[TREATMENT OF SEROTONIN AND NOREPINEPHRINE REUPTAKE INHIBITORS (SSRIS AND SNRIS) DURING PREGNANCY AND LACTATION].

INTRODUCTION: Women are more likely to develop depression during the perinatal period than at any other time in their lives. Studies from recent years raise significant concerns regarding the potential of a depressive disorder in the pregnant mother to cause adverse obstetric results for the mother and the newborn. As antidepressants can penetrate the placenta to different degrees, concern has been raised regarding their teratogenic potential. In recent years various inconsistent and ambiguous reports specifying mild risks to the fetus and newborn from exposure to serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) during pregnancy have been published. This paper provides a review of current medical knowledge regarding the pharmacological treatment with common antidepressants such as SSRIs and SNRIs in pregnant women. Based on this review we also present treatment and follow-up recommendations of the major published guidelines for the treatment of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs and SNRIs) during pregnancy for the medical care providers.

[STIGMA AND MISINFORMATION ABOUT METHADONE MAINTENANCE THERAPY].

INTRODUCTION: Opioids play a key role in managing acute and chronic pain, but at the same time, opioid abuse is a socio-economic and health problem that has been expanding over the past three decades, causing a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Methadone maintenance therapy is the most effective treatment choice (combined with psychosocial therapy) for opioid addiction. However, only a small proportion of people with opioid addiction turn to this treatment. In addition, patients applying for methadone maintenance treatment do so with great delay, after 10 and even 20 years of addiction. A possible explanation for this phenomenon discussed in the medical literature is stigma and misinformation about methadone maintenance therapy in patients with substance use disorder, society, family of patients, and healthcare professionals.

Ocular side effects of novel anti-cancer biological therapies.

To examine the ocular side effects of selected biological anti-cancer therapies and the ocular and systemic prognosis of patients receiving them. We retrospectively reviewed all medical records of patients who received biological anti-cancer treatment from 1/2012 to 12/2017 and who were treated at our ocular oncology service. The following data was retrieved: primary malignancy, metastasis, type of biological therapy, ocular side effects, ophthalmic treatment, non-ocular side effects, and ocular and systemic disease prognoses. Twenty-two patients received biological therapies and reported ocular side effects. Eighteen patients (81.8%) had bilateral ocular side effects, including uveitis (40.9%), dry eye (22.7%), and central serous retinopathy (22.7%). One patient (4.5%) had central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), and one patient (4.5%) had branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). At the end of follow-up, 6 patients (27.27%) had resolution of the ocular disease, 13 patients (59.09%) had stable ocular disease, and 3 patients (13.64%) had progression of the ocular disease. Visual acuity improved significantly at the end of follow-up compared to initial values. Eighteen patients (81.8%) were alive at study closure. Biological therapies can cause a wide range of ocular side effects ranging from dry eye symptoms to severe pathologies that may cause ocular morbidity and vision loss, such as uveitis, CRAO and BRVO. All patients receiving biological treatments should be screened by ophthalmologists before treatment, re-screened every 4-6 months during treatment, and again at the end of treatment. Patients on biological treatment who have ocular complaints should be urgently referred to ocular consultation for early identification and early intervention.

The Relation between Changes in Vitamin D and Vitamin B12 Levels, Body Mass Index and Outcome in Methadone Maintenance Treatment Patients.

Patients' Body Mass Index (BMI) increase during methadone maintenance treatment (MMT), and both Vitamins D and B12 deficiencies may be associated with BMI. We studied the relations between BMI, these vitamins and treatment outcome in patients with opioid use disorder receiving MMT. Vitamin B12 levels were available for 272 patients and Vitamin D levels were available for 260 patients. Of those 112 and 80 respectively had two measures (at admission or thereafter, and while stabilized or after one year in treatment). Patients' BMI levels and long-term retention were analyzed. Vitamin B12 was lower in patients abusing cocaine/amphetamine on admission. Vitamin D did not change over time, but a significant weight gain could be observed in 38 patients whose vitamin D was elevated compared to 42 whose levels were not, (25.4 ± 4.8 to 28.8 ± 5.2 vs. 24.3 ± 3.7 to 25.5 ± 4.0, p(Time) < 0.0005, p(Group) = 0.03, p(interaction) = 0.02). BMI changes correlated with vitamin D levels change (r = 0.26, p = .04). Longer cumulative retention was observed among the elevated vitamin D group (8.1 years, 95% CI 6.3-9.8) in comparison with the non-elevated group (4.8y 95% CI 3.6-6.1, Kaplan Meier, p = .02). Stimulants misuse was associated with low B12 levels. Vitamin D elevation is associated with weight gain and longer retention in treatment.

Incidence of typically Severe Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases in Consanguineous and Non-consanguineous Populations.

PURPOSE: Primary immunodeficiency diseases are considered to be rare diseases; however, data on the exact birth incidences of these diseases are sparse. Southern Israel is inhabited by two major populations: a relatively non-consanguineous Jewish population and a highly consanguineous Muslim Bedouin population. We sought to calculate the incidences of typically severe primary immunodeficiency diseases and compare the incidences in these populations. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all typically severe primary immunodeficiency diseases evaluated at a single center from January 1, 1996 to December 31, 2016. The amount of live births by population was the denominator for calculating the incidences by population. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients were included, 85 of Bedouin and 10 of Jewish ethnicities. There were 152,331 births in the Bedouin and 160,998 births in the Jewish populations. The total incidence of typically severe primary immunodeficiency diseases was higher in the Bedouin population than expected based on previous studies. The total incidences were 55.8/105 births in the Bedouin population compared with 6.2/105 births in the Jewish population (P < 0.001). The incidences of all combined immunodeficiency diseases, ataxia telangiectasia, and infantile IBD due to interleukin 10 receptor defects were all significantly higher in the Bedouin population (P < 0.001). The incidence of X-linked agammaglobulinemia was not significantly different between both populations (P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Typically, severe primary immunodeficiency diseases are not rare diseases in a consanguineous population; these diseases are significantly more common in the Bedouin population. This finding is probably also applicable to other consanguineous populations, and in these populations, primary immunodeficiency diseases should not be regarded as rare diseases.