of tenapanor. KEY RESULTS: A total of 312 patients were enrolled in T3MPO-3; 90 received ≥52 weeks of tenapanor. TEAEs were reported in 117 (37.5%) patients in the safety population and in 52 (57.8%) patients who received ≥52 weeks of tenapanor. Diarrhea was the most common TEAE, occurring in 10.6% of the safety population and in 11.1% of patients who received ≥52 weeks of tenapanor. Most cases were mild or moderate in severity, with only two severe cases reported in the safety population. No deaths occurred during the T3MPO-3 study. CONCLUSIONS: Tenapanor was tolerable over ≥52 weeks of treatment and showed similar safety to that seen in shorter studies. Combined results of the T3MPO studies indicate that tenapanor is a valuable new treatment option for patients with IBS-C.

A Randomized Trial of Tenapanor and Phosphate Binders as a Dual-Mechanism Treatment for Hyperphosphatemia in Patients on Maintenance Dialysis (AMPLIFY).

BACKGROUND: Hyperphosphatemia is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients receiving maintenance dialysis. It is unknown whether combining two therapies with different mechanisms of action-tenapanor, an inhibitor of paracellular phosphate absorption, and phosphate binders-is safe and effective for the management of hyperphosphatemia in patients receiving maintenance dialysis. METHODS: This double-blind phase 3 trial enrolled 236 patients undergoing maintenance dialysis with hyperphosphatemia (defined in this trial as serum phosphorus 5.5-10 mg/dl inclusive) despite receiving phosphate binder therapy (sevelamer, nonsevelamer, sevelamer plus nonsevelamer, or multiple nonsevelamer binders). These participants were randomly assigned to receive oral tenapanor 30 mg twice daily or placebo for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the change in serum phosphorus concentration from baseline to week 4. RESULTS: Of the 236 randomized patients, 235 (99.6%) were included in the full analysis set; this included 116 in the tenapanor plus binder group and 119 in the placebo plus binder group. A total of 228 patients (96.6%) completed the 4-week treatment period. In the full analysis set (mean age 54.5 years, 40.9% women), patients treated with tenapanor plus binder achieved a larger mean change in serum phosphorus concentration from baseline to week 4 compared with placebo plus binder (-0.84 versus -0.19 mg/dl, P<0.001). Diarrhea was the most commonly reported adverse event, resulting in study drug discontinuation in four of 119 (3.4%) and two of 116 (1.7%) patients receiving tenapanor plus binder or placebo plus binder, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A dual-mechanism treatment using both tenapanor and phosphate binders improved control of hyperphosphatemia in patients undergoing maintenance dialysis compared with phosphate binders alone. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: AMPLIFY, NCT03824587.

Safety and Efficacy of Tenapanor for Long-term Serum Phosphate Control in Maintenance Dialysis: A 52-Week Randomized Phase 3 Trial (PHREEDOM).

Background: Treating hyperphosphatemia is a tenet of dialysis care. This trial assessed the safety and efficacy of tenapanor for the management of hyperphosphatemia. Methods: In this 52-week phase 3 study (NCT03427125), participants receiving maintenance dialysis with both hyperphosphatemia (serum phosphate 6.0-10.0 mg/dl) and a 1.5 mg/dl increase after phosphate binder washout were randomized (3:1) to tenapanor 30 mg twice daily for 26 weeks (randomized treatment period) or sevelamer carbonate (52-week safety control). Participants completing 26 weeks of treatment with tenapanor were rerandomized (1:1) to tenapanor or placebo for 12 weeks (randomized withdrawal period), and were eligible to enter the 14-week safety extension period. With input from the US Food and Drug Administration, the primary efficacy end point was the difference in the change in serum phosphate from the end of the randomized treatment period to the end of the randomized withdrawal period, among participants who achieved ≥1.2 mg/dl decrease in serum phosphate during the randomized treatment period (efficacy analysis set). Efficacy was also evaluated in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis set. Results: Of 564 eligible participants randomized to receive tenapanor (n=423) or sevelamer carbonate (n=141) during the randomized treatment period, 255 (60%) in the tenapanor group subsequently were rerandomized to tenapanor (n=128) or placebo (n=127) during the randomized withdrawal period. In the efficacy analysis set (n=131), the difference in estimated mean change in serum phosphate level between tenapanor and placebo from the beginning to the end of the randomized withdrawal period was -1.4 mg/dl (P<0.0001); in the ITT analysis set (n=243), the estimated mean difference was -0.7 mg/dl (P=0.002). Loosened stools were the most frequently reported adverse event (53% during the randomized treatment period). Serious adverse events were reported more frequently for participants treated with sevelamer carbonate (16%-23% across the three study periods) compared with tenapanor (11%-17%). Conclusions: Tenapanor reduced serum phosphate concentrations and maintained control of serum phosphate in participants receiving maintenance dialysis, with an acceptable safety and tolerability profile.

Efficacy of Tenapanor in Treating Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation: A 26-Week, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial (T3MPO-2).

INTRODUCTION: Tenapanor is a first-in-class, minimally absorbed, small-molecule inhibitor of the gastrointestinal sodium/hydrogen exchanger isoform 3. This phase 3 trial assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of tenapanor 50 mg b.i.d. for the treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C). METHODS: In this randomized double-blind study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02686138), patients with IBS-C received tenapanor 50 mg b.i.d. or placebo b.i.d. for 26 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who had a reduction of ≥30.0% in average weekly worst abdominal pain and an increase of ≥1 weekly complete spontaneous bowel movement from baseline, both in the same week, for ≥6 of the first 12 treatment weeks (6/12-week combined responder). RESULTS: Of the 620 randomized patients with IBS-C, 593 (95.6%) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis set (tenapanor: n = 293; placebo: n = 300) and 481 patients (77.6%) completed the 26-week treatment period. In the intention-to-treat analysis set (mean age: 45.4 years; 82.1% women), a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with tenapanor were 6/12-week combined responders than those treated with placebo (36.5% vs 23.7%; P < 0.001). Abdominal symptoms and global symptoms of IBS were significantly improved with tenapanor compared with placebo. Diarrhea, the most common adverse event, was typically transient and mild to moderate in severity. Diarrhea led to study drug discontinuation for 19 (6.5%) and 2 patients (0.7%) receiving tenapanor and placebo, respectively. DISCUSSION: Tenapanor 50 mg b.i.d. improved IBS-C symptoms over 26 weeks and was generally well tolerated, offering a potential new long-term treatment option for patients with IBS-C (see Visual abstract, Supplementary Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/AJG/B797).

Combination treatment with tenapanor and sevelamer synergistically reduces urinary phosphorus excretion in rats.

The majority of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) receiving dialysis do not achieve target serum phosphorus concentrations, despite treatment with phosphate binders. Tenapanor is a nonbinder, sodium/hydrogen exchanger isoform 3 (NHE3) inhibitor that reduces paracellular intestinal phosphate absorption. This preclinical study evaluated the effect of tenapanor and varying doses of sevelamer carbonate on urinary phosphorus excretion, a direct reflection of intestinal phosphate absorption. We measured 24-h urinary phosphorus excretion in male rats assigned to groups dosed orally with vehicle or tenapanor (0.3 mg/kg/day) and provided a diet containing varying amounts of sevelamer [0-3% (wt/wt)]. We also evaluated the effect of the addition of tenapanor or vehicle on 24-h urinary phosphorus excretion to rats on a stable dose of sevelamer [1.5% (wt/wt)]. When administered together, tenapanor and sevelamer decreased urinary phosphorus excretion significantly more than either tenapanor or sevelamer alone across all sevelamer dose levels. The Bliss statistical model of independence indicated that the combination was synergistic. A stable sevelamer dose [1.5% (wt/wt)] reduced mean ± SE urinary phosphorus excretion by 42 ± 3% compared with vehicle; together, tenapanor and sevelamer reduced residual urinary phosphorus excretion by an additional 37 ± 6% (P < 0.05). Although both tenapanor and sevelamer reduce intestinal phosphate absorption individually, administration of tenapanor and sevelamer together results in more pronounced reductions in intestinal phosphate absorption than if either agent is administered alone. Further evaluation of combination tenapanor plus phosphate binder treatment in patients receiving dialysis with hyperphosphatemia is warranted.

Efficacy of Tenapanor in Treating Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation: A 12-Week, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trial (T3MPO-1).

OBJECTIVES: Tenapanor is a first-in-class, minimally absorbed, small-molecule inhibitor of the gastrointestinal sodium/hydrogen exchanger isoform 3. This phase 3 trial assessed the efficacy and safety of tenapanor 50 mg b.i.d. for the treatment of patients with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C). METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02621892), patients with IBS-C were randomized to tenapanor 50 mg b.i.d. or placebo b.i.d. for 12 weeks followed by a 4-week randomized withdrawal period. The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients who reported a reduction in average weekly worst abdominal pain of ≥30.0% and an increase of ≥1 complete spontaneous bowel movement from baseline, both in the same week, for ≥6 weeks of the 12-week treatment period. RESULTS: Of the 629 randomized patients with IBS-C, 606 (96.3%) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis set (tenapanor: n = 307; placebo: n = 299) and 533 (84.7%) completed the 12-week treatment period. In the intention-to-treat analysis set (mean age 45 years, 81.4% women), a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with tenapanor met the primary endpoint than patients treated with placebo (27.0% vs 18.7%, P = 0.020). Abdominal symptoms and global symptoms of IBS also improved with tenapanor (P < 0.05 vs placebo). Diarrhea was the most commonly reported adverse event, resulting in study drug discontinuation in 6.5% and 0.7% of patients receiving tenapanor and placebo, respectively, during the 12-week treatment period. DISCUSSION: Tenapanor 50 mg b.i.d. improved IBS-C symptoms and was generally well tolerated, offering a potential new treatment option for patients with IBS-C.

Efficacy and Safety of Tenapanor in Patients with Hyperphosphatemia Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Randomized Phase 3 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend reducing elevated serum phosphate in patients with CKD. Tenapanor, a minimally absorbed inhibitor of gastrointestinal sodium/hydrogen exchanger 3 (NHE3), reduces paracellular phosphate transport. METHODS: In this phase 3 randomized, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned patients with hyperphosphatemia receiving maintenance hemodialysis to receive twice-daily oral tenapanor (3, 10, or 30 mg [the latter down-titrated, if needed]) for 8 weeks. Patients were then rerandomized 1:1 to receive either their previously assigned dose or placebo for a 4-week 'withdrawal' period. We measured serum phosphate levels over the course of the trial. The primary end point was mean change in serum phosphate over the 4-week withdrawal period for the tenapanor group (using pooled data) versus the placebo group. RESULTS: Of 219 patients randomized, 152 completed both study phases. During the initial 8-week treatment period, all three treatment groups experienced significant decreases in mean serum phosphate (reductions of 1.00, 1.02, and 1.19 mg/dl, corresponding to the 3, 10, and 30 mg [down-titrated] dose groups, respectively). Tenapanor also showed a significant benefit over placebo during the withdrawal period, with a mean increase of 0.85 mg/dl in the placebo group versus a mean increase of 0.02 mg/dl in the pooled tenapanor group. Adverse events were largely limited to softened stool and a modest increase in bowel movement frequency, resulting from increased stool sodium and water content, stemming from tenapanor's mechanism of action. CONCLUSIONS: Tenapanor significantly reduced elevated serum phosphate in patients with hyperphosphatemia receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Adverse effects were limited to those induced by its known mechanism of action, which increases stool sodium and water content.

The effects of tenapanor on serum fibroblast growth factor 23 in patients receiving hemodialysis with hyperphosphatemia.

Background: Elevated serum fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) is strongly associated with cardiovascular risk and mortality. Tenapanor, an inhibitor of gastrointestinal sodium/hydrogen exchanger isoform 3, decreased serum phosphate in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02081534) of patients receiving hemodialysis with hyperphosphatemia. Here, we report a secondary analysis of effects on serum FGF23 during that study. Methods: After 1-3 weeks of washout of phosphate binders, 162 patients were randomized to receive 4 weeks of treatment with placebo or one of six tenapanor regimens (3 or 30 mg once daily, or 1, 3, 10 or 30 mg twice daily). Intact FGF23 concentrations were determined from serum samples collected at screening, post-washout and end of treatment, assayed in duplicate in a single batch at the end of the study. Results: After phosphate-binder washout, serum FGF23 concentrations increased in all groups [range of geometric means: 1430-2605 pg/mL before, to 2601-6294 pg/mL after washout (P < 0.001 for all patients analyzed as a single group)]. Serum FGF23 concentrations subsequently decreased in tenapanor-treated patients (2030-3563 pg/mL), whereas they increased further in placebo-treated patients (6930 pg/mL). In an analysis of covariance, FGF23 decreased by 9.1-27.9% in tenapanor-treated patients and increased by 21.9% in placebo-treated patients (P ≤ 0.001-0.04). Conclusions: Following a marked increase in serum FGF23 in response to withdrawal of phosphate binders, tenapanor significantly decreased serum FGF23 in patients receiving hemodialysis with hyperphosphatemia. Further studies are required to explore the long-term effects of controlling FGF23 with tenapanor.

Inhibition of sodium/hydrogen exchanger 3 in the gastrointestinal tract by tenapanor reduces paracellular phosphate permeability.

Hyperphosphatemia is common in patients with chronic kidney disease and is increasingly associated with poor clinical outcomes. Current management of hyperphosphatemia with dietary restriction and oral phosphate binders often proves inadequate. Tenapanor, a minimally absorbed, small-molecule inhibitor of the sodium/hydrogen exchanger isoform 3 (NHE3), acts locally in the gastrointestinal tract to inhibit sodium absorption. Because tenapanor also reduces intestinal phosphate absorption, it may have potential as a therapy for hyperphosphatemia. We investigated the mechanism by which tenapanor reduces gastrointestinal phosphate uptake, using in vivo studies in rodents and translational experiments on human small intestinal stem cell-derived enteroid monolayers to model ion transport physiology. We found that tenapanor produces its effect by modulating tight junctions, which increases transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and reduces permeability to phosphate, reducing paracellular phosphate absorption. NHE3-deficient monolayers mimicked the phosphate phenotype of tenapanor treatment, and tenapanor did not affect TEER or phosphate flux in the absence of NHE3. Tenapanor also prevents active transcellular phosphate absorption compensation by decreasing the expression of NaPi2b, the major active intestinal phosphate transporter. In healthy human volunteers, tenapanor (15 mg, given twice daily for 4 days) increased stool phosphorus and decreased urinary phosphorus excretion. We determined that tenapanor reduces intestinal phosphate absorption predominantly through reduction of passive paracellular phosphate flux, an effect mediated exclusively via on-target NHE3 inhibition.

An Evaluation of the Pharmacodynamics, Safety, and Tolerability of the Potassium Binder RDX7675.

Hyperkalemia is common in patients with heart failure or chronic kidney disease, particularly those taking renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, and can cause arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The most widely used treatment, sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS), limits gastrointestinal potassium absorption, but has poor palatability. RDX7675 (RDX227675) is the calcium salt of a reengineered polystyrene sulfonate-based resin with improved palatability over SPS. The pharmacodynamic effects and safety of RDX7675 were assessed in a phase 1, single-center, randomized, active-controlled study. Healthy volunteers received nominal active doses of RDX7675 4.6 g twice a day (BID), 4.6 g 3 times a day (TID), 6.9 g BID, 13.7 g daily (QD), 9.2 g TID, or 13.7 g BID (n = 12 each), or equivalent doses of SPS (n = 3 each), for 4 days. RDX7675 dosing increased stool potassium excretion and decreased urinary potassium excretion from baseline. Stool potassium excretion increased by up to 1481 mg/day with RDX7675 (6.9 g BID), and urinary potassium excretion decreased by up to 939 mg/day (13.7 g BID). Similar levels of potassium excretion were observed using QD, BID, or TID dosing of a 13.7 g total daily RDX7675 dose. Few adverse events were reported. In conclusion, repeated oral dosing with RDX7675 over 4 days reduced potassium absorption in healthy volunteers; the results support QD dosing of RDX7675 in future clinical studies.

Pharmacodynamics, Safety, and Tolerability of the NHE3 Inhibitor Tenapanor: Two Trials in Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Tenapanor, a small molecule with minimal systemic availability, is a first-in-class sodium/hydrogen exchanger 3 (NHE3) inhibitor that acts in the gut. Here, we evaluate the pharmacodynamics and safety of tenapanor in healthy adults. METHODS: Two phase I, single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were performed. The first study assessed single-ascending oral tenapanor doses of 10, 50, 150, 450, and 900 mg (n = 8 per group; six tenapanor, two placebo) and multiple ascending doses over 7 days of 3, 10, 30, and 100 mg q.d. (n = 10 per group; eight tenapanor, two placebo). In the second study, different tenapanor regimens were evaluated over 7 days (n = 15 per group; 12 tenapanor, three placebo): 15 mg twice daily (b.i.d.), 30 mg once daily (q.d.), 30 mg b.i.d., 30 mg three times daily (t.i.d.), 60 mg b.i.d., escalating b.i.d. dose (daily total 30-90 mg), 30 mg b.i.d. with psyllium. RESULTS: Tenapanor produced generally dose-dependent increases in stool sodium excretion and decreases in urinary sodium excretion versus placebo; in addition, twice-daily dosing appeared to have a greater effect on sodium absorption than once-daily dosing with an equivalent daily dose. Tenapanor softened stool consistency and increased stool frequency and weight from baseline versus placebo. Tenapanor concentrations were below the quantification limit (0.5 ng/ml) in 98.5% of 895 plasma samples. Adverse events were mild or moderate in severity, and were typically gastrointestinal in nature. There were no clinically relevant changes in serum electrolytes. CONCLUSIONS: Tenapanor was well tolerated and resulted in reduced intestinal sodium absorption and softer stool consistency versus placebo. Systemic exposure to tenapanor was minimal. These results support potential use of tenapanor in patients who could benefit from modification of gastrointestinal sodium balance. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIERS: NCT02819687, NCT02796131.