Utility of pelvic examination in assessing women with bleeding in early pregnancy: a multicenter Canadian emergency department study.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding in early pregnancy is a common emergency department (ED) presentation. Although variability in approaches has been demonstrated, research is relatively uncommon on practices and outcomes. This study investigated the influence of clinical pattern of care, utility, and contribution of pelvic examination aimed at diagnosing and managing bleeding in early pregnancy at three Canadian EDs. METHODS: After obtaining informed consent, data were collected from adult women who were pregnant and from treating ED physicians using a structured questionnaire. We defined the change in management based on the initial clinical plan at the time of the initial physician assessment in the ED and any subsequent changes made after the pelvic examination was performed. Patient telephone follow-up was supplemented by linking with provincial administrative data for births. Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with a change in patient management following pelvic examination in the ED. RESULTS: Overall, 200 women were enrolled. The mean age was 31 years, patients had been bleeding for a median of 1 day and stayed in the ED for a median of 5 h. Of these, 166 (83.0%) received a pelvic examination, including speculum examination and/or bimanual palpation. Pregnancy outcome data were available for 192 pregnancies; 107 (56%) experienced a miscarriage. Factors significantly associated with a change in management after pelvic examination in the univariate logistic regression analysis were brown/dark-red bleeding per vaginam (physician determined), tachycardia, right lower quadrant tenderness, and bimanual palpation. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, brown/dark-red bleeding per vaginam was independently associated with a reduced likelihood of a change in management after pelvic examination (aOR = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.14-0.98). CONCLUSION: Among women presenting to the ED with bleeding in early pregnancy prior to 20 weeks gestation, only brown/dark-red vaginal bleeding, potentially indicative of bleeding resolution, significantly independently influenced the baseline odds of a change in management after pelvic examination. Until the debate on the utility of pelvic examination in the ED for this presentation is resolved, physician preferences and shared decision making with patients should guide practice regarding speculum examination/bimanual palpation for the management of bleeding in early pregnancy.

The HEARTRISK6 Scale: Predicting Short-Term Serious Outcomes in Emergency Department Acute Heart Failure Patients.

Background: Acute heart failure (AHF) is a common emergency department (ED) presentation that may have poor outcomes but often does not require hospital admission. There is little evidence to guide dispositional decisions. Objectives: The authors sought to create a risk score for predicting short-term serious outcomes (SSO) in patients with AHF. Methods: We pooled data from 3 prospective cohorts: 2 published studies and 1 new cohort. The 3 cohorts prospectively enrolled patients who required treatment for AHF at 10 tertiary care hospital EDs. The primary outcome was SSO, defined as death <30 days, intubation or noninvasive ventilation (NIV), myocardial infarction, or relapse to ED <14 days. The logistic regression model evaluated 13 predictors, used an AIC-based step-down procedure, and bootstrapped internal validation. Results: Of the 2,246 patients in the 3 cohorts (N = 559; 1,100; 587), the mean age was 77.4 years, 54.5% were male, 3.1% received intravenous nitroglycerin, 5.2% received ED NIV, and 48.6% were admitted to the hospital. There were 281 (12.5%) SSOs including 70 deaths (3.1%) with many in discharged patients. The final HEARTRISK6 Scale included 6 variables: valvular heart disease, tachycardia, need for NIV, creatinine, troponin, and failed reassessment (walk test). Choosing HEARTRISK6 total-point admission thresholds of ≥1 or ≥2 would yield, respectively, sensitivities of 88.3% (95% CI: 83.9%-91.8%) and 71.5% (95% CI: 65.9%-76.7%) and specificities of 24.7% (95% CI: 22.8%-26.7%) and 50.1% (95% CI: 47.9%-52.4%) for SSO. Conclusions: Using 3 large prospectively collected datasets, we created a concise and sensitive risk scale for patients with AHF in the ED. Implementation of the HEARTRISK6 scale could lead to safer and more efficient disposition decisions.

Utility of serial troponin testing for emergency department patients with syncope.

BACKGROUND: For emergency department (ED) patients with syncope, cardiac troponin can identify acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and prognosticate for 30-day serious adverse events. However, it is unclear if serial testing improves diagnostic yield and prognostication. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of data from two prospective studies conducted to develop the Canadian Syncope Risk Score. Adults (age ≥ 16 years) with syncope were enrolled, and patient characteristics, vital signs, physician diagnostic impression, electrocardiogram and troponin results, and adjudicated 30-day serious adverse event were collected. The primary outcome was the detection of a serious adverse event within 30 days of ED disposition. The secondary outcome was comparison of ED length of stay among patients with single versus serial troponin measurements. RESULTS: 4996 patients [mean age 64.5 (SD 18.8) years, 52.2% male] were included: 4397 (89.8%) with single troponin [232 (5.3%) with serious adverse event in the ED and 203 (4.6%) after ED disposition]; 499 (10.2%) patients with > 1 troponin measurement [39 (7.8%) with serious adverse event in ED and 60 (12.0%) after ED disposition]. Among those with serial measurements, 10 patients (2.0%) had a rise from below to above the 99th percentile threshold, of whom 4 patients (0.8%) suffered serious adverse event: two with arrhythmias diagnosed on electrocardiogram, one with ACS and one suffered respiratory failure. Nine patients (1.8%) had Canadian Syncope Risk Score risk reclassification based on serial measurement, and none suffered 30-day serious adverse event. Median ED length of stay was significantly longer for patients with serial testing (5.6 vs. 3.8 h, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The initial troponin measurement was sufficient for serious adverse event detection and in-ED risk stratification. Serial troponin testing does not improve the diagnostic yield or prognostication and should be reserved for patients with ongoing symptoms or electrocardiogram findings suggestive of cardiac ischemia.

ABSTRAIT: CONTEXTE: Pour les patients du service des urgences (DE) atteints de syncope, la troponine cardiaque peut identifier le syndrome coronarien aigu (SCA) et le pronostic pour les événements indésirables graves de 30 jours. Cependant, il n'est pas clair si les tests en série améliorent le rendement diagnostique et le pronostic. MéTHODES: Il s'agissait d'une analyse secondaire des données de deux études prospectives menées pour élaborer le Canadian Syncope Risk Score. Des adultes (âgés de 16 ans) atteints de syncope ont été recrutés, et les caractéristiques du patient, les signes vitaux, l'empreinte diagnostique du médecin, les résultats de l'électrocardiogramme et de la troponine, ainsi que les événements indésirables graves évalués à 30 jours ont été recueillis. Le critère de jugement principal était la détection d'un événement indésirable grave dans les 30 jours suivant la décision de l'urgence. Le critère de jugement secondaire était la comparaison de la durée de séjour à l'urgence chez les patients ayant une seule mesure de troponine par rapport à la mesure en série. RéSULTATS: 4 996 patients [âge moyen 64,5 (ET 18,8) ans, 52,2 % d'hommes] ont été inclus : 4 397 (89,8 %) avec une seule troponine [232 (5,3 %) avec un événement indésirable grave à l'urgence et 203 (4,6 %) après l'urgence]; 499 (10,2 %) patients avec > 1 mesure de la troponine [39 (7,8 %) avec événement indésirable grave à l'urgence et 60 (12,0 %) après la décision à l'urgence]. Parmi les patients ayant fait l'objet de mesures en série, 10 (2,0 %) présentaient une augmentation du seuil inférieur à supérieur au seuil du 99e percentile, dont 4 (0,8 %) ont subi un événement indésirable grave : deux avec arythmies diagnostiquées par électrocardiogramme, un avec SCA et un avec insuffisance respiratoire. Neuf patients (1,8 %) ont présenté une reclassification du risque selon le score canadien de risque de syncope en fonction de la mesure en série, et aucun n'a subi d'événement indésirable grave de 30 jours. La durée médiane de séjour aux urgences était significativement plus longue pour les patients ayant subi des tests en série (5,6 vs. 3,8 heures, p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONS: La mesure initiale de la troponine était suffisante pour la détection des effets indésirables graves et la stratification des risques aux urgences. Les tests de troponine en série n'améliorent pas le rendement diagnostique ou le pronostic et doivent être réservés aux patients présentant des symptômes continus ou des résultats d'électrocardiogramme suggérant une ischémie cardiaque.

The development and validation of a conceptual definition of avoidable transitions from long-term care to the emergency department: A mixed methods study.

Background/Objectives: Transitions to and from Emergency Departments (EDs) can be detrimental to long-term care (LTC) residents and burden the healthcare system. While reducing avoidable transfers is imperative, various terms are used interchangeably including inappropriate, preventable, or unnecessary transitions. Our study objectives were to develop a conceptual definition of avoidable LTC-ED transitions and to verify the level of stakeholder agreement with this definition. Methods: The EXamining Aged Care Transitions study adopted an exploratory sequential mixed-method design. The study was conducted in 2015-2016 in 16 LTC facilities, 1 ED, and 1 Emergency Medical Service (EMS) in a major urban center in western Canada. Phase 1 included 80 participants, (healthcare aides, licensed practical nurses, registered nurses, LTC managers, family members of residents, and EMS staff). We conducted semistructured interviews (n = 25) and focus groups (n = 19). In Phase 2, 327 ED staff, EMS staff, LTC staff, and medical directors responded to a survey based on the qualitative findings. Results: Avoidable transitions were attributed to limited resources in LTC, insufficient preventive care, and resident or family wishes. The definition generated was: A transition of an LTC resident to the ED is considered avoidable if: (a) Diagnostic testing, medical assessment, and treatment can be accessed in a timely manner by other means; (b) the reasons for a transfer are unclear and the transition would increase the disorientation, pain, or discomfort of a resident, outweighing a clear benefit of a transfer; and (c) the transition is against the wishes expressed by the resident over time, including through informal and undocumented conversations. There was a high level of agreement with the definition across the four participant groups. Conclusions and Implications: To effectively reduce LTC resident avoidable transitions, stakeholders must share a common definition. Our conceptual definition may significantly contribute to improved care for LTC residents.

The Impact of an Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol Using Conventional Troponin I for Patients With Cardiac Chest Pain in the Emergency Department.

Background: This study strove to assess the impact of the implementation of an accelerated diagnostic protocol (ADP), using shortened serial-testing intervals and a conventional troponin I (c-TnI) test, on emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adults (aged ≥ 18 years) presenting to a Canadian ED with a primary complaint of cardiac chest pain between January 14, 2017 and January 15, 2019. For non-high-risk patients, the troponin delta timing decreased from 6 hours to 3 hours, and a different conventional troponin I level cut-point was implemented on January 15, 2018. The primary outcome was ED LOS. Secondary outcomes included disposition status, consultation proportions, and major adverse cardiac events within 30 days. Results: A total of 3133 patient interactions were included. Although the overall decrease in median ED LOS was not significant (P = 0.074), a significant reduction occurred in ED LOS (-33 minutes; 95% confidence interval: -53.6 to -12.4 minutes) among patients who were discharged in the post-ADP group. Consultations were unchanged between groups (36.1% before vs 33.8% after; P = 0.17). The major adverse cardiac events outcomes were unchanged across cohorts (15.9% vs 15.3%; P = 0.62). Conclusions: The implementation of an ADP, with a conventional troponin I test, for cardiac chest pain in a Canadian ED was not associated with a significant reduction of LOS for all patients; however, a significant reduction occurred for patients who were discharged, and the strategy appears safe.

Contexte: Cette étude visait à évaluer les répercussions de la mise en œuvre d'un protocole de diagnostic accéléré avec intervalles plus courts entre les épreuves séquentielles et dosage classique de la troponine I sur la durée du séjour à l'urgence. Méthodologie: Cette étude de cohortes rétrospective a été menée chez des adultes (âgés de 18 ans ou plus) qui se sont présentés à l'urgence d'un hôpital canadien principalement pour une douleur thoracique cardiaque entre le 14 janvier 2017 et le 15 janvier 2019. Chez les patients qui n'étaient pas exposés à un risque élevé, l'intervalle de dosage de la troponine (delta) est passé de 6 heures à 3 heures, et une nouvelle valeur seuil a été utilisée pour le dosage classique de la troponine I à compter du 15 janvier 2018. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la durée du séjour à l'urgence. Les critères d'évaluation secondaires comprenaient le statut au moment de la sortie, les proportions de consultation et les événements cardiovasculaires indésirables majeurs dans les 30 jours. Résultats: Au total, 3 133 interactions avec des patients ont été incluses. Bien que la diminution globale de la durée médiane du séjour à l'urgence n'ait pas été significative (p = 0,074), une réduction significative du séjour à l'urgence (-33 minutes; intervalle de confiance à 95 % : -53,6 à -12,4 minutes) a été observée chez les patients ayant reçu leur congé appartenant au groupe dans lequel le protocole de diagnostic accéléré a été mis en œuvre. Les consultations étaient inchangées entre les groupes (36,1 % avant vs 33,8 % après; p = 0,17). Les résultats relatifs aux événements cardiovasculaires indésirables majeurs sont demeurés inchangés dans les cohortes (15,9 % vs 15,3 %; p = 0,62). Conclusions: La mise en œuvre d'un protocole de diagnostic accéléré, avec un dosage classique de la troponine I, en cas de douleur thoracique d'origine cardiaque, à l'urgence d'un établissement canadien ne s'est pas traduite par une réduction significative du séjour à l'urgence chez tous les patients. Une réduction significative a néanmoins été observée chez les patients qui ont reçu leur congé, et la stratégie s'est avérée sûre.

The effectiveness of parenteral agents for pain reduction in patients with migraine presenting to emergency settings: A systematic review and network analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of parenteral agents for pain reduction in patients with acute migraine. BACKGROUND: Parenteral agents have been shown to be effective in treating acute migraine pain; however, the comparative effectiveness of different approaches is unclear. METHODS: Nine electronic databases and gray literature sources were searched to identify randomized clinical trials assessing parenteral agents to treat acute migraine pain in emergency settings. Two independent reviewers completed study screening, data extraction, and Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment, with differences being resolved by adjudication. The protocol of the review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; CRD42018100096). RESULTS: A total of 97 unique studies were included, with most studies reporting a high or unclear risk of bias. Monotherapy, as well as combination therapy, successfully reduced pain scores prior to discharge. They also increased the proportion of patients reporting pain relief and being pain free. Across the pain outcomes assessed, combination therapy was one of the higher ranked approaches and provided robust improvements in pain outcomes, including lowering pain scores (mean difference -3.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.64 to -2.08) and increasing the proportion of patients reporting pain relief (risk ratio [RR] 2.83, 95% CI 1.74-4.61). Neuroleptics and metoclopramide also ranked high in terms of the proportion of patients reporting pain relief (neuroleptics RR 2.76, 95% CI 2.12-3.60; metoclopramide RR 2.58, 95% CI 1.90-3.49) and being pain free before emergency department discharge (neuroleptics RR 4.8, 95% CI 3.61-6.49; metoclopramide RR 4.1, 95% CI 3.02-5.44). Most parenteral agents were associated with increased adverse events, particularly combination therapy and neuroleptics. CONCLUSIONS: Various parenteral agents were found to provide effective pain relief. Considering the consistent improvements across various outcomes, combination therapy, as well as monotherapy of either metoclopramide or neuroleptics are recommended as first-line options for managing acute migraine pain. There are risks of adverse events, especially akathisia, following treatment with these agents. We recommend that a shared decision-making model be considered to effectively identify the best treatment option based on the patient's needs.

Physician Management and CT Ordering in the Emergency Department for Primary Headaches.

OBJECTIVE: Management of primary headache (PHA) varies across emergency departments (ED), yet there is widespread agreement that computed tomography (CT) scans are overused. This study assessed emergency physicians' (EPs) PHA management and their attitudes towards head CT ordering. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was undertaken with EPs from one Canadian center. Drivers of physicians' perceptions regarding the appropriateness of CT ordering for patients with PHA were explored. RESULTS: A total of 73 EPs (70% males; 48% with <10 years of practice) participated in the study. Most EPs (88%) did not order investigations for moderate-severe primary headaches; however, CT was the common investigation (47%) for headaches that did not improve. Computed tomography ordering was frequently motivated by the need for specialist consultation (64%) or admission (64%). A small proportion (27%) believed patients usually/frequently expected a scan. Nearly half of EPs (48%) identified patient imaging expectations/requests as a barrier to reducing CT ordering. Emergency physicians with CCFP (EM) certification were less likely to perceive CT ordering for patients with PHA as appropriate. Conversely, those who identified the possibility of missing a condition as a major barrier to limiting their CT use were more likely to perceive CT ordering for patients with PHA as appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency physicians reported consistency and evidence-based medical management. They highlighted the complexities of limiting CT ordering and both their level of training and their perceived barriers for limiting CT ordering seem to be influencing their attitudes. Further studies could elucidate these and other factors influencing their practice.

Social Determinants of Health and Pediatric Emergency Department Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Social determinants of health contribute to disparities in pediatric health and health care. Our objective was to synthesize and evaluate the evidence on the association between social determinants of health and emergency department (ED) outcomes in pediatric populations. METHODS: This review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Equity Extension guidelines. Observational epidemiological studies were included if they examined at least 1 social determinant of health from the PROGRESS-Plus framework in relation to ED outcomes among children <18 years old. Effect direction plots were used for narrative results and pooled odds ratios (pOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for meta-analyses. RESULTS: Fifty-eight studies were included, involving 17,275,090 children and 103,296,839 ED visits. Race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status were the most reported social determinants of health (71% each). Black children had 3 times the odds of utilizing the ED (pOR 3.16, 95% CI 2.46 to 4.08), whereas visits by Indigenous children increased the odds of departure prior to completion of care (pOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.39 to 1.80) compared to White children. Public insurance, low income, neighborhood deprivation, and proximity to an ED were also predictors of ED utilization. Children whose caregivers had a preferred language other than English had longer length of stay and increased hospital admission. CONCLUSION: Social determinants of health, particularly race, socioeconomic deprivation, proximity to an ED, and language, play important roles in ED care-seeking patterns of children and families. Increased utilization of ED services by children from racial minority and lower socioeconomic status groups may reflect barriers to health insurance and access to health care, including primary and subspecialty care, and/or poorer overall health, necessitating ED care. An intersectional approach is needed to better understand the trajectories of disparities in pediatric ED outcomes and to develop, implement, and evaluate future policies.

Canadian Association of Radiologists Thoracic Imaging Referral Guideline.

The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) Thoracic Expert Panel consists of radiologists, respirologists, emergency and family physicians, a patient advisor, and an epidemiologist/guideline methodologist. After developing a list of 24 clinical/diagnostic scenarios, a rapid scoping review was undertaken to identify systematically produced referral guidelines that provide recommendations for one or more of these clinical/diagnostic scenarios. Recommendations from 30 guidelines and contextualization criteria in the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) for guidelines framework were used to develop 48 recommendation statements across the 24 scenarios. This guideline presents the methods of development and the referral recommendations for screening/asymptomatic individuals, non-specific chest pain, hospital admission for non-thoracic conditions, long-term care admission, routine pre-operative imaging, post-interventional chest procedure, upper respiratory tract infection, acute exacerbation of asthma, acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, suspect pneumonia, pneumonia follow-up, immunosuppressed patient with respiratory symptoms/febrile neutropenia, chronic cough, suspected pneumothorax (non-traumatic), clinically suspected pleural effusion, hemoptysis, chronic dyspnea of non-cardiovascular origin, suspected interstitial lung disease, incidental lung nodule, suspected mediastinal lesion, suspected mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and elevated diaphragm on chest radiograph.

Role of sex and gender in concussion outcome differences among patients presenting to the emergency department: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to identify research involving adults presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a concussion to document the reporting of sex and/or gender according to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) guidelines, the prevalence of sex and gender-based analysis (SGBA) and to summarise sex and/or gender-based differences in ED presentation, management and outcomes. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: Electronic databases and grey literature were searched to identify studies that recruited adult patients with concussion from the ED. Two independent reviewers identified eligible studies, assessed quality and extracted data. A descriptive summary of the evidence was generated, and sex and/or gender reporting was examined for accuracy according to standardised criteria. RESULTS: Overall, 126 studies were included in the analyses. A total of 80 (64%) studies reported sex and/or gender as demographic information, of which 51 (64%) included sex and/or gender in their analysis; however, 2 (3%) studies focused on an SGBA. Sex was more accurately reported in alignment with CIHR definitions than gender (94% vs 12%; p<0.0001). In total, 25 studies used an SGBA for outcomes of interest. Males and females experience different causes of concussion, 60% of studies documented that females had less frequent CT scanning while in the ED, and 57% of studies reported that postconcussion syndrome was more prevalent in females and women. CONCLUSION: This systematic review highlighted that sex is reported more accurately than gender, approximately half of studies did not report either sex and/or gender as demographic information, and one-third of studies did not include SGBA. There were important sex and gender differences in the cause, ED presentation, management and outcomes of concussions. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021258613.

Examining changes in vascular function, arterial stiffness and systemic inflammation during hospitalization and recovery from an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

An acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. The elevated risk during an AECOPD may be related to changes in vascular function, arterial stiffness, and systemic inflammation; the time course of these measures and their corresponding recovery are poorly understood. Further, physical activity is reduced during an AECOPD, and physical activity may influence the cardiovascular responses to an AECOPD. The purpose of the study was to examine the acute impact of an AECOPD requiring hospitalization on vascular function, arterial stiffness, and systemic inflammation and examine whether physical activity modulates these variables during recovery. Patients hospitalized for an AECOPD were prospectively recruited and compared to control patients with stable COPD. Vascular function, arterial stiffness, and systemic inflammation (CRP, IL-6) were measured at hospital admission, hospital discharge and within 14 days of discharge. Physical activity was electronically tracked daily while in hospital and for 7 days following discharge using a Fitbit. One hundred and twenty-one patients with an AECOPD requiring hospitalization and 33 control patients with stable COPD were enrolled in the study. Vascular function was significantly lower, and systemic inflammation higher at hospital admission in patients with an AECOPD compared to stable COPD. Significant improvements in vascular function and inflammation were observed within 14 days of hospital discharge; however, vascular function remained lower than stable COPD. Physical activity was low at admission and increased following discharge; however, physical activity was unrelated to measures of vascular function or inflammation at any time point. An AECOPD requiring hospitalization is associated with impaired vascular function that persists during recovery. These findings provide a mechanistic link to help explain the enduring increase in CV risk and mortality following a severe AECOPD event.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01949727; Registered: 09/20/2013.

Acceptance of and adherence with long-term positive airway pressure treatment in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review protocol.

BACKGROUND: Long-term noninvasive positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment is effective treatment for sleep-related breathing disorders and chronic hypercarbic respiratory failure secondary to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). PAP treatment may be delivered as continuous positive airway pressure or noninvasive ventilation. Success in initiating PAP treatment and barriers to its use in adult patients with COPD are largely unknown. This systematic review aims to identify the acceptance of and adherence to PAP treatment prescribed for long-term use in adult patients with COPD and to summarize variables associated with these measures. METHODS: Seven online electronic databases will be searched by an experienced medical librarian to identify records containing the concepts "obstructive airways disease" and "noninvasive positive airway pressure" and "acceptance" or "adherence". Randomized and non-randomized studies of interventions will be included. Citation lists from relevant articles will be reviewed, and experts will be contacted regarding unpublished studies. Abstracts from key conferences between 2018-2023 and Google Scholar search results will be reviewed for inclusion. Titles, abstracts and full texts will be reviewed independently for inclusion by two reviewers. Data extraction will be completed by one author using a pre-established form and primary outcomes confirmed by a second author. Methodological quality will be evaluated. If sufficient data are available for meta-analysis, a pooled summary statistic for the primary outcome will be calculated using a random-effects generic inverse-variance meta-analysis, weighted proportion or weighted medians-based approach. Subgroup analysis will explore clinically meaningful sources of heterogeneity. Variables that are associated with acceptance and adherence will be described. DISCUSSION: Long-term PAP treatment is a complex intervention prescribed to patients with COPD for several indications. Synthesis of the evidence on success with PAP treatment and variables associated with acceptance or adherence will inform program and policy development for supporting patients with COPD who are prescribed this therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Systematic review registration: This protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on July 13, 2021 (registration number CRD42021259262), with revisions submitted on April 17, 2023.

You exhaust me! Air pollution exposure near schools during pick-up and drop-off times.

Background: Public and healthcare practitioner awareness of climate change and the longitudinal health impacts of air pollution is growing; however, it is not always clear how to implement practical and feasible steps that individuals and communities can take to help decrease air pollution and protect children, and it can be challenging to request and enforce behaviour changes that the public associates with perceived personal inconvenience. In this context, it is important to consider common, chronic exposures that increase children's risks, especially when straightforward solutions with minimal negative impact where significant evidence-based positive results are available. Aims: This article provides simple tips that healthcare providers, parents, and communities can use to advocate for decreased idling in school zones to improve air quality in and around schools.

Emergency department crowding negatively influences outcomes for adults presenting for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

OBJECTIVES: Emergency department (ED) crowding leads to poor outcomes. Patients with respiratory conditions like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are especially vulnerable to crowding-related delays in care. We aimed to assess the associations of ED crowding metrics with outcomes for patients presenting with COPD. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of adult patients presenting with a diagnosis of COPD to 18 high-volume EDs between 2014 and 2019 in Alberta, Canada. Administrative databases provided date and time data on key stages of the presentation including physician initial assessment and disposition decision. Crowding metrics were calculated using facility-specific median physician initial assessment and length of stay. Patient presentations were grouped by acuity and mixed-effects regression models were fit to adjust for the clustering at the facility level. RESULTS: There were 49,085 presentations for COPD made by 25,734 patients (median age = 73 years). A 1-h increase in the physician initial assessment metric was associated with an increase in physician initial assessment for COPD patients by 23, 53, and 59 min for the high, moderate, and low acuity groups, respectively, adjusted for other predictors. For the low acuity group, this metric was associated with an increased length of stay of 73 min for admitted individuals. Similarly, an increase in the length of stay metric was also associated with an increased likelihood of being admitted for all acuity groups. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with COPD, ED crowding results in delays in assessment increased length of stay, and increased proportion of patients admitted. These results suggest that ED crowding mitigation efforts to provide timely care for patients with COPD are urgently needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: N/A.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: L'encombrement des services d'urgence entraîne de mauvais résultats. Les patients souffrant de maladies respiratoires telles que la maladie pulmonaire obstructive chronique (MPOC) sont particulièrement vulnérables aux retards de soins liés à l'encombrement. Notre avons cherché à évaluer les associations entre les paramètres d'encombrement des services d'urgence et les résultats pour les patients présentant une MPOC. MéTHODES: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte basée sur la population de patients adultes se présentant avec un diagnostic de MPOC dans dix-huit services d'urgence à haut volume entre 2014 et 2019 en Alberta, au Canada. Les bases de données administratives ont fourni des données sur la date et l'heure des principales étapes de la présentation, y compris l'évaluation initiale par le médecin et la décision de sortie. Les mesures d'encombrement ont été calculées à partir de l'évaluation initiale médiane du médecin et de la durée du séjour propres à l'établissement. Les présentations des patients ont été regroupées par gravité et des modèles de régression à effets mixtes ont été ajustés pour tenir compte du regroupement au niveau de l'établissement. RéSULTATS: Il y a eu 49 085 présentations pour la MPOC effectuées par 25 734 patients (âge médian = 73 ans). Une augmentation d'une heure de l'évaluation initiale par le médecin était associée à une augmentation de l'évaluation initiale par le médecin pour les patients atteints de MPOC de 23, 53 et 59 min pour les groupes de gravité élevée, modérée et faible, respectivement, après ajustement pour d'autres facteurs prédictifs. Pour le groupe de faible gravité, ce paramètre était associé à une augmentation de la durée de séjour de 73 min pour les personnes admises. De même, une augmentation de la durée du séjour était également associée à une probabilité accrue d'admission pour tous les groupes de gravité. CONCLUSIONS: Pour les patients atteints de MPOC, l'encombrement des urgences entraîne des retards dans l'évaluation, une augmentation de la durée du séjour et une augmentation de la proportion de patients admis. Ces résultats suggèrent qu'il est urgent d'atténuer l'encombrement des urgences afin de fournir des soins en temps opportun aux patients atteints de MPOC. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'ESSAI: N/A.

Development of practice recommendations based on the Canadian Syncope Risk Score and identification of barriers and facilitators for implementation.

BACKGROUND: Wide variations in emergency department (ED) syncope management exist. The Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) was developed to predict the probability of 30-day serious outcomes after ED disposition. Study objectives were to evaluate the acceptability of proposed CSRS practice recommendations among providers and patients, and identify barriers and facilitators for CSRS use to guide disposition decisions. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 41 physicians involved in ED syncope and 35 ED patients with syncope. We used purposive sampling to ensure a variety of physician specialties and CSRS patient risk levels. Thematic analysis was completed by two independent coders with consensus meetings to resolve conflicts. Analysis proceeded in parallel with interviews until data saturation. RESULTS: The majority (97.6%; 40/41) of physicians agreed with discharge of low risk (CSRS ≤ 0) but opined that 'no follow up' changed to 'follow-up as needed'. Physicians indicated current practices do not align with the medium-risk recommendation to discharge patients with 15-day monitoring (CSRS = 1-3; due to lack of access to monitors and timely follow-up) and the high-risk recommendation (CSRS ≥ 4) to potentially discharge patients with 15-day monitoring. Physicians recommended brief hospitalization of high-risk patients due to patient safety concerns. Facilitators included the CSRS-based patient education and scores supporting their clinical gestalt. Patients reported receiving varying levels of information regarding syncope and post-ED care, were satisfied with care received and preferred less resource intensive options. CONCLUSION: Our recommendations based on the study results were: discharge of low-risk patients with physician follow-up as needed; discharge of medium-risk patients with 15-day cardiac monitoring and brief hospitalization of high-risk patients with 15-day cardiac monitoring if discharged. Patients preferred less resource intensive options, in line with CSRS recommended care. Implementation should leverage identified facilitators (e.g., patient education) and address the barriers (e.g., monitor access) to improve ED syncope care.

RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: La prise en charge des syncopes par les services d'urgence varie considérablement. Le Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) a été mis au point pour prédire la probabilité d'une issue grave à 30 jours après la prise en charge par le service des urgences. Les objectifs de l'étude étaient d'évaluer l'acceptabilité des recommandations pratiques proposées par le CSRS parmi les prestataires et les patients, et d'identifier les barrières et les facilitateurs de l'utilisation du CSRS pour guider les décisions de disposition. MéTHODES: Nous avons mené des entretiens semi-structurés avec 41 médecins impliqués dans la syncope aux urgences et 35 patients souffrant de syncope aux urgences. Nous avons utilisé un échantillonnage raisonné pour assurer une variété de spécialités médicales et de niveaux de risque pour les patients du CSRS. L'analyse thématique a été réalisée par deux codeurs indépendants, avec des réunions de consensus pour résoudre les conflits. L'analyse s'est déroulée parallèlement aux entretiens jusqu'à saturation des données. RéSULTATS: La majorité (97,6 % ; 40/41) des médecins étaient d'accord avec la sortie des patients à faible risque (CSRS ≤ 0), mais ont estimé que " pas de suivi " devait être remplacée par " suivi en fonction des besoins ". Les médecins ont indiqué que leurs pratiques actuelles ne sont pas conformes à la recommandation à risque moyen de faire sortir les patients avec une surveillance de 15 jours (CSRS = 1-3 ; en raison du manque d'accès aux moniteurs et au suivi en temps opportun) et à la recommandation à risque élevé (CSRS ≥ 4) de potentiellement faire sortir les patients avec une surveillance de 15 jours. Les médecins ont recommandé une brève hospitalisation des patients à haut risque pour des raisons de sécurité. Les facilitateurs comprenaient l'éducation des patients basée sur le CSRS et les scores soutenant leur gestalt clinique. Les patients ont déclaré avoir reçu différents niveaux d'information concernant la syncope et les soins post-urgence, étaient satisfaits des soins reçus et préféraient des options moins gourmandes en ressources. CONCLUSIONS: Nos recommandations basées sur les résultats de l'étude sont les suivantes : sortie des patients à faible risque avec suivi par un médecin si nécessaire ; la sortie des patients à risque moyen avec une surveillance cardiaque de 15 jours et une brève hospitalisation des patients à risque élevé avec une surveillance cardiaque de 15 jours en cas de sortie. Les patients ont préféré des options moins gourmandes en ressources, conformément aux soins recommandés par le CSRS. La mise en œuvre devrait s'appuyer sur les facilitateurs identifiés (par exemple, l'éducation des patients) et s'attaquer aux obstacles (par exemple, le contrôle de l'accès) pour améliorer les soins aux urgences en cas de syncope.

Low immunoglobulin levels affect the course of COPD in hospitalized patients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects up to 10% of Canadians. Patients with COPD may present with secondary humoral immunodeficiency as a result of chronic disease, poor nutrition or frequent courses of oral corticosteroids; decreased humoral immunity may predispose these patients to mucosal infections. We hypothesized that decreased serum immunoglobulin (Ig) levels was associated with the severity of an acute COPD exacerbations (AECOPD). METHODS: A prospective study to examine cardiovascular risks in patients hospitalized for AECOPD, recruited patients on the day of hospital admission and collected data on length of hospital stay at index admission, subsequent emergency department visits and hospital readmissions. Immunoglobulin levels were measured in serum collected prospectively at recruitment. RESULTS: Among the 51 patients recruited during an admission for AECOPD, 14 (27.5%) had low IgG, 1 (2.0%) low IgA and 16 (31.4%) low IgM; in total, 24 (47.1%) had at least one immunoglobulin below the normal range. Patients with low IgM had longer hospital stay during the index admission compared to patients with normal IgM levels (6.0 vs. 3.0 days, p = 0.003), but no difference in other clinical outcomes. In the whole cohort, there was a negative correlation between serum IgM levels and length of hospital stay (R = - 0.317, p = 0.024). There was no difference in clinical outcomes between subjects with normal and low IgG levels. CONCLUSION: In patients presenting with AECOPD, low IgM is associated with longer hospital stay and may indicate a patient phenotype that would benefit from efforts to prevent respiratory infections. Trial registration statement: Retrospectively registered.

Adjuvant anticholinergic therapy for the prevention of akathisia in patients with primary headache in the emergency department: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Adjunct therapy with anticholinergic agents has been proposed to reduce the incidence of extrapyramidal side effects such as akathisia following treatment with neuroleptics or metoclopramide. This systematic review assessed the effectiveness of anticholinergic agents to prevent neuroleptic or metoclopramide-induced akathisia in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with benign headache. METHODS: Eight electronic databases and the gray literature were searched to identify randomized controlled trials involving adult patients presenting to the ED with primary headache treated with neuroleptic or metoclopramide. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were completed by two independent reviewers. Individual or pooled meta-analysis of dichotomous outcomes were calculated as relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: A total of 1032 studies were screened, of which two studies were included in the review. Both studies provided patients with diphenhydramine following treatment with neuroleptics or metoclopramide. Treatment with diphenhydramine did not reduce the incidence of akathisia compared to treatment with placebo (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.43-1.61, I2  = 0%). The impact of diphenhydramine on pain relief, need for rescue medications, and relief of other extrapyramidal side effects was reported in one of the two studies, with no significant differences noted in any outcomes compared to patients treated with placebo. CONCLUSION: This review found insufficient evidence to recommend the use of diphenhydramine as an adjunct therapy to prevent akathisia in ED patients treated with neuroleptics or metoclopramide for primary headache. This finding relies on the results of two small randomized controlled trials with incomplete outcome reporting. Additional high-quality studies are needed to better understand the clinical efficacy of agents with anticholinergic properties in the ED management of patients with primary headaches.

Emergency Department Visits During Pregnancy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Pregnant women often seek care in an emergency department (ED). We sought to describe the frequency, characteristics, and factors associated with increased ED visits during pregnancy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative health data of all pregnancies resulting in a live birth at 20 or more weeks of gestation in Alberta, Canada, from 2011 to 2017. The primary outcome was the occurrence of any ED visit during pregnancy. The secondary outcomes were ED visit characteristics and discharge disposition. We calculated rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between sociodemographic and clinical factors and increased ED visits during pregnancy using random-effect negative binomial regression adjusting for multiple pregnancies per person during the study period. RESULTS: We included 255,929 pregnancies from 193,965 women. Of all the pregnancy episodes followed, 37.3% (95% CI 37.1 to 37.5) had at least 1 ED visit, resulting in a total of 226,811 ED visits and an overall ED visit rate of 94.0 visits per 100 pregnancies (95% CI 93.6 to 94.3). Most visits were nonobstetric (46.4%) and resulted in ED discharge (85.3%). Increased ED visits were associated with living in remote (RR 6.9; 95 %CI 6.7 to 7.1) or rural (RR 3.4; 95% CI 3.4 to 3.5) areas, younger age (RR 1.9; 95% CI 1.8 to 2.0), intensive prenatal care (RR 1.5; 95% CI 1.5 to 1.5), major/moderate health conditions (RR 1.6; 95% CI 1.6 to 1.6), mental health conditions (RR 1.6; 95% CI 1.5 to 1.6), and high antepartum risk score (RR 1.1; 95% CI 1.1 to 1.1). CONCLUSION: Approximately 1 in 3 women in our sample visited the ED during pregnancy. A higher number of visits occurred in those with rural/remote residence, younger maternal age, and concomitant health conditions.