Perchlozone Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

The emergence of drug-resistant tuberculosis forced the development of new drugs and the screening of more effective or less toxic analogues. Mycolic acid biosynthesis is targeted by several antituberculosis drugs, isoniazid being one of the most important in tuberculosis therapy. Recently, perchlozone, acting on another step in the FAS-II cycle, was officially approved for tuberculosis treatment in the Russian Federation and was included in the Russian national clinical guidelines. Using the serial dilution method on 7H10 agar plates for perchlozone and a Sensititre MYCOTB microdilution plate, we analyzed the phenotypic properties of primary clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis and analyzed the molecular determinants of resistance to isoniazid, ethionamide, and perchlozone. We found a wide variation in the MIC of perchlozone from 2 to 64 mg/L, correlating with the overall resistance profile: the MIC was higher for MDR and pre-XDR isolates. The cross-resistance between ethionamide and perchlozone was driven by mutations in the ethA gene encoding monooxygenase responsible for the activation of both drugs. The presumably susceptible to perchlozone and wild-type strains had MICs ranging from 2 to 4 mg/L, and the breakpoint was estimated to be 4 or 8 mg/L. In conclusion, susceptibility to perchlozone is retained for a part of the MDR strains, as is susceptibility to ethionamide, providing the possibility of therapy for such cases based on phenotypic or molecular analysis.

Molecular Determinants of Ethionamide Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

BACKGROUND: Ethionamide and prothionamide are now included in group C of the WHO recommended drugs for the treatment of tuberculosis resistant to rifampicin and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. The clinical relevance of ethionamide and prothionamide has increased with the wide spread of resistant tuberculosis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 349 clinical isolates obtained between 2016 and 2020. The susceptibility to ethionamide was tested using both the BactecTM MGITTM 960 system and the SensititreTM MYCOTB plate. RESULTS: The MIC of ethionamide increases with the total resistance of the isolates in a row from susceptible to XDR strains. A significant part of the isolates have a MIC below the breakpoint: 25%, 36%, and 50% for XDR, pre-XDR, and MDR strains. Sensitivity and specificity of detection of mutations were 96% and 86% using MGIT resistance as a reference. CONCLUSIONS: Phenotypic methods for testing ethionamide are imperfectly correlated, and the isolates with MIC of 5 mg/L have the intermediate resistance. A significant proportion of resistant TB cases are susceptible and eligible for ethionamide treatment. Resistance could be explained using only analysis of loci ethA, PfabG1, and inhA for most isolates in the Moscow region. The promoter mutation PfabG1 c(-15)t predicts resistance to ethionamide with high specificity but low sensitivity.

Genetic Profile of Linezolid-Resistant M. tuberculosis Clinical Strains from Moscow.

BACKGROUND: Linezolid, bedaquiline, and newer fluoroquinolones are currently placed as priority Group A drugs for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. The number of reported linezolid-resistant clinical strains is still low, and the correlation of molecular determinants with phenotype is not perfect. METHODS: We determined the linezolid MICs for clinical isolates from the Moscow region and identified mutations in rplC and rrl genes. RESULTS: All 16 linezolid-resistant isolates had previously reported mutations in the rplC or rrl loci, and 13 of them bore a RplC C154R substitution. Detection of this substitution in a heteroresistant state was not successful, probably, due to the more stable DNA secondary structure of the mutated fragment, which precludes its amplification in mixes with the wild-type DNA. Strains with an rplC mutation had higher linezolid MIC compared to isolates with rrl mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid resistance mostly emerged during treatment with the latest regimen. Three primary cases with linezolid resistance question the possible transmission of totally drug-resistant tuberculosis in the Moscow region, which demands further investigation.

Reduced susceptibility and resistance to bedaquiline in clinical M. tuberculosis isolates.

OBJECTIVES: Bedaquiline is an effective drug used to treat MDR and XDR tuberculosis, providing high cure rates in complex therapy. Mutations in the mmpR (rv0678) and atpE genes are associated with reduced susceptibility to bedaquiline and have been identified in both in vitro selected strains and clinical isolates. However, the phenotypic criteria used to detect bedaquiline resistance have yet to be established due to the collection of few clinical isolates from patients receiving bedaquiline-containing treatment regimens. METHODS: One hundred eighty-two clinical isolates from 74 patients receiving bedaquiline and 163 isolates from 107 patients not exposed to bedaquiline were analysed. The bedaquiline MICs were tested using serial dilutions on 7H11 agar plates and the Bactec MGIT 960 system. The mmpR and atpE genes were sequenced by Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: The 7H11 agar method allowed for rapid discrimination between mutated and wild-type isolates and between exposed and non-exposed isolates. Seventy-three percent of bedaquiline-exposed isolates, as well as 91% of isolates with mutations, had an elevated bedaquiline MIC (≥ 0.12 mg/L on 7H11 media) compared to the reference isolates (89% had an MIC ≤ 0.03 mg/L). Previously reported in vitro-selected mutants (E61D and A63P) and novel AtpE substitutions (G25S and D28G) were observed in the clinical isolates. Substitutions in codon 63 of AtpE were likely associated with a higher bedaquiline MIC. Five new cases of pre-existing reduced susceptibility to bedaquiline, accompanied by mmpR mutations in most isolates, without a history of bedaquiline treatment were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Bedaquiline treatment leads to an elevated bedaquiline MIC and the acquisition of mmpR and atpE gene mutations in tuberculosis strains. The standardisation of bedaquiline phenotypic susceptibility testing is urgently needed based on observed discrepancies between our study and previous studies and differences in solid and liquid media MIC determinations.

Drug susceptibility testing of slowly growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria using slomyco test-system.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the research was to assess the susceptibility of the slowly growing nontuberculous mycobacteria strains to the antimicrobial drugs used for mycobaterioses treatment using SLOMYCO test system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed 363 NTM strains: 177 MAC (161 M. avium, 16 M. intracellulare), 112 M. kansasii and 74 M. xenopi collected from the respiratory material of the patients were under the treatment or under diagnostic procedures at our Center, affiliates and the diagnostic department in 2010-2016. Drug sucseptibility for NTM was tested using the Sensititre SLOWMYCO system (TREK DIAGNOSTIC Systems Ltd., UK). MICs were established by microdilutions in Mueller-Hinton broth on polystyrene 96-well plates. The statistical analysis was done using the StatGraphics Plus 5.0 software. The data were compared pairwise using Pearson χ2 test with Yates correction. 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Statistically significant differences were considered for p <0.05. Log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess the concentration-dependent surveillance probability. RESULTS: The statistically significant differences were revealed in sensitivity/resistance isolates of M. avium and M. intracellulare: M. avium strains were resistant to higher concentrations of amikacin, clarithromycin, linezolid and streptomycin (p <0.01); M. intracellulare strains were resistant to higher concentrations of ethionamide (p <0.05). The isolates of M. avium were significantly more resistant than M. kansasii to amikacin, doxycycline, isoniazid, clarithromycin, linezolid, moxifloxacin, rifabutin, rifampicin, streptomycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, ethambutol, ethionamide (visible growth of M. avium were inhibited by higher drug concentrations, p <0.01). The isolates of M. avium showed significantly higher resistance than M. xenopi to amikacin, doxycycline, isoniazid, clarithromycin, linezolid, moxifloxacin, rifampicin, streptomycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, ethambutol, and ethionamide (visible growth of M. avium were inhibited by higher drug concentrations, p <0.01). Statistically significant differences in the dynamics of the response to the antibacterial effects of isoniazid, linezolid, moxifloxacin, rifampicin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ethambutol, and ethionamide were found for M. intracellulare and M. xenopi (complete inhibition of the visible growth of M. intracellulare required higher drugs concentrations, p <0, 05). Comparison of the Kaplan-Meyer curves revealed statistically significant differences in survialence probability of M. kansasii and M. xenopi for amikacin, doxycycline, rifampicin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, ethambutol, and ethionamide (a higher number of isolates of M. xenopi were inhibited by low drugs concentrations, p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that M. avium and M. intracellulare were more resistant to the majority of the studied drugs than M. kansasii and M. xenopi.

Examination of bedaquiline- and linezolid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from the Moscow region.

Objectives: To study the isolates with acquired resistance to bedaquiline and linezolid that were obtained from patients enrolled in a clinical study of a novel therapy regimen for drug-resistant TB in Moscow, Russia. Methods: Linezolid resistance was detected using MGIT 960 with a critical concentration of 1 mg/L. The MIC of bedaquiline was determined using the proportion method. To identify genetic determinants of resistance, sequencing of the mmpR ( Rv0678 ), atpE , atpC , pepQ , Rv1979c , rrl , rplC and rplD loci was performed. Results: A total of 85 isolates from 27 patients with acquired resistance to linezolid and reduced susceptibility to bedaquiline (MIC ≥0.06 mg/L) were tested. Most mutations associated with a high MIC of bedaquiline were found in the mmpR gene. We identified for the first time two patients whose clinical isolates had substitutions D28N and A63V in AtpE, which had previously been found only in in vitro -selected strains. Several patients had isolates with elevated MICs of bedaquiline prior to treatment; four of them also bore mutations in mmpR , indicating the presence of some hidden factors in bedaquiline resistance acquisition. The C154R substitution in ribosomal protein L3 was the most frequent in the linezolid-resistant strains. Mutations in the 23S rRNA gene (g2294a and g2814t) associated with linezolid resistance were also found in two isolates. Heteroresistance was identified in ∼40% of samples, which reflects the complex nature of resistance acquisition. Conclusions: The introduction of novel drugs into treatment must be accompanied by continuous phenotypic susceptibility testing and the analysis of genetic determinants of resistance.

A Comparison of the Sensititre MycoTB Plate, the Bactec MGIT 960, and a Microarray-Based Molecular Assay for the Detection of Drug Resistance in Clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates in Moscow, Russia.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to compare the consistency of three assays for the determination of the drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) strains with various resistance profiles isolated from the Moscow region. METHODS: A total of 144 MTB clinical isolates with a strong bias toward drug resistance were examined using Bactec MGIT 960, Sensititre MycoTB, and a microarray-based molecular assay TB-TEST to detect substitutions in the rpoB, katG, inhA, ahpC, gyrA, gyrB, rrs, eis, and embB genes that are associated with resistance to rifampin, isoniazid, fluoroquinolones, second-line injectable drugs and ethambutol. RESULTS: The average correlation for the identification of resistant and susceptible isolates using the three methods was approximately 94%. An association of mutations detected with variable resistance levels was shown. We propose a change in the breakpoint minimal inhibitory concentration for kanamycin to less than 5 µg/ml in the Sensititre MycoTB system. A pairwise comparison of the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of two different drugs revealed an increased correlation in the first-line drug group and a partial correlation in the second-line drug group, reflecting the history of the preferential simultaneous use of drugs from these groups. An increased correlation with the MICs was also observed for drugs sharing common resistance mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: The quantitative measures of phenotypic drug resistance produced by the Sensititre MycoTB and the timely detection of mutations using the TB-TEST assay provide guidance for clinicians for the choice of the appropriate drug regimen.