Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: A groin hernia is a collective name for inguinal and femoral hernias, which can present acutely with incarceration or strangulation of the hernia sac content, requiring emergency treatment. Timely repair of emergency groin hernias is crucial due to the risk of reduced blood supply and thus damage to the bowel, but the optimal surgical approach is unclear. While mesh repair is the standard treatment for elective hernia surgery, using mesh for emergency groin hernia repair remains controversial due to the risk of surgical site infection. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of mesh compared with non-mesh in emergency groin hernia repair in adult patients with an inguinal or femoral hernia. SEARCH METHODS: On 5 August 2022, we searched the following databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid, and Embase Ovid, as well as two trial registers for ongoing and completed trials. Additionally, we performed forward and backward citation searches for the included trials and relevant review articles. We searched without any language or publication restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing mesh with non-mesh repair in emergency groin hernia surgery in adults. We included any mesh and any non-mesh repairs. All studies fulfilling the study, participant, and intervention criteria were included irrespective of reported outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodology. We presented dichotomous data as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We based missing data analysis on best- and worst-case scenarios. For outcomes with sufficiently low heterogeneity, we performed meta-analyses using the random-effects model. We analysed subgroups when feasible, including the degree of contamination. We used RoB 2 for risk of bias assessment, and summarised the certainty of evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 15 trials randomising 1241 participants undergoing emergency groin hernia surgery with either mesh (626 participants) or non-mesh hernia repair (615 participants). The studies were conducted in China, the Middle East, and South Asia. Most patients were men, and most participants had an inguinal hernia (41 participants had femoral hernias). The mean/median age in the mesh group ranged from 35 to 70 years, and from 41 to 69 years in the non-mesh group. All studies were performed in a hospital emergency setting (tertiary care) and lasted for 11 to 139 months, with a median study duration of 31 months. The majority of the studies only included participants with clean to clean-contaminated surgical fields. For all outcomes, we considered the certainty of the evidence to be very low, mainly downgraded due to high risk of bias (due to deviations from intended intervention and missing outcome data), indirectness, and imprecision. Mesh hernia repair may have no effect on or slightly increase the risk of 30-day surgical site infections (RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.88; I² = 21%; 2 studies, 454 participants) when compared with non-mesh hernia repair, but the evidence is very uncertain. The evidence is also very uncertain about the effect of mesh hernia repair compared with non-mesh hernia repair on 30-day mortality (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.58 to 3.28; 1 study, 208 participants). In summary, the results showed 70 more (from 5 fewer to 200 more) surgical site infections and 29 more (from 32 fewer to 175 more) deaths within 30 days of mesh hernia repair per 1000 participants compared with non-mesh hernia repair. The evidence is very uncertain about 90-day surgical site infections after mesh versus non-mesh hernia repair (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.15 to 6.64; 1 study, 60 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No 30-day recurrences were recorded, and mesh hernia repair may not reduce recurrence within one year (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04 to 1.03; I² = 0%; 2 studies, 104 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Within 30 days of hernia repair, no meshes were removed from clean to clean-contaminated fields, but 6.7% of meshes (1 study, 208 participants) were removed from contaminated to dirty surgical fields. Among the four studies reporting 90-day mesh removal, no events occurred. We were not able to identify any studies reporting complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification or reoperation for complications within 30 days of repair. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that in terms of 30-day surgical site infections, 30-day mortality, and hernia recurrence within one year, the evidence for the use of mesh hernia repair compared with non-mesh hernia repair in emergency groin hernia surgery is very uncertain. Unfortunately, firm conclusions cannot be drawn due to very low-certainty evidence and meta-analyses based on small-sized and low-quality studies. There is a need for future high-quality RCTs or high-quality registry-based studies if RCTs are unfeasible.

Organisation of emergency groin hernia surgery across Denmark.

INTRODUCTION: A laparoscopic repair is recommended for emergency groin hernias. However, due to increasing sub-specialisation, the expertise in performing a laparoscopic hernia repair may not always be present. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the organisation of Danish hospitals' surgical acute teams in regard to emergency groin hernia care. METHODS: A nationwide questionnaire study was conducted for all Danish surgical departments performing emergency groin hernia repair and completed by the departments' administrative heads via REDCap. RESULTS: A total of 18 out of 19 departments completed the questionnaire. The overall response was positive towards providing emergency laparoscopic groin hernia repairs at all times. However, this was possible only in a minority of the departments outside daytime on weekdays, and regional differences were found. Surgical proficiency at the hospital and on-call from home varied, and only 24% of the departments could page surgeons (not on-call) to perform emergency laparoscopic groin hernia repair. CONCLUSIONS: A discrepancy was found between the wish of the surgical departments to provide laparoscopic emergency groin hernia repairs and the possibilities in today's surgical acute teams. Therefore, a reorganisation should be considered to ensure the availability of laparoscopic groin hernia repair for acute procedures. FUNDING: This study was funded by The Copenhagen Medical Society and Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals' research council. The funding providers had no role in designing, conducting or analysing the results. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.

Mortality after emergency versus elective groin hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Emergency groin hernia repair is associated with increased mortality risk, but the actual risk is unknown. Therefore, this review aimed to investigate 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality in adult patients who had undergone emergency or elective groin hernia repair. METHODS: This review was reported following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, and a protocol (CRD42021244412) was registered to PROSPERO. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL in April 2021. Studies were included if they reported 30- or 90-day mortality following an emergency or elective groin hernia repair. Meta-analyses were conducted when possible, and subgroup analyses were made for bowel resection, sex, and hernia type. According to the study design, the risk of bias was assessed using either the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies with 30,740 patients receiving emergency repair and 457,253 receiving elective repair were included. The 30-day mortality ranged from 0-11.8% to 0-1.7% following emergency and elective repair, respectively. The risk of 30-day mortality following emergency repair was estimated to be 26-fold higher than after elective repair (RR = 26.0, 95% CI 21.6-31.4, I2 = 0%). A subgroup meta-analysis on bowel resection in emergency repair estimated 30-day mortality to be 7.9% (95% CI 6.5-9.3%, I2 = 6.4%). Subgroup analyses on sex and hernia type showed no differences regarding the mortality risk in elective surgery. However, femoral hernia and female sex significantly increased the risk of mortality in emergency surgery, both given by a risk ratio of 1.7. CONCLUSION: The overall mortality after emergency groin hernia repair is 26-fold higher than after elective repair, but the increased risk is attributable mostly to female and femoral hernias. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO protocol (CRD42021244412).

High complication and mortality rates after emergency groin hernia repair: a nationwide register-based cohort study.

PURPOSE: Emergency groin hernia is an understudied research field despite its severity requiring emergency surgery associated with high postoperative morbidity and mortality rates. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the characteristics of patients, hernias, and surgical repairs, as well as complication rates following emergency groin hernia repair. METHODS: Nationwide cohort study based on prospectively collected data obtained from the Danish Hernia Database and person-level linked to the Danish National Patient Registry. We included all adult patients undergoing an emergency groin hernia repair for inguinal- and/or femoral hernias registered in the Danish Hernia Database between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2020. Primary outcomes were 30- and 90-day mortality, 30- and 90-day readmissions, and reoperations for recurrence. Outcomes were presented as crude numbers, odds ratios for mortality and readmission, and hazard ratios for reoperation. RESULTS: We included 9741 patients in the study. Within 30 days of surgery, 510 (6%) deaths and 1800 (23%) readmissions were recorded. During a median follow-up of 5 years, 537 (6%) reoperations for recurrence were performed. Multivariate analyses showed that mortality and readmission rates were influenced by increasing age, comorbidity, and bowel resection. Cumulative and adjusted reoperation rates were lower for mesh than non-mesh repairs. Moreover, mortality rates have improved over time, whereas readmission rates have increased over time. CONCLUSIONS: Complication and mortality rates after emergency groin hernia repair remain high. This study underlines the importance of a timely repair in incarcerated hernias to avoid contaminated surgical fields and the need for bowel resection.