Efficacy of Nonpharmacological Interventions in Cognitive Impairment: Systematic Review And Network Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: There is currently no known cure for cognitive impairment, which highlights the need to explore other ways of managing this condition. This topic has recently become an area of active research. However, the availability of nonpharmacological options poses a challenge when trying to determine the best treatment for improving cognitive function. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and a Bayesian network meta-analysis to compare the effects of nonpharmacological interventions on global cognition in patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia. The nonpharmacological interventions were classified as aerobic exercise, strength exercise, multicomponent physical exercise, other physical exercises, tai chi, mind-body exercises, traditional cognitive rehabilitation, computer-based cognitive rehabilitation, occupational therapy, music therapy, physical-cognitive rehabilitation, and reminiscence therapy. RESULTS: Physical-cognitive rehabilitation emerged as the most effective nonpharmacological intervention for enhancing global cognition in patients with unspecified cognitive impairment and dementia, whereas occupational therapy focused on dual-task interventions was found to be the most effective nonpharmacological intervention for mild cognitive impairment. CONCLUSION: These results underscore the importance of adopting a dual approach to managing cognitive impairment, integrating both cognitive and physical rehabilitation within the same intervention.

Nota epidemiológica: razón de ODDS (OR) / Epidemiologic note: ODDS ratio (OR)

Introducción: el Odds Ratio es una medida de efecto para la cual existen diversas traducciones al español. En este documento lo denominaremos OR (Razón de Odds). Es una medida que a través de la historia ha contribuido a establecer asociaciones relevantes para la salud pública. Objetivo: realizar una nota epidemiológica donde se presentan los principales aspectos teórico práctico de la razón de Odds. Metodología: búsquedas en las bases de datos biomédica (Pubmed, Cochrane Library, LILACS), metabuscadores (Google) y a través de la estrategia en bola de nieve y referencias claves. Esta nota metodológica contiene introducción, escenario clínico, desarrollo de concepto, ejemplos, discusión y conclusiones. Resultados: un Odds es el cociente entre la probabilidad de ocurrencia de un evento (p) sobre la probabilidad de que dicho evento no ocurra (1-p). El OR o razón de Odds, es un cociente entre dos Odds. Es una medida del efecto que permite a los investigadores plantear posibles asociaciones entre una exposición y un desenlace. Conclusiones: el OR puede determinarse en diferentes tipos de diseños y por medio del análisis estratificado (método Mantel-Haenszel) y el multivariado utilizando regresión logística, controla variables de confusión.

Introduction: The Odds ratio (OR) is a measure of effect, which has many Spanish equivalents. The term Razón de Odds will be used in this document to designate OR. Throughout history OR has contributed to establish associations in public health. Objective: to conduct an epidemiologic note presenting the main theoretical and practical aspects of Odds ratio. Methodology: a search was conducted in the Pubmed, Cochrane Library and LILACS biomedical databases, Google meta-searchers and through the snowball key references strategy. This methodologic note includes an introduction, clinical scenario, concept development, examples, discussion and conclusions. Results: an Odds is the quotient between the probability of occurrence of an event (p) over the probability of absence of said event (1-p), OR (Odds ratio), is the quotient between two Odds. It is a measure of effect which allows researchers to identify how strongly an exposure is associated with an outcome. Conclusions: OR may be determined using different types of study designs and by means of a stratified analysis (Mantel-Haenszel method) and the multivariate method by logistic regression and control for confounding variables.

Treatments for alopecia areata: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata is an autoimmune disease leading to nonscarring hair loss on the scalp or body. There are different treatments including immunosuppressants, hair growth stimulants, and contact immunotherapy. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of the treatments for alopecia areata (AA), alopecia totalis (AT), and alopecia universalis (AU) in children and adults. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP were searched up to July 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated classical immunosuppressants, biologics, small molecule inhibitors, contact immunotherapy, hair growth stimulants, and other therapies in paediatric and adult populations with AA. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used the standard procedures expected by Cochrane including assessment of risks of bias using RoB2 and the certainty of the evidence using GRADE. The primary outcomes were short-term hair regrowth ≥ 75% (between 12 and 26 weeks of follow-up), and incidence of serious adverse events. The secondary outcomes were long-term hair regrowth ≥ 75% (greater than 26 weeks of follow-up) and health-related quality of life. We could not perform a network meta-analysis as very few trials compared the same treatments. We presented direct comparisons and made a narrative description of the findings. MAIN RESULTS: We included 63 studies that tested 47 different treatments in 4817 randomised participants. All trials used a parallel-group design except one that used a cross-over design. The mean sample size was 78 participants. All trials recruited outpatients from dermatology clinics. Participants were between 2 and 74 years old. The trials included patients with AA (n = 25), AT (n = 1), AU (n = 1), mixed cases (n = 31), and unclear types of alopecia (n = 4). Thirty-three out of 63 studies (52.3%) reported the proportion of participants achieving short-term hair regrowth ≥ 75% (between 12 and 26 weeks). Forty-seven studies (74.6%) reported serious adverse events and only one study (1.5%) reported health-related quality of life. Five studies (7.9%) reported the proportion of participants with long-term hair regrowth ≥ 75% (greater than 26 weeks). Amongst the variety of interventions found, we prioritised some groups of interventions for their relevance to clinical practice: systemic therapies (classical immunosuppressants, biologics, and small molecule inhibitors), and local therapies (intralesional corticosteroids, topical small molecule inhibitors, contact immunotherapy, hair growth stimulants and cryotherapy). Considering only the prioritised interventions, 14 studies from 12 comparisons reported short-term hair regrowth ≥ 75% and 22 studies from 10 comparisons reported serious adverse events (18 reported zero events and 4 reported at least one). One study (1 comparison) reported quality of life, and two studies (1 comparison) reported long-term hair regrowth ≥ 75%. For the main outcome of short-term hair regrowth ≥ 75%, the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of oral prednisolone or cyclosporine versus placebo (RR 4.68, 95% CI 0.57 to 38.27; 79 participants; 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence), intralesional betamethasone or triamcinolone versus placebo (RR 13.84, 95% CI 0.87 to 219.76; 231 participants; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence), oral ruxolitinib versus oral tofacitinib (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.52; 80 participants; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence), diphencyprone or squaric acid dibutil ester versus placebo (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.71; 99 participants; 1 study; very-low-certainty evidence), diphencyprone or squaric acid dibutyl ester versus topical minoxidil (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.71; 99 participants; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence), diphencyprone plus topical minoxidil versus diphencyprone (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.13 to 3.44; 30 participants; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence), topical minoxidil 1% and 2% versus placebo (RR 2.31, 95% CI 1.34 to 3.96; 202 participants; 2 studies; very low-certainty evidence) and cryotherapy versus fractional CO2 laser (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.86; 80 participants; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence suggests oral betamethasone may increase short-term hair regrowth ≥ 75% compared to prednisolone or azathioprine (RR 1.67, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.88; 80 participants; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference between subcutaneous dupilumab and placebo in short-term hair regrowth ≥ 75% (RR 3.59, 95% CI 0.19 to 66.22; 60 participants; 1 study; low-certainty evidence) as well as between topical ruxolitinib and placebo (RR 5.00, 95% CI 0.25 to 100.89; 78 participants; 1 study; low-certainty evidence). However, baricitinib results in an increase in short-term hair regrowth ≥ 75% when compared to placebo (RR 7.54, 95% CI 3.90 to 14.58; 1200 participants; 2 studies; high-certainty evidence). For the incidence of serious adverse events, the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of topical ruxolitinib versus placebo (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.94; 78 participants; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). Baricitinib and apremilast may result in little to no difference in the incidence of serious adverse events versus placebo (RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.60 to 3.60; 1224 participants; 3 studies; low-certainty evidence). The same result is observed for subcutaneous dupilumab compared to placebo (RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.07 to 36.11; 60 participants; 1 study; low-certainty evidence). For health-related quality of life, the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of oral cyclosporine compared to placebo (MD 0.01, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.07; very low-certainty evidence). Baricitinib results in an increase in long-term hair regrowth ≥ 75% compared to placebo (RR 8.49, 95% CI 4.70 to 15.34; 1200 participants; 2 studies; high-certainty evidence). Regarding the risk of bias, the most relevant issues were the lack of details about randomisation and allocation concealment, the limited efforts to keep patients and assessors unaware of the assigned intervention, and losses to follow-up. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found that treatment with baricitinib results in an increase in short- and long-term hair regrowth compared to placebo. Although we found inconclusive results for the risk of serious adverse effects with baricitinib, the reported small incidence of serious adverse events in the baricitinib arm should be balanced with the expected benefits. We also found that the impact of other treatments on hair regrowth is very uncertain. Evidence for health-related quality of life is still scant.

Impact of vaccination against COVID-19 on patients with cancer in ACHOC-C19 study: Real world evidence from one Latin American country.

Introduction: During the pandemic, it has been recommended that vaccination against COVID-19 be a priority for patients with cancer; however, these patients were not included in the initial studies evaluating the available vaccines. Objective: To define the impact of vaccination against COVID-19 in preventing the risk of complications associated with the infection in a cohort of patients with cancer in Colombia. Methods: An analytical observational cohort study, based on national registry of patients with cancer and COVID 19 infection ACHOC-C19, was done. The data was collected from June 2021, until October 2021. Inclusion criteria were: Patients older than 18 years with cancer diagnosis and confirmed COVID-19 infection. Data from the unvaccinated and vaccinated cohorts were compared. Outcomes evaluated included all-cause mortality within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis, hospitalization, and need for mechanical ventilation. The estimation of the effect was made through the relative risk (RR), the absolute risk reduction (ARR) and the number needed to treat (NNT). Multivariate analysis was performed using generalized linear models. Results: 896 patients were included, of whom 470 were older than 60 years (52.4%) and 59% were women (n=530). 172 patients were recruited in the vaccinated cohort and 724 in the non-vaccinated cohort (ratio: 1 to 4.2). The cumulative incidence of clinical outcomes among the unvaccinated vs vaccinated patients were: for hospitalization 42% (95% CI: 38.7%-46.1%) vs 29%; (95% CI: 22.4%-36.5%); for invasive mechanical ventilation requirement 8.4% (n=61) vs 4.6% (n=8) and for mortality from all causes 17% (n=123) vs 4.65% (n=8). Conclusion: In our population, unvaccinated patients with cancer have an increased risk of complications for COVID -19 infection, as hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, and mortality. It is highly recommended to actively promote the vaccination among this population.

Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Patients With Early Malignant Melanoma in One Latin American Country: Results of the Epidemiological Registry of Malignant Melanoma in Colombia Study.

To describe the population with early malignant melanoma, we performed a cohort study on the basis of the Epidemiological Registry of Malignant Melanoma in Colombia-Asociacion Colombiana de Hematologia y Oncologia. From January 2011 until December 2021, 759 patients were included; the average age was 66 years, 57% were women, acral lentiginous histology was found in 27.8% of patients, and the median follow-up was 36.5 months. The prognostic factors for overall survival in our population are Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 3-4 (hazard ratio [HR], 13.8), stage III (HR, 5.07), received radiotherapy (HR, 3.38), ulceration on histology (HR, 2.68), chronic sun exposure (HR, 2.3), low income (HR, 2.04), previous local surgery (HR, 0.27), and have received adjuvant treatment (HR, 0.41).

Expectations and Experiences of a Group of Patients Enrolled in an Educational Program for Rheumatoid Arthritis at a Specialized Care Center in Colombia.

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease diagnosed in a productive stage of life. Patients with RA experience changes in their musculoskeletal system, overall health and quality of life. It has been identified that patients with RA do not have appropriate knowledge about their condition. Educational programs can provide new knowledge, accompaniment, and closer follow-up to improve empowerment and quality of life in patients with RA. Purpose: To describe rheumatoid arthritis patients' experiences, perceptions, and expectations when enrolling on a multicomponent educational program in a specialized RA setting. Patients and Methods: A qualitative study was done. Patients with RA who attended a specialized center and enrolled in an educational program participated in two focus groups. The focus group discussions and the interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, analyzed, and emerging themes were constructed. Results: Thirty-one participants were included in the focus groups. The median age was 60 years IQR (54-67), 92% were female. Two relevant categories emerged: first, the experience of being diagnosed with RA. Second, the program's ability to empower participants with knowledge and the possibility of transferring knowledge to other patients with the same condition. In addition, patients gave a high score to the expectations regarding the educational program. Conclusion: Understanding patients' expectations when enrolling in an educational program allows educators and clinicians to understand their motivations to create tailored programs that can contribute to acquiring empowerment in the educational process and managing their disease. Stakeholders should consider patients' expectations when implementing these interventions for patients with RA to adapt the intervention according to the patient's context and needs, which will directly affect the patient's adherence and lead to better use and allocation of resources for educational activities.

Guía de práctica clínica para el tratamiento de la rinosinusitis crónica: versión completa / Clinical practice guideline for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: full version

La rinosinusitis (RS) se define como la inflamación de la nariz y los senos paranasales con dos o más síntomas como bloqueo/obstrucción/congestión o secreción nasal (goteo nasal anterior/posterior) más dolor/presión facial y/o reducción o pérdida del sentido del olfato. Adicional, se tienen en cuenta los hallazgos objetivos como la presencia de pólipos nasales y/o descarga mucopurulenta en meato medio y/o edema u obstrucción de la mucosa en el meato medio en la endoscopia nasal. Se pueden considerar o no, los cambios tomográficos como cambios mucosos en el complejo osteomeatal y la mucosa de los senos paranasales. Se reconoce que los síntomas tienen alta sensibilidad, pero baja especificidad, de ahí la necesidad de hallazgos objetivos.

Rhinosinusitis (RS) is defined as inflammation of the nose and sinuses with two or more symptoms such as blockage/obstruction/congestion or nasal discharge. with two or more symptoms such as nasal blockage/obstruction/congestion or nasal discharge (anterior/posterior runny nose) plus facial pain/pressure and/or reduction or loss of the sense of smell. sense of smell. In addition, objective findings such as the presence of nasal polyps and/or nasal presence of nasal polyps and/or mucopurulent discharge from the middle meatus and/or edema or mucosal obstruction or mucosal obstruction in the middle meatus on nasal endoscopy. Tomographic changes may or may not tomographic changes may or may not be considered as mucosal changes in the osteomeatal complex and mucosal osteomeatal complex and the mucosa of the paranasal sinuses. It is recognized that the symptoms symptoms have high sensitivity but low specificity, hence the need for objective findings. findings.

Guía de práctica clínica para el tratamiento de la rinosinusitis crónica: versión corta para profesionales de la salud. Colombia-2023 / Clinical practice guideline for the management of chronic rhinosinusitis: short version for health care professionals. Colombia-2023

La rinosinusitis (RS) se define como la inflamación de la nariz y los senos paranasales con dos o más síntomas como bloqueo/obstrucción/congestión o secreción nasal (goteo nasal anterior/posterior) más dolor/presión facial y/o reducción o pérdida del sentido del olfato. Adicional, se tienen en cuenta los hallazgos objetivos como la presencia de pólipos nasales y/o descarga mucopurulenta en meato medio y/o edema u obstrucción de la mucosa en el meato medio en la endoscopia nasal.

Rhinosinusitis (RS) is defined as inflammation of the nose and sinuses with two or more symptoms such as blockage/obstruction/congestion or nasal discharge with two or more symptoms such as nasal blockage/obstruction/congestion or nasal discharge (anterior/posterior runny nose) plus facial pain/pressure and/or reduced or lost sense of smell sense of smell. Additionally, objective findings such as the presence of nasal polyps and/or nasal presence of nasal polyps and/or mucopurulent discharge in the middle meatus and/or edema or mucous or mucosal obstruction in the middle meatus on nasal endoscopy.

Adherence to Subcutaneous Anti-Tumour Necrosis Factor Treatment in a Cohort of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Before and After the Implementation of a Comprehensive Care Model.

Purpose: To assess, in a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with subcutaneous antitumor necrosis factor drugs (anti-TNFs), the levels of treatment adherence before and after implementing a comprehensive care model (CCM). Patients and Methods: An observational study including RA patients under treatment with subcutaneous anti-TNFs (adalimumab, etanercept, and golimumab) selected at convenience was performed; a sample size of 125 patients was calculated. The outcome variable was adherence assessed with the Compliance Questionnaire on Rheumatology (CQR19), measured before and after implementing a CCM. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed comparing adherence before and after applying the model (Wilcoxon and McNemar's Chi2 test). For multivariate analysis, a generalized linear model adjusted for covariates was performed, where the difference in the proportion of adherence was the outcome measure. Results: A total of 131 RA patients were followed-up for 24 months; average age was 62 years, and 83.9% were women. The median of DAS28 at the beginning of the follow-up was 2.32, and the HAQ was 0.25. At baseline, 87.8% were adherent; after 24 months, 96.2% were adherent according to CQR19. At the end of follow-up, adherence increased with the three types of anti-TNFs treatment. In a matched model adjusted for clinical variables, the CCM was estimated to produce a 9.4% increase in the total percentage of adherent patients. Additionally, a statistically significant increase of 4.5% in the percentage of adherent patients treated with golimumab compared with etanercept and adalimumab was found. Conclusion: A CCM produced an important increase in the percentage of patients with rheumatoid arthritis adherent to treatment after 24 months of follow-up. It is noteworthy that Golimumab patients were more adherent when compared with other current anti-TNFs treatments.

Barriers and facilitators to provide multidisciplinary care for breast cancer patients in five Latin American countries: A descriptive-interpretative qualitative study.

Background: Multidisciplinary care (MDC) remains a cornerstone for breast cancer management as it is associated with improved quality of care and patient outcomes. However, the adoption of MDC practice is heterogeneous and has been poorly explored in Latin America. The objective was to describe barriers and possible facilitators for providing MDC to breast cancer patients in five Latin American countries. Methods: A panel of experts with an active clinical practice in Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, and Uruguay was convened to identify barriers and facilitators to MDC. This study is a qualitative synthesis of a structured discussion regarding the state of MDC in the setting of breast cancer. Findings: Experts recognized that most oncology practices in Latin America do not apply a multidisciplinary approach for breast cancer patients. Predominant barriers for MDC are fragmentation of health services, being understaffed, inadequate infrastructure, and geographic disparities. Access to MDC varies widely in the region, with significant heterogeneity documented within countries. MDC practice was described as being more common in the private sector in Ecuador and Uruguay, while it is more widely implemented in public institutions of Colombia and Bolivia. Interpretation: Establishing quality MDC remains a challenge for oncology practices in Latin America. Addressing regional issues and identifying specific local needs is warranted to encourage the adoption of an effective multidisciplinary approach and, consequently, improve clinical outcomes. Active involvement of all stakeholders is required to build locally solutions and should involve institutions, health professionals, and patients. Funding: Research was funded by Productos Roche S.A.

Guía de práctica clínica para el tratamiento de la leucemia linfocítica crónica: guía para profesionales de la salud / Clinical practice guideline for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a guide for health care professionals

La leucemia linfocítica crónica (LLC) es una neoplasia caracterizada por la proliferación y acumulación clonal de células B maduras, que típicamente co-expresan los antígenos de superficie CD5 ­ CD23, dentro de la sangre, la médula ósea, los ganglios linfáticos, el bazo y otros tejidos . Esta patología es considerada el tipo de leucemia más común en personas adultas en países occidentales, y se considera una enfermedad de adultos mayores, con una mediana de edad al diagnóstico de 70 años .

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a neoplasm characterized by the proliferation and clonal accumulation of mature B cells, which typically co-express the CD5 - CD23 surface antigens, within the blood, bone marrow, lymph nodes, spleen and other tissues. This pathology is considered the most common type of leukemia in adults in Western countries, and is considered a disease of older adults, with a median age at diagnosis of 70 years.

Guía de práctica clínica para el tratamiento de la leucemia linfocítica crónica / Clinical practice guideline for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

La guía está dirigida al personal clínico asistencial especializado que brinda tratamiento a los pacientes con diagnóstico de LLC, en el contexto del SGSSS colombiano. Incluye a los siguientes profesionales potenciales: Hematólogos y Hematólogos-oncólogos. También está dirigida a los centros asistenciales que brindan cuidado a los pacientes con diagnóstico de LLC y a quienes toman decisiones administrativas, tanto en el medio hospitalario como en las aseguradoras, pagadores del gasto en la salud y en la generación de políticas de salud. Finalmente, las recomendaciones pueden ser de interés para pacientes con LLC, sus familiares y cuidadores. Se considera pertinente aclarar que la guía ofrecerá recomendaciones específicas frente a las preguntas definidas, y excede el alcance de esta, definir las competencias profesionales del equipo involucrado en el manejo de esta patología.

The guide is aimed at specialized clinical care personnel who provide treatment to patients diagnosed with CLL, in the context of the Colombian SGSSS. It includes the following potential professionals: hematologists and hematologist-oncologists. It is also addressed to health care centers that provide care to patients diagnosed with CLL and to administrative decision makers, both in the hospital environment and in the insurance companies, health care payers and health policy makers. Finally, the recommendations may be of interest to CLL patients, their families and caregivers. It is considered pertinent to clarify that the guide will offer specific recommendations in response to the questions defined, and it is beyond the scope of this guide to define the professional competencies of the team involved in the management of this pathology.

Prevalencia de Sífilis, Hepatitis B y Virus de Inmunodeficiencia Humana en población masculina privada de la libertad de un establecimiento carcelario en Bogotá-Colombia. Año 2019 / Prevalence of Syphilis, Hepatitis B and Human Immunodeficiency Virus in the male prison population in Bogotá, Colombia in 2019

Resumen Objetivo: Determinar la prevalencia de sífilis, hepatitis B y virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana en una población privada de la libertad de un establecimiento carcelario masculino de Bogotá D.C.-Colombia en 2019. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio de corte transversal en un establecimiento carcelario masculino de Bogotá, se incluyeron personas privadas de la libertad, mayores de 18 años. Los sujetos fueron sometidos a pruebas de detección de anticuerpos contra el Treponema pallidum, Antígenos de Superficie contra hepatitis B (HBsAg) y Virus de Inmunodeficiencia Humana (VIH) y respondieron un cuestionario estructurado para la descripción de conductas de riesgo. Resultados: Participaron 447 sujetos, ubicados en 7 pabellones del establecimiento carcelario. La prevalencia de sífilis fue del 5.8% (IC95% 3.8 - 8.4), del 1.1% para VIH (IC95% 0.4 - 2.6), y del 0.45% para hepatitis B crónica (IC95% 0.05 - 1.6). Discusión: A pesar de que la prevalencia documentada para estas patologías es más alta que en la población general, los resultados son más bajos que los reporta dos en instituciones de condiciones similares en otras latitudes. Se recomienda que el establecimiento continúe desarrollando políticas de promoción y prevención de estas patologías dentro de su población.

Abstract Objective: To determine the prevalence of syphilis, hepatitis B and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the male prison population in Bogotá, Colombia in 2019. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in a male prison center in Bogotá, in which sequential sampling, stratified by ward, included people deprived of liberty, over 18 years of age and who voluntarily agreed to participate in the investigation. Subjects underwent tests for antibodies to Treponema pallidum, Surface Antigens against hepatitis B (HBsAg) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and they answered a structured questionnaire for the description of risk behaviors. Results: A total of 447 subjects were included, belonging to 7 prison wards. The prevalence of syphilis was 5.8% (95% CI 3.8 - 8.4), 0.5% for chronic hepatitis B (95% CI 0.05 - 1.6) and 1.1% for HIV (95% CI 0.4 - 2.6). Discussion: Although the documented prevalence for these pathologies is higher than in the general population, the results are lower than those reported in other institutions with similar conditions in other latitudes. It is recommended that the institution continue to strengthen its policies for the promotion and prevention of these pathologies within its population.

Conocimientos, prácticas y prevalencia de uso de medidas de protección adecuada frente a la radiación ultravioleta en habitantes de Bogotá D.C. (2013-2018) / Knowledges, practices, and prevalence of the use of appropriate protective measures facing ultraviolet radiation (UVR) in inhabitants of Bogotá D.C. (2013-2018) / Conhecimento, práticas e prevalência do uso de medidas de proteção adequadas contra a radiação ultravioleta em habitantes de Bogotá D.C. (2013-2018)

Objetivo: describir los conocimientos, las prácticas y la prevalencia de uso de medidas de protección adecuadas frente a la radiación ultravioleta (RUV) en una muestra de habitantes de Bogotá D.C., Colombia (2013-2018). Método: estudio de corte transversal a partir de encuestas realizadas por la Secretaría Distrital de Salud (SDS) en diferentes sectores de Bogotá. Se entrevistaron transeúntes de áreas públicas de concentración masiva en las 20 localidades de Bogotá, los cuales fueron incluidos de forma secuencial y por conveniencia. Se estudiaron aspectos sociodemográficos, fenotípicos, antecedente de interés, conocimientos y prácticas relacionadas con la exposición a la RUV. Resultados: se analizaron 8.420 encuestas, donde el 66 % (n: 5.560) eran sujetos de género femenino, con una mediana de edad de 38 años. La mayoría de los encuestados se ubicaron en los estratos socioeconómicos del I al III (95,6 %; n: 8.051). El 27 % declaró una ocupación laboral al aire libre (n: 2.268) y el 50 % reportaron exponerse a la RUV los siete días de la semana (n: 4.255). El 70 % de los participantes (n: 5.870) reconoció que la RUV es un factor de riesgo de cáncer de piel, pero tan sólo el 20,8 % (n: 1.753) reportó prácticas adecuadas de protección. Conclusiones: a pesar del alto nivel de conocimiento frente a los riesgos de la RUV existe un bajo porcentaje de uso de medidas de protección en esta muestra de habitantes de Bogotá. Se deben reforzar las estrategias que conduzcan a incrementar la protección frente a la RUV en este grupo poblacional.

Objective: To describe knowledge, practices, and prevalence of the use of appropriate protective measures facing ultraviolet radiation (UVR) in a sample of inhabitants of Bogotá D.C., Colombia (2013-2018). Method: A cross-sectional study from surveys carried out by the District Secretariat of Health (SDS according to its Spanish initials) in different sectors of Bogotá. Transients of public areas of mass concentration in 20 localities of Bogotá were interviewed. These were included in a sequential way and by convenience. Sociodemographic, phenotype aspects were studied, along with interests, knowledge, and practices related to UVR exposure. Results: 8,420 surveys were analyzed, where 66% (n: 5,560) were female, with an average age of 38 years. Most people surveyed were in socioeconomic levels I to III (95.6%; n: 8,051). 27% declared that they worked outside (n: 2,268), and 50% reported exposure to UVR seven days a week (n: 4,255). 70% of participants (n: 5,870) recognized that UVR is a skin cancer risk factor, but only 20.8% (n: 1,753) reported appropriate protection measures. Conclusions: Despite high levels of knowledge regarding the risk of UVR, there is a low level of use of protection measures in this sample of inhabitants in Bogotá. Strategies must be reinforced that lead to an increase of protection against UVR in this population group.

Objetivo: descrever os conhecimentos, as práticas e a prevalência do uso de medidas de proteção adequadas contra a radiação ultravioleta (RUV) em uma amostra de habitantes de Bogotá D.C., Colômbia (2013-2018). Método: estudo transversal baseado em inquéritos realizados pela Secretaria Distrital de Saúde (SDS) em diferentes setores de Bogotá. Foram entrevistados transeuntes de áreas públicas de maior concentração nas 20 localidades de Bogotá; eles foram incluídos sequencialmente e por conveniência. Foram estudados aspectos sociodemográficos e fenotípicos, histórico de interesse, conhecimentos e práticas relacionadas à exposição à RUV. Resultados: foram analisados 8.420 inquéritos, dos quais 66% (n: 5.560) eram do sexo feminino, com mediana de idade de 38 anos. A maioria dos entrevistados estava localizados nos estratos socioeconômicos de I a III (95,6%; n: 8.051). 27% declararam ocupação ao ar livre (n: 2.268) e 50% relataram exposição à RUV sete dias por semana (n: 4.255). 70% dos participantes (n: 5.870) reconheceram que a RUV é um fator de risco para câncer de pele, mas apenas 20,8% (n: 1.753) relataram práticas de proteção adequadas. Conclusões: apesar do alto nível de conhecimento sobre os riscos da RUV, há um baixo percentual de uso de medidas de proteção nesta amostra de habitantes de Bogotá. Estratégias que levem ao aumento da proteção contra RUV nesse grupo populacional devem ser reforçadas.

Factores de riesgo asociados a las caídas intrahospitalarias en tres instituciones de Colombia / Risk factors associated with inpatient falls in three hospitals of Colombia

Resumen Introducción. Las caídas intrahospitalarias son eventos adversos que se relacionan con múltiples factores de riesgo y que tienen implicaciones importantes para los pacientes y los sistemas de salud. Objetivo. Determinar los factores de riesgo asociados a las caídas intrahospitalarias en tres hospitales de tercer nivel de Colombia. Materiales y métodos. Estudio observacional analítico de casos y controles. La muestra mínima requerida fue de 270 casos y 270 controles (error alfa del 5%). Se incluyeron 690 pacientes y se analizaron 17 variables. El análisis de los datos se realizó mediante el cálculo del OR y el desarrollo de un modelo de regresión logística con un nivel de significancia del 5%. Resultados. Los factores de riesgo fueron tener catéter venoso periférico (OR: 2.92, IC95%: 1.01-8.43), contar con medidas de sujeción o sedación (OR: 2.35, IC95%: 1.11-4.97), tener una estancia hospitalaria mayor a ocho días (OR: 2.85, IC95%: 2.0-4.06), estar en tratamiento con medicamentos de alto riesgo (OR: 2.82, IC95%: 1.86-4.28), no contar con acompañante permanente (OR: 2.68, IC95%: 1.87-3.83) y, por último, ser un paciente no colaborador (OR: 1.61, IC95%: 0.84-3.0), variable sin significancia estadística, pero clínicamente relevante. Conclusión. Fue posible determinar factores de riesgo relacionados a las caídas intrahospitalarias que requieren ser abordados por estas tres instituciones para prevenir y disminuir la presentación de estos eventos adversos. Asimismo, otros hospitales del país pueden utilizar los resultados aquí reportados para mejorar el cuidado de sus pacientes y prevenir este fenómeno dentro de sus instalaciones.

Abstract Introduction: Falls in the hospital are adverse events that are associated with multiple risk factors and have important implications for patients and health systems. Objective: To determine risk factors associated with inpatient falls in three tertiary Colombian hospitals. Materials and methods: Analytical observational case-control study. The minimum sample required for the study was 270 cases and 270 controls (5% alpha error). In total, 690 patients were included and 17 variables were analyzed. Data analysis was conducted by calculating the OR and developing a logistic regression model with a significance level of 5%. Results: Risk factors associated with inpatient falls were having a peripheral venous catheter (OR: 2.92, 95%CI: 1.01-8.43), being restrained or sedated (OR: 2.35, 95%CI: 1.11-4.97), having a hospital stay longer than eight days (OR: 2.85, 95%CI: 2.0-4.06), being treated with high risk medications (OR: 2.82, 95%CI: 1.86-4.28), not having a permanent hospital sitter (OR 2.68 95%CI 1.87-3.83) and finally being an uncooperative patient (OR: 1.61, 95%CI: 0.84-3.0), a variable without statistical significance, but clinically relevant. Conclusions: It was possible to determine risk factors associated with inpatient falls that need to be addressed by these three hospitals in order to prevent and reduce the occurrence of these adverse events. Likewise, other hospitals in the country may use the findings reported here to improve the care they provide to their patients and prevent inpatient falls in their facilities.

Betahistine in the Treatment of Peripheral Vestibular Vertigo: Results of a Real-Life Study in Primary Care.

The present research was carried out with the objective to establish the clinical effect and safety of betahistine (48 mg daily), for the management of peripheral vestibular vertigo, in patients treated by primary care physicians in Colombia. An observational prospective cohort study was conducted including patients older than 15 years with clinical diagnosis of peripheral vestibular vertigo who were candidates to be treated with betahistine (48 mg daily). A sample size of 150 individuals was calculated, and weekly follow-ups were planned for 12 weeks. Rotatory movement sensation, loss of balance, and global improvement scale from 0 to 100 points were evaluated. Complete improvement was defined when the patient reached a level of 100 points. We calculated average weekly improvement, cumulative incidence of complete improvement, incidence rate of complete improvement, and the probability of complete improvement as a function of time. After the first week, the average improvement was 56.6 points (95% confidence interval [CI]: 50.4-62.7). At the end of week 12, it was 89.3 points (95% CI: 86.5-92.2). Sixty-one percent of the patients had achieved complete improvement at the end of the second week. After the sixth week, the percentage of cumulative improvement was 72%, and after 12 weeks of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of complete improvement was 73% (95% CI: 65%-80%). Based on the follow-up times, a complete improvement incidence rate of 16 cases per 100 people/week was calculated (95% CI: 13-19). We concluded that Betahistine (48 mg daily) has a positive effect, controlling the symptoms associated with benign paroxysmal vertigo, with an adequate safety profile.

Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Treatment With Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor α Drugs in a Cohort of Colombian Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical response at 24 months and evaluate the adverse events (AEs) of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with etanercept 50 (injectable solution 50 mg prefilled syringe), etanercept 25 (lyophilized 25 mg), infliximab, adalimumab, or golimumab. METHODS: A cohort study was carried out in patients with RA, in treatment with etanercept (injectable solution 50 mg prefilled syringe or lyophilized 25 mg), infliximab, adalimumab, or golimumab. Duration of study: follow-up was carried out for 24 months. The difference of initial and final 28-joint Disease Activity Score, remission incidence, difference of initial and final Health Assessment Questionnaire score, disability recovery, and AE rate were evaluated. RESULTS: The study enrolled 435 patients (108 adalimumab, 107 infliximab, 92 etanercept 25 mg, 81 etanercept 50 mg, and 47 golimumab). For etanercept 50, the median difference between basal and at the end of follow-up 28-joint Disease Activity Score was 1.7. For golimumab, it was 1.4; for adalimumab, it was 1.1; for etanercept 25, it was 1.02; and for infliximab, it was 0.96 (p = 0.001). The median difference between basal and final Health Assessment Questionnaire ranged was 1.66 for etanercept 50, 1.34 for etanercept 25, 1.3 for golimumab, 1.24 for adalimumab, and 1.07 for infliximab (p = 0.0005). Comparatively, etanercept 50 presented the highest cumulative incidence (77%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 67%-86%) and remission incidence (64 cases per 100 person-months; 95% CI, 4.9-8.1 cases per 100 person-months) and the lowest AE rate (8.6 per 100 person-years; 95% CI, 5.3-15 per 100 person-years). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with RA treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor α drugs, the highest incidence of remission and the lowest rate of AEs were documented for the cohort exposed to etanercept 50 mg.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of Mucosal Leishmaniasis diagnosis with PCR-based vs parasitological tests in Colombia.

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of available diagnosis alternatives for Mucosal Leishmaniasis (ML) in Colombian suspected patients. A simulation model of the disease's natural history was built with a decision tree and Markov models. The model´s parameters were identified by systematic review and validated by expert consensus. A bottom-up cost analysis to estimate the costs of diagnostic strategies and treatment per case was performed by reviewing 48 clinical records of patients diagnosed with ML. The diagnostic strategies compared were as follows: 1) no diagnosis; 2) parasite culture, biopsy, indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), and Montenegro skin test (MST) combined ; 3) parasite culture, biopsy, and IFA combined; 4) PCR-miniexon; and 5) PCR-kDNA. Three scenarios were modeled in patients with ML clinical suspicion, according to ML prevalence scenarios: high, medium and low. Adjusted sensitivity and specificity parameters of a combination of diagnostic tests were estimated with a discrete event simulation (DES) model. For each alternative, the costs and health outcomes were estimated. The time horizon was life expectancy, considering the average age at diagnosis of 31 years. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated per Disability Life Year (DALY) avoided, and deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. A threshold of willingness to pay (WTP) of three-time gross domestic product per capita (GDPpc) (US$ 15,795) and a discount rate of 3% was considered. The analysis perspective was the third payer (Health System). All costs were reported in American dollars as of 2015. PCR- kDNA was the cost-effective alternative in clinical suspicion levels: low, medium and high with ICERs of US$ 7,909.39, US$ 5,559.33 and US$ 4,458.92 per DALY avoided, respectively. ML diagnostic tests based on PCR are cost-effective strategies, regardless of the level of clinical suspicion. PCR-kDNA was the most cost-effective strategy in the competitive scenario with the parameters included in the present model.