Supporting Pharmacovigilance Signal Validation and Prioritization with Analyses of Routinely Collected Health Data: Lessons Learned from an EHDEN Network Study.

INTRODUCTION: Individual case reports are the main asset in pharmacovigilance signal management. Signal validation is the first stage after signal detection and aims to determine if there is sufficient evidence to justify further assessment. Throughout signal management, a prioritization of signals is continually made. Routinely collected health data can provide relevant contextual information but are primarily used at a later stage in pharmacoepidemiological studies to assess communicated signals. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility and utility of analysing routine health data from a multinational distributed network to support signal validation and prioritization and to reflect on key user requirements for these analyses to become an integral part of this process. METHODS: Statistical signal detection was performed in VigiBase, the WHO global database of individual case safety reports, targeting generic manufacturer drugs and 16 prespecified adverse events. During a 5-day study-a-thon, signal validation and prioritization were performed using information from VigiBase, regulatory documents and the scientific literature alongside descriptive analyses of routine health data from 10 partners of the European Health Data and Evidence Network (EHDEN). Databases included in the study were from the UK, Spain, Norway, the Netherlands and Serbia, capturing records from primary care and/or hospitals. RESULTS: Ninety-five statistical signals were subjected to signal validation, of which eight were considered for descriptive analyses in the routine health data. Design, execution and interpretation of results from these analyses took up to a few hours for each signal (of which 15-60 minutes were for execution) and informed decisions for five out of eight signals. The impact of insights from the routine health data varied and included possible alternative explanations, potential public health and clinical impact and feasibility of follow-up pharmacoepidemiological studies. Three signals were selected for signal assessment, two of these decisions were supported by insights from the routine health data. Standardization of analytical code, availability of adverse event phenotypes including bridges between different source vocabularies, and governance around the access and use of routine health data were identified as important aspects for future development. CONCLUSIONS: Analyses of routine health data from a distributed network to support signal validation and prioritization are feasible in the given time limits and can inform decision making. The cost-benefit of integrating these analyses at this stage of signal management requires further research.

Vulval Aphthous Ulcers in Adolescents Following COVID-19 Vaccination-Analysis of an International Case Series.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To review and characterize reports of vulval aphthous ulcers (VAUs) following COVID-19 vaccination in VigiBase, the World Health Organization global database of reported potential adverse effects of medicinal products, to demonstrate the importance and power of case reports for rare suspected adverse reactions and to investigate whether they suggest a potential for COVID-19 vaccination to be a trigger METHODS: Cases reporting the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities' (MedDRA) preferred term "Vulvovaginal ulceration" and related preferred terms in adolescent patients aged 12-17 years in association with any COVID-19 vaccine were extracted from VigiBase. The cases were clinically reviewed, and causality was assessed by applying the Bradford Hill criteria to the obtained case series. RESULTS: As of June 30th, 2022, there were 444 reports for the selected Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms following COVID-19 vaccination in VigiBase. Ninety-four de-duplicated reports concerned adolescent female patients. Thirty-seven cases were clinically consistent with the diagnosis of VAU. On causality assessment, the analyzed case series fulfilled 6 of the 9 Austen Bradford Hill criteria supporting a potential causal relationship. CONCLUSION: VAUs can be perceived as a traumatic experience, especially in adolescent patients. There is, furthermore, a risk that the ulcers will be misdiagnosed, resulting in avoidable investigation and treatment burdens for patients. We communicate our findings to support the small number of published case reports and raise awareness of VAUs occurring in a temporal association with COVID-19 vaccination. Furthermore, our analysis supports observations about the value of case reports for the recognition and assessment of rare adverse events.

Global safety monitoring of COVID-19 vaccines: how pharmacovigilance rose to the challenge.

Pharmacovigilance (PV) came suddenly into the spotlight when several new vaccines, developed as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, received emergency authorisation and were rolled out on a large scale in late 2020. The vaccines underwent stringent clinical trials and evaluation from regulatory authorities, but with the use of novel technology and an anticipated rapid and vast deployment of the vaccines, the importance of a well-functioning international post marketing safety surveillance system was stressed. International PV stakeholders were faced with several challenges due to the extent of the global vaccination campaign. The unprecedented volume of reports of suspected adverse events following immunization has led to the development and use of new tools. Furthermore, the collaboration between various PV stakeholders was encouraged and strengthened. PV rose to the challenges posed by the currently ongoing global COVID-19 vaccination campaign and successful adaptations were made in a short period of time. However, the pandemic has not ended yet, the vaccination campaign is far from being completed, and further challenges are anticipated. Advances made during the pandemic will be important to strengthen PV in future and ensure to advance medicines' safety together. Plain Language Summary: Global safety monitoring of the COVID-19 vaccines: challenges, preparations, and outlooks Pharmacovigilance (PV) is the umbrella term for all sciences and activities relating to the detection, assessment, understanding, and prevention of adverse effects relating to medicines or vaccines. PV came into the spotlight when several new vaccines were authorised and rolled out as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic.The anticipated extent of the global vaccine rollout stressed the importance of a well-functioning safety surveillance system and international collaborations between patients, health care workers, vaccine producers, regulatory authorities, and PV centres.The identification and communication of potential safety concerns showed that adaptations to PV processes made in a short period of time as well as international collaborations were successful. However, it is important to learn from experiences made so far and to make sure the positive advances are maintained in the future to advance medicines' safety together.

Coadministration of tizanidine and ciprofloxacin: a retrospective analysis of the WHO pharmacovigilance database.

PURPOSE: Tizanidine, an alpha-adrenergic substance with antinociceptive and antihypertensive effects, is extensively metabolized via cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2. Therefore, coadministration with potent CYP1A2 inhibitors, such as ciprofloxacin, is contraindicated. However, both drugs are broadly utilized in various countries. Their concomitant use bears an inherent high risk for clinically significant symptoms, especially in multimorbid patients experiencing polypharmacy. This study aims to investigate the impact of coadministration of tizanidine and ciprofloxacin using real-world pharmacovigilance data and to raise awareness of this potentially underestimated safety issue. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSR) registered until March 1, 2017, in the World Health Organization (WHO) global database. Demographic data, drug administration information, the course of the adverse drug reaction (ADR), its severity, and outcomes were analyzed for cases reporting ciprofloxacin comedication. RESULTS: In 91 (2.0%) of the identified 4192 worldwide ICSR on tizanidine, coadministration of ciprofloxacin was reported. Most of the patients were female (n = 59, 64.8%) with a median age of 54 years (range 13-85 years). The countries contributing most reports were the USA (n = 54, 59.3%) and Switzerland (n = 16, 17.6%). ADRs reported most often affected the nervous system and the cardiac function, especially with large tizanidine doses or drugs with CNS and cardiovascular depressant effects. In two cases, a fatal outcome was reported. CONCLUSION: Despite the existing formal contraindication, the concomitant use of tizanidine and ciprofloxacin can be observed in real-world clinical practice. Reactions mainly affected the central nervous and the cardiovascular system resulting in potentially severe adverse effects. The concomitant use of tizanidine and ciprofloxacin should absolutely be avoided.

Identifying and Characterizing Serious Adverse Drug Reactions Associated With Drug-Drug Interactions in a Spontaneous Reporting Database.

Background: Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are an important cause of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In literature most of studies focus only on potential DDIs, while detailed data on serious ADRs associated with DDIs are limited. Our aim is to identify and characterize serious ADRs caused by DDIs using a spontaneous reporting database. Methods: All serious ADR reports, not related to vaccines and with a "definite", "probable" or "possible" causality assessment, inserted into the National Pharmacovigilance database from Veneto Region (January 1, 2015 to May 31, 2020) were analyzed. A list of drug pairs was created by selecting the reports containing at least two suspected or concomitant drugs. We verified which drug pairs potentially interacted according to the online version of DRUGDEX® system. For each potential DDI we controlled whether the ADR description in the report corresponded to the interaction effect as described in Micromedex. A detailed characterization of all serious reports containing an occurring DDI was performed. Results: In the study period a total of 31,604 reports of suspected ADRs from the Veneto Region were identified, of which 2,195 serious reports (6.9% of all ADR reports) containing at least two suspected or concomitant drugs were analyzed. We identified 1,208 ADR reports with at least one potential DDI (55.0% of 2,195) and 381 reports (17.4% of 2,195 reports) with an occurring ADR associated with a DDI. The median age of patients and the number of contraindicated or major DDIs were significantly higher in reports with an occurring DDI. Warfarin was the most frequently reported interacting drug and the most common ADRs were gastrointestinal or cerebral hemorrhagic events. The proton pump inhibitors/warfarin, followed by platelet aggregation inhibitors/warfarin were the drug-drug combinations most frequently involved in ADRs caused by DDIs. The highest proportion of fatal reports was observed with platelet aggregation inhibitors/warfarin and antidepressants/warfarin. Conclusion: Our findings showed that about one-third of patients exposed to a potential DDI actually experienced a serious ADR. Furthermore, our study confirms that a spontaneous reporting database could be a valuable resource for identifying and characterizing ADRs caused by DDIs and the drugs leading to serious ADRs and deaths.

Effect of chest compressions only during experimental basic life support on alveolar collapse and recruitment.

AIM: The importance of ventilatory support during cardiac arrest and basic life support is controversial. This experimental study used dynamic computed tomography (CT) to assess the effects of chest compressions only during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCO-CPR) on alveolar recruitment and haemodynamic parameters in porcine model of ventricular fibrillation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve anaesthetized pigs (26+/-1 kg) were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: (1) intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) both during basic life support and advanced cardiac life support, or (2) CCO during basic life support and IPPV during advanced cardiac life support. Measurements were acquired at baseline prior to cardiac arrest, during basic life support, during advanced life support, and after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), as follows: dynamic CT series, arterial and central venous pressures, blood gases, and regional organ blood flow. The ventilated and atelectatic lung area was quantified from dynamic CT images. Differences between groups were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, and a p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: IPPV was associated with cyclic alveolar recruitment and de-recruitment. Compared with controls, the CCO-CPR group had a significantly larger mean fractional area of atelectasis (p=0.009), and significantly lower PaO2 (p=0.002) and mean arterial pressure (p=0.023). The increase in mean atelectatic lung area observed during basic life support in the CCO-CPR group remained clinically relevant throughout the subsequent advanced cardiac life support period and following ROSC, and was associated with prolonged impaired haemodynamics. No inter-group differences in myocardial and cerebral blood flow were observed. CONCLUSION: A lack of ventilation during basic life support is associated with excessive atelectasis, arterial hypoxaemia and compromised CPR haemodynamics. Moreover, these detrimental effects remain evident even after restoration of IPPV.