Standard therapy of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease shows limited efficacy in an open source hollow fibre system that simulates human plasma and epithelial lining fluid pharmacokinetics.

OBJECTIVES: Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) bacteria can cause chronic pulmonary disease (PD). Current treatment regimens of azithromycin, ethambutol and rifampicin have culture conversion rates of around 65%. Dynamic, preclinical models to assess the efficacy of treatment regimens are important to guide clinical trial development. The hollow fibre system (HFS) has been applied but reports lack experimental details. METHODS: We simulated the human pharmacokinetics of azithromycin, ethambutol and rifampicin both in plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) in a HFS, exposing THP-1 cells infected with M. avium to the triple-drug regimen for 3 weeks. We accounted for drug-drug interactions and protein-binding and provide all laboratory protocols. We differentiated the effects on the intracellular and extracellular mycobacterial population. RESULTS: The antibiotic concentrations in the HFS accurately reflected the time to peak concentration (Tmax), the peak concentration (Cmax) and half-life of azithromycin, rifampicin and ethambutol in plasma and ELF reported in literature. We find that plasma drug concentrations fail to hold the MAC bacterial load static (ΔLog10 CFU/mLControl:Regimen = 0.66 ± 0.76 and 0.45 ± 0.28 at 3 and 21 days); ELF concentrations do hold the bacterial load static for 3 days and inhibit bacterial growth for the duration of the experiment (ΔLog10 CFU/mLControl:Regimen = 1.1 ± 0.1 and 1.64 ± 0.59 at 3 and 21 days). DISCUSSION: In our model, the current therapy against MAC is ineffective, even when accounting for antibiotic accumulation at the site of infection and intracellularly. New treatment regimens need to be developed and be compared with currently recommended regimens in dynamic models prior to clinical evaluation. With the publication of all protocols we aim to open this technology to new users.

The Benzimidazole SPR719 Shows Promising Concentration-Dependent Activity and Synergy against Nontuberculous Mycobacteria.

Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) is emerging worldwide. Currently recommended multidrug treatment regimens yield poor outcomes, and new drugs and regimens are direly needed. SPR719, the active moiety of SPR720, is a new benzimidazole antibiotic with limited data on antimycobacterial activity. We determined MICs and MBCs against 138 clinical and reference strains of M. avium complex (MAC), M. kansasii, M. abscessus, M. xenopi, M. malmoense, and M. simiae and determined synergy with antimycobacterial drugs by checkerboard titrations. To study pharmacodynamics, we performed time-kill kinetics assays of SPR719 alone and in combinations against M. avium, M. kansasii, and M. abscessus and assessed synergy by response surface analysis according to Bliss independence. SPR719 showed potent activity against MAC (MIC90, 2 mg/liter) and M. kansasii (MIC90, 0.125 mg/liter) and modest activity against M. abscessus (MIC90, 8 mg/liter); its activity is bacteriostatic and concentration-dependent. We recorded a potential for combination therapy with ethambutol against M. kansasii and M. avium and synergy with clarithromycin against M. abscessus Ethambutol increased the SPR719 kill rate against M. kansasii but only prevented SPR719 resistance in M. avium SPR719 is active in vitro against NTM; its activity is strongest against M. kansasii, followed by MAC and M. abscessus SPR719 shows promise for combination therapy with ethambutol against MAC and M. kansasii and synergy with clarithromycin against M. abscessus The parent drug SPR720 could have a role especially in MAC pulmonary disease treatment. Further studies in dynamic models and trials are ongoing to advance clinical development.

Thioridazine Is an Efflux Pump Inhibitor in Mycobacterium avium Complex but of Limited Clinical Relevance.

Treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) is challenging partly due to high efflux pump expression. Thioridazine might block these efflux pumps. We explore the efficacy of thioridazine against M. avium isolates using MICs, time-kill combination assays, ex vivo macrophage infection assays, and efflux assays. Thioridazine is bactericidal against M. avium, inhibits intracellular growth at 2× MIC, and blocks ethidium bromide efflux. However, its toxicity and low plasma concentrations make it unlikely to add efficacy to MAC-PD therapy.

Is there a role for tedizolid in the treatment of non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease?

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary infections caused by non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are hard to treat and have low cure rates despite intensive multidrug therapy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of tedizolid, a new oxazolidinone, for the treatment of Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium abscessus. METHODS: We determined MICs of tedizolid for 113 isolates of NTM. Synergy with key antimycobacterial drugs was assessed using the chequerboard method and calculation of the FIC index (FICI). We performed time-kill kinetics assays of tedizolid alone and combined with amikacin for M. abscessus and with ethambutol for M. avium. Human macrophages were infected with M. abscessus and M. avium and subsequently treated with tedizolid; intracellular and extracellular cfu were quantified over time. RESULTS: NTM isolates generally had a lower MIC of tedizolid than of linezolid. FICIs were lowest between tedizolid and amikacin for M. abscessus (FICI = 0.75) and between tedizolid and ethambutol for M. avium (FICI = 0.72). Clarithromycin and tedizolid showed initial synergy, which was abrogated by erm(41)-induced macrolide resistance (FICI = 0.53). Tedizolid had a weak bacteriostatic effect on M. abscessus and combination with amikacin slightly prolonged its effect. Tedizolid had concentration-dependent activity against M. avium and its efficacy was enhanced by ethambutol. Both combinations had a concentration-dependent synergistic effect. Tedizolid could inhibit the intracellular bacterial population of both M. avium and M. abscessus. CONCLUSIONS: Tedizolid should be further investigated in pharmacodynamic studies and clinical trials for M. avium complex pulmonary disease. It is less active against M. abscessus, but still promising.

Auranofin Activity Exposes Thioredoxin Reductase as a Viable Drug Target in Mycobacterium abscessus.

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are highly drug-resistant, opportunistic pathogens that can cause pulmonary disease. The outcomes of the currently recommended treatment regimens are poor, especially for Mycobacterium abscessus New or repurposed drugs are direly needed. Auranofin, a gold-based antirheumatic agent, was investigated for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Here, we test auranofin against NTM in vitro and ex vivo We tested the susceptibility of 63 NTM isolates to auranofin using broth microdilution. Next, we assessed synergy between auranofin and antimycobacterial drugs using the checkerboard method and calculated the fractional inhibition concentration index (FICI). Using time-kill kinetics assays (TK), we assessed pharmacodynamics of auranofin alone and in combination with drug combinations showing the lowest FICIs for M. abscessus CIP 104536. A response surface analysis was used to assess synergistic interactions over time in TKs. Primary isolated macrophages were infected with M. abscessus and treated with auranofin. Finally, using KEGG Orthology, we looked for orthologues to auranofins drug target in M. tuberculosisM. abscessus had the lowest auranofin MIC50 (2 µg/ml) among the tested NTM. The lowest average FICIs were observed between auranofin and amikacin (0.45) and linezolid (0.50). Auranofin exhibited concentration-dependent killing of M. abscessus, with >1-log killing at concentrations of >2× MIC. Only amikacin was synergistic with auranofin according to Bliss independence. Auranofin could not lower the intracellular bacterial load in macrophages. Auranofin itself may not be feasible for M. abscessus treatment, but these data point toward a promising, unutilized drug target.

Implementation of Semiautomated Antimicrobial Susceptibility Interpretation Hardware for Nontuberculous Mycobacteria May Overestimate Susceptibility.

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) cause severe opportunistic infections and have a rising incidence in most settings. Rising diagnostic need must be met by national reference laboratories, which rely on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline-approved manual readout of microtiter plates for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) to determine antibiotic minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). Interpretation of these plates leads to different outcomes between laboratories. The SensiTitre Vizion digital MIC viewing system (Vizion) offers a more streamlined approach using semiautomated reading. Here, we conducted a blinded trial comparing the outcome of AST between manual readout and Vizion readout for 132 NTM isolates, amounting to 727 individual tests for antibiotic susceptibility ranging across 13 individual antibiotics with established CLSI breakpoints. From this, we calculated specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and the F1 value, as well as assessing major error (ME) and very major error (VME) rates. We find that Vizion-assisted AST produces significantly lower MICs (paired Wilcox signed rank test; P < 0.0001). The Vizion had an accuracy of 89,40%, producing 61 MEs (8.39%) and 16 VMEs (2.20%). The calculated specificity was 0.8370, the sensitivity was 0.9550, the PPV was 0.8460, the NPV was 0.9520, and the F1 score was 0.8970. We show that discrepant readings mostly stem from CLSI guideline breakpoints being close to, or overlapping, the MIC50 values, leading to small discrepancies crossing the breakpoint, contributing to VMEs and MEs. Using the Vizion in standard clinical diagnostics for NTM might lead to an overestimation of antibiotic susceptibility.

A bedaquiline/clofazimine combination regimen might add activity to the treatment of clinically relevant non-tuberculous mycobacteria.

BACKGROUND: Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections are hard to treat. New antimicrobial drugs and smarter combination regimens are needed. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to determine the in vitro activity of bedaquiline against NTM and assess its synergy with established antimycobacterials. METHODS: We determined MICs of bedaquiline for clinically relevant NTM species and Mycobacterium tuberculosis by broth microdilution for 30 isolates. Synergy testing was performed using the chequerboard method for 22 reference strains and clinical isolates of Mycobacterium abscessus (MAB) and Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). Time-kill kinetics (TK) assays with resistance monitoring of bedaquiline alone and combined with clofazimine were performed for MAB CIP 104536 and M. avium ATCC 700898; bedaquiline/clarithromycin combinations were evaluated against M. avium ATCC 700898. Interactions were assessed for TK experiments based on Bliss independence. RESULTS: Bedaquiline had modest activity against tested NTM, with MICs between <0.007 and 1 mg/L. Bedaquiline showed no interaction with tested drugs against MAB or MAC. Lowest mean fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) values were 0.79 with clofazimine for MAB and 0.97 with clofazimine and 0.82 with clarithromycin for MAC. In TK assays, bedaquiline showed a bacteriostatic effect. Clofazimine extended the bacteriostatic activity of bedaquiline against MAB and yielded a slight bactericidal effect against M. avium. The bedaquiline/clofazimine combination slowed emergence of bedaquiline resistance for M. avium but promoted it for MAB. Relative to Bliss independence, bedaquiline/clofazimine showed synergistic interaction over time for MAB and no interaction for M. avium and bedaquiline/clarithromycin showed antagonistic interaction for M. avium. CONCLUSIONS: Following these in vitro data, a bedaquiline/clofazimine combination might add activity to MAB and MAC treatment. The bedaquiline/clarithromycin combination might have lower activity compared with bedaquiline alone for MAC treatment.