Neoadjuvant Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Resectable Stage III Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Phase 1-2 trials involving patients with resectable, macroscopic stage III melanoma have shown that neoadjuvant immunotherapy is more efficacious than adjuvant immunotherapy. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with resectable, macroscopic stage III melanoma, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive two cycles of neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab and then undergo surgery or to undergo surgery and then receive 12 cycles of adjuvant nivolumab. Only the patients in the neoadjuvant group who had a partial response or nonresponse received subsequent adjuvant treatment. The primary end point was event-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 423 patients underwent randomization. At a median follow-up of 9.9 months, the estimated 12-month event-free survival was 83.7% (99.9% confidence interval [CI], 73.8 to 94.8) in the neoadjuvant group and 57.2% (99.9% CI, 45.1 to 72.7) in the adjuvant group. The difference in restricted mean survival time was 8.00 months (99.9% CI, 4.94 to 11.05; P<0.001; hazard ratio for progression, recurrence, or death, 0.32; 99.9% CI, 0.15 to 0.66). In the neoadjuvant group, 59.0% of the patients had a major pathological response, 8.0% had a partial response, 26.4% had a nonresponse (>50% residual viable tumor), and 2.4% had progression; in 4.2%, surgery had not yet been performed or was omitted. The estimated 12-month recurrence-free survival was 95.1% among patients in the neoadjuvant group who had a major pathological response, 76.1% among those who had a partial response, and 57.0% among those who had a nonresponse. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher that were related to systemic treatment occurred in 29.7% of the patients in the neoadjuvant group and in 14.7% in the adjuvant group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with resectable, macroscopic stage III melanoma, neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed by surgery and response-driven adjuvant therapy resulted in longer event-free survival than surgery followed by adjuvant nivolumab. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and others; NADINA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04949113.).

Predicting Recurrence-Free and Overall Survival for Patients With Stage II Melanoma: The MIA Calculator.

PURPOSE: Improvements in recurrence-free survival (RFS) were demonstrated in two recent randomized trials for patients with sentinel node (SN)-negative stage IIB or IIC melanoma receiving adjuvant systemic therapy (pembrolizumab/nivolumab). However, adverse events also occurred. Accurate individualized prognostic estimates of RFS and overall survival (OS) would allow patients to more accurately weigh the risks and benefits of adjuvant therapy. Since the current American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition (AJCC-8) melanoma staging system focuses on melanoma-specific survival, we developed a multivariable risk prediction calculator that provides estimates of 5- and 10-year RFS and OS for these patients. METHODS: Data were extracted from the Melanoma Institute Australia (MIA) database for patients diagnosed with stage II (clinical or pathological) melanoma (n = 3,220). Survival prediction models were developed using multivariable Cox regression analyses (MIA models) and externally validated twice using data sets from the United States and the Netherlands. Each model's performance was assessed using C-statistics and calibration plots and compared with Cox models on the basis of AJCC-8 staging (stage models). RESULTS: The 5-year and 10-year RFS C-statistics were 0.70 and 0.73 (MIA-model) versus 0.61 and 0.60 (stage-model), respectively. For OS, the 5-year and 10-year C-statistics were 0.71 and 0.75 (MIA-model) compared with 0.62 and 0.61 (stage-model), respectively. The MIA models were well calibrated and externally validated. CONCLUSION: The MIA models offer accurate and personalized estimates of both RFS and OS in patients with stage II melanoma even in the absence of pathological staging with SN biopsy. These models were robust on external validations and may be used in everyday practice both with (ideally) and without performing SN biopsy to identify high-risk patients for further management strategies. An online tool will be available at the MIA website (Risk Prediction Tools).

Role of Concurrent Ultrasound Surveillance of Sentinel Node-Positive Node Fields in Melanoma Patients Having Routine Cross-Sectional Imaging.

PURPOSE: In sentinel node-positive (SN+ve) melanoma patients, active surveillance with regular ultrasound examination of the node field has become standard, rather than completion lymph node dissection (CLND). A proportion of these patients now receive adjuvant systemic therapy and have routine cross-sectional imaging (computed tomography [CT] or positron emission tomography [PET]/CT). The role of concurrent ultrasound (US) surveillance in these patients is unclear. The purpose of our study was to describe the modality of detection of nodal recurrence in SN+ve node fields. METHODS: SN+ve melanoma patients who did not undergo CLND treated at a single institution from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020 were included. RESULTS: A total of 225 SN+ve patients with a median follow-up of 23 months were included. Of these, 119 (53%) received adjuvant systemic therapy. Eighty (36%) developed a recurrence at any site; 24 (11%) recurred first in the SN+ve field, of which 12 (5%) were confirmed node field recurrence only at 2 months follow-up. The nodal recurrences were first detected by ultrasound in seven (3%), CT in seven (3%), and PET/CT in seven (3%) patients. All nodal recurrences evident on US were also evident on PET/CT and vice versa. CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of recurrences outside the node field and the identification of all US-detected nodal recurrences on concurrent cross-sectional imaging modalities suggest that routine concurrent ultrasound surveillance of the node-positive field may be unnecessary for SN+ve melanoma patients having routine cross-sectional imaging.

Modeling Methods in Craniofacial Virtual Surgical Planning.

Despite the widespread use of virtual surgical planning (VSP), few papers describe the modeling methods used to generate the digital simulations that underpin VSP. This paper aims to review the modeling methods that are currently available for use in VSP and the implications of their use in clinical practice. A literature review was undertaken of the two broad categories of modeling techniques; contour-based planning-namely mirroring from the contralateral side, templating from a normative database, and extrapolation from surrounding landmarks-and occlusal-based planning (OBP). The indications for each modeling method were discussed, including mandibular/maxillary reconstruction, pediatric craniofacial surgery, and orthognathic, as well as the limitations to the accuracy of modeling types. Unilateral defects of the upper/midface, wherein contour accuracy is paramount, are best reconstructed using mirroring methods, whereas bilateral defects-or cases with asymmetry due to craniofacial dysmorphology-are most suited to normative-data-based methods. Cases involving resection of the alveolar margin, in which functional occlusion is the primary outcome are best managed with OBP. Similarly, orthognathic surgery typically uses OBP, although complex cases involving asymmetry, such as clefts, may benefit from a combination of OBP and normative data methods. The choice of modeling methods is, therefore, largely driven by the defect type and the goals of reconstruction.

Assessment of paediatric head shape and management of craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: The presentation of a child with an abnormal head shape can be challenging and should be met with an appropriate clinical approach. Craniosynostosis is a common cause of paediatric skull deformity and is best managed by a multispecialty tertiary referral unit with regular follow-up. As craniosynostosis frequently requires time-sensitive surgery, it is important to differentiate between craniosynostosis and common self-limiting conditions such as deformational plagiocephaly. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article is to outline the clinical approach to paediatric skull deformity in the general practice setting, and to highlight the importance of early referral if there is clinical suspicion of craniosynostosis. DISCUSSION: Parental concern regarding infant head shape is common. General practitioners (GPs) have an important role in assessment, diagnosis and referral for paediatric skull deformities. GPs are well placed to clinically differentiate between deformational plagiocephaly and craniosynostosis and provide timely referrals to optimise patient outcomes.

BRAF mutation testing for patients diagnosed with stage III or stage IV melanoma: practical guidance for the Australian setting.

Targeted therapy (BRAF inhibitor plus MEK inhibitor) is now among the possible treatment options for patients with BRAF mutation-positive stage III or stage IV melanoma. This makes prompt BRAF mutation testing an important step in the management of patients diagnosed with stage III or IV melanoma; one that can help better ensure that the optimal choice of systemic treatment is initiated with minimal delay. This article offers guidance about when and how BRAF mutation testing should be conducted when patients are diagnosed with melanoma in Australia. Notably, it recommends that pathologists reflexively order BRAF mutation testing whenever a patient is found to have American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage III or IV melanoma (i.e., any metastatic spread beyond the primary tumour) and that patient's BRAF mutation status is hitherto unknown, even if BRAF mutation testing has not been specifically requested by the treating clinician (in Australia, Medicare-subsidised BRAFV600 mutation testing does not need to be requested by the treating clinician). When performed in centres with appropriate expertise and experience, immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the anti-BRAF V600E monoclonal antibody (VE1) can be a highly sensitive and specific means of detecting BRAFV600E mutations, and may be used as a rapid and relatively inexpensive initial screening test. However, VE1 immunostaining can be technically challenging and difficult to interpret, particularly in heavily pigmented tumours; melanomas with weak, moderate or focal BRAFV600E immunostaining should be regarded as equivocal. It must also be remembered that other activating BRAFV600 mutations (including BRAFV600K), which account for ∼10-20% of BRAFV600 mutations, are not detected with currently available IHC antibodies. For these reasons, if available and practicable, we recommend that DNA-based BRAF mutation testing always be performed, regardless of whether IHC-based testing is also conducted. Advice about tissue/specimen selection for BRAF mutation testing of patients diagnosed with stage III or IV melanoma is also offered in this article; and potential pitfalls when interpreting BRAF mutation tests are highlighted.

Case report of a challenging medium-sized congenital melanocytic nevus (CMN): Highlighting a role for reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) for evaluating changing CMN in children.

A 3.5-month-old boy presented with a changing medium-sized congenital melanocytic nevus on his leg. Due to atypical features on dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), an excision of the area of concern was performed. Histopathology showed many of the pathological features usually associated with a diagnosis of melanoma in situ in older patients, but due to the young age of the patient, absence of mitoses, and the degree of atypia, a diagnosis of a dysplastic compound nevus arising in a congenital compound (predominantly dermal) nevus was favored. In our case, RCM corresponded to histopathology helped target the area of concern and map the clinical and subclinical components to facilitate an optimal biopsy.

Re-defining the role of surgery in the management of patients with oligometastatic stage IV melanoma in the era of effective systemic therapies.

Although previously the mainstay of treatment, the role of surgery in the management of patients with oligometastatic stage IV melanoma has changed with the advent of effective systemic therapies (most notably immunotherapy). Contemporary treatment options for patients with asymptomatic solitary or oligo-metastases include upfront surgery followed by adjuvant immunotherapy or upfront immunotherapy with salvage surgery as required. For suspected solitary or oligo-metastases, surgery serves both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Advances in radiological technology allow metastases to be detected earlier and surgery to be less morbid. Surgical morbidities are generally more tolerable than serious immune-related adverse effects, but surgery may be less effective. Upfront immunotherapy ensures that futile surgery is not offered for rapidly progressive disease. It also provides an opportunity to assess response to treatment, which predicts outcome, and may obviate the need for surgery. However, it is important not to miss a window of opportunity for surgical intervention, whereby if disease progresses on immunotherapy it becomes unresectable. In situations where local therapy is recommended but surgery is not desired, stereotactic radiosurgery may be an effective alternative. The decision-making process regarding upfront surgery versus immunotherapy needs to take place within a specialist melanoma multidisciplinary setting and be customised to individual patient and tumour factors. Ultimately, high-level clinical trial evidence is required to resolve uncertainties in the management of patients with oligometastatic stage IV melanoma but the complexity of the varying presentations may make trial design challenging.

Use of Onlay Hydroxyapatite Cement for Secondary Cranioplasty.

BACKGROUND: Children who undergo bi-fronto-orbital advancement (BFOA) frequently develop a contour deformity on the temporal and supra-orbital region, with an incidence reported as high as 55% and 75%, respectively. Up to 20% of patients may require correction. Hydroxyapatite cement (HAC) is a good alternative to autogenous tissue. The available literature on its use focusses on the reconstruction of bone defects, but little has been published on its efficacy and safety as an onlay graft over intact cranium. OBJECTIVES: To describe our institution's experience with HAC in the pediatric population. METHODS: Retrospective chart review from 1998 to 2018 on all patients from the Craniofacial Unit at the Sydney Children's Hospital who had either coronal or metopic craniosynostosis and underwent BFOA and later in life required cranioplasty with HAC for contour repair. FINDINGS: We have performed 166 BFOA and nineteen secondary cranioplasties for contour repair using onlay HAC. The mean age at the time of operation was 14 years. Bi-coronal craniosynostosis was most frequently associated with secondary cranioplasty and 37% had an associated syndrome. The mean volume of HAC used was 37 mL. There was only 1 patient who had a complication (5.3%) and required partial removal of allograft. The mean length of admission was 2 days. Mean follow up time of 22.4 months. CONCLUSIONS: HAC represents a safe option when used correctly, with low rates of complication and satisfactory cosmetic outcomes.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for in-transit melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in metastatic melanoma is well established. However, there are limited data regarding their efficacy in in-transit melanoma (ITM). This study assessed the efficacy of ICI in patients with ITM. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with ITM commenced on an ICI between March 2013 and February 2018 at three tertiary centers in Australia. Patients were excluded if they had previous or synchronous distant metastases. Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were based on a composite of radiological and clinical assessments. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were included: 27 (50%) female; median age 75 (range 26-94); 12 (22%) stage IIIB, 40 (74%) stage IIIC and 2 (4%) stage IIID; 10 (19%) BRAF mutant. Forty (74%) received single-agent anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab or nivolumab), 8 (15%) single agent anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab), 5 (9%) combination anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab and nivolumab or pembrolizumab) and 1 (2%) combination anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab) and MEK inhibitor (cobimetinib). The median follow-up was 15 months (2-46).ORR to ICI was 54%: 14 (26%) complete responses; 15 (28%) partial responses; 9 (17%) stable disease; 16 (30%) progressive disease. Thirteen (46%) responders had only one ITM lesion. ORR was 58% for single-agent anti-PD-1, 38% for single-agent anti-CTLA4 and 40% for anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4. The median PFS was 11.7 months (6.6-not reached). 1-year and 2-year PFS were 48% and 39%, respectively,. Fourteen progressed locoregionally and 11 progressed distantly. The median OS was not reached. 1-year and 2-year OS were 85% and 63%, respectively. No clinicopathological features were associated with ORR. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: ICI produce objective responses in ITM and should be considered in patients with unresectable ITM or disease recurrence.

The removal of cranial springs used in the treatment of scaphocephaly: A minimal access approach.

The treatment of non-syndromic scaphocephaly with spring-activated cranioplasty offers acceptable outcomes with the potential for reduced surgical morbidity when compared with cranial vault remodelling procedures. A disadvantage of this technique is the need for a second operative intervention to remove the implanted devices. There are many descriptions of the surgical technique for performing spring-activated cranioplasty available in the literature; however, little is documented regarding the procedures used for device removal. The published accounts of spring removal demonstrate a wide range of approaches, from the reopening and dissection of the entire previous surgical field, to attempts to limit the incisions and dissection. In this study we describe our technique for the minimally invasive removal of cranial springs used in the treatment of scaphocephaly. Our technique focuses on minimal soft tissue disruption and uses a Kirschner wire cutter to divide the spring at its mid-point so as to relieve any residual internal forces acting on the footplates.

Orthognathic Surgery for Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate.

Cleft orthognathic surgery is an important component of a comprehensive cleft care plan. Applying combined orthodontic and orthognathic treatment principles to a cohort of patients with cleft lip and palate raises many challenges not encountered in conventional orthognathic care. Cleft patients share a commonality in their midfacial anatomy that is characterized by a 3-dimensionally deficient maxilla. The residual sequelae of multiple previous surgeries along with dental differences and unhealed fistulae are considerations when embarking on treatment. This article describes many of these challenges and highlights approaches that are used to address the specific needs of this special group of patients.

Pigmented lesions of the nail bed - Clinical assessment and biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Subungual melanoma is an uncommon type of melanoma that can be difficult to diagnose. Patients often present with advanced primary lesions and have an associated increased risk of nodal disease. Delays in diagnosis are believed to contribute to poor patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to offer an approach to assessing and managing patients who present with subungual pigmented lesions. We describe the anatomy of the nail bed to offer a rationale for our technique of nail bed biopsy, and warn of the potential to cause permanent nail dystrophy through other approaches. DISCUSSION: Many clinicians have limited experience in assessing lesions of the nail apparatus.Subungual pigmentation has extremely broad differential diagnoses, which include a variety of benign pathologies. A systematic approach to assessment, and early referral of patients with suspicious lesions to a specialist unit, has the potential to improve patient outcomes.

Gene therapy for tolerance: high-level expression of donor major histocompatibility complex in the liver overcomes naive and memory alloresponses to skin grafts.

BACKGROUND: The liver has long been recognized as having tolerogenic properties. We investigated whether recombinant adenoassociated virus (rAAV)-mediated expression of donor major histocompatibility complex in recipient livers could induce tolerance to donor-strain grafts. METHODS: Naive B10.BR (H-2) or B10.BR recipients primed with a H-2K-expressing (K) skin graft were injected with rAAV-expressing H-2K (rAAV-K) to induce K expression on hepatocytes 7 days before challenge with a K skin graft. K-specific responses were measured by interferon (IFN)-γ ELISpot and flow cytometric assessment of directly H-2K reactive cells. Fully allogeneic grafts from C57BL/6 (H-2) donors were transplanted onto longstanding B10.BR recipients of K skin to test for linked epitope suppression. RESULTS: rAAV-K-treated B10.BR mice accepted K skin grafts with increased median survival time (MST) more than 169 days compared to uninoculated (MST=18.5 days) and rAAV-K-treated controls (MST=19 days). rAAV-K-treated B10.BR animals primed with K skin grafts also accepted secondary K skin grafts in the long term (MST>100 days) compared to accelerated rejection in primed, uninoculated mice (MST=12 days). Treatments did not induce liver pathology, assessed by serum alanine aminotransferase levels and histology. IFN-γ ELISpot analysis of splenocytes from rAAV-K-treated mice indicated reduced responses to donor K antigen, but protection was not extended to fully allogeneic C57BL/6 skin or heart grafts, even in recipients that had accepted K skin grafts in the long term. CONCLUSIONS: High-level expression of donor major histocompatibility complex in recipient livers promotes tolerance to skin allografts, even in animals primed to produce a memory response. This provides proof of concept for an approach using liver-targeted gene delivery for tolerance induction to donor antigen.

The 2009 Sydney shark attacks: case series and literature review.

BACKGROUND: There were 59 unprovoked shark attacks worldwide in 2008. Twelve of these occurred in Australia, ranking it as second only to the USA. In February 2009, two attacks occurred within 72 h in Sydney, Australia. METHODS: The two patients involved survived severe limb trauma. Case 1 suffered bite trauma to the lower limb and hand and underwent staged debridement and early amputation. Case 2 presented with a hand severed at the level of the wrist that was initially replanted. However, it would succumb to progressive necrosis after 12 days. We discuss the aspects of these cases that contributed to the patients' survival and ultimately good functional outcomes. DISCUSSION: New paradigms for the management of major trauma patients have emerged over the last decade. We consider recent advances in the understanding of pre-hospital tourniquet use, rapid transit to the operating suite and damage control surgery, and examine how they impacted on the management of our patients. Very little is known about the microbiology of shark bites. Organisms from sea water, the patient's skin and the shark's mouth must all be considered when selecting appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis. The planning of definitive surgery in severe limb trauma is dependent on the interactions of a number of factors including physical, psychological and social issues. The decision to ultimately replant or amputate the effected limb is best made in union with the patient and their family.

Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: tip of the iceberg.

The World Health Organization predicts that people aged older than 65 years will comprise 20% of the world's population by 2030. One of the most commonly prescribed medications for the elderly are the bisphosphonates, which have been shown to significantly reduce debilitating and fatal fractures by preserving bone density and consequently saving governments billions of dollars annually. Despite rigorous testing, 190 million prescriptions worldwide and US$8000 million in revenue, there is a serious adverse effect called bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw, which is poorly described and difficult to treat. The difficulty is compounded by the inability of medical personnel to recognize and adequately refer these patients or take adequate precautions before instituting bisphosphonate therapy. A myriad of differentials and a lack of consensus on how to definitively treat these patients have made this new presentation a worrying precursor for millions of other consumers who will reach the 5-year oral half life of bisphosphonates, which is when they generally start to present. In this paper, we explore historical parallels and provide the most comprehensive review to date in the literature about the presentation, diagnosis, treatment, pathophysiology, oncogenic associations, and best practice guidelines. Legal action pursuant to bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw is underway on 3 continents, and we believe that every health care professional should become au fait with this condition for which our growing case series represents merely the tip of the iceberg.