Prevalence and coexistence of type 2 inflammatory diseases.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 inflammation has been described as a pathophysiological basis common to some diseases, such as atopic dermatitis (AD), chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, and asthma (CRSwNP). OBJECTIVE: The present study used population-based prevalence in Catalonia to analyse the coexistence of type 2 inflammatory diseases in patients primarily diagnosed with the above mentioned conditions. RESULTS: We found a high degree of coexistence of type 2 inflammatory diseases among these patients, with the prevalence being higher in the severe forms, except for AD. For the severe forms of primary diseases, the proportion of patients with coexisting type 2 inflammatory diseases (severe or non-severe) was 16.2% for AD, 19.8% for asthma, and a striking 62.4% for CRSwNP. This patient population has the highest proportion of coexisting type 2 inflammatory diseases, both severe (48.9%) and non-severe (13.5%). CONCLUSION: Our findings have significant implications for the management of patients with AD, asthma, and CRSwNP.

Prevalence of atopic dermatitis in the adolescent population of Catalonia (Spain).

BACKGROUND: Studies on the prevalence of atopic dermatitis (AD) for the adolescent cohort in general-based large populations are scarce worldwide. We performed a retrospective population--based observational cohort study of 76,665 adolescent patients diagnosed with AD in Catalonia (Spain). We studied the prevalence of AD by age, gender, disease severity, comorbidities, serum total immunoglobulin E (tIgE) and appropriate medical treatment (AMT) for the Catalan population. METHODS: Adolescent individuals (12-17 years) diagnosed with AD by medical records at different health care levels (primary, hospital, emergency) from the Catalan Health System (CHS) were included. Statistical analyses evaluated sociodemographic characteristics, prevalence, comorbidities, serum tIgE and AMT. RESULTS: The overall diagnosed AD prevalence in the adolescent Catalan population (76,665) was 16.9%, being higher for the non-severe (16.7%) than for the severe (0.2%) populations. Topical corticosteroids were the most prescribed drug (49.5%), and the use of all prescribed treatments was higher in severe AD patients, especially systemic corticosteroids (49.7%) and immunosuppressants (45.4%). AD patients had, on average, a serum tIgE of 163.6 KU/L, which was higher for severe than non-severe disease (155.5 KU/L vs 101.9 KU/L, respectively). Allergic rhinitis (15.0%) and asthma (13.5%) were among the most frequent comorbid respiratory and allergy diseases. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first Spanish study reporting the overall diagnosed prevalence for a large-scale adolescent cohort (12-17 years old) from Catalonia. It provides new and robust evidence of AD's prevalence and related characteristics in this region.

Economic evaluation of supplemental breast cancer screening modalities to mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts and average or intermediate breast cancer risk in US healthcare.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of supplemental breast imaging modalities for women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts and average or intermediate risk of breast cancer (BC) in the USA, and analyze capacity requirements for supplemental magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). METHODS: Clinical and economic outcomes for supplemental imaging modalities including full- and abbreviated-protocol MRI (Fp-MRI, Ab-MRI), CEM, and ultrasound (U/S) as add-on to x-ray mammography (XM) or digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), were compared to XM or DBT alone, in a decision tree linked to a Markov chain validated by comparison with a microsimulation analysis. A Delphi panel supplemented model input parameters from the literature. A capacity model evaluated the number of additional daily scans and scanners required for Fp-MRI and CEM. RESULTS: Compared to XM or DBT alone, all supplemental imaging protocols were cost-effective. Both Fp- and Ab-MRI, and to a lesser extent CEM and U/S, yielded superior clinical outcomes to XM or DBT. Compared to XM alone, U/S and Ab-MRI had the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). For U/S, the ICER was $23,394 for the average-risk population and $13,241 for the intermediate-risk population. For CEM, the ICER was $38,423 and $23,772, respectively. For the extremely dense subpopulation with intermediate risk, supplemental screening requirements could be accommodated by conducting one Fp-MRI scan per day per existing general scanner. CONCLUSIONS: While ultrasound had the lowest ICER, MRI and CEM demonstrated the best clinical outcomes, compared to XM or DBT alone for women with dense breasts and intermediate and high risk. Existing MRI scanner capacity has the potential to meet most of the supplemental screening needs of this population.