Feasibility of In Vivo Metal Artifact Reduction in Contrast-Enhanced Dedicated Spiral Breast Computed Tomography.

BACKGROUND: Radiopaque breast markers cause artifacts in dedicated spiral breast-computed tomography (SBCT). This study investigates the extent of artifacts in different marker types and the feasibility of reducing artifacts through a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm. METHODS: The pilot study included 18 women who underwent contrast-enhanced SBCT. In total, 20 markers of 4 different types were analyzed for artifacts. The extent of artifacts with and without MAR was measured via the consensus of two readers. Image noise was quantitatively evaluated, and the effect of MAR on the detectability of breast lesions was evaluated on a 3-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Breast markers caused significant artifacts that impaired image quality and the detectability of lesions. MAR decreased artifact size in all analyzed cases, even in cases with multiple markers in a single slice. The median length of in-plain artifacts significantly decreased from 31 mm (range 11-51 mm) in uncorrected to 2 mm (range 1-5 mm) in corrected images (p ≤ 0.05). Artifact size was dependent on marker size. Image noise in slices affected by artifacts was significantly lower in corrected (13.6 ± 2.2 HU) than in uncorrected images (19.2 ± 6.8 HU, p ≤ 0.05). MAR improved the detectability of lesions affected by artifacts in 5 out of 11 cases. CONCLUSION: MAR is feasible in SBCT and improves the image quality and detectability of lesions.

Radiation dose estimates based on Monte Carlo simulation for spiral breast computed tomography imaging in a large cohort of patients.

BACKGROUND: Spiral breast computed tomography (BCT) equipped with a photon-counting detector (PCD) is a new radiological modality allowing for the compression-free acquisition of high-resolution 3-D datasets of the breast. Optimized dose exposu04170/re setups according to breast size were previously proposed but could not effectively be applied in a clinical environment due to ambiguity in measuring breast size. PURPOSE: This study aims to report the standard radiation dose values in a large cohort of patients examined with BCT, and to provide a mathematical model to estimate radiation dose based on morphological features of the breast. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted on 1657 BCT examinations acquired between 2018 and 2021 from 829 participants (57 ± 10 years, all female). Applying a dedicated breast tissue segmentation algorithm and Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, mean absorbed dose (MAD), mean glandular dose (MGD), mean skin dose (MSD), maximum glandular dose (maxGD), and maximum skin dose (maxSD) were calculated and related to morphological features such as breast volume, effective diameter, breast length, skin volume, and glandularity. Effective dose (ED) was calculated by applying the corresponding beam and tissue weighting factors, 1 Sv/Gy and 0.12 per breast. Relevant morphological features predicting dose values were identified based on the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Exponential or bi-exponential models predicting the dose values as a function of morphological features were fitted by using a non-linear least squares (LS) method. The models were validated by assessing R2 and residual standard error (RSE). RESULTS: The most relevant morphological features for radiation dose estimation were the breast volume (correlation coefficient: -0.8), diameter (-0.7), and length (-0.6). The glandularity presented a weak-positive correlation (0.4) with MGD and maxGD due to the inhomogeneous distribution of the glandularity and absorbed dose in the 3-D breast volume. The standard MGDs were calculated to be 7.3 ± 0.7, 6.5 ± 0.3, and 5.9 ± 0.3 mGy, MADs to 7.6 ± 0.8, 6.8 ± 0.3, and 6.2 ± 0.3 mGy, maxSDs to 19.9 ± 1.6, 19.5 ± 0.5, and 18.9 ± 0.5 mGy, and EDs to 0.88 ± 0.08, 0.78 ± 0.04, and 0.72 ± 0.04 mSv for small, medium, and large breasts with average breast lengths of 5.9 ± 1.6, 8.7 ± 1.3, and 12.2 ± 2.0 cm, respectively. The estimated glandularity - 23.1 ± 16.9, 12.5 ± 11.4, and 6.9 ± 7.3% from small to large breasts. The mathematical models were able to estimate the MAD, MGD, MSD, and maxSD as a function of each morphological feature with only upto 0.5 mGy RSE. CONCLUSION: We presented the typical morphological features and standard dose values according to the breast size acquired from a large patient cohort. We established radiation dose estimation models allowing accurate estimation of dose values including MGD with an acceptable RSE based on each of the easily measured morphological features of the breast. Clinicians could use the breast length to operate as a dosimetric alert of the scanner prior to a BCT scan. Radiation exposure for BCT was lower than diagnostic mammography (MG) and cone-beam breast CT (BCT).

Investigation of spectral performance for single-scan contrast-enhanced breast CT using photon-counting technology: A phantom study.

PURPOSE: Contrast-enhanced imaging of the breast is frequently used in breast MRI and has recently become more common in mammography. The purpose of this study was to make single-scan contrast-enhanced imaging feasible for photon-counting breast CT (pcBCT) and to assess the spectral performance of a pcBCT scanner by evaluating iodine maps and virtual non-contrast (VNC) images. METHODS: We optimized the settings of a pcBCT to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio between iodinated contrast agent and breast tissue. Therefore, an electronic energy threshold dividing the x-ray spectrum used into two energy bins was swept from 23.17 keV to 50.65 keV. Validation measurements were performed by placing syringes with contrast agent (2.5 mg/ml to 40 mg/ml) in phantoms with 7.5 cm and 12 cm in diameter. Images were acquired at different tube currents and reconstructed with 300 µm isotropic voxel size. Iodine maps and VNC images were generated using image-based material decomposition. Iodine concentrations and CT values were measured for each syringe and compared to the known concentrations and reference CT values. RESULTS: Maximal signal-to-noise ratios were found at a threshold position of 32.59 keV. Accurate iodine quantification (average root mean square error of 0.56 mg/ml) was possible down to a concentration of 2.5 mg/ml for all tube currents investigated. The enhancement has been sufficiently removed in the VNC images, so they can be interpreted as unenhanced CT images. Only minor changes of CT values compared to a conventional CT scan were observed. Noise was increased by the decomposition by a factor of 2.62 and 4.87 (7.5 cm and 12 cm phantoms) but did not compromise the accuracy of the iodine quantification. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate iodine quantification and generation of VNC images can be achieved using contrast-enhanced pcBCT from a single CT scan in the absence of temporal or spatial misalignment. Using iodine maps and VNC images, pcBCT has the potential to reduce dose, shorten examination and reading time, and to increase cancer detection rates.

Metal Artifact Reduction in X-ray Computed Tomography Using Computer-Aided Design Data of Implants as Prior Information.

OBJECTIVES: The performance of metal artifact reduction (MAR) methods in x-ray computed tomography (CT) suffers from incorrect identification of metallic implants in the artifact-affected volumetric images. The aim of this study was to investigate potential improvements of state-of-the-art MAR methods by using prior information on geometry and material of the implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The influence of a novel prior knowledge-based segmentation (PS) compared with threshold-based segmentation (TS) on 2 MAR methods (linear interpolation [LI] and normalized-MAR [NORMAR]) was investigated. The segmentation is the initial step of both MAR methods. Prior knowledge-based segmentation uses 3-dimensional registered computer-aided design (CAD) data as prior knowledge to estimate the correct position and orientation of the metallic objects. Threshold-based segmentation uses an adaptive threshold to identify metal. Subsequently, for LI and NORMAR, the selected voxels are projected into the raw data domain to mark metal areas. Attenuation values in these areas are replaced by different interpolation schemes followed by a second reconstruction. Finally, the previously selected metal voxels are replaced by the metal voxels determined by PS or TS in the initial reconstruction. First, we investigated in an elaborate phantom study if the knowledge of the exact implant shape extracted from the CAD data provided by the manufacturer of the implant can improve the MAR result. Second, the leg of a human cadaver was scanned using a clinical CT system before and after the implantation of an artificial knee joint. The results were compared regarding segmentation accuracy, CT number accuracy, and the restoration of distorted structures. RESULTS: The use of PS improved the efficacy of LI and NORMAR compared with TS. Artifacts caused by insufficient segmentation were reduced, and additional information was made available within the projection data. The estimation of the implant shape was more exact and not dependent on a threshold value. Consequently, the visibility of structures was improved when comparing the new approach to the standard method. This was further confirmed by improved CT value accuracy and reduced image noise. CONCLUSIONS: The PS approach based on prior implant information provides image quality which is superior to TS-based MAR, especially when the shape of the metallic implant is complex. The new approach can be useful for improving MAR methods and dose calculations within radiation therapy based on the MAR corrected CT images.

Technical feasibility proof for high-resolution low-dose photon-counting CT of the breast.

X-ray computed tomography (CT) has been proposed and evaluated multiple times as a potentially alternative method for breast imaging. All efforts shown so far have been criticized and partly disapproved because of their limited spatial resolution and higher patient dose when compared to mammography. Our concept for a dedicated breast CT (BCT) scanner therefore aimed at novel apparatus and detector design to provide high spatial resolution of about 100 µm and average glandular dose (AGD) levels of 5 mGy or below. Photon-counting technology was considered as a solution to reach these goals. The complete concept was previously evaluated and confirmed by simulations and basic experiments on laboratory setups. We here present measurements of dose, technical image quality parameters and surgical specimen results on such a scanner. For comparison purposes, the specimens were also imaged with digital mammography (DM) and breast tomosynthesis (BT) apparatus. Results show that photon-counting BCT (pcBCT) at 5 mGy AGD offers sufficiently high 3D spatial resolution for reliable detectability of calcifications and soft tissue delineation. KEY POINTS: • Photon-counting detector technology allows for spatial resolution better than 100 µm. • pcBCT allows for dose levels in the screening mammography range. • pcBCT provides the highest quality imaging of microcalcifications.

Performance of Photon-Counting Breast Computed Tomography, Digital Mammography, and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Evaluating Breast Specimens.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: This study compared a novel photon-counting breast computed tomography (pcBCT) system with digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems. For this reason, surgical specimens were examined with all three techniques and rated by three observers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 surgical specimens were investigated with DM, DBT, and pcBCT; the associated images were shown to three experienced radiologists. Findings (22 microcalcifications and 23 mass lesions) were recorded and compared to the results of the pathological examination. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of microcalcifications and lesions were calculated and displayed using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Sensitivity for microcalcifications was 82% for DM, 70% for DBT, and 85% for pcBCT. Specificity for microcalcifications was 71% for DM, 75% for DBT, and 83% for pcBCT. Sensitivity for lesions was 45% for DM, 62% for DBT, and 65% for pcBCT. Specificity for lesions was 76% for DM, 62% for DBT, and 76% for pcBCT. CONCLUSIONS: pcBCT showed a comparable or superior performance compared to the clinically approved DM and DBT systems. Mass lesion detectability can be increased further by the use of contrast media.