Skin testing with ultra-heat-treated (UHT) cow's milk in children with cow's milk allergy.

BACKGROUND: A large proportion of cow's milk (CM)-allergic children are able to tolerate extensively heated forms of CM such as baked goods. Little is known about whether ultra-heat-treated (UHT) forms of cow's milk are immunologically similar to extensively heated cow's milk and therefore may be tolerated by these children. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether skin test wheal size using UHT CM was significantly different from other forms of CM and CM extracts. METHODS: Children presenting for oral food challenges with either extensively heated or unheated cow's milk underwent skin prick test (SPT) to commercial CM, UHT CM, evaporated CM, and fresh whole CM. The results were compared between groups of children. RESULTS: At study exit, only 14% of children were avoiding all forms of CM, compared with 70% at study entry. No difference was seen in the mean SPT results for UHT CM between those children that could tolerate heated CM compared with those that could not. The mean SPT result for casein was significantly lower in those that could tolerate heated CM. However, within the group of heated milk-tolerant children, the mean SPT for UHT CM was significantly lower than the SPT for fresh whole CM. CONCLUSION: Ultra-heat-treated CM does not behave significantly differently from other forms of CM when evaluated by SPT in heated milk-allergic vs heated milk-tolerant children. This suggests that UHT CM is not sufficiently immunologically different from unheated CM to be tolerated by heated CM-tolerant children.

Repeat oral food challenges in peanut and tree nut allergic children with a history of mild/moderate reactions.

BACKGROUND: In peanut and tree nut allergic children a history of anaphylaxis is associated with subsequent severe reactions. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to prospectively rechallenge peanut and tree nut allergic children with a history of mild/moderate reactions to assess their allergy over time. METHODS: In this cohort study peanut and tree nut allergic children with a history of mild/moderate reactions during a controlled oral challenge were invited to have a follow-up oral challenge to the same food at least 1 year later. RESULTS: Twenty-six children participated in the study. The mean time interval between the first and second challenge for all participants was 35.5 months. Peanut or tree nut allergy resolved in 38.5% of participants. Those with persistent peanut or tree nut allergy showed a decrease in their reaction threshold and/or increased severity in 81% of cases. There were no demographic features or skin test results that were predictive of changes in severity over time. CONCLUSION: Peanut and tree nut allergic children with a history of mild/moderate reactions who remained allergic demonstrated a high rate of more severe reactions and/or reduced thresholds upon rechallenge over a year later, however, the rate of resolution of allergy in this group may be higher than previously reported.