Maternal Implications of Fetal Anomalies: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Although it is well-known that the presence of fetal anomalies is associated with maternal morbidity, granular information on these risks by type of anomaly is not available. OBJECTIVE: To examine adverse maternal outcomes according to the type of fetal anomaly. STUDY DESIGN: This was a repeated cross-sectional analysis of US vital statistics Live Birth/Infant Death linked data from 2011 to 2020. All pregnancies at 20 weeks or greater were included. Our primary outcome was severe maternal morbidity (SMM), defined as any maternal intensive care unit admission, transfusion, uterine rupture, or hysterectomy. Outcomes were compared between pregnancies with a specific type of fetal anomaly and pregnancies without any fetal anomaly. Fetal anomalies that were available in the dataset included anencephaly, meningomyelocele/spina bifida, cyanotic congenital heart disease, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, omphalocele, gastroschisis, cleft lip and/or palate, hypospadias, limb anomaly, and chromosomal disorders. If a fetus had more than one anomaly, it was classified as multiple anomalies. Adjusted relative risks (aRR) with 99% confidence intervals (99%CI) were calculated using modified Poisson regression. Adjusted risk differences (aRDs) were calculated using the marginal standardization form of predictive margins. RESULTS: Of 35,760,626 pregnancies included in the analysis, 35,655,624 pregnancies had no fetal anomaly and 105,002 had isolated or multiple fetal anomalies. Compared to pregnancies without fetal anomaly, all fetal anomalies were associated with an increased risk of SMM except for gastroschisis and limb anomaly in order of aRRs [99%CI]: 1.58 [1.29-1.92] with cleft lip and/or palate; 1.75 [1.35-2.27] with multiple anomalies; 1.76 [1.18-2.63] with a chromosomal disorder; 2.19 [1.82-2.63] with hypospadias; 2.20 [1.51-3.21] with spina bifida; 2.39 [1.62-3.53] with congenital diaphragmatic hernia; 2.66 [2.27-3.13] with congenital heart disease; 3.15 [2.08-4.76] with omphalocele; and 3.27 [2.22-4.80] with anencephaly. Compared to pregnancies without fetal anomaly, all fetal anomalies were associated with an increased absolute risk of SMM except for gastroschisis and limb anomaly in order of aRDs [99%CI]: 0.26 [0.12-0.40] with cleft lip and/or palate, 0.34 [0.13-0.55] with multiple anomalies, 0.34 [0.02-0.66] with a chromosomal disorder, 0.54 [0.36-0.72] with hypospadias, 0.54 [0.17-0.92] with spina bifida, 0.63 [0.21-1.05] with congenital diaphragmatic hernia, 0.75 [0.56-0.95] with congenital heart disease, 0.97 [0.38-1.56] with omphalocele, and 1.03 [0.46-1.59] with anencephaly. CONCLUSION: The presence of fetal anomalies is associated with adverse maternal health outcomes. The risk of severe maternal morbidity varies according to the type of fetal anomaly. Counseling mothers about the maternal implications of fetal anomalies is paramount to help them make informed decisions regarding their pregnancy outcome.

Impact of the ARRIVE Trial on Stillbirth Rates in Nulliparous Individuals.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to examine the population-level rates of induction, stillbirth, perinatal mortality, and neonatal death before and after the ARRIVE (A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management) trial. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a cross-sectional analysis of publicly available U.S. Live Birth data linked with Infant Death and Fetal Death certificate data from National Vital Statistics Online. We limited analyses to nulliparous individuals with singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation who delivered at 39 weeks or greater. The pre- and post-ARRIVE periods spanned from August 2016 to July 2018, and from January 2019 to December 2020, respectively. Our primary outcome was a stillbirth. Secondary outcomes included induction of labor, perinatal mortality, and neonatal death. Outcomes were compared between the pre- and post-ARRIVE periods. Modified Poisson regression was used to calculate adjusted relative risks (aRRs). RESULTS: Of 2,817,071 births, there were 1,454,346 births in the pre-ARRIVE period and 1,362,725 in the post-ARRIVE period; there were 1,196 and 1,062 stillbirths in the pre- and post-ARRIVE periods, respectively. Compared to the pre-ARRIVE period, the post-ARRIVE period was not associated with a significant decrease in the risk of stillbirth at 39 weeks or greater (aRR 0.92 [95% confidence interval {95% CI} 0.85-1.00]) and stillbirth at 40 weeks or greater (aRR 0.92 [95% CI 0.82-1.04]). Compared to the pre-ARRIVE trial period, the post-ARRIVE trial was associated with increased rates of induction of labor at 39 weeks (aRR 1.37 [95% CI 1.37-1.38]) and 40 weeks (aRR 1.24 [95% CI 1.24-1.25]. Similar to stillbirth, there was no significant decrease in the risk of perinatal mortality at 39 weeks or greater or 40 weeks or greater. There was also no statistically significant change in neonatal death rates at 39 weeks or greater or at 40 weeks or greater. CONCLUSION: The increase in induction of labor at 39 weeks was not large enough to impact the stillbirth rate at 39 weeks or greater. KEY POINTS: · Post-ARRIVE trial, rate of induction of labor increased at 39 and 40 weeks.. · Post-ARRIVE trial, stillbirth and perinatal mortality rates remained unchanged.. · Induction rate rise post-ARRIVE trial did not impact neonatal death rates..

Neonatal and Maternal Outcomes in Nulliparous Individuals According to Prepregnancy Body Mass Index.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of incremental changes in body mass index (BMI kg/m2) on the association with adverse pregnancy outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of US vital statistics Live Birth and Infant Death linked data from 2011 to 2020. We limited analyses to nulliparas with singleton pregnancies who delivered at 20 weeks or greater. Outcomes were compared according to the pre-pregnancy BMI category using 5 kg/m2 increments, with each of the other BMI categories sequentially as the referent. The composite neonatal outcome was defined as any neonatal death, neonatal intensive care unit (ICU), surfactant use, ventilation use, or seizure. Severe maternal morbidity was defined as any maternal ICU, transfusion, uterine rupture, and hysterectomy. Adjusted relative risks were calculated for each BMI category as a referent group, using modified Poisson regression and adjusting for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 11,174,890 nulliparous individuals were included. From 2011 to 2020, the proportions of individuals with BMI 40 or greater, BMI 50 or greater, and BMI 60 or greater increased significantly (from 3.1% to 4.9%, from 0.4% to 0.6%, from 0.03% to 0.06%, respectively; all trend P-values <0.001). As BMI deviated from normal BMI, risks of neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes increased progressively. For example, as BMI deviated from normal BMI (18.5-24.9), the risk of composite neonatal outcome increased by 2% in individuals with BMI <18.5 and up to 2.11-fold in individuals with BMI 65-69.9. When compared to BMI 40-44.9, BMI 35-39.9 was associated with an 8% decreased risk of composite neonatal outcome whereas BMI 45-49.9 was associated with an 8% increased risk of composite neonatal outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Incremental increases in pre-pregnancy BMI are linked to higher risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes, highlighting the need for effective weight management before conception.

The role of point-of-care ultrasound to monitor response of fluid replacement therapy in pregnancy.

Fluid management in obstetrical care is crucial because of the complex physiological conditions of pregnancy, which complicate clinical manifestations and fluid balance management. This expert review examined the use of point-of-care ultrasound to evaluate and monitor the response to fluid therapy in pregnant patients. Pregnancy induces substantial physiological changes, including increased cardiac output and glomerular filtration rate, decreased systemic vascular resistance, and decreased plasma oncotic pressure. Conditions, such as preeclampsia, further complicate fluid management because of decreased intravascular volume and increased capillary permeability. Traditional methods for assessing fluid volume status, such as physical examination and invasive monitoring, are often unreliable or inappropriate. Point-of-care ultrasound provides a noninvasive, rapid, and reliable means to assess fluid responsiveness, which is essential for managing fluid therapy in pregnant patients. This review details the various point-of-care ultrasound modalities used to measure dynamic changes in fluid status, focusing on the evaluation of the inferior vena cava, lung ultrasound, and left ventricular outflow tract. Inferior vena cava ultrasound in spontaneously breathing patients determines diameter variability, predicts fluid responsiveness, and is feasible even late in pregnancy. Lung ultrasound is crucial for detecting early signs of pulmonary edema before clinical symptoms arise and is more accurate than traditional radiography. The left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral assesses stroke volume response to fluid challenges, providing a quantifiable measure of cardiac function, which is particularly beneficial in critical care settings where rapid and accurate fluid management is essential. This expert review synthesizes current evidence and practice guidelines, suggesting the integration of point-of-care ultrasound as a fundamental aspect of fluid management in obstetrics. It calls for ongoing research to enhance techniques and validate their use in broader clinical settings, aiming to improve outcomes for pregnant patients and their babies by preventing complications associated with both under- and overresuscitation.

Progression of Gestational Subclinical Hypothyroidism and Hypothyroxinemia to Overt Hypothyroidism After Pregnancy: Pooled Analysis of Data from Two Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background: To examine the incidence of overt hypothyroidism 1 and 5 years after pregnancies where screening before 21 weeks identified subclinical hypothyroidism (SH) or hypothyroxinemia (HT). Methods: Secondary analysis of two multicenter treatment trials for either SH or HT diagnosed between 8 and 20 weeks gestation. Current analyses focus only on individuals randomized to the placebo groups in the two parallel studies. SH was diagnosed with thyrotropin (TSH) ≥4.0 mU/L and normal free T4 (fT4) (0.86-1.9 ng/dL). HT was diagnosed with normal TSH (0.08-3.99 mU/L) but fT4 <0.86 ng/dL. Serum from initial testing was stored for later thyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibody assay; results were not returned for clinical management. At 1 and 5 years after delivery, participants were asked whether they had either been diagnosed with or were being treated for a thyroid condition. Maternal serum was collected at these visits and thyroid function measured. Subsequent overt hypothyroidism was defined as TSH ≥4.0 mU/L with fT4 <0.86 ng/dL. Results: Data for 1- and 5-year follow-up were available in 307 of the 338 participants with SH and 229 of the 261 with HT. Subsequent hypothyroidism was more common both at year 1 (13.4% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.001) and year 5 (15.6% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.001) for participants with SH compared with those with HT. This progression was more common in individuals with TSH values >10 mIU/mL. Baseline TPO level >50 IU/mL in participants with SH was associated with higher rates of hypothyroidism at year 1 (26.7% vs. 6.5%, odds ratio [OR] = 5.3 [confidence interval (CI) 2.6-10.7]) and year 5 (30.5% vs. 7.5%, OR = 5.4 [CI: 2.8-10.6]) compared with those with TPO levels ≤50 IU/mL. For participants with HT, no differences in overt hypothyroidism were seen at 1 year related to baseline TPO level >50 IU/mL (1/10 (10%) vs. 6/218 (2.8%), OR = 3.9 [CI: 0.43-36.1]), but more participants with TPO levels >50 IU/mL developed hypothyroidism by year 5 (2/10 (20%) vs. 4/218 (1.8%), OR = 13.4 [CI: 2.1-84.1]). Conclusion: SH is associated with higher rates of overt hypothyroidism or thyroid replacement therapy within 5 years of delivery than is HT when these conditions are diagnosed in the first half of pregnancy.

Large-Scale Proteomics in Early Pregnancy and Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.

Importance: There is no consensus regarding the best method for prediction of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), including gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Objective: To determine predictive ability in early pregnancy of large-scale proteomics for prediction of HDP. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a nested case-control study, conducted in 2022 to 2023, using clinical data and plasma samples collected between 2010 and 2013 during the first trimester, with follow-up until pregnancy outcome. This multicenter observational study took place at 8 academic medical centers in the US. Nulliparous individuals during first-trimester clinical visits were included. Participants with HDP were selected as cases; controls were selected from those who delivered at or after 37 weeks without any HDP, preterm birth, or small-for-gestational-age infant. Age, self-reported race and ethnicity, body mass index, diabetes, health insurance, and fetal sex were available covariates. Exposures: Proteomics using an aptamer-based assay that included 6481 unique human proteins was performed on stored plasma. Covariates were used in predictive models. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prediction models were developed using the elastic net, and analyses were performed on a randomly partitioned training dataset comprising 80% of study participants, with the remaining 20% used as an independent testing dataset. Primary measure of predictive performance was area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: This study included 753 HDP cases and 1097 controls with a mean (SD) age of 26.9 (5.5) years. Maternal race and ethnicity were 51 Asian (2.8%), 275 non-Hispanic Black (14.9%), 275 Hispanic (14.9%), 1161 non-Hispanic White (62.8% ), and 88 recorded as other (4.8%), which included those who did not identify according to these designations. The elastic net model, allowing for forced inclusion of prespecified covariates, was used to adjust protein-based models for clinical and demographic variables. Under this approach, no proteins were selected to augment the clinical and demographic covariates. The predictive performance of the resulting model was modest, with a training set AUC of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.61-0.67) and a test set AUC of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.56-0.68). Further adjustment for study site yielded only minimal changes in AUCs. Conclusions and Relevance: In this case-control study with detailed clinical data and stored plasma samples available in the first trimester, an aptamer-based proteomics panel did not meaningfully add to predictive utility over and above clinical and demographic factors that are routinely available.

Diet quality, community food access, and glycemic control among nulliparous individuals with diabetes.

Better diet quality regardless of community food access was associated with a higher likelihood of glycemic control in early pregnancy among nulliparous individuals with pregestational diabetes. These findings highlight the need for interventions that address nutrition insecurity for pregnant individuals living with diabetes.

Longitudinal associations between urinary biomarkers of phthalates and replacements with novel in vivo measures of placental health.

STUDY QUESTION: What is the longitudinal association between gestational phthalate exposure and in vivo placental outcomes? SUMMARY ANSWER: Phthalates were adversely associated with placental microvasculature, stiffness, and presence of calcification, with different metabolites associated with different outcomes. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Phthalate exposure is ubiquitous and implicated as a contributor to adverse pregnancy outcomes, possibly through impacts on the placenta. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A total of 303 women were recruited in early pregnancy and prospectively followed for up to eight visits across gestation in the Human Placenta and Phthalates study. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: At each visit, women provided urine samples and underwent placental ultrasounds. Urine was analyzed for 18 metabolites of phthalates and replacements. We took the geometric mean of repeated measurements to reflect pregnancy-averaged phthalate or replacement exposure for each participant (n = 303). Placental microvasculature, stiffness, and microcalcification presence were quantified from ultrasounds at each visit. Higher scores reflected worse placental function for all measures. Generalized linear mixed models were created to estimate the association between pregnancy-averaged exposure biomarker concentrations and repeated outcome measurements for microvasculature and stiffness. Gestational age at the time of calcification detection was modeled using Cox proportional hazards models. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Monocarboxyisononyl phthalate and summed di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate metabolites were associated with impaired microvasculature development, such that an interquartile range increase in concentration was associated with 0.11 standard deviation increase in the microvasculature ratio, indicating poorer vascularization (95% CI: 0.00, 0.22); 0.11 [95% CI: -0.01, 0.22], respectively. Monoethyl phthalate was associated with increased placental stiffness (0.09 [95% CI: -0.01, 0.19]) while summed di-iso-butyl phthalate metabolites and monobenzyl phthalate were associated with increased hazard of calcification detection (hazard ratios: 1.18 [95% CI: 0.98, 1.42]; 1.13 [95% CI: 0.96, 1.34]). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Outcomes used in this study are novel and further investigation is needed to provide clinical context and relevance. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: We found evidence of associations between select phthalate biomarkers and various aspects of in vivo placental health, although we did not observe consistency across placental outcomes. These findings could illustrate heterogeneous effects of phthalate exposure on placental function. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ZIA ES103344), and NIEHS T32ES007018. The authors declare that they have no competing interests to disclose. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the CDC, the Public Health Service, or the US Department of Health and Human Services. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Association Between Influenza Vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

BACKGROUND: Recent data in nonpregnant individuals suggest a protective effect of influenza vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection and its severity. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to evaluate whether influenza vaccination was associated with COVID-19 severity and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes among those infected with SARS-CoV-2. The secondary objective was to examine the association between influenza vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a multicenter retrospective cohort of pregnant people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March and August 2020, and a cohort of random deliveries during the same time period. The associations between 2019 influenza vaccination and the primary outcome of moderate-to-critical COVID-19 as well as maternal and perinatal outcomes were examined among all people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March and August 2020. The association between 2019 influenza vaccination and having a positive SARS-CoV-2 test was examined among a cohort of individuals who delivered on randomly selected dates between March and August 2020. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 2325 people who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 1068 (45.9%) were vaccinated against influenza in 2019. Those who received the influenza vaccine were older, leaner, more likely to have private insurance, and identify as White or Hispanic. They were less likely to smoke tobacco and identify as Black. Overall, 419 (18.0%) had moderate, 193 (8.3%) severe, and 52 (2.2%) critical COVID-19. There was no association between influenza vaccination and moderate-to-critical COVID-19 (29.2% vs. 28.0%, adjusted OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.90-1.34) or adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes among those who tested positive. Of 8152 people who delivered in 2020, 4658 (57.1%) received the influenza vaccine. Prior vaccination was not associated with a difference in the odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection (3.8% vs. 4.2%, adjusted OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.74-1.19). CONCLUSION: Prior influenza vaccination was not associated with decreased severity of COVID-19 or lower odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy.

Optimal Timing of Delivery for Pregnant Individuals With Mild Chronic Hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the optimal gestational age to deliver pregnant people with chronic hypertension to improve perinatal outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of chronic hypertension treatment to different blood pressure goals. Participants with term, singleton gestations were included. Those with fetal anomalies and those with a diagnosis of preeclampsia before 37 weeks of gestation were excluded. The primary maternal composite outcome included death, serious morbidity (heart failure, stroke, encephalopathy, myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, intensive care unit admission, intubation, renal failure), preeclampsia with severe features, hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion, or abruption. The primary neonatal outcome included fetal or neonatal death, respiratory support beyond oxygen mask, Apgar score less than 3 at 5 minutes, neonatal seizures, or suspected sepsis. Secondary outcomes included intrapartum cesarean birth, length of stay, neonatal intensive care unit admission, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), transient tachypnea of the newborn, and hypoglycemia. Those with a planned delivery were compared with those expectantly managed at each gestational week. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% CIs are reported. RESULTS: We included 1,417 participants with mild chronic hypertension; 305 (21.5%) with a new diagnosis in pregnancy and 1,112 (78.5%) with known preexisting hypertension. Groups differed by body mass index (BMI) and preexisting diabetes. In adjusted models, there was no association between planned delivery and the primary maternal or neonatal composite outcome in any gestational age week compared with expectant management. Planned delivery at 37 weeks of gestation was associated with RDS (7.9% vs 3.0%, aOR 2.70, 95% CI, 1.40-5.22), and planned delivery at 37 and 38 weeks was associated with neonatal hypoglycemia (19.4% vs 10.7%, aOR 1.97, 95% CI, 1.27-3.08 in week 37; 14.4% vs 7.7%, aOR 1.82, 95% CI, 1.06-3.10 in week 38). CONCLUSION: Planned delivery in the early-term period compared with expectant management was not associated with a reduction in adverse maternal outcomes. However, it was associated with increased odds of some neonatal complications. Delivery timing for individuals with mild chronic hypertension should weigh maternal and neonatal outcomes in each gestational week but may be optimized by delivery at 39 weeks.

Post-Acute Sequelae of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) After Infection During Pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of post-acute sequelae of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (PASC) after infection with SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy and to characterize associated risk factors. METHODS: In a multicenter cohort study (NIH RECOVER [Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery]-Pregnancy Cohort), individuals who were pregnant during their first SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled across the United States from December 2021 to September 2023, either within 30 days of their infection or at differential time points thereafter. The primary outcome was PASC , defined as score of 12 or higher based on symptoms and severity as previously published by the NIH RECOVER-Adult Cohort, at the first study visit at least 6 months after the participant's first SARS-CoV-2 infection. Risk factors for PASC were evaluated, including sociodemographic characteristics, clinical characteristics before SARS-CoV-2 infection (baseline comorbidities, trimester of infection, vaccination status), and acute infection severity (classified by need for oxygen therapy). Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to estimate associations between these characteristics and presence of PASC. RESULTS: Of the 1,502 participants, 61.1% had their first SARS-CoV-2 infection on or after December 1, 2021 (ie, during Omicron variant dominance); 51.4% were fully vaccinated before infection; and 182 (12.1%) were enrolled within 30 days of their acute infection. The prevalence of PASC was 9.3% (95% CI, 7.9-10.9%) measured at a median of 10.3 months (interquartile range 6.1-21.5) after first infection. The most common symptoms among individuals with PASC were postexertional malaise (77.7%), fatigue (76.3%), and gastrointestinal symptoms (61.2%). In a multivariable model, the proportion PASC positive with vs without history of obesity (14.9% vs 7.5%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.65, 95% CI, 1.12-2.43), depression or anxiety disorder (14.4% vs 6.1%, aOR 2.64, 95% CI, 1.79-3.88) before first infection, economic hardship (self-reported difficulty covering expenses) (12.5% vs 6.9%, aOR 1.57, 95% CI, 1.05-2.34), and treatment with oxygen during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection (18.1% vs 8.7%, aOR 1.86, 95% CI, 1.00-3.44) were associated with increased prevalence of PASC. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of PASC at a median time of 10.3 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy was 9.3% in the NIH RECOVER-Pregnancy Cohort. The predominant symptoms were postexertional malaise, fatigue, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Several socioeconomic and clinical characteristics were associated with PASC after infection during pregnancy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT05172024.

Pregnancy Outcomes of Nifedipine Compared With Labetalol for Oral Treatment of Mild Chronic Hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes by type of antihypertensive used in participants of the CHAP (Chronic Hypertension in Pregnancy) trial. METHODS: We conducted a planned secondary analysis of CHAP, an open-label, multicenter, randomized trial of antihypertensive treatment compared with standard care (no treatment unless severe hypertension developed) in pregnant patients with mild chronic hypertension (blood pressure 140-159/90-104 mm Hg before 20 weeks of gestation) and singleton pregnancies. We performed three comparisons based on medications prescribed at enrollment: labetalol compared with standard care, nifedipine compared with standard care, and labetalol compared with nifedipine. Although active compared with standard care groups were randomized, medication assignment within the active treatment group was not random but based on clinician or patient preference. The primary outcome was the occurrence of superimposed preeclampsia with severe features, preterm birth before 35 weeks of gestation, placental abruption, or fetal or neonatal death. The key secondary outcome was small for gestational age (SGA) neonates. We also compared medication adverse effects between groups. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated with log binomial regression to adjust for confounding. RESULTS: Of 2,292 participants analyzed, 720 (31.4%) received labetalol, 417 (18.2%) received nifedipine, and 1,155 (50.4%) received no treatment. The mean gestational age at enrollment was 10.5±3.7 weeks; nearly half of participants (47.5%) identified as non-Hispanic Black; and 44.5% used aspirin. The primary outcome occurred in 217 (30.1%), 130 (31.2%), and 427 (37.0%) in the labetalol, nifedipine, and standard care groups, respectively. Risk of the primary outcome was lower among those receiving treatment (labetalol use vs standard adjusted RR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.72-0.94; nifedipine use vs standard adjusted RR 0.84, 95% CI, 0.71-0.99), but there was no significant difference in risk when labetalol was compared with nifedipine (adjusted RR 0.98, 95% CI, 0.82-1.18). There were no significant differences in SGA or serious adverse events between participants receiving labetalol and those receiving nifedipine. CONCLUSION: No significant differences in predetermined maternal or neonatal outcomes were detected on the basis of the use of labetalol or nifedipine for treatment of chronic hypertension in pregnancy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02299414.

Early vs. delayed amniotomy in individuals undergoing pre-induction cervical ripening with transcervical Foley balloon: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and perform a meta-analysis comparing early amniotomy with delayed amniotomy in individuals undergoing pre-induction cervical ripening by Foley balloon. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery. Understanding the impact of the timing of amniotomy on the rate of cesarean delivery is crucial for obstetricians and healthcare providers when making decisions about the management of labor induction. DATA SOURCES: Data were sourced from electronic databases, including PubMed, OVID, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov through February 2024. The review adhered to Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (ID CRD42023454520). STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Inclusion criteria comprised RCTs comparing early amniotomy with delayed amniotomy in individuals undergoing cervical ripening by Foley balloon. Early amniotomy was defined as amniotomy soon after cervical ripening. Delayed amniotomy was defined as withholding amniotomy until after the onset of the active phase of labor, until at least 4 hours from either initiation of oxytocin or Foley balloon removal/expulsion, or until achieving >4 cm of dilation. Participants included nulliparous or multiparous individuals with singleton pregnancies undergoing labor induction at 37 weeks or later. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS: A systematic literature search was conducted using defined search terms including "early amniotomy," "delayed amniotomy," "induction of labor," "cervical ripening," and "Foley balloon," and "Foley catheter." The quality of the included trials was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included outcomes related to labor duration and neonatal outcomes. Pooled relative risks (RR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Five trials involving 849 participants undergoing induction and cervical ripening by Foley balloon were included. The rate of cesarean delivery did not differ between individuals randomly assigned to the early amniotomy group compared with those assigned to the delayed amniotomy group (22.9% vs. 23.3%; RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.65-1.55). Early amniotomy compared to delayed amniotomy was associated with a higher proportion of delivery within 24 hours (79.9% vs. 67.1%; RR 1.19; 95% CI 1.04-1.36). Early amniotomy compared with delayed amniotomy was associated with a shorter interval from oxytocin to delivery (WMD -1.5 hours; 95% CI -2.1 to -0.8), from Foley expulsion to vaginal delivery (WMD -2.5 hours; 95% CI -4.8 to -0.1), and from the start of oxytocin to vaginal delivery (WMD -1.8 hours; 95% CI -3.2 to -0.4). Other outcomes were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Early amniotomy following cervical ripening by Foley balloon in individuals with singleton pregnancies did not impact rates of cesarean delivery compared with delayed amniotomy but led to shorter duration for various labor progress outcomes.

Continuous glucose monitoring vs. self-monitoring in pregnant individuals with type 1 diabetes: an economic analysis.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, approximately 1% of pregnancies are complicated by pregestational diabetes. Individuals with type 1 diabetes have an increased risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. While continuous glucose monitoring has demonstrated benefits for patients with type 1 diabetes, its cost is higher than traditional intermittent fingerstick monitoring, particularly if used only during pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: To develop an economic analysis model to compare in silico the cost of continuous glucose monitoring and self-monitoring of blood glucose in a cohort of pregnant individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus. STUDY DESIGN: We developed an economic analysis model to compare two glucose monitoring strategies in pregnant individuals with type 1 diabetes: continuous glucose monitoring and self-monitoring. The model considered hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, large for gestational age, cesarean delivery, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and neonatal hypoglycemia. The primary outcome was the total cost per strategy in 2022 USD from a health system perspective, with self-monitoring as the reference group. Probabilities, relative risks, and costs were extracted from the literature, and the costs were adjusted to 2022 US dollars. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying parameters based on the probability, relative risk, and cost distributions. The robustness of the results was tested through 1000 Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, the cost of pregnancy using continuous glucose monitoring was $26,837 compared to $29,039 for self-monitoring, resulting in a cost reduction of $2,202 per individual. The parameters with the greatest effect on the incremental cost included the relative risk of NICU admission, cost of NICU admission, continuous glucose monitoring costs, and usual care costs. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that continuous glucose monitoring was the optimal strategy 98.7% of the time. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that continuous glucose monitoring was more economical if the relative risk of NICU admission with continuous glucose monitoring vs. self-monitoring was below 1.15. CONCLUSION: Compared to self-monitoring, continuous glucose monitoring is an economical strategy for pregnant individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Optimizing Opioid Prescription Quantity After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether an individualized opioid-prescription protocol (IOPP) with a shared decision-making component can be used without compromising postcesarean pain management. METHODS: In this multicenter randomized controlled noninferiority trial, we compared IOPP with shared decision making with a fixed quantity of opioid tablets at hospital discharge. We recruited at 31 centers participating in the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Study participants had uncomplicated cesarean births. Follow-up occurred through 12 weeks postdischarge. Individuals with complicated cesarean births or history of opioid use in the pregnancy were excluded. Participants were randomized 1:1 to IOPP with shared decision making or fixed quantity (20 tablets of 5 mg oxycodone). In the IOPP group, we calculated recommended tablet quantity based on opioid use in the 24 hours before discharge. After an educational module and shared decision making, participants selected a quantity of discharge tablets (up to 20). The primary outcome was moderate to severe pain (score 4 or higher [possible range 0-10]) on the BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) at 1 week after discharge. A total sample size of 5,500 participants was planned to assess whether IOPP with shared decision making was not inferior to the fixed quantity of 20 tablets. RESULTS: From September 2020 to March 2022, 18,990 individuals were screened and 5,521 were enrolled (n=2,748 IOPP group, n=2,773 fixed-quantity group). For the primary outcome, IOPP with shared decision making was not inferior to fixed quantity (59.5% vs 60.1%, risk difference 0.67%; 95% CI, -2.03% to 3.37%, noninferiority margin -5.0) and resulted in significantly fewer tablets received (median 14 [interquartile range 4-20] vs 20, P <.001) through 90 days postpartum. CONCLUSION: Compared with fixed quantity, IOPP with shared decision making was noninferior for outpatient postcesarean analgesia at 1 week postdischarge and resulted in fewer prescribed opioid tablets at discharge. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04296396.

Maternal Preconception Omega-6, Omega-3, and Omega-6:Omega-3 Intake and Uterine Artery Indices in Mid-Gestation.

OBJECTIVE: Maternal preconception diet influences pregnancy health and fetal outcomes. We examined the relationship between preconception fatty acid (FA) intake and uterine artery indices in mid-gestation in a large, heterogeneous cohort of nulliparous individuals. STUDY DESIGN: This is a secondary analysis of the nuMom2b (Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-be) study. Dietary ω-6 and ω-3 FA intake was assessed with food frequency questionnaires and uterine artery indices were obtained via Doppler studies in the second trimester. For our primary outcome of pulsatility index (PI) > 1.6, we compared proportions by each dichotomous FA exposure and tested differences with chi-square test. RESULTS: For PI > 1.6, odds ratio for the unfavorable FA quartile compared with remaining quartiles for the exposures were 0.96 to 1.25, p = 0.157 (ω-6 FA); 0.97 to 1.26, p = 0.124 (ω-3 FA); 0.87 to 1.14, p = 1.00 (ω-6:ω-3 FA ratio). CONCLUSION: No significant associations between self-reported maternal preconception ω-6 and ω-3 FA intake and uterine artery Doppler indices measured during the second trimester were observed. KEY POINTS: · Maternal diet impacts pregnancy health/fetal outcomes.. · ω-3 and ω-6 FA intake influences cardiovascular health.. · FA intake may affect blood flow to fetoplacental unit.. · Results are limited by inadequate adherence to dietary recommendations..

Neonatal outcomes in term and preterm infants following adjunctive azithromycin antibiotic prophylaxis for non-elective cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE: It is currently unknown whether adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis at the time of non-elective cesarean has differential effects on neonatal outcomes in the context of prematurity. The objective of this study was to compare whether neonatal outcomes differ in term and preterm infants exposed to adjunctive azithromycin prophylaxis before non-elective cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: A planned secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial that enrolled women with singleton pregnancies ≥24 weeks gestation undergoing non-elective cesarean delivery (during labor or ≥4 h after membrane rupture). Women received standard antibiotic prophylaxis and were randomized to either adjunctive azithromycin (500 mg) or placebo. The primary composite outcome was neonatal death, suspected or confirmed neonatal sepsis, and serious neonatal morbidities (NEC, PVL, IVH, BPD). Secondary outcomes included NICU admission, neonatal readmission, culture positive infections and prevalence of resistant organisms. Odds ratios (OR) for the effect of azithromycin versus placebo were compared between gestational age strata (preterm [less than 37 weeks] versus term [37 weeks or greater]). Tests of interaction examined homogeneity of treatment effect with gestational age. RESULTS: The analysis includes 2,013 infants, 226 preterm (11.2%) and 1,787 term. Mean gestational ages were 34 and 39.5 weeks, respectively. Within term and preterm strata, maternal and delivery characteristics were similar between the azithromycin and placebo groups. There was no difference in the odds of composite neonatal outcome between those exposed to azithromycin versus placebo in preterm neonates (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.48-1.41) and in term neonates (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.77-1.46), with no difference between gestational age strata (p = 0.42). Analysis of secondary outcomes also revealed no differences in treatment effects within or between gestational age strata. CONCLUSION: Exposure to adjunctive azithromycin antibiotic prophylaxis for non-elective cesarean delivery does not increase neonatal morbidity or mortality in term or preterm infants. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01235546.