Undertreatment of opioid use disorder in patients hospitalized with injection drug use-associated infections.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) initiation and addiction consultation and outcomes for patients hospitalized with infectious complications of injecting opioids. METHOD: This was a retrospective cohort study performed at four academic medical centers in the United States. The participants were patients who had been hospitalized with infectious complications of injecting opioids in 2018. Three hundred and twenty-two patients were included and their individual patient records were manually reviewed to identify inpatient receipt of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD), initiation of MOUD, and addiction consultation. The main outcomes of interest were premature discharge, MOUD on discharge, linkage to outpatient MOUD, one-year readmission and death. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-two patients were predominately male (59%), white (66%), and median age 38 years, with 36% unstably housed, and 30% uninsured. One hundred and forty-five (45%) patients received MOUD during hospitalization, including only 65 (28%) patients not on baseline MOUD. Discharge was premature for 64 (20%) patients. In the year following discharge, 27 (9%) patients were linked to MOUD, and 159 (50%) patients had at least one readmission. Being on MOUD during hospitalization was significantly associated with higher odds of planned discharge [odds ratio (OR) 3.87, P  < 0.0001], MOUD on discharge (OR 129.7, P  < 0.0001), and linkage to outpatient MOUD (OR 1.25, P  < 0.0001), however, was not associated with readmission. Study limitations were the retrospective nature of the study, so post-discharge data are likely underestimated. CONCLUSION: There was dramatic undertreatment with MOUD from inpatient admission to outpatient linkage, and high rates of premature discharge and readmission. Engagement in addiction care during hospitalization is a critical first step in improving the care continuum for individuals with opioid use disorder; however, additional interventions may be needed to impact long-term outcomes like readmission.

Use of nonstigmatizing language is associated with improved outcomes in hospitalized people who inject drugs.

BACKGROUND: Stigma surrounding opioid use disorder (OUD) is a barrier to treatment. The use of stigmatizing language may be evidence of negative views toward patients. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify associations between language and clinical outcomes in patients admitted for infectious complications of OUD. DESIGNS: We performed a retrospective medical record review. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Four U.S. academic health systems. Participants were patients with OUD admitted for infectious complications of injection opioid use from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2018, identified through international classification of diseases, 10th revision codes consistent with OUD and acute bacterial/fungal infection. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Discharge summaries were reviewed for language, specifically: abuse, addiction, dependence, misuse, use disorder, intravenous drug use, and others. Binary outcomes including medication for OUD, planned discharge, naloxone provision, and an OUD treatment plan were evaluated using logistic regressions and admission duration was evaluated using Gamma regression. RESULTS: A total of 1285 records were reviewed and 328 met inclusion criteria. Of those, 191 (58%) were male, with a median age of 38 years. The most common term was "abuse" (219, 67%), whereas "use disorder" was recorded in 75 (23%) records. Having "use disorder" in the discharge summary was associated with increased odds of having a documented plan for ongoing OUD treatment (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 4.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.89-8.93) and having a documented plan for addiction-specific follow-up care (AOR: 2.31, 95% CI: 1.30-4.09). CONCLUSIONS: Stigmatizing language was common in this study of patients hospitalized for infectious complications of OUD. Best-practice language was uncommon, but when used was associated with increased odds of addiction treatment and specialty care referrals.

PrEP Indications and PrEP Knowledge, Access, and Interest Among Individuals With HCV.

Background: Individuals with hepatitis C (HCV) represent a population that may benefit from pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), given the overlapping risk factors and transmission networks of HCV and HIV. This analysis assesses the prevalence of PrEP indications among individuals with HCV monoinfection and PrEP awareness, interest, and access in this population. Methods: GRAVITY was an observational study for the collection of epidemiologic data from individuals with HCV and/or HIV in Washington DC and Baltimore, with the present analysis limited to HCV-monoinfected patients. The prevalence of PrEP indications was determined using epidemiologic survey responses. Bivariate and multivariable analyses assessed for associations between PrEP indications and PrEP awareness, access, and interest. Results: Among 314 HCV-monoinfected participants, 109 (35%) had an indication for PrEP. Forty-eight (44%) had a drug use indication alone, 40 (37%) had a sexual indication alone, and 21 (19%) had both drug use and sexual indications. Eighty-five (27%) participants had heard of PrEP, 32 (10%) had been offered PrEP by a provider, 114 (38%) were interested or maybe interested in PrEP, and 6 (2%) were currently taking PrEP. On bivariate analysis, PrEP awareness was significantly associated with study site (P < .0001), race (P = .0003), age (P < .0001), and sexual PrEP indication (P = .04). However, only study site remained significant (P = .0002) on regression analysis. Conclusions: Though indications for PrEP were prevalent among individuals with HCV in this cohort, most patients were unaware of PrEP, had never been offered PrEP, and were not using PrEP. These data support the need for improved PrEP implementation among people with HCV.

Initiation of Low-threshold Buprenorphine in Nontreatment Seeking Patients With Opioid Use Disorder Engaged in Hepatitis C Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: The ANCHOR program offered buprenorphine treatment to people who inject drugs engaged in hepatitis C (HCV) treatment at a Washington, DC harm reduction organization. This analysis describes the program model and outcomes of the opioid care continuum at 1 year. METHODS: Primary outcomes were initiation of buprenorphine and retention in care, defined by an active buprenorphine prescription at given time points. Secondary outcomes included treatment interruptions, reasons for treatment noninitiation and termination, buprenorphine and opiate use, and HIV risk behaviors. Buprenorphine and opiate use were measured by urine toxicology screens and HIV risk behavior was quantified using a validated survey. RESULTS: Of 67 patients receiving HCV treatment not on opioid agonist therapy at baseline, 96% (n = 64) were interested and 73% (n = 49) initiated buprenorphine. Retention was 82% (n = 40), 65% (n = 32), and 59% (n = 29) at months 1, 6, and 12, respectively. Retention at 12 months was associated with self-reported engagement in routine medical care (P < 0.01), but was not associated with gender, stable housing, past opioid agonist therapy, or past overdose. Among retained patients, urine screens positive for opioids were 73% (n = 29), 56% (n = 18), and 79% (n = 23) at months 1, 6, and 12. There was a significant mean decrease in HIV risk-taking behavior scores over the treatment period, primarily driven by reduced injection frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Patients engaged in HCV treatment at a harm reduction organization showed a high rate of initiation of buprenorphine treatment, with retention comparable to other treatment settings. Although most patients continued using opioids on treatment, there was a reduced frequency of injection drug use, a significant driver of OUD-related risk. These data support the use of low-threshold buprenorphine access alongside HCV treatment to reduce morbidity and mortality in people with OUD.

Concurrent Initiation of Hepatitis C and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment in People Who Inject Drugs.

BACKGROUND: People who inject drugs have a high prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and significant disease associated with drug use; however, HCV treatment often occurs in absence of interventions to address opioid use disorder and drug use-related harms. The impact of concurrent initiation of opioid agonist therapy (OAT) on HCV treatment and drug use outcomes is unknown. METHODS: In this prospective, open-label, observational trial at a harm reduction organization's drop-in center in Washington, DC, 100 patients with chronic HCV infection, opioid use disorder, and ongoing injection drug use were treated with sofosbuvir-velpatasvir for 12-weeks and offered buprenorphine initiation. The primary end point was sustained virologic response (SVR), and secondary end points included uptake of and retention in OAT, change in risk behavior, and determinants of SVR. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients (82%) achieved SVR, which was not associated with baseline OAT status (P = .33), on-treatment drug use (P >.99), or imperfect daily adherence (P = .35) but was significantly associated with completing 2 or more 28-pill bottles of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir (P < .001) and receiving OAT at week 24 (P = .01). Of 67 patients not already receiving OAT at baseline, 53 (79%) started OAT. At week 24, 68 (68%) patients were receiving OAT. Receipt of OAT was associated with fewer opiate-positive urine drug screens (P = .003), lower human immunodeficiency virus risk-taking behavior scores (P < .001), and lower rates of opioid overdose (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: The Novel Model of Hepatitis C Treatment as an Anchor to Prevent HIV, Initiate Opioid Agonist Therapy, and Reduce Risky Behavior study demonstrates high uptake of buprenorphine collocated with HCV treatment, and it shows that concurrent initiation of OAT with HCV treatment can result in high rates of SVR while reducing risks associated with drug use. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03221309.

High Morbidity and Mortality Among Patients With Sentinel Admission for Injection Drug Use-Related Infective Endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations for individuals with injection drug use-related infective endocarditis (IDU-IE) represent an increasing portion of all patients with endocarditis. This study describes the evolving trends in demographics, clinical characteristics, rates of surgical intervention, and mortality among patients hospitalized with IE, comparing those with and without injection drug use. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted between January 1, 2007 to June 30, 2015 at a tertiary care center in Boston, Massachusetts. Endocarditis was defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code and verified by the modified Duke Criteria for IE. The clinical characteristics, microbiology, site of infection, complications of IE, and outcome were all abstracted by chart review. Rates of surgical consultation and surgical intervention within 90 days of admission were obtained, and assessment of surgical risk calculated was by EuroSCORE II (euroscore.org/calc). Subsequent hospitalizations for all causes were also reviewed. RESULTS: Injection drug use-related infective endocarditis occurred in younger patients with lower rates of diabetes, renal dysfunction, and prior cardiothoracic (CT) surgery than those without IDU. Injection drug use-related infective endocarditis was associated with higher rates of complications, CT surgery consultation, and surgery within 90 days for absolute surgical indication. Readmissions for endocarditis occurred in 20% of IDU-IE patients and 9% of those with non-IDU IE. All-cause 1-year mortality rates were similar (IDU-IE 16%, non-IDU IE 13%; P = .58). CONCLUSIONS: Despite younger age, fewer medical comorbidities, and fewer prior cardiac surgeries, all-cause 1-year mortality was similar for patients after sentinel admission for IDU-IE compared with non-IDU IE. Interventions in the acute hospital setting and after discharge are needed to support patients with IDU-IE, focusing on harm reduction and treatment of addiction to reduce the unexpectedly high mortality of this young population.

Inpatient Management of Opioid Use Disorder: A Review for Hospitalists.

The United States is experiencing an epidemic of nonmedical opioid use and opioid overdose-related deaths. As a result, there have been a number of public health interventions aimed at addressing this epidemic. However, these interventions fail to address care of individuals with opioid use disorder during hospitalizations and, therefore, miss a key opportunity for intervention. The role of hospitalists in managing hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder is not established. In this review, we discuss the inpatient management of individuals with opioid use disorder, including the treatment of withdrawal, benefits of medication-assisted treatment, and application of harm-reduction strategies. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2017;12:369-374.

Clinical Laboratory Testing in the Era of Directly Acting Antiviral Therapies for Hepatitis C.

Directly acting antiviral (DAA) combination therapies for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are highly effective, but treatment decisions remain complex. Laboratory testing is important to evaluate a range of viral, host, and pharmacological factors when considering HCV treatment, and patients must be monitored during and after therapy for safety and to assess the viral response. In this review, we discuss the laboratory tests relevant for the treatment of HCV infection in the era of DAA therapy, grouped according to viral and host factors.

Price and affordability of direct-acting antiviral regimens for hepatitis C virus in the United States.

Hepatitis C virus is a serious infection causing cirrhosis, liver cancer, and death. The recent development of direct-acting antivirals has dramatically improved tolerability of treatment and rates of cure. However, the high price of these medications has often limited access to care and resulted in rationing of medications in the United States to those with advanced liver disease, access to specialist care, and without active substance use. This review assesses the way pharmaceutical prices are established and how pricing of directly acting antiviral regimens in the United States has impacted access to treatment for hepatitis C virus.

Sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for HIV/HCV co-infected patients.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a chronic infection that disproportionately impacts people living with HIV. In the past, HCV therapy was less effective in individuals with HIV co-infection. However, the advent of direct-acting antivirals has revolutionized HCV treatment with high rates of success in patients both with and without HIV. AREAS COVERED: In this paper, we review the evidence supporting the use of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) for the treatment of HCV in patients with HIV co-infection. Articles searchable on MEDLINE/PubMed were reviewed to provide context for use of LDV/SOF in individuals with HCV and HIV co-infection. EXPERT OPINION: This treatment is highly effective in achieving HCV cure or sustained virologic response, however further studies need to done to address efficacy of treatment in people with uncontrolled HIV, concerns regarding drug-interactions with antiretroviral therapy, and potential for shorter duration treatment.

Suboptimal Addiction Interventions for Patients Hospitalized with Injection Drug Use-Associated Infective Endocarditis.

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis is a serious infection, often resulting from injection drug use. Inpatient treatment regularly focuses on management of infection without attention to the underlying addiction. We aimed to determine the addiction interventions done in patients hospitalized with injection drug use-associated infective endocarditis. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients hospitalized with injection drug use-associated infective endocarditis from January, 2004 through August, 2014 at a large academic tertiary care center in Boston, Massachusetts. For the initial and subsequent admissions, data were collected regarding addiction interventions, including consultation by social work, addiction clinical nurse and psychiatry, documentation of addiction in the discharge summary plan, plan for medication-assisted treatment and naloxone provision. RESULTS: There were 102 patients admitted with injection drug use-associated infective endocarditis, 50 patients (49.0%) were readmitted and 28 (27.5%) patients had ongoing injection drug use at readmission. At initial admission, 86.4% of patients had social work consultation, 23.7% had addiction consultation, and 24.0% had psychiatry consultation. Addiction was mentioned in 55.9% of discharge summary plans, 7.8% of patients had a plan for medication-assisted treatment, and naloxone was never prescribed. Of 102 patients, 26 (25.5%) are deceased. The median age at death was 40.9 years (interquartile range 28.7-48.7). CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients hospitalized with injection drug use-associated infective endocarditis had high rates of readmission, recurrent infective endocarditis and death. Despite this, addiction interventions were suboptimal. Improved addiction interventions are imperative in the treatment of injection drug use-associated infective endocarditis.

Pulmonary zygomycosis in a non-neutropenic patient with myelodysplastic syndrome on lenalidomide.

Pulmonary zygomycosis is an uncommon infection that occurs mostly in immunocompromised patients. We report the case of a 75-year-old man with myelodysplastic syndrome, treated with lenalidomide for 3 months, who developed respiratory failure and a rapidly progressive left upper lobe consolidation. An extensive workup was unrevealing of the etiology, and the patient expired. A full autopsy was declined, but an in situ post-mortem transbronchial lung biopsy revealed pulmonary zygomycosis. This unique case illustrates the potential risks of lenalidomide therapy in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and the difficulties in diagnosing pulmonary zygomycosis. To our knowledge this is the first report of a diagnostic in situ post-mortem transbronchial lung biopsy.