A comparative analysis of tranexamic acid dosing strategies in traumatic major hemorrhage.

INTRODUCTION: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a life-saving treatment for traumatic hemorrhage, but the optimal dosing regimen remains unknown. Different doses and treatment strategies have been proposed, including single bolus, repeated bolus, or bolus plus infusion. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of different TXA dosing strategies on clinical outcomes in bleeding trauma patients. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a perpetual cohort study from a UK Level I trauma center. Adult patients who activated the local major hemorrhage protocol and received TXA were included. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were 24-hour mortality, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, venous thromboembolism, and rotational thromboelastometry fibrinolysis. RESULTS: Over an 11-year period, 525 patients were included. Three dosing groups were identified: 1 g bolus only (n = 317), 1 g bolus +1 g infusion over 8 hours (n = 80), and 2 g bolus (n = 128). Demographics and admission physiology were similar, but there were differences in injury severity (median Injury Severity Score, 25, 29, and 25); and admission systolic blood pressure (median Systolic Blood Pressure, 99, 108, 99 mm Hg) across the 1-g, 1 g + 1 g, and 2-g groups. 28-day mortality was 21% in each treatment group. The incidence of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome was significantly higher in the bolus plus infusion group (84%) vs. 1 g bolus (64%) and 2 g bolus (62%) group, p = 0.002, but on multivariable analysis was nonsignificant. Venous thromboembolism rates were similar in the 1-g bolus (4%), 2 g bolus (8%) and bolus plus infusion groups (7%). There was no difference in rotational thromboelastometry maximum lysis at 24 hours: 5% in both the 1-g and 2-g bolus groups vs. 4% in bolus plus infusion group. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes and 24-hour fibrinolysis state were equivalent across three different dosing strategies of TXA. Single bolus administration is likely preferable to a bolus plus infusion regimen. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Immature platelet dynamics are associated with clinical outcomes after major trauma.

BACKGROUND: Major trauma results in dramatic changes in platelet behavior. Newly formed platelets are more reactive than older platelets, but their contributions to hemostasis and thrombosis after severe injury have not been previously evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To determine how immature platelet metrics and plasma thrombopoietin relate to clinical outcomes after major injury. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study was performed in adult trauma patients. Platelet counts and the immature platelet fraction (IPF) were measured at admission and 24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days after injury. Thromboelastometry was performed at admission. Plasma thrombopoietin, c-Mpl, and GPIbα were quantified in a separate cohort. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes were venous thromboembolic events and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). RESULTS: On admission, immature platelet counts (IPCs) were significantly lower in nonsurvivors (n = 40) than in survivors (n = 236; 7.3 × 109/L vs 10.6 × 109/L; P = .009), but IPF did not differ. Similarly, impaired platelet function on thromboelastometry was associated with lower admission IPC (9.1 × 109/L vs 11.9 × 109/L; P < .001). However, at later time points, we observed significantly higher IPF and IPC in patients who developed venous thromboembolism (21.0 × 109/L vs 11.1 × 109/L; P = .02) and prolonged MODS (20.9 × 109/L vs 11 × 109/L; P = .003) than in those who did not develop complications. Plasma thrombopoietin levels at admission were significantly lower in nonsurvivors (P < .001), in patients with MODS (P < .001), and in those who developed venous thromboembolism (P = .04). CONCLUSION: Lower levels of immature platelets in the acute phase after major injury are associated with increased mortality, whereas higher immature platelet levels at later time points may predispose to thrombosis and MODS.

Nationwide analysis of prehospital tranexamic acid for trauma demonstrates systematic bias in adherence to treatment guidelines: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Prehospital (PH) tranexamic acid (TXA) improves survival from trauma haemorrhage. Injury mechanism, physiology, and sex demographics vary with patient age. The authors hypothesised that these factors influence TXA guideline compliance and examined national trends in PH use to identify any systematic biases in bleeding management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The UK Trauma Audit and Research Network data for TXA eligible patients admitted to major trauma centres were divided into two cohorts: 2013-2015 ( n =32 072) and 2017-2019 ( n =14 974). Patients were stratified by PH, emergency department or no TXA use. Logistic regression models explored interaction between PH variables and TXA administration. Results are presented as odds ratios with a 95% CI. RESULTS: PH TXA use increased from 8% to 27% over time ( P <0.001). Only 3% of eligible patients who fell less than 2 m received PH TXA versus 63% with penetrating injuries ( P <0.001). Older patients eligible for PH TXA were less likely to receive it compared to younger patients [≥65 years old: 590 (13%) vs. <65 years old: 3361 (33%), P <0.001]. There was a significant interaction between age and sex with fewer older women receiving PH TXA. In shocked patients, one third of females compared to a fifth of men did not receive TXA ( P <0.001). There was a decrease in PH TXA use as age increased ( P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a threefold increase in use, treatment guidance for PH TXA is not universally applied. Older people, women, and patients with low energy injury mechanisms appear to be systematically under treated. Training and education for PH providers should address these potential treatment biases.

A new global fibrinolysis capacity assay for the sensitive detection of hyperfibrinolysis and hypofibrinogenemia in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Conventional clotting tests are not expeditious enough to allow timely targeted interventions in trauma, and current point-of-care analyzers, such as rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), have limited sensitivity for hyperfibrinolysis and hypofibrinogenemia. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of a recently developed global fibrinolysis capacity (GFC) assay in identifying fibrinolysis and hypofibrinogenemia in trauma patients. METHODS: Exploratory analysis of a prospective cohort of adult trauma patients admitted to a single UK major trauma center and of commercially available healthy donor samples was performed. Lysis time (LT) was measured in plasma according to the GFC manufacturer's protocol, and a novel fibrinogen-related parameter (percentage reduction in GFC optical density from baseline at 1 minute) was derived from the GFC curve. Hyperfibrinolysis was defined as a tissue factor-activated ROTEM maximum lysis of >15% or LT of ≤30 minutes. RESULTS: Compared to healthy donors (n = 19), non-tranexamic acid-treated trauma patients (n = 82) showed shortened LT, indicative of hyperfibrinolysis (29 minutes [16-35] vs 43 minutes [40-47]; p < .001). Of the 63 patients without overt ROTEM-hyperfibrinolysis, 31 (49%) had LT of ≤30 minutes, with 26% (8 of 31) of them requiring major transfusions. LT showed increased accuracy compared to maximum lysis in predicting 28-day mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.96 [0.92-1.00] vs 0.65 [0.49-0.81]; p = .001). Percentage reduction in GFC optical density from baseline at 1 minute showed comparable specificity (76% vs 79%) to ROTEM clot amplitude at 5 minutes from tissue factor-activated ROTEM with cytochalasin D in detecting hypofibrinogenemia but correctly reclassified >50% of the patients with false negative results, leading to higher sensitivity (90% vs 77%). CONCLUSION: Severe trauma patients are characterized by a hyperfibrinolytic profile upon admission to the emergency department. The GFC assay is more sensitive than ROTEM in capturing hyperfibrinolysis and hypofibrinogenemia but requires further development and automation.

Sonorheometry versus rotational thromboelastometry in trauma: a comparison of diagnostic and prognostic performance.

BACKGROUND: Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is used to rapidly identify trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) and direct targeted interventions in hemorrhaging trauma patients. A novel technology, Quantra System (HemoSonics), utilizes sonic estimation of elasticity via resonance sonorheometry, avoids mechanical clot interference, and may increase diagnostic accuracy, but there are limited data on bleeding in major trauma patients. OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of Quantra with that of ROTEM for rapid diagnosis of TIC and prediction of transfusion requirements and mortality. METHODS: Samples were collected from adult trauma patients enrolled in a perpetual cohort study upon admission to a single level 1 trauma center between 2020 and 2021. Samples were analyzed using Quantra, ROTEM, multiple electrode aggregometry, and conventional coagulation assays. RESULTS: Samples from 209 patients were analyzed. Correlations were strong between Quantra and ROTEM parameters (for all, p < .001): clot stiffness (CS) and tissue factor-activated ROTEM (EXTEM) clot amplitude at 5 minutes (A5) (r = 0.90); fibrinogen contribution to CS and tissue factor-activated ROTEM with cytochalasin D (FIBTEM) A5 (r = 0.85); and platelet contribution to CS and EXTEM-FIBTEM A5 (r = 0.73). Although CS showed higher discrimination than EXTEM A5 in detecting TIC (international normalized ratio, >1.2; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.83 vs 0.79; p = .038), the ability of fibrinogen contribution to CS to detect hypofibrinogenemia (a fibrinogen level of <2g/L) was good but lower than that of FIBTEM A5 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.79 vs 0.84; p = .027). There was no difference between Quantra and ROTEM in detecting a platelet count of <150 × 109/L, predicting rapid transfusion or mortality at 6 hours. CONCLUSION: Quantra and ROTEM have similar diagnostic performances in evaluating TIC and predicting clinically relevant outcomes. Larger studies are required to determine the utility of Quantra for goal-directed treatment of TIC.

Temporal Transitions in Fibrinolysis after Trauma: Adverse Outcome Is Principally Related to Late Hypofibrinolysis.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between late clinical outcomes after injury and early dynamic changes between fibrinolytic states is not fully understood. The authors hypothesized that temporal transitions in fibrinolysis states using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) would aid stratification of adverse late clinical outcomes and improve understanding of how tranexamic acid modulates the fibrinolytic response and impacts mortality. METHODS: The authors conducted a secondary analysis of previously collected data from trauma patients enrolled into an ongoing prospective cohort study (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number [ISRCTN] 12962642) at a major trauma center in the United Kingdom. ROTEM was performed on admission and at 24 h with patients retrospectively grouped into three fibrinolysis categories: tissue factor-activated ROTEM maximum lysis of less than 5% (low); tissue factor-activated ROTEM maximum lysis of 5 to 15% (normal); or tissue factor-activated ROTEM maximum lysis of more than 15% (high). Primary outcomes were multiorgan dysfunction syndrome and 28-day mortality. RESULTS: Seven-hundred thirty-one patients were included: 299 (41%) were treated with tranexamic acid and 432 (59%) were untreated. Two different cohorts with low-maximum lysis at 24 h were identified: (1) severe brain injury and (2) admission shock and hemorrhage. Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome was greatest in those with low-maximum lysis on admission and at 24 h, and late mortality was four times higher than in patients who remained normal during the first 24 h (7 of 42 [17%] vs. 9 of 223 [4%]; P = 0.029). Patients that transitioned to or remained in low-maximum lysis had increased odds of organ dysfunction (5.43 [95% CI, 1.43 to 20.61] and 4.85 [95% CI, 1.83 to 12.83], respectively). Tranexamic acid abolished ROTEM hyperfibrinolysis (high) on admission, increased the frequency of persistent low-maximum lysis (67 of 195 [34%]) vs. 8 of 79 [10%]; P = 0.002), and was associated with reduced early mortality (28 of 195 [14%] vs. 23 of 79 [29%]; P = 0.015). No increase in late deaths, regardless of fibrinolysis transition patterns, was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse late outcomes are more closely related to 24-h maximum lysis, irrespective of admission levels. Tranexamic acid alters early fibrinolysis transition patterns, but late mortality in patients with low-maximum lysis at 24 h is not increased.

Prehospital tranexamic acid shortens the interval to administration by half in Major Trauma Networks: a service evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces bleeding and mortality. Recent trials have demonstrated improved survival with shorter intervals to TXA administration. The aims of this service evaluation were to assess the interval from injury to TXA administration and describe the characteristics of patients who received TXA pre-hospital and in-hospital. METHODS: We reviewed Trauma and Audit Research Network records and local trauma registries to identify patients of any age that received TXA at all London Major Trauma Centres and Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, during 2017. We used the 2016 NICE Guidelines (NG39) which state that TXA should be given within 3 hours of injury. RESULTS: We identified 1018 patients who received TXA, of whom 661 (65%) had sufficient data to assess the time from injury to TXA administration. The median interval was 74 min (IQR: 47-116). 92% of patients received TXA within 3 hours from injury, and 59% within 1 hour. Half of the patients (54%) received prehospital TXA. The median time to TXA administration when given prehospital was 51 min (IQR: 39-72), and 112 min (IQR: 84-160) if given in-hospital (p<0.001). In-hospital TXA patients had less haemodynamic derangement and lower base deficit on admission compared with patients given prehospital TXA. CONCLUSION: Prehospital administration of TXA is associated with a shorter interval from injury to drug delivery. Identifying a proportion of patients at risk of haemorrhage remains a challenge. However, further reinforcement is needed to empower pre-hospital clinicians to administer TXA to trauma patients without overt signs of shock.