Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros













Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pesqui. vet. bras ; 37(9): 941-948, Sept. 2017. tab, ilus
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS, VETINDEX | ID: biblio-895520

RESUMEN

This study focused on isolating Pseudomonas spp. during milking process in ten dairy farms with manual and mechanical milking systems during dry and rainy seasons, and evaluating DNA homology and patterns of distribution between isolates, in order to identify main sources of milk contamination by Pseudomonas spp. A total of 167 isolates of Pseudomonas spp. were obtained from water, milkers' hands, cows' teats, teat cups, cooling tanks and raw milk. Bacteria of Pseudomonas spp. genus were isolated from 85 and 82 sampling points in dairy farms with manual and mechanical milking system, respectively. A significant difference (p=0.02) on Pseudomonas spp. isolation was observed among samples of surface of cows' teats before and after pre-dipping, but no significant difference (p>0.05) was observed among milking systems or seasons. The possibility of the same Pseudomonas spp. patterns are distributed in different farms and seasons using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) technique was demonstrated. Milkers' hands, surface of cows' teats, teat cups and cooling tanks were associated with raw milk contamination with Pseudomonas spp. on farms with manual and mechanical milking system, showing that regardless of the type of milking system and season, proper hygiene procedures of equipment, utensils and workers' hands are essential to avoid contamination of the milk and, therefore, improve milk quality.(AU)


Este estudo se propôs a isolar Pseudomonas spp. durante o processo de ordenha em dez fazendas com sistemas manuais e mecanizados, durante as estações seca e chuvosa, além de avaliar a homologia do DNA e seus padrões de distribuição entre os isolados, a fim de se determinar as principais fontes de contaminação do leite. Cento e sessenta e sete isolados de Pseudomonas spp. foram obtidos a partir de amostras de água, mãos de ordenhadores, tetos, teteiras, tanques de resfriamento e leite cru armazenado, sendo 85 e 82 pontos de amostragem em fazendas com sistemas de ordenha manual e mecânico, respectivamente. Diferença estatisticamente significativa foi encontrada entre os isolados observados entre a superfície dos tetos antes e após o pré-dipping (p=0,02), mas nenhuma diferença foi encontrada entre sistemas de ordenha ou estações (p>0,05). A possibilidade do mesmo padrão de Pseudomonas spp. estar distribuído em diferentes fazendas ou estações foi avaliada pela técnica de Polimorfismo do Tamanho de Fragmento Amplificado (AFLP). As mãos de ordenhadores, superfície dos tetos das vacas, teteiras e tanques de resfriamento foram associados com a contaminação do leite cru, demonstrando que independente do tipo de ordenha e estação, a higiene adequada de equipamentos, utensílios e mãos dos ordenhadores é essencial para evitar contaminação do leite, e consequentemente aumentar sua qualidade.(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Animales , Bovinos , Pseudomonas/aislamiento & purificación , Lagunas de Estabilización/análisis , Leche/microbiología , Contaminación de Alimentos , Análisis del Polimorfismo de Longitud de Fragmentos Amplificados/veterinaria , Granjas
2.
BMC Res Notes ; 9: 22, 2016 Jan 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26754836

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diarrhea in piglets directly affects commercial swine production. The disease results from the interaction of pathogens with the host immune system and is also affected by management procedures. Several pathogenic agents such as Campylobacter spp., Clostridium perfringens, Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., group A rotavirus (RV-A), coronaviruses (transmissible gastroenteritis virus; porcine epidemic diarrhea virus), as well as nematode and protozoan parasites, can be associated with disease cases. RESULTS: All bacterial, viral, protozoan, and parasitic agents here investigated, with the exception of Salmonella spp. as well as both coronaviruses, were detected in varying proportions in piglet fecal samples, and positive animals were equally distributed between case and control groups. A statistically significant difference between case and control groups was found only for Cystoisospora suis (p = 0.034) and Eimeria spp. (p = 0.047). When co-infections were evaluated, a statistically significant difference was found only for C. perfringens ß2 and C. suis (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of pathogens in piglets alone does not determine the occurrence of diarrhea episodes. Thus, the indiscriminate use of antibiotic and anthelminthic medication should be re-evaluated. This study also reinforces the importance of laboratory diagnosis and correct interpretation of results as well as the relevance of control and prophylactic measures.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Campylobacter/veterinaria , Coccidiosis/veterinaria , Infecciones por Coronavirus/veterinaria , Diarrea/veterinaria , Isosporiasis/veterinaria , Infecciones por Rotavirus/veterinaria , Infecciones por Strongylida/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/diagnóstico , Animales , Animales Recién Nacidos , Campylobacter/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Campylobacter/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Campylobacter/microbiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Coccidiosis/diagnóstico , Coccidiosis/parasitología , Coinfección , Coronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Diarrea/microbiología , Diarrea/parasitología , Diarrea/virología , Eimeria/aislamiento & purificación , Heces/microbiología , Heces/parasitología , Heces/virología , Isospora/aislamiento & purificación , Isosporiasis/diagnóstico , Isosporiasis/parasitología , Rotavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Rotavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Rotavirus/virología , Estrongílidos/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Strongylida/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Strongylida/parasitología , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/microbiología , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/parasitología , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/virología
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 51(8): 2750-3, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23761160

RESUMEN

This study determined the group A rotavirus occurrence in pig farms from 7 different cities in São Paulo State, Brazil. Out of 143 samples, 70 tested positive. Sequence analyses of 37 strains indicated that the strains had the G3, G5, G9, and P[6], P[13]/P[22]-like, and P[23] genotypes.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos Virales/genética , Proteínas de la Cápside/genética , Infecciones por Rotavirus/veterinaria , Rotavirus/clasificación , Rotavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/virología , Animales , Brasil , Variación Genética , Genotipo , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , ARN Viral/genética , Rotavirus/genética , Infecciones por Rotavirus/virología , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Porcinos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA