Review of the Impact of Biofilm Formation on Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) may recur in approximately 10-30% of patients, and the risk of recurrence increases with each successive recurrence, reaching up to 65%. C. difficile can form biofilm with approximately 20% of the bacterial genome expressed differently between biofilm and planktonic cells. Biofilm plays several roles that may favor recurrence; for example, it may act as a reservoir of spores, protect the vegetative cells from the activity of antibiotics, and favor the formation of persistent cells. Moreover, the expression of several virulence genes, including TcdA and TcdB toxins, has been associated with recurrence. Several systems and structures associated with adhesion and biofilm formation have been studied in C. difficile, including cell-wall proteins, quorum sensing (including LuxS and Agr), Cyclic di-GMP, type IV pili, and flagella. Most antibiotics recommended for the treatment of CDI do not have activity on spores and do not eliminate biofilm. Therapeutic failure in R-CDI has been associated with the inadequate concentration of drugs in the intestinal tract and the antibiotic resistance of a biofilm. This makes it challenging to eradicate C. difficile in the intestine, complicating antibacterial therapies and allowing non-eliminated spores to remain in the biofilm, increasing the risk of recurrence. In this review, we examine the role of biofilm on recurrence and the challenges of treating CDI when the bacteria form a biofilm.

Transcriptomic analysis of biofilm formation in strains of Clostridioides difficile associated with recurrent and non-recurrent infection reveals potential candidate markers for recurrence.

The transcriptomic profile in a biofilm model of ribotypes (RT) 001 and 027 associated with recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (R-CDI) and not associated with recurrent (NR)-CDI was analyzed to identify genes that may favor the recurrence. Twenty strains were selected, 10 RT001 and 10 RT027. From each ribotype, 5 were R-CDI and 5 NR-CDI. Biofilm and nonadherent cells were prepared from each clinical isolate, and the RNA was extracted. RNA samples were pooled in 8 combinations implying ribotype, recurrence, and biofilm formation. Each pool was separately labeled with Cy3 dye and hybridized on a microarray designed for this study. Slides were scanned, analyzed, and gene expression was compared between unique and grouped pools using the Student's t-test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction when appropriate. Validation was carried out by qRT-PCR for selected genes. Results: After comparisons of differentially expressed genes from both ribotypes of R-CDI strains (nonadherent cells vs. biofilm) and both ribotypes in biofilm (R-CDI vs. NR-CDI), we found 3 genes over-expressed and 1 under-expressed in common (adj. p ≤ 0.05). Overexpressed genes were CAJ70148 (a putative dehydrogenase), CAJ68100 (a secretion type II system protein from the GspH (pseudopilins) family), and CAJ69725 (a putative membrane protein); under-expressed was CAJ68151 (a segregation and condensation protein A). Because CAJ70148, CAJ68100, CAJ69725 and CAJ68151 were differentially expressed in biofilm in strains associated with R-CDI, they may support the biofilm favoring the recurrence of CDI. However, further studies will be needed for poorly studied genes.

Whole genome analysis of Gram-negative bacteria using the EPISEQ CS application and other bioinformatic platforms.

OBJECTIVES: To determine genomic characteristics and molecular epidemiology of carbapenem non-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from medical centres of Mexico using whole genome sequencing data analysed with the EPISEQⓇ CS application and other bioinformatic platforms. METHODS: Clinical isolates collected from 28 centres in Mexico included carbapenem-non-susceptible K. pneumoniae (n = 22), E. coli (n = 24), A. baumannii (n = 16), and P. aeruginosa (n = 13). Isolates were subjected to whole genome sequencing using the Illumina (MiSeq) platform. FASTQ files were uploaded to the EPISEQⓇ CS application for analysis. Additionally, the tools Kleborate v2.0.4 and Pathogenwatch were used as comparators for Klebsiella genomes, and the bacterial whole genome sequence typing database was used for E. coli and A. baumannii. RESULTS: For K. pneumoniae, both bioinformatic approaches detected multiple genes encoding aminoglycoside, quinolone, and phenicol resistance, and the presence of blaNDM-1 explained carbapenem non-susceptibility in 18 strains and blaKPC-3 in four strains. Regarding E. coli, both EPISEQⓇ CS and bacterial whole genome sequence typing database analyses detected multiple virulence and resistance genes: 20 of 24 (83.3%) strains carried blaNDM, 3 of 24 (12.4%) carried blaOXA-232, and 1 carried blaOXA-181. Genes that confer resistance to aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, sulfonamides, phenicols, trimethoprim, and macrolides were also detected by both platforms. Regarding A. baumannii, the most frequent carbapenemase-encoding gene detected by both platforms was blaOXA-72, followed by blaOXA-66. Both approaches detected similar genes for aminoglycosides, carbapenems, tetracyclines, phenicols, and sulfonamides. Regarding P. aeruginosa, blaVIM, blaIMP, and blaGES were the more frequently detected. Multiple virulence genes were detected in all strains. CONCLUSION: Compared to the other available platforms, EPISEQⓇ CS enabled a comprehensive resistance and virulence analysis, providing a reliable method for bacterial strain typing and characterization of the virulome and resistome.

Carbapenemase-Encoding Genes and Colistin Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mexico: Results from the Invifar Network.

In this study, we report the carbapenemase-encoding genes and colistin resistance in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinical isolates included carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, carbapenem-resistant E. coli, carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa. Carbapenemase-encoding genes were detected by PCR. Carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant E. coli isolates were analyzed using the Rapid Polymyxin NP assay. mcr genes were screened by PCR. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and whole-genome sequencing were performed on representative isolates. A total of 80 carbapenem-resistant E. coli, 103 carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, 284 carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, and 129 carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates were recovered. All carbapenem-resistant E. coli and carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates were included for further analysis. A selection of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa strains was further analyzed (86 carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii and 82 carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa). Among carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant E. coli isolates, the most frequent gene was blaNDM (86/103 [83.5%] and 72/80 [90%], respectively). For carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, the most frequently detected gene was blaOXA-40 (52/86, 60.5%), and for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, was blaVIM (19/82, 23.2%). For carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, five indistinguishable pulsotypes were detected. Circulation of K. pneumoniae New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase (NDM) and E. coli NDM was detected in Mexico. High virulence sequence types (STs), such as K. pneumoniae ST307, E. coli ST167, P. aeruginosa ST111, and A. baumannii ST2, were detected. Among K. pneumoniae isolates, 18/101 (17.8%) were positive for the Polymyxin NP test (two, 11.0% positive for the mcr-1 gene, and one, 5.6% with disruption of the mgrB gene). All E. coli isolates were negative for the Polymyxin NP test. In conclusion, K. pneumoniae NDM and E. coli NDM were detected in Mexico, with the circulation of highly virulent STs. These results are relevant in clinical practice to guide antibiotic therapies considering the molecular mechanisms of resistance to carbapenems.