Determination of Traditional and Designer Benzodiazepines in Urine through LC-MS/MS.

BACKGROUND: The detection of new designer benzodiazepines in biological fluids and tissues, together with the traditional ones, could represent an important analytical update for laboratories performing clinical and forensic toxicological analysis. OBJECTIVE: A liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method (LC-MS/MS) has been developed, fully validated, and applied to a cohort of real urine samples collected from patients under withdrawal treatment and from intoxication cases. METHODS: 100 µL urines were added to a buffer solution containing deuterated internal standards; the samples were then extracted through a liquid/liquid procedure, dried under a nitrogen stream, and reconstituted in mobile phase. The chromatographic separation was performed in reverse phase through a C18 column with gradient elution. Mass spectrometry operated in positive polarization and multiple reaction monitoring mode. RESULTS: 25 molecules were optimized for instrumental analysis: 9 designer benzodiazepines and 16 traditional compounds (parent drugs and main metabolites). Sensitivity, specificity, linearity, accuracy, imprecision, recovery, matrix effects, and carry-over have been evaluated for all molecules. Only cinazepam did not satisfy all acceptance criteria for validation. 10 among the 50 analyzed samples tested positive for at least one of the monitored molecules. In particular, two different samples collected from the same case provided positive results for flubromazepam, a designer benzodiazepine. CONCLUSION: The method was proven to be useful in detecting not only traditional benzodiazepines but also new designer ones. The identification of a New Psychoactive Substance in real samples confirmed that analytical procedures should be updated to include as many substances as possible.

Comparison of Two Immunoassay Screening Methods and a LC-MS/MS in Detecting Traditional and Designer Benzodiazepines in Urine.

Sensitive and specific immunoassay screening methods for the detection of benzodiazepines in urine represent an important prerequisite for routine analysis in clinical and forensic toxicology. Moreover, emerging designer benzodiazepines force labs to keep their methodologies updated, in order to evaluate the reliability of the immunochemical techniques. This study aimed at evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of two different immunoassay methods for the detection of benzodiazepines in urine, through a comparison with the results obtained by a newly developed liquid chromatographic tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) procedure. A cohort of authentic urine samples (N = 501) were processed, before and after a hydrolysis procedure, through two immunoassays and an LC-MS/MS method. The LC-MS/MS target procedure was optimized for monitoring 25 different molecules, among traditional and designer benzodiazepines, including some metabolites. At least one of the monitored substances was detected in 100 out of the 501 samples. A good specificity was observed for the two immunoassays (>0.99), independently of the cut-offs and the sample hydrolysis. The new kit demonstrated a fairly higher sensitivity, always higher than 0.90; in particular, a high cross-reactivity of the new immunoassay was observed for samples that tested positive for lorazepam and 7-aminoclonazepam. The two immunoassays appeared adequate to monitor not only traditional benzodiazepines but also new designer ones.