RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The presence of autoantibodies against citrullinated proteins (ACPA) significantly increases the risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Dysregulation of lymphocyte subpopulations was previously described in RA. OBJECTIVES: To propose the predictive model for progression to clinical arthritis based on peripheral lymphocyte subsets and ACPA in individuals who are at risk of RA. METHODS: Our study included 207 at-risk individuals defined by the presence of arthralgias and either additional ACPA positivity or meeting the EULAR definition for clinically suspect arthralgia. For the construction of predictive models, 153 individuals with symptom duration ≥12 months who have not yet progressed to arthritis were included. The lymphocyte subsets were evaluated using flow cytometry and anti-CCP using ELISA. RESULTS: Out of all individuals with arthralgia, 41 progressed to arthritis. A logistic regression model with baseline peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations and ACPA as predictors was constructed. The resulting predictive model showed that high anti-CCP IgG, higher percentage of CD4+ T cells, and lower percentage of T and NK cells increased the probability of arthritis development. Moreover, the proposed classification decision tree showed, that individuals having both high anti-CCP IgG and low NK cells have the highest risk of developing arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a predictive model based on baseline levels of lymphocyte subpopulations and ACPA to identify individuals with arthralgia with the highest risk of progression to clinical arthritis. The final model includes T cells and NK cells, which are involved in the pathogenesis of RA. This preliminary model requires further validation in larger at-risk cohorts.
RESUMEN
There is increasing knowledge in the recognition of individuals at risk for progression to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) before the clinical manifestation of the disease. This prodromal phase preceding the manifestation of RA may represent a "window of opportunity" for preventive interventions that may transform the clinical approach to this disease. However, limited evidence exists in support of effective interventions to delay the onset or even halt the manifestation of RA. Given the multifactorial nature of RA development and disease progression, the latest guidelines for established RA stress the use of integrative interventions and multidisciplinary care strategies, combining pharmacologic treatment with non-pharmacological approaches. Accordingly, individuals at risk of RA could be offered an integrative, multifactorial intervention approach. Current data point toward pharmacological intervention reverting the subclinical inflammation and delay in the disease onset. In addition, targeting life style modifiable factors (smoking cessation, dental health, physical activity, and diet) may presumably improve RA prognosis in individuals at risk, mainly by changes in epigenetics, autoantibodies, cytokines profiles, and microbiome. Nonetheless, the benefits of multidisciplinary interventions to halt the manifestation of RA in at-risk individuals remain unknown. As there is a growing knowledge of possible pharmacological intervention in the preclinical phase, this narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of non-pharmacological treatments in individuals at risk of RA. Considering the mechanisms preceding the clinical manifestation of RA we explored all aspects that would be worth modifying and that would represent an integrative non-pharmacological care for individuals at risk of RA.
