Femoral Head Autograft Can Reliably Reconstruct Dysplastic Acetabula Through the Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Background: Bone deficiencies in dysplastic acetabula create technical difficulties during total hip arthroplasty (THA). Bulk femoral head autograft (FHA) is one method to increase cup coverage and bone stock of the true acetabulum; however, only limited data exist on its efficacy through a direct anterior approach (DAA). This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of FHA during THA via a DAA in dysplastic hips. Methods: Retrospective review of 34 patients (41 hips) with hip dysplasia (Crowe I-III) who underwent primary THA via a DAA with FHA at a single institution was performed. Surgical procedures were performed on a traction table with intraoperative fluoroscopy and highly porous-coated cup placement in the true acetabulum. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively (range, 2 to 7). Results: The average modified Harris Hip Score improved from 31.9 ± 10.8 to 94.1 ± 5.8, Merle d'Aubigné Hip Score from 7.5 ± 2.8 to 16.6 ± 1.1, and visual analog pain score from 7.9 ± 2.7 to 1.4 ± 1.4 (all P < .001). All hips had an "anatomic" inferomedial cup position postoperatively, with an average increase in horizontal coverage of 43.4%. Mean postoperative limb-length discrepancy improved from 21.8 ± 16.1 mm to 1.6 ± 5.7 mm (P < .001). There were no cases of revision THA, nor complications such as dislocation, infection, or osteolysis. Conclusion: Reconstructing dysplastic acetabula (Crowe I-III) with FHA during THA can be successfully accomplished via the DAA with increased acetabular bone stock and accurate correction of limb-length discrepancy.

Outcomes of an Institutional Rapid Recovery Protocol for Total Joint Arthroplasty at a Safety Net Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Rapid recovery protocols (RRPs) for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) can reduce hospital length of stay (LOS) and improve patient care in select cohorts; however, there is limited literature regarding their utility in marginalized patient populations. This report aimed to evaluate the outcomes of an institutional RRP for TJA at a safety net hospital. METHODS: A retrospective review of 573 primary TJA patients was done, comparing the standard recovery protocol (n = 294) and RRP cohorts (n = 279). Measured outcomes included LOS, 90-day complications, revision surgeries, readmissions, and emergency department visits. RESULTS: The mean LOS reduced from 3.0 ± 3.1 days in the standard recovery protocol cohort to 1.6 ± 0.9 days in the RRP cohort (P < 0.001). The RRP cohort had significantly fewer 90-day complications (11.1% versus 21.4%, P = 0.005), readmissions (1.4% versus 5.8%, P = 0.007), and revision surgeries (1.4% versus 4.4%, P = 0.047). CONCLUSION: A RRP for primary TJA can be successfully implemented at a safety net hospital with a shorter LOS and fewer acute adverse events. Such protocols require a coordinated, multidisciplinary effort with strict adherence to evidence-based practices to provide high-quality, value-based surgical health care to an underserved cohort.

An Orthopedic Surgeon's Dental Examination: Reducing Unnecessary Delays in Joint Replacement Surgery for Marginalized Patients in a Safety Net Hospital System.

BACKGROUND: Selective dental clearance before total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has been proposed; however, effective strategies of carrying out this practice are lacking. This study aims to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of a novel oral examination performed by an orthopedic surgeon to better direct limited resources for marginalized patients in a safety net hospital system. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on 105 consecutive patients who had an oral examination performed by a single surgeon before elective TJA. Patients who screened negative proceeded to surgery without further formal dental clearance. Patients who screened positive underwent formal examination/intervention by a dentist before surgery. The rate of correct referral that resulted in patients undergoing an oral surgical intervention was determined. Complications during a minimum 90-day postoperative follow-up period were collected and compared. RESULTS: Thirty patients (28.6%) screened positive while 75 patients (71.4%) screened negative and proceeded to surgery without referral. The PPV of the screening test was high, with 73.3% of patients receiving a major surgical oral intervention before TJA. Patients sent for formal referral required 89.1 more days to receive their surgery than those that screened negative (54.9 days ± 4.24 vs 144.0 days ± 82.4, P < .001). CONCLUSION: An orthopedic surgeon's oral examination demonstrates a high PPV to identify high-risk patients in need of an oral surgical intervention before TJA. This provides a unique solution regarding over-referral for preoperative dental clearance and avoids delays for marginalized patients considering elective TJA in a safety net hospital system.

Implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol at a safety net hospital : a silver lining to COVID-19?

AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate whether an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) for arthroplasty established during the COVID-19 pandemic at a safety net hospital can be associated with a decrease in hospital length of stay (LOS) and an increase in same-day discharges (SDDs) without increasing acute adverse events. METHODS: A retrospective review of 124 consecutive primary arthroplasty procedures performed after resuming elective procedures on 11 May 2020 were compared to the previous 124 consecutive patients treated prior to 17 March 2020, at a single urban safety net hospital. Revision arthroplasty and patients with < 90-day follow-up were excluded. The primary outcome measures were hospital LOS and the number of SDDs. Secondary outcome measures included 90-day complications, 90-day readmissions, and 30day emergency department (ED) visits. RESULTS: The mean LOS was significantly reduced from 2.02 days (SD 0.80) in the pre-COVID cohort to 1.03 days (SD 0.65) in the post-COVID cohort (p < 0.001). No patients in the pre-COVID group were discharged on the day of surgery compared to 60 patients (48.4%) in the post-COVID group (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in 90-day complications (13.7% (n = 17) vs 9.7% (n = 12); p = 0.429), 30-day ED visits (1.6% (n = 2) vs 3.2% (n = 4); p = 0.683), or 90-day readmissions (2.4% (n = 3) vs 1.6% (n = 2); p = 1.000) between the pre-COVID and post-COVID groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Through use of an ERP, arthroplasty procedures were successfully resumed at a safety net hospital with a shorter LOS and increased SDDs without a difference in acute adverse events. The resulting increase in healthcare value therefore may be considered a 'silver lining' to the moratorium on elective arthroplasty during the COVID-19 pandemic. These improved efficiencies are expected to continue in post-pandemic era. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):871-878.

Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty for Neglected Blount Disease Using a Gap Balancing Technique.

Blount disease is an acquired, asymmetrical disorder of proximal tibial growth that results in a complex three-dimensional proximal tibial deformity, with tibial varus being the dominating feature. Although the exact pathophysiology is unknown, Blount disease is separated into 2 clinical variants, infantile and adolescent, based on the onset of symptoms occurring before or after the age of 10 years. If recognized and treated early, affected patients generally have a favorable prognosis; however, if neglected, it can lead to progressive malalignment and premature osteoarthritis. We present a patient with bilateral neglected Blount disease who underwent successful bilateral total knee arthroplasty performed in a staged fashion using a gap balancing technique with constrained condylar knee implants.

Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty With Bulk Femoral Head Autograft in a Patient With Camurati-Engelmann Disease.

Camurati-Engelmann disease (CED) is an extremely rare, sclerosing bone disorder of intramedullary ossification with only 300 reported cases worldwide. The pathogenesis is related to activating mutations in transforming growth factor beta 1, which results in bilateral, symmetric hyperostosis affecting primarily the diaphysis of long bones. Despite effective pharmacological treatment options, the diagnosis of CED is problematic owning to its rarity and variability of clinical presentation. We present a patient with known CED with advanced early hip osteoarthritis, secondary to underlying hip dysplasia, for which she underwent a successful total hip arthroplasty via a direct anterior approach with the use of bulk femoral head autograft to reconstruct her native acetabulum.

Utilization Patterns, Efficacy, and Complications of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Strategies in Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty as Reported by American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Candidates.

BACKGROUND: The optimum venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis strategy to minimize risk of VTE and bleeding complications following revision total hip and knee arthroplasty (rTHA/rTKA) is controversial. The purpose of this study is to describe current VTE prophylaxis patterns following revision arthroplasty procedures to determine efficacy, complication rates, and prescribing patterns for different prophylactic strategies. METHODS: The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II (oral) examination case list database was analyzed. Current Procedural Terminology codes for rTHA/rTKA were queried and geographic region, VTE prophylaxis strategy, and complications were obtained. Less aggressive prophylaxis patterns were defined if only aspirin and/or sequential compression devises were utilized. More aggressive VTE prophylaxis patterns were considered if any of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin), warfarin, rivaroxaban, fondaparinux, or other strategies were used. RESULTS: In total, 6387 revision arthroplasties were included. The national rate of less aggressive VTE prophylaxis strategies was 35.3% and more aggressive in 64.7%. Use of less aggressive prophylaxis strategy was significantly associated with patients having no complications (89.8% vs 81.9%, P < .001). Use of more aggressive prophylaxis patterns was associated with higher likelihood of mild thrombotic (1.2% vs 0.3%, P < .001), mild bleeding (1.7% vs 0.6%, P < .001), moderate thrombotic (2.6% vs 0.4%, P < .001), moderate bleeding (6.2% vs 4.0%, P < .001), severe bleeding events (4.4% vs 2.4%, P < .001), infections (6.4% vs 3.8%, P < .001), and death within 90 days (3.1% vs 1.3%, P < .001). There were no significant differences in rates of fatal pulmonary embolism (0.1% vs 0.04%, P = .474). Subgroup analysis of rTHA and rTKA patients showed similar results. CONCLUSION: The individual rationale for using a more aggressive VTE prophylaxis strategy was unknown; however, more aggressive strategies were associated with higher rates of bleeding and thrombotic complications. Less aggressive strategies were not associated with a higher rate of thrombosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

Spine Infections Reduced at Dedicated Orthopaedics and Spine Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies stratified postoperative infection risk by patient comorbidities. However, it is unclear whether the incidence varies by surgical approach in a specialized orthopaedic setting. This study aims to compare infection rates and microbiologic characteristics of postoperative spine infections requiring return to the operating room for debridement by hospital setting: a dedicated orthopaedic and spine hospital versus a general hospital serving multiple surgical specialties. METHODS: The study is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Procedures performed between March 2006 and August 2008 at the multispecialty university hospital were compared with cases at an orthopaedic specialty hospital from September 2008 through August 2016. The surgeons, residents, and patients were similar, but the operative venue changed in 2008. RESULTS: The overall general university hospital infection rate was 2.03%, higher than the overall infection rate at the dedicated orthopaedic and spine hospital of 1.31% (P < .0104). The general university infection rate was 2.27% in the final years of practice, compared with 0.91% at the dedicated orthopaedic and spine hospital (P < .0001) during a recent 2-year time frame. Demographic variables did not significantly differ between the 2 settings. The overall proportion of Gram-negative infection rates was not statistically different (21.7% vs 18.6%), despite an increased proportion of Gram-negative infections at the general university hospital following surgery from an anterior approach. Most of the organisms isolated in both facilities were Staphylococcus species. There was no difference in the seasonality of postoperative spine infections in either setting. CONCLUSIONS: In transitioning from a multispecialty university hospital to a dedicated orthopaedic hospital, the incidence of postoperative spine infections was significantly reduced to 0.91%. Despite the change in venue, the proportion of Gram-negative infections (∼20%) following spine surgery did not significantly change. These results suggest improved infection rates during the course of the last 10 years with consistent proportions of Gram-negative infections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Opioid Use After Discharge Following Primary Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: How Much Are We Over-Prescribing?

BACKGROUND: The opioid crisis pressures orthopedic surgeons to reduce the amount of narcotics prescribed for post-operative pain management. This study sought to quantify post-operative opioid use after hospital discharge for primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. METHODS: A prospective cohort of primary unilateral TKA patients performed by one of 5 senior fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons were enrolled at a single institution. Detailed pain journals tracked all prescriptions and over-the-counter pain medications, quantities, frequencies, and visual analog scale pain scores. Narcotic and narcotic-like pain medications were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME). Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test with α < 0.05. RESULTS: Data from 89 subjects were analyzed; the average visual analog scale pain score was 6.92 while taking narcotics. The average number of days taking narcotics was 16.8 days. The distribution of days taking narcotics was right shifted with 52.8% of patients off narcotics after 2 week, and 74.2% off by 3 weeks post-op. The average MME prescribed was significantly greater than MME taken (866.6 vs 428.2, P < .0001). The average number of narcotic pills prescribed was significantly greater than narcotic pills taken (105.1 vs 52.0, P < .0001). The average excess narcotic pills prescribed per patient was 53.1 pills. About 48.3% took fewer than 40 narcotic pills; 75.3% took fewer than 75 narcotic pills. About 3.4% did not require any narcotics; 40.5% required a refill of narcotics. Also, 9.0% went home the day of surgery. CONCLUSION: Significantly more narcotics were prescribed than were taken in the post-operative period following TKA with an average 53.1 excess narcotic pills per patient. Adjusting prescribing patterns to match patient narcotic usage could reduce the excess narcotic pills following TKA.

Use of Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol Products in the Perioperative Period Around Primary Unilateral Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Given the opioid crisis in America, patients are trying alternative medications including tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and other cannabidiol (CBD) containing products in the perioperative period, especially in states where these products are legal. This study sought to analyze usage rates of CBD/THC products in the perioperative period for primary unilateral total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) patients and identify a possible association with post-operative opioid use. METHODS: A prospective cohort of primary unilateral THA/TKA patients were enrolled at a single institution. Patients who completed detailed pain journals were retrospectively surveyed for CBD/THC product usage. Pain medications were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME). RESULTS: Data from 195 of the 210 patients (92.9% response rate) following primary arthroplasty were analyzed. Overall, 16.4% of arthroplasty-22.6% (n = 19) of TKA and 11.7% (n = 13) of THA-patients used CBD/THC products in the perioperative period. There was a wide variety of usage patterns among those using CBD/THC products. In comparing CBD/THC users and non-users, there was no significant difference in the length of narcotic use, total morphine milligram equivalents taken, narcotic pills taken, average post-op pain scores, the percentage of patients requiring a refill of narcotics, or length of stay. CONCLUSION: Understanding that CBD/THC usage was not consistent for patients who used these products, 22.6% of TKA and 11.7% of THA patients tried CBD/THC products in the perioperative period. In this small sample, CBD/THC use was not associated with a major effect on narcotic requirements. Further studies on the effects of CBD/THC are needed as these therapies become more widely available.

Opioid Use After Discharge Following Primary Unilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty: How Much Are We Overprescribing?

BACKGROUND: The opioid crisis pressures orthopedic surgeons to reduce the amount of narcotics prescribed for postoperative pain management. This study sought to quantify postoperative opioid use after hospital discharge for primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. METHODS: A prospective cohort of primary unilateral THA patients were enrolled at a single institution. Detailed pain journals tracked all prescription and over-the-counter pain medication, quantity, frequency, and visual analog scale pain scores. Pain medications were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME). RESULTS: Data from 121 subjects were analyzed; the average visual analog scale pain score was 3.44 while taking narcotics. The average number of days taking narcotics was 8.46 days. The distribution of days taking narcotics was right shifted with 50.5% of patients off narcotics after 1 week, and 82.6% off by 2 weeks postoperatively. The average number of narcotic pills prescribed was significantly greater than narcotic pills taken (72.5 vs 28.8, P < .0001). The average MME prescribed was significantly greater than MME taken (452.1 vs 133.8, P < .0001). The average excess narcotic pills prescribed per patient was 51.7 pills. And 71.9% took fewer than 30 narcotic pills; 90.9% patients took fewer than 50 narcotic pills. Also, 10.7% did not require any narcotics; 9.9% required a refill of narcotics; and 33.1% went home the day of surgery. CONCLUSION: Significantly more narcotics were prescribed than were taken in the postoperative period following THA with an average 51.7 excess narcotic pills per patient. Adjusting prescribing patterns to match patient narcotic usage could reduce the excess narcotic pills following THA.

Posterior Labral Repairs of the Shoulder Among Baseball Players: Results and Outcomes With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of information regarding the treatment of posterior labral tears of the shoulder for baseball players. Reports regarding treatment and postoperative outcomes are more limited than its anterior and superior counterparts. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical presentation, surgical findings, postoperative outcomes, and rate of return to sport after arthroscopic repair of posterior labral injuries of the shoulder among baseball players. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of baseball players who underwent arthroscopic posterior labral repair between 2009 and 2015 by a single surgeon, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The group was composed of 32 male patients involved in recreational (6.3%), high school (43.8%), college (31.3%), and professional (18.8%) baseball, with a mean age of 20.5 years. Patients were categorized by chief complaint, clinical findings, surgical findings, and concomitant procedures performed. Pre- and postoperative measures included pain scale, range of motion, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score, return to play, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: A variety of tear patterns were identified; 32% involved 90° of the posterior superior labrum; 35% involved the posterior 180°; and 32% involved 90° of the posterior inferior labrum. The dominant mechanism of injury was throwing (34.4%). The most common chief complaint was pain (n = 25, 78%), followed by pain and instability symptoms (n = 6, 18.8%), with only 3% citing isolated sensation of instability. Magnetic resonance imaging clearly identified tear patterns in 75% of cases. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores significantly improved ( P < .0001), increasing on average 30.9 points from the preoperative mean of 65.4 to a postoperative mean of 96.3. No significant range of motion deficits were noted. Tear size and number of anchors utilized did not influence outcomes. Ninety-four percent of athletes returned to play, 61% at previous levels, and 6% did not return. Pitchers had a lower return to previous level of play than position players (41% vs 86%, P = .0113). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic treatment of posterior labral tears of baseball players was effective in improving pain and function, resulting in 94% patient satisfaction and 94% return to sport, with 61% returning to previous level of play. Patient presentation is variable, with a majority of patients citing pain rather than instability.

Prosthetic Joint Infection Trends at a Dedicated Orthopaedics Specialty Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Historically, a majority of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) grew Gram-positive bacteria. While previous studies stratified PJI risk with specific organisms by patient comorbidities, we compared infection rates and microbiologic characteristics of PJIs by hospital setting: a dedicated orthopaedic hospital versus a general hospital serving multiple surgical specialties. METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data on 11,842 consecutive primary hip and knee arthroplasty patients was performed. Arthroplasty cases performed between April 2006 and August 2008 at the general university hospital serving multiple surgical specialties were compared to cases at a single orthopaedic specialty hospital from September 2008 to August 2016. RESULTS: The general university hospital PJI incidence rate was 1.43%, with 5.3% of infections from Gram-negative species. In comparison, at the dedicated orthopaedic hospital, the overall PJI incidence rate was substantially reduced to 0.75% over the 8-year timeframe. Comparing the final two years of practice at the general university facility to the most recent two years at the dedicated orthopaedics hospital, the PJI incidence was significantly reduced (1.43% vs 0.61%). Though the overall number of infections was reduced, there was a significantly higher proportion of Gram-negative infections over the 8-year timeframe at 25.3%. CONCLUSION: In transitioning from a multispecialty university hospital to a dedicated orthopaedic hospital, the PJI incidence has been significantly reduced despite a greater Gram-negative proportion (25.3% versus 5.3%). These results suggest a change in the microbiologic profile of PJI when transitioning to a dedicated orthopaedic facility and that greater Gram-negative antibiotic coverage could be considered.

Utilization Patterns, Efficacy, and Complications of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Strategies in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty as Reported by American Board of Orthopedic Surgery Part II Candidates.

BACKGROUND: Many strategies for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following hip and knee arthroplasty exist, with extensive controversy regarding the optimum strategy to minimize risk of VTE and bleeding complications. Data from the American Board of Orthopedic Surgery Part II (oral) Examination case list database was analyzed to determine efficacy, complication rates, and prescribing patterns for different prophylactic strategies. METHODS: The American Board of Orthopedic Surgery case database was queried utilizing Current Procedural Terminology codes 27447 and 27130 for primary total knee and hip arthroplasty, respectively. Geographic region, patient age, gender, deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis strategy, and complications were obtained. Less aggressive prophylaxis patterns were considered if only aspirin and/or sequential compression devises were utilized. More aggressive VTE prophylaxis patterns were considered if any of low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin), warfarin, rivaroxaban, fondaparinux, or other strategies was used. RESULTS: In total, 22,072 cases of primary joint arthroplasty were analyzed from 2014 to 2016. The national rate of less aggressive VTE prophylaxis strategies was 45.4%, while more aggressive strategies were used in 54.6% of patients. Significant regional differences in prophylactic strategy patterns exist between the 6 regions. The predominant less aggressive prophylaxis pattern was aspirin with sequential compression devises at 84.8% with 14.8% receiving aspirin alone. Use of less aggressive prophylaxis strategy was significantly associated with patients having no complications (95.5% vs 93.0%). Use of more aggressive prophylaxis patterns was associated with higher likelihood of mild thrombotic (0.9% vs 0.2%), mild bleeding (1.3% vs 0.4%), moderate thrombotic (1.2% vs 0.4%), moderate bleeding (2.7% vs 2.1%), severe thrombotic (0.1% vs 0.0%), severe bleeding events (1.2% vs 0.9%), infections (1.9% vs 1.3%), and death within 90 days (0.7% vs 0.3%). Similar results were found in subgroup analysis of total hip and knee arthroplasty patients. CONCLUSION: It was not possible to ascertain the individual rationale for use of more aggressive VTE prophylaxis strategies; however, more aggressive strategies were associated with higher rates of bleeding and thrombotic complications. Less aggressive strategies were not associated with a higher rate of thrombosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. DISCLAIMER: All views expressed in the study are the sole views of the authors and do not represent the views of the American Board of Orthopedic Surgery.

A reproducible and reliable localization technique for lumbar spine surgery that minimizes unintended-level exposure and wrong-level surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Exposure of unintended levels (defined as a spinal segment outside the intended surgical levels) is unnecessary and potentially adds to operative time and patient morbidity. Wrong-level surgery (defined as decompression, instrumentation, or fusion of a spinal segment not part of the intended surgical procedure) clearly adds to morbidity as well as putting the surgeon at medicolegal risk. PURPOSE: To describe a localization technique for posterior lumbar spine surgery to minimize both unintended-level exposure and wrong-level surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Consecutive case series. PATIENT SAMPLE: One thousand nine hundred and eighty-six consecutive posterior lumbar operations performed from January 2010 to January 2017 using this technique were reviewed. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the incidence of unintended-level exposure and wrong-level surgery. METHODS: This localization technique was consistently used for determination of skin incision, soft tissue dissection, and identification of spinal levels for all patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery during the time interval noted. Two spinal needles are inserted under sterile technique 3cm lateral to the midline before incision at the approximate cranial and caudal aspects of the anticipated incision based on external landmarks. A cross-table lateral X-ray before incision is obtained and the actual incision is adjusted based on the location of the spinal needles. Once dissection is carried down to the facet capsules, spinal needles are then placed in adjacent facets, and a second cross-table lateral film is obtained to confirm appropriate levels. A retrospective review of all posterior lumbar cases was performed to determine the incidence of unintended-level exposure and wrong-level surgery using this technique. RESULTS: There were no wrong-level surgeries during this time period. There were six (0.30%) cases of unintended-level exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The technique described provides surgeons with a reliable, accurate, and easily reproducible method for localizing surgical levels during posterior lumbar spine surgery while minimizing exposure of uninvolved areas. This technique offers distinct advantages over previously proposed protocols and may lead to a widely accepted system for intraoperative spinal level identification.

Frailty predicts mortality and complications in chronologically young patients with traumatic orthopaedic injuries.

BACKGROUND: As morbidity and mortality from traumatic orthopaedic injuries continues to rise, increased research is being conducted on how to best predict complications in at risk patients. Recently, frailty indices have been validated in a variety of surgical subspecialties as predictors of morbidity and mortality. However, the vast majority of research has been conducted on geriatric patient populations, with little evidence on patients who are chronologically young. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of a modified frailty index (mFI) in predicting mortality and complications after pelvis, acetabulum, and lower extremity trauma in patients of all ages. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried from 2005 to 2014 for all patients who underwent surgery for pelvis, acetabulum, and lower extremity trauma. The sample size was divided into geriatric (age ≥ 60) and young (age < 60) cohorts. The mFI score was calculated for each patient. Bivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression and a chi-square test to determine the relationship between mFI and both primary and secondary outcomes while adjusting for age. Univariate analysis and multivariate analyses were performed. All analyses were done using SAS 9.4 (Cary, NC) and a p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: 56,241 patients were identified to have undergone surgery for pelvis, acetabulum, or lower extremity trauma. 28% of patients were identified under the age of 60. In the young cohort, mFI was a strong predictor of thirty-day mortality (OR 11.02, 95% CI 6.26-19.39, p < 0.001). With regards to Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications, MFI is also a strong predictor in the young cohort (OR 28.82, 95% CI 16.05-51.77, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The mFI score was a significant predictor of morbidity and mortality in chronologically young orthopaedic trauma patients. The use of the mFI score can provide an individualized risk assessment to interdisciplinary teams for perioperative counseling and to improve outcomes.

Quadriceps Strength Deficits After a Femoral Nerve Block Versus Adductor Canal Block for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective, Single-Blinded, Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve blocks, particularly femoral nerve blocks (FNBs), are commonly performed for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, associated quadriceps muscle weakness after FNBs is well described and may occur for up to 6 months postoperatively. The adductor canal block (ACB) has emerged as a viable alternative to the FNB, theoretically causing less quadriceps weakness during the immediate postoperative period, as it bypasses the majority of the motor fibers of the femoral nerve that branch off proximal to the adductor canal. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: This study sought to identify if a difference in quadriceps strength exists after an ACB or FNB for ACL reconstruction beyond the immediate postoperative period. Beyond the immediate postoperative period, we anticipated no difference in quadriceps strength between patients who received ACBs or FNBs for ACL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: A total of 102 patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction using a variety of graft types were enrolled between November 2015 and April 2016. All patients were randomized to receive an ACB or FNB before surgery, and the surgeon was blinded to the block type. All patients underwent aggressive rehabilitation without functional bracing postoperatively. The time to the first straight-leg raise was reported by the patient. Isokinetic strength testing was performed at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Data for 73 patients were analyzed. There was no significant difference in patient demographics of age, body mass index, sex, or tourniquet time between the FNB (n = 35) and ACB (n = 38) groups. The mean time to the first straight-leg raise was similar, at 13.1 ± 1.0 hours for the FNB group and 15.5 ± 1.2 hours for the ACB group (P = .134). The mean extension torque at 60 deg/s increased significantly for both the ACB (53.7% ± 3.4% to 68.3% ± 2.9%; P = .008) and the FNB (53.3% ± 3.3% to 68.5% ± 4.1%; P = .006) groups from 3 to 6 months postoperatively. There was also no significant difference in mean extension torque at 60 deg/s or 180 deg/s between the FNB and ACB groups at 3 and 6 months. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications (infection, arthrofibrosis, retear) between groups. CONCLUSION: Although prior studies have shown immediate postoperative benefits of ACBs compared with FNBs, with a faster return of quadriceps strength, in the current study there was no statistically or clinically significant difference in quadriceps strength at 3 and 6 months postoperatively in patients who received ACBs or FNBs for ACL reconstruction.

Disparities in follow-up care for ballistic and non-ballistic long bone lower extremity fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To describe differences in follow-up compliance and emergency department (ED) visits between ballistic and non-ballistic operative lower extremity fracture patients. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Urban level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients age ≥18 years with ≥1 tibia or femur fractures treated with ORIF or intramedullary nailing (IMN) between September 1, 2013 and August 31, 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A compliance fraction calculated as ([number of attended follow-up visits] / [number of attended follow-up visits + number of missed follow-up visits]) and ED visits in the post-operative period. RESULTS: 612 patients were studied. Patients with ballistic lower extremity fractures had a younger mean age (30.8 years v. 41.6 years; p < 0.0001); a shorter length of stay (5.00 days v. 8.00 days; p < 0.0001); and were more likely to be male (92.6% v. 68%; p < 0.0001) and African-American (90.1% v. 63.1%; p < 0.0001) when compared to non-ballistic long bone injuries. Increased follow-up compliance (defined as a compliance fraction ≥0.75) was associated with having a non-ballistic fracture (OR 1.73, 1.13-2.64; p = 0.01), not having an ED visit (OR 2.08, 1.30-3.33; p = 0.002), and being female (OR 1.82, 1.27-2.61; p = 0.001). Increased ED utilization (≥ 1 ED visit) was associated with ballistic mechanism (OR 1.95, 1.20-3.16; p = 0.006), a low follow-up compliance fraction (OR 2.08, 1.30-3.33; p = 0.0019), homelessness (OR 3.91, 1.53-9.98; p = 0.006), and African-American race (OR 2.26, 1.26-4.05; p = 0.05). Scheduling a specific follow-up visit on the discharge summary did not predict higher compliance (OR 1.51, 0.98-2.33; p = 0.06). Conversely, the lack of a specific follow-up visit scheduled on the discharge summary did not predict ED utilization (OR 0.63, 0.34-1.17; p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that increased utilization of the ED was associated with ballistic fractures, homelessness, decreased clinic compliance, and African American race. Furthermore, patients with non-ballistic injuries, women, and those without any ED visit were more likely to have higher outpatient clinic compliance.

Femoral neuropathy following direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: an anatomic review and case series†.

The popularity of the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has dramatically increased in recent years. Many patients request this muscle sparing approach for the theorized benefits of quicker recovery and reduced post-operative pain. Femoral nerve injury is a rare, yet serious complication following the anterior approach for THA. During the 7-year period from 2008 to 2016, 1756 patients underwent primary THA with a direct anterior approach by a single senior surgeon for end-stage osteoarthritis. Six (0.34%) of these patients had a post-operative femoral nerve palsy. We aim to discuss anatomic considerations, risk factors, and a timeline of severity and recovery for femoral nerve palsy following direct anterior THA in six patients.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Injury After Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an increasingly utilized and patient-requested approach for arthroplasty carrying a unique set of complications. Injury to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) can have a wide range of clinical symptoms ranging from hypesthesia to painful paresthesia. Long-term effects of this injury have not been well studied. We describe duration and severity of these symptoms and correlate their relationship with hip functional scores. METHODS: Between January 2009 and January 2016, 1665 patients with 1871 hips who underwent direct anterior THA by a single surgeon were surveyed for reported outcomes including Douleur Neuropathique 4-Interview (DN4-I), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Form Global Health Assessment. The DN4-I was considered positive if 3 (or more) of 7 neuropathic pain symptoms were affirmed at present in the distribution of the LFCN of the affected leg. RESULTS: Six hundred eighty patients accounting for 778 hips completed the survey. Overall, 16% of responders had positive DN4-I scores for continued neuropathic symptoms with a mean time since surgery of 3.9 years at assessment. Twenty-four percent of those responding within 2 years of surgery had positive scores compared with 15% from 2 to 4 years, 14% from 4 to 6 years, and 11% positive from 6 to 8 years after surgery. Of those with positive DN4-I scores, the most commonly affirmed neuropathic symptom was "numbness", reported in 37% of patients. The overall average interval HOOS, JR score was 89.8. There were no differences in HOOS, JR or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores for patients further out from surgery. CONCLUSION: The most commonly experienced neuropathic symptom in the distribution of the LFCN following direct anterior THA is "numbness" that occurred in 37% of patients with a positive DN4-I score. Neuropathic symptoms improved in patients further out from surgery with pain reported in 11% of patients from 6 to 8 years postoperatively. Neuropathic symptoms significantly improve with time and appear to be independent of hip function scores.