Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros













Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 443, 2024 Apr 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38600440

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Altered glycosylation is a hallmark of cancer associated with therapy resistance and tumor behavior. In this study, we investigated the glycosylation profile of stemness-related proteins OCT4, CIP2A, MET, and LIMA1 in HNSCC tumors. METHODS: Tumor, adjacent normal tissue, and blood samples of 25 patients were collected together with clinical details. After tissue processing, lectin-based glycovariant screens were performed. RESULTS: Strong correlation between glycosylation profiles of all four stemness-related proteins was observed in tumor tissue, whereas glycosylation in tumor tissue, adjacent normal tissue, and serum was differential. CONCLUSIONS: A mannose- and galactose-rich glycosylation niche associated with stemness-related proteins was identified.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Glicosilación , Línea Celular Tumoral , Proteínas del Citoesqueleto/metabolismo
2.
J Laryngol Otol ; 136(2): 176-180, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34649636

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implantation can be used when a patient's hearing cannot satisfactorily be improved after optimised hearing aid fitting. However, in patients with a cochlear nerve or brain disorder affecting hearing, the benefits of cochlear implants are not so straightforward. METHODS: This paper describes a 58-year-old patient suffering from multiple sclerosis and profound sensorineural hearing loss, rehabilitated with a cochlear implant. Literature concerning cochlear implantation in demyelinating conditions was systematically reviewed using PubMed/Medline and Web of Science databases. RESULTS: The patient's cochlear implantation was successful, with speech discrimination scores remaining above 90 per cent for eight years post-operatively. No previous cases of cochlear implantation with multiple sclerosis related hearing loss have been reported, despite the high incidence of hearing loss in multiple sclerosis patients. CONCLUSION: This paper demonstrates that multiple sclerosis lesions should not be an exclusion criterion in an otherwise suitable candidate for cochlear implantation.


Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/rehabilitación , Esclerosis Múltiple/fisiopatología , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/complicaciones , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 278(11): 4575-4585, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33582846

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Prognostic biomarkers and novel therapeutic approaches have been slow to emerge in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). In this study, an HNSCC patient cohort is created and performance of putative prognostic biomarkers investigated in a population-validated setting. The overall goal is to develop a novel way to combine biomarker analyses with population-level clinical data on HNSCC patients and thus to improve the carryover of biomarkers into clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To avoid selection biases in retrospective study design, all HNSCC patients were identified and corresponding clinical data were collected from the Southwest Finland geographical area. A particular emphasis was laid on avoiding potential biases in sample selection for immunohistochemical staining analyses. Staining results were evaluated for potential prognostic resolution. RESULTS: After comprehensive evaluation, the patient cohort was found to be representative of the background population in terms of clinical characteristics such as patient age and TNM stage distribution. A negligible drop-out of 1.3% (6/476) was observed during the first follow-up year. By immunohistochemical analysis, the role of previously implicated HNSCC biomarkers (p53, EGFR, p16, CIP2A, Oct4, MET, and NDFIP1) was investigated. DISCUSSION: Our exceptionally representative patient material supports the use of population validation to improve the applicability of results to real-life situations. The failure of the putative prognostic biomarkers emphasizes the need for controlling bias in retrospective studies, especially in the heterogenous tumor environment of HNSCC. The resolution of simple prognostic examination is unlikely to be sufficient to identify biomarkers for clinical practice of HNSCC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Finlandia/epidemiología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/diagnóstico , Humanos , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/diagnóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA