[Exposure to isotretinoin during pregnancy in France: 25 years of follow-up]. / Isotrétinoïne et grossesse : bilan français de 25 années de suivi.

Because of its teratogenicity, isotretinoin is contraindicated in pregnant women and also among women of childbearing age in the absence of effective contraception. The objective of this work is to summarize the results of studies assessing the effects of regulatory measures successively implemented in France since 1996 to prevent foetal exposure to isotretinoin. The five pharmacovigilance studies have shown persistence of pregnancies exposed to isotretinoin, with an estimated incidence in the latter study, between 0.32 and 0.95 per 1000 treated women of childbearing age. The strengthening of the prevention plan of pregnancies, established in France in March 2010, seems to have resulted in a decrease in the incidence of pregnancies exposed, but this trend needs to be confirmed. However, these pregnancies are almost preventable, because most of them are explained by the non-compliance with the conditions of prescribing and dispensing. Then it seems mandatory to not deliver oral isotretinoin if it is not prescribed in accordance with the prescription laid down by the authorities.

Simultaneous determination of the antiretroviral agents: amprenavir, lopinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir and efavirenz in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry.

A selective and accurate assay for the simultaneous quantitation of four protease inhibitors (PIs) (amprenavir (APV), lopinavir (LPV), ritonavir (RTV) and saquinavir (SQV)) and a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) (efavirenz, EFV) in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells using high-performance liquid chromatography-mass chromatography (LC/MS) has been developed and validated. After liquid-liquid extraction, the antiretroviral agents were separated within 15 min. The calibration curves of each drug showed a good linearity in a range of concentration between 2 and 200 ng/3 x 10(6) cells for amprenavir, lopinavir, efavirenz, 1.60 and 128 ng/3 x 10(6) cells for ritonavir and saquinavir. Mean intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation over the ranges of the standard curves were less than 15% and mean extraction recoveries ranged 88.7-112.1%. The limits of quantification were 2 ng/3 x 10(6) cells for amprenavir, lopinavir, efavirenz, 1 ng/3 x 10(6) cells for ritonavir and 1.6 ng/3 x 10(6) cells for saquinavir. This novel LC/MS assay, which provides an excellent method for simultaneous intra-cellular determination of amprenavir, lopinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir and efavirenz in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, could be successfully applied for therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic studies.

Virological, intracellular and plasma pharmacological parameters predicting response to lopinavir/ritonavir (KALEPHAR study).

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of HIV-1 protease mutations and intracellular and plasma lopinavir minimum concentrations (Cmin) on virological success or failure on lopinavir/ritonavir-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). DESIGN: HIV-1-infected HAART-experienced patients included in an observational study, received lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100 mg twice a day) plus two to three nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) or one NRTI plus one non-NRTI. A viral load less than 50 copies/ml at month 6 defined virological success. METHODS: Intracellular and plasma lopinavir concentrations were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography with mass-spectrometry detection. Reverse transcriptase and protease genes were sequenced at baseline and the time of virological failure. RESULTS: When the 38 patients started the lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen, baseline median (25-75th percentile) values were: CD4 cell count 218 cells/microl (133-477); plasma HIV-1-RNA load 5.3 log10 copies/ml (3.8-5.1); number of lopinavir mutations four per protease gene (two to six). Univariate analysis associated virological success or failure at month 6 (21/38 patients) with the number of baseline lopinavir mutations, intracellular and plasma lopinavir Cmin, and the genotype inhibitory quotient (GIQ) at months 1 and 6. Multivariate analysis showed that the number of baseline lopinavir mutations and intracellular and plasma lopinavir Cmin were independently associated with virological success or failure. We defined the most discriminating intracellular and plasma lopinavir Cmin efficacy thresholds (8 and 4 microg/ml, respectively) and GIQ thresholds (1 and 3, respectively). CONCLUSION: The monitoring of lopinavir/rironavir-based HAART efficacy should include the number of baseline lopinavir/ritonavir mutations, intracellular and plasma lopinavir Cmin and GIQ calculation.