A significant proportion of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and suboptimal response according to European Leukemia Net criteria have excellent prognosis without treatment change.

BACKGROUND: The Recommendations of the European Leukemia Net (ELN) have become an essential tool in the management and prognosis of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the definition of suboptimal response remains under discussion. METHODS: We used conventional cytogenetics for the detection of clonal changes in Ph-positive and negative clones. RT-PCR and sequencing were carried out on peripheral blood leukocytes to detect the type of BCR-ABL1 transcript. The BCR-ABL1 mutational status was assessed using sequencing of RT-PCR products. High performance capillary electrophoresis for determination of imatinib (IMA) plasma concentration was used. RESULTS: A retrospective study of 110 patients diagnosed with chronic-phase (CP) CML treated with IMA or 2(nd) generation TKIs in the years 2000-2009 focused on analysis of patients with suboptimal response according to ELN criteria. 40 patients were administered IMA as first-line therapy and 70 had been pretreated with interferon-alpha (IFN-α) with or without Ara-C and/or hydroxyurea (HU) for a median 12 months (range, 1-92 months). After adjusting for the ELN criteria, major molecular response (MMR) was achieved after median 34 and 39 months in 66.7% and 41.7% of patients after the first and second-line IMA therapy with suboptimal response defined as lack of achievement of MMR at the 18(th) month of treatment, respectively. In comparison to patients with optimal response, patients with suboptimal response did not show significant differences in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS). Cytogenetic assays demonstrated additional chromosome abnormalities (ACAs): chromosome 8 trisomy in a Ph-negative clone during the IMA treatment (in 1 case) and der(9q) in Ph-positive clone (in 2 cases); in patients receiving first-line IMA only chromosome 8 trisomy was observed which was associated with myelodysplastic syndrome - this was the only case where hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was performed. During the treatment with IMA in both subgroups no regulatory mutations in the ABL kinase domain were confirmed. CONCLUSION: We believe that the category of suboptimal response should be redefined or withdrawn from the ELN 2009 recommendations for management of CML patients treated with TKIs. Patients with suboptimal response who have no additional risks (additional cytogenetic abnormalities or BCR-ABL1 regulatory mutations) may remain on IMA treatment while patients with these risks should be switched to the 2(nd) generation TKIs.

Imatinib trough plasma levels do not correlate with the response to therapy in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in routine clinical setting.

Association of trough imatinib plasma levels (IPL) with cytogenetic or molecular response to treatment in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) was repeatedly reported. We analyzed their value in the routine clinical setting in 131 patients with chronic phase CML in whom imatinib was applied as first- or second-line treatment. A total of 1,118 measurements were obtained by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay in patients treated with daily dose of imatinib ranging from 100 to 800 mg. Samples were obtained from 1 to 96 h after drug ingestion. High inter (36%) and intraindividual variability (9-33%) of IPL was observed. For analysis of correlation of IPL with treatment response, two sets of samples were selected according to the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria. The first set consisted of 241 samples taken 24 ± 2 h after dosing in 54 patients, and the second one consisted of 329 samples taken 24 ± 4 h after imatinib ingestion in 84 patients. In both sets, only patients treated with 400 mg imatinib once daily for at least 18 months were included. From multiple measurements in individual patients, mean IPL were used. In both sets, we were not able to demonstrate a statistically significant correlation between IPL and response to treatment according to the ELN. We believe that this was due to the differences in patients' compliance, leukemia biology, and other variables that are difficult to eliminate in the routine clinical practice. The use of IPL for prognostic estimation in CML treatment outside the clinical trials is probably limited.

Operational cures after interferon-alpha in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in Central and Northern Moravia.

We assessed long-term outcome of 118 consecutive patients in chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with interferon-alpha (IFN-α) in the Central and Northern Moravia region between 1989 and 2006 with focus on operational cure. The median follow-up was 82.6 months (range 12.4-212.6). Eighteen (15.3%) patients achieved complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) after median 16.7 (3.7-40.8) months. Nine of these patients (7.6%) achieved BCR-ABL negativity in nested reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction ["complete" molecular response (CMR)] and 6 of them have been operationally cured without any treatment for median 6 (4-10) years, while 2 continue with IFN-α and 1 died from CML-unrelated cause. Operationally cured patients had a significantly lower percentage of initial peripheral promyelocytes, blasts, and erythroblasts than the rest of patients treated for more than 12 months (P=0.01-0.03). Unlike patients with sole CCyR, the majority of whom lost CCyR despite continuing IFN-α therapy and required imatinib, patients who achieved CMR had excellent long-term outcome.

Imatinib dose escalation in two patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, with low trough imatinib plasma levels measured at various intervals from the beginning of therapy and with suboptimal treatment response, leads to the achievement of higher plasma levels and major molecular response.

Despite the prognostic value of trough imatinib plasma levels (IPL) identified in some studies, no recommendations for the use of IPL results in routine management of CML patients have been issued. We report two patients in whom daily imatinib dose was increased from 400 to 600 or 800 mg because of low IPL found at various intervals from the beginning of treatment (7 measurements; mean IPL values = 616.33 and 764.5 ng/mL, respectively). Both patients achieved suboptimal response according to the European LeukemiaNet criteria (complete cytogenetic response was not achieved after 1 year of treatment in patient 1 and major molecular response after 47 months of standard-dose imatinib therapy in patient 2). In addition, we have demonstrated low hOCT-1 expression at diagnosis in both patients, retrospectively. Escalation of imatinib daily dose resulted in a significant increase of IPL (6 measurements; mean = 1790 and 1416.66 ng/mL, respectively) and in the achievement of complete cytogenetic response in patient 1 after 3 months and major molecular response within 15 and 6 months in both patients. Our cases demonstrate that low IPL identified at various non-predefined intervals from the beginning of therapy may be used for deciding on dose escalation in selected CML patients in the routine clinical setting, especially in cases with suboptimal treatment response.

Imatinib mesylate efficacy in 72 previously treated Philadelphia-positive chronic myeloid leukemia patients with and without additional chromosomal changes: single-center results.

Reported here are 72 previously treated Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) CML patients on imatinib (IM) therapy, with a focus on patients with additional chromosomal aberrations (CAs). At the start of IM treatment, 49 patients exhibited only the Ph chromosome (68%) and 23 patients (32%) had one or more additional CAs. The most frequent additional changes were deletions on the der(9q) (8 of 23), trisomy 8 (3 of 23), and an extra copy of the Ph chromosome (2 of 23). Five patients had a complex karyotype. At the latest follow-up, 49 of the 72 patients (68%) were alive, including 15 of the 23 patients with additional CAs (65%). Median follow-up was 6.6 years; median duration of IM treatment was 4.4 years. In all, 35 of the 49 patients with Ph only (71%) and 10 of the 23 patients with additional CAs (43%) achieved complete cytogenetic response. All patients with deletion on der(9q) achieved complete cytogenetic response. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall survival of patients with additional CAs and patients with Ph as the sole abnormality. Patients in accelerated phase had significantly worse overall survival on IM, regardless of additional CAs. The present results confirm that the majority of previously treated Ph+ CML patients benefit from starting IM therapy, including patients with defined additional changes. In contrast, patients with complex karyotypes have poor prognosis, even with IM.

Successful childbirth in a patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia treated with imatinib mesylate during early pregnancy.

AIMS: To report a case of successful pregnancy in a patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia treated with imatinib mesylate for the first 4 months of pregnancy. RESULTS: Imatinib mesylate is potentially teratogenic and its use during pregnancy in humans can lead to abortion or development of fetal abnormalities in nearly 40% of fully reported cases. We report a case of a 28-year-old woman who delivered a healthy child of normal weight after having been treated with imatinib for Ph1-positive CML during the first four months of her pregnancy. She refused advocated interruption and for the rest of the pregnancy was treated with interferon. The treatment was associated with a rapid 2-log increase in the leukemia clone measured by the real-time polymerase chain reaction. Reintroduction of imatinib after delivery resulted in achievement of the complete cytogenetic response again. CONCLUSIONS: We discuss possible strategies for successful management of pregnancy in CML patients treated with imatinib.

Intermittent dosage of imatinib mesylate in CML patients with a history of significant hematologic toxicity after standard dosing.

Hematologic toxicity is reported as one of the most important problems connected with imatinib mesylate (IM) treatment in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Withholding the drug or application of growth factors is recommended in this situation. This study introduced a novel approach using intermittent dosage of IM in order to avoid prolonged interruptions in therapy, to allow spontaneous recovery in blood count and, simultaneously, to achieve intermittently therapeutic plasma drug levels. A retrospective analysis of intermittent therapy (iT) in 12 patients with CML is presented. All patients had intermediate-to-high prognostic scores. Two patients had history of autologous stem cell transplantation. Initial standard therapy with IM was indicated for resistance to interferon (eight subjects) and for accelerated phase in four cases (one of them cytogenetic) and lasted for 1 - 6 months. iT with 300 - 600 mg of IM 1 - 5 times a week was started after significant hematologic toxicity occurred. In three patients treated 3 - 5 times a week, hematologic recovery allowed reintroduction of full dose after 3 - 7 (mean 4.6) months. In three patients, one-to-three doses per week were sufficient to maintain the cytogenetic response for a mean of 30.6 months (range 29 - 33). Six patients tolerated more frequent dosage of 4 - 5 times a week for a mean of 17.8 months (range 3 - 28). Five patients improved their cytogenetic response during iT, while hematologic progression occurred in one patient. Development of a cytogenetic abnormality in a Ph-negative clone was observed in one patient. Overall, two complete and five major cytogenetic responses were achieved. The sensitivity of Bcr/Abl kinase to inhibition by IM was proved in seven patients tested by Crkl phosphorylation assay. Measurement of plasma IM concentrations in three subjects showed concentrations fully compatible with the dosage applied suggesting normal intestinal absorption. iT with IM is a feasible and safe strategy for short-time 'bridging' management of patients with significant hematologic toxicity after standard daily dosing. Long-term iT with IM does not seem to compromise the cytogenetic response in patients with sensitivity of Bcr/Abl kinase to IM and should be considered as a plausible treatment option in patients with persistent signs of myelotoxicity.