RESUMEN
[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.12.018.].
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the efficacy and cardiovascular safety of roxadustat versus placebo by analyzing data pooled from three phase 3 studies of roxadustat in patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD and CKD-related anemia. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In the three phase 3, double-blind studies of roxadustat versus placebo evaluating the treatment of CKD-related anemia in patients not requiring dialysis, the primary efficacy end point was mean change from baseline in hemoglobin averaged over weeks 28-52, regardless of rescue therapy. The primary cardiovascular safety end point was a composite measure of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke). MACE plus (MACE+; MACE plus unstable angina and heart failure requiring hospitalization) and all-cause mortality were key secondary safety end points. These safety end points were adjudicated. RESULTS: A total of 4277 patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD were randomized (roxadustat, n=2391; placebo, n=1886). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups; the mean (SD) hemoglobin was 9.1 (0.7) g/dl and mean eGFR was 20 (12) ml/min per 1.73 m2. Patients treated with roxadustat versus those treated with placebo showed a mean change from baseline in hemoglobin averaged over weeks 28-52, regardless of rescue therapy, of 1.9 versus 0.2 g/dl, a treatment difference of 1.7 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.7 to 1.8). Roxadustat reduced the need for red blood cell transfusion in the first 52 weeks versus placebo (6.1 versus 20.4 per 100 patient-exposure years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.32). There were no increased risks of MACE (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.27), MACE+ (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.21), all-cause mortality (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.26), or individual MACE+ components in patients treated with roxadustat versus those treated with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Roxadustat was more effective than placebo at increasing hemoglobin in patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD and anemia, while decreasing transfusion rate and being noninferior to placebo with respect to risk of MACE. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: A Study of FG-4592 for the Treatment of Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Not Receiving Dialysis, NCT01750190; Roxadustat in the Treatment of Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Not Requiring Dialysis (ALPS), NCT01887600; Safety and Efficacy Study of Roxadustat to Treat Anemia in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), Not on Dialysis, NCT02174627.
Asunto(s)
Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inducido químicamente , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapéutico , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Isoquinolinas/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Anciano , Anemia/sangre , Anemia/etiología , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/efectos adversos , Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Femenino , Glicina/efectos adversos , Glicina/uso terapéutico , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Prolina Dioxigenasas del Factor Inducible por Hipoxia/antagonistas & inhibidores , Isoquinolinas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, standard of care for anemia of end-stage kidney disease, are associated with cardiovascular events. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of roxadustat, an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor that stimulates erythropoiesis. METHODS: SIERRAS was a phase 3, randomized, open-label, active-controlled study enrolled adults on dialysis for end-stage kidney disease receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemia. Patients were randomized (1:1) to thrice-weekly roxadustat or epoetin alfa. Doses were based on previous epoetin alfa dose and adjusted in the roxadustat arm to maintain hemoglobin at â¼11 g/dl during treatment. Epoetin alfa dosing was adjusted per US package insert. Primary efficacy endpoint was mean hemoglobin (g/dl) change from baseline averaged over weeks 28 to 52. Treatment-emergent adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: Enrolled patients (roxadustat, n = 370 and epoetin alfa, n = 371) had similar mean (SD) baseline hemoglobin levels (10.30 [0.66] g/dl). Mean (SD) hemoglobin changes for weeks 28 to 52 were 0.39 (0.93) and -0.09 (0.84) in roxadustat and epoetin alfa, respectively. Roxadustat was noninferior (least squares mean difference: 0.48 [95% confidence interval: 0.37, 0.59]; P < 0.001) to epoetin alfa. Tolerability was comparable between treatments. CONCLUSION: In end-stage kidney disease, roxadustat was noninferior to epoetin alfa in up to 52 weeks of treatment in this erythropoietin-stimulating agent conversion study. Roxadustat had an acceptable tolerability profile.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are associated with increased cardiovascular risk when higher doses are used toward higher hematocrit targets. Patients new to dialysis are at higher risk for morbidity and mortality. Systematic evaluation of this population was predefined in the roxadustat clinical development program. Roxadustat is a hypoxia-inducible prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor. METHODS: Data were pooled from 3 phase 3, randomized, open-label, active-controlled trials. Eligible adults had kidney failure and initiated dialysis for 2 weeks to ≤ 4 months prior to randomization to roxadustat or epoetin alfa. Efficacy was assessed as mean change in hemoglobin from baseline averaged over weeks 28 to 52, regardless of rescue therapy. Key cardiovascular safety endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; all-cause mortality [ACM], myocardial infarction, and stroke), and MACE+ (MACE plus unstable angina or congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization), and ACM. RESULTS: This study included 1530 patients with kidney failure incident to dialysis. Mean (SD) changes in hemoglobin from baseline averaged over weeks 28 to 52, regardless of rescue therapy, were 2.12 (1.45) versus 1.91 (1.42) g/dl in the roxadustat and epoetin alfa groups (least-squares mean difference: 0.22; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.40; P = 0.0130). Risks of MACE and MACE+ were lower in the roxadustat group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.96) than the epoetin alfa group (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.89); the HR for ACM was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.52 to 1.11). CONCLUSION: Roxadustat was at least as efficacious as epoetin alfa. Roxadustat had a lower risk of MACE/MACE+ in patients new to dialysis.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Roxadustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor that stimulates erythropoiesis and improves iron metabolism. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of roxadustat in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)-related anemia not on dialysis. METHODS: ANDES was a global Phase 3 randomized study in which adults with stage 3-5 CKD not on dialysis received roxadustat or placebo. Patients were initially dosed thrice weekly; dose was titrated to achieve a hemoglobin level ≥11.0 g/dl, followed by titration for maintenance. The primary endpoints were change in hemoglobin (weeks 28-52) and proportion of patients achieving a hemoglobin response (hemoglobin ≥11.0 g/dl and increase ≥1.0 g/dl [baseline >8.0 g/dl], or increase ≥2.0 g/dl [baseline ≤8.0 g/dl]) (week 24). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (TESAEs) were recorded. RESULTS: In roxadustat (n = 616) and placebo (n = 306) groups, hemoglobin mean (SD) change from baseline over weeks 28-52 was significantly larger for roxadustat (2.00 [0.95]) versus placebo (0.16 [0.90]), corresponding to least-squares mean difference of 1.85 g/dl (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.74-1.97; P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients achieving a response at week 24 was larger for roxadustat (86.0%; 95% CI 83.0%-88.7%) versus placebo (6.6%; 95% CI 4.1%-9.9%; P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients receiving rescue therapy at week 52 was smaller for roxadustat (8.9%) versus placebo (28.9%); hazard ratio, 0.19 (95% CI 0.14-0.28; P < .0001). The incidences of TEAEs and TESAEs were comparable. CONCLUSION: This study showed that roxadustat corrected and maintained hemoglobin and was well tolerated in patients with CKD-related anemia not on dialysis (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01750190).
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Roxadustat (FG-4592), an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor that stimulates erythropoiesis, regulates iron metabolism, and reduces hepcidin, was evaluated in this phase 2b study for safety, efficacy, optimal dose, and dose frequency in patients with nondialysis CKD. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: The 145 patients with nondialysis CKD and hemoglobin ≤10.5 g/dl were randomized into one of six cohorts of approximately 24 patients each with varying roxadustat starting doses (tiered weight and fixed amounts) and frequencies (two and three times weekly) followed by hemoglobin maintenance with roxadustat one to three times weekly. Treatment duration was 16 or 24 weeks. Intravenous iron was prohibited. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving hemoglobin increase of ≥1.0 g/dl from baseline and hemoglobin of ≥11.0 g/dl by week 17 (16 weeks of treatment). Secondary analyses included mean hemoglobin change from baseline, iron utilization, and serum lipids. Safety was evaluated by frequency/severity of adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 145 patients enrolled, 143 were evaluable for efficacy. Overall, 92% of patients achieved hemoglobin response. Higher compared with lower starting doses led to earlier achievement of hemoglobin response. Roxadustat-induced hemoglobin increases were independent of baseline C-reactive protein levels and iron repletion status. Overall, over the first 16 treatment weeks, hepcidin levels decreased by 16.9% (P=0.004), reticulocyte hemoglobin content was maintained, and hemoglobin increased by a mean (±SD) of 1.83 (±0.09) g/dl (P<0.001). Overall mean total cholesterol level was reduced by a mean (±SD) of 26 (±30) mg/dl (P<0.001) after 8 weeks of therapy, independent of the use of statins or other lipid-lowering agents. No drug-related serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with nondialysis CKD who were anemic, various starting dose regimens of roxadustat were well tolerated and achieved anemia correction with reduced serum hepcidin levels. After anemia correction, hemoglobin was maintained by roxadustat at various dose frequencies without intravenous iron supplementation.
Asunto(s)
Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/uso terapéutico , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Isoquinolinas/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anemia/sangre , Anemia/etiología , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , Colesterol/sangre , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Glicina/administración & dosificación , Glicina/efectos adversos , Glicina/uso terapéutico , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Hepcidinas/sangre , Humanos , Prolina Dioxigenasas del Factor Inducible por Hipoxia/antagonistas & inhibidores , Isoquinolinas/administración & dosificación , Isoquinolinas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Roxadustat (FG-4592) is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitor that promotes erythropoiesis through increasing endogenous erythropoietin, improving iron regulation, and reducing hepcidin. STUDY DESIGN: Phase 2, randomized (3:1), open-label, active-comparator, safety and efficacy study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients with stable end-stage renal disease treated with hemodialysis who previously had hemoglobin (Hb) levels maintained with epoetin alfa. INTERVENTION: Part 1: 6-week dose-ranging study in 54 individuals of thrice-weekly oral roxadustat doses versus continuation of intravenous epoetin alfa. Part 2: 19-week treatment in 90 individuals in 6 cohorts with various starting doses and adjustment rules (1.0-2.0mg/kg or tiered weight based) in individuals with a range of epoetin alfa responsiveness. Intravenous iron was prohibited. OUTCOMES: Primary end point was Hb level response, defined as end-of-treatment Hb level change (ΔHb) of -0.5g/dL or greater from baseline (part 1) and as mean Hb level ≥ 11.0g/dL during the last 4 treatment weeks (part 2). MEASUREMENTS: Hepcidin, iron parameters, cholesterol, and plasma erythropoietin (the latter in a subset). RESULTS: Baseline epoetin alfa doses were 138.3±51.3 (SD) and 136.3±47.7U/kg/wk in part 1 and 152.8±80.6 and 173.4±83.7U/kg/wk in part 2, in individuals randomly assigned to roxadustat and epoetin alfa, respectively. Hb level responder rates in part 1 were 79% in pooled roxadustat 1.5 to 2.0mg/kg compared to 33% in the epoetin alfa control arm (P=0.03). Hepcidin level reduction was greater at roxadustat 2.0mg/kg versus epoetin alfa (P<0.05). In part 2, the average roxadustat dose requirement for Hb level maintenance was â¼1.7mg/kg. The least-squares-mean ΔHb in roxadustat-treated individuals was comparable to that in epoetin alfa-treated individuals (about -0.5g/dL) and the least-squares-mean difference in ΔHb between both treatment arms was -0.03 (95% CI, -0.39 to 0.33) g/dL (mixed effect model-repeated measure). Roxadustat significantly reduced mean total cholesterol levels, not observed with epoetin alfa. No safety concerns were raised. LIMITATIONS: Short treatment duration and small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase 2 study of anemia therapy in patients with end-stage renal disease on maintenance hemodialysis therapy, roxadustat was well tolerated and effectively maintained Hb levels.
Asunto(s)
Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epoetina alfa/uso terapéutico , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Hematínicos/uso terapéutico , Isoquinolinas/uso terapéutico , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Epoetina alfa/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Glicina/administración & dosificación , Glicina/uso terapéutico , Hematínicos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Isoquinolinas/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Safety concerns with erythropoietin analogues and intravenous (IV) iron for treatment of anemia in CKD necessitate development of safer therapies. Roxadustat (FG-4592) is an orally bioavailable hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor that promotes coordinated erythropoiesis through HIF-mediated transcription. We performed an open-label, randomized hemoglobin (Hb) correction study in anemic (Hb≤10.0 g/dl) patients incident to hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). Sixty patients received no iron, oral iron, or IV iron while treated with roxadustat for 12 weeks. Mean±SD baseline Hb was 8.3±1.0 g/dl in enrolled patients. Roxadustat at titrated doses increased mean Hb by ≥2.0 g/dl within 7 weeks regardless of baseline iron repletion status, C-reactive protein level, iron regimen, or dialysis modality. Mean±SEM maximal change in Hb from baseline (ΔHb(max)), the primary endpoint, was 3.1±0.2 g/dl over 12 weeks in efficacy-evaluable patients (n=55). In groups receiving oral or IV iron, ΔHb(max) was similar and larger than in the no-iron group. Hb response (increase in Hb of ≥1.0 g/dl from baseline) was achieved in 96% of efficacy-evaluable patients. Mean serum hepcidin decreased significantly 4 weeks into study: by 80% in HD patients receiving no iron (n=22), 52% in HD and PD patients receiving oral iron (n=21), and 41% in HD patients receiving IV iron (n=9). In summary, roxadustat was well tolerated and corrected anemia in incident HD and PD patients, regardless of baseline iron repletion status or C-reactive protein level and with oral or IV iron supplementation; it also reduced serum hepcidin levels.
Asunto(s)
Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Isoquinolinas/uso terapéutico , Diálisis Renal , Anemia/sangre , Femenino , Glicina/uso terapéutico , Hepcidinas/sangre , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis PeritonealRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to assess the safety and tolerability of omecamtiv mecarbil treatment during symptom-limited exercise in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and angina. These patients may have increased vulnerability to prolongation of the systolic ejection time. BACKGROUND: Omecamtiv mecarbil is a selective cardiac myosin activator that augments cardiac contractility in patients with systolic heart failure through a dose-dependent increase in systolic ejection time. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients with chronic heart failure were randomized 2:1 to receive omecamtiv mecarbil or placebo in 2 sequential cohorts of escalating doses designed to achieve plasma concentrations previously shown to increase systolic function. Patients underwent 2 symptom-limited exercise treadmill tests (ETTs) at baseline (ETT1 and ETT2) and again before the end of a 20-h infusion of omecamtiv mecarbil (ETT3). RESULTS: The primary pre-defined safety endpoint (i.e., the proportion of patients who stopped ETT3 because of angina at a stage earlier than baseline) was observed in 1 patient receiving placebo and none receiving omecamtiv mecarbil. No dose-dependent differences emerged in the proportion of patients stopping ETT3 for any reason or in the pattern of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Doses of omecamtiv mecarbil producing plasma concentrations previously shown to increase systolic function were well tolerated during exercise in these study patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and angina. There was no indication that treatment increased the likelihood of myocardial ischemia in this high-risk population. (Pharmacokinetics [PK] and Tolerability of Intravenous [IV] and Oral CK-1827452 in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Angina; NCT00682565).
Asunto(s)
Angina de Pecho/tratamiento farmacológico , Tolerancia a Medicamentos , Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Contracción Miocárdica/efectos de los fármacos , Isquemia Miocárdica/tratamiento farmacológico , Urea/análogos & derivados , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angina de Pecho/diagnóstico , Angina de Pecho/fisiopatología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Georgia (República) , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Miocárdica/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Federación de Rusia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Urea/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In this study we tested the hypothesis that tirasemtiv, a selective fast skeletal muscle troponin activator that sensitizes the sarcomere to calcium, could amplify the response of muscle to neuromuscular input in humans. METHODS: Healthy men received tirasemtiv and placebo in a randomized, double-blind, 4-period, crossover design. The deep fibular nerve was stimulated transcutaneously to activate the tibialis anterior muscle and produce dorsiflexion of the foot. The force-frequency relationship of tibialis anterior dorsiflexion was assessed after dosing. RESULTS: Tirasemtiv increased force produced by the tibialis anterior in a dose-, concentration-, and frequency-dependent manner with the largest increases [up to 24.5% (SE 3.1), P < 0.0001] produced at subtetanic nerve stimulation frequencies (10 Hz). CONCLUSIONS: The data confirm that tirasemtiv amplifies the response of skeletal muscle to nerve input in humans. This outcome provides support for further studies of tirasemtiv as a potential therapy in conditions marked by diminished neuromuscular input.
Asunto(s)
Imidazoles/farmacología , Músculo Esquelético/efectos de los fármacos , Músculo Esquelético/inervación , Fármacos Neuromusculares/farmacología , Pirazinas/farmacología , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Cruzados , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Estimulación Eléctrica , Humanos , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Músculo Esquelético/fisiología , Fármacos Neuromusculares/administración & dosificación , Pirazinas/administración & dosificación , Troponina T/efectos de los fármacos , Troponina T/fisiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Limited neural input results in muscle weakness in neuromuscular disease because of a reduction in the density of muscle innervation, the rate of neuromuscular junction activation or the efficiency of synaptic transmission. We developed a small-molecule fast-skeletal-troponin activator, CK-2017357, as a means to increase muscle strength by amplifying the response of muscle when neural input is otherwise diminished secondary to neuromuscular disease. Binding selectively to the fast-skeletal-troponin complex, CK-2017357 slows the rate of calcium release from troponin C and sensitizes muscle to calcium. As a consequence, the force-calcium relationship of muscle fibers shifts leftwards, as does the force-frequency relationship of a nerve-muscle pair, so that CK-2017357 increases the production of muscle force in situ at sub-maximal nerve stimulation rates. Notably, we show that sensitization of the fast-skeletal-troponin complex to calcium improves muscle force and grip strength immediately after administration of single doses of CK-2017357 in a model of the neuromuscular disease myasthenia gravis. Troponin activation may provide a new therapeutic approach to improve physical activity in diseases where neuromuscular function is compromised.
Asunto(s)
Calcio/metabolismo , Músculo Esquelético/metabolismo , Enfermedades Neuromusculares/metabolismo , Troponina C/agonistas , Troponina C/metabolismo , Adenosina Trifosfatasas/metabolismo , Animales , Bovinos , Humanos , Imidazoles/química , Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Contracción Muscular/efectos de los fármacos , Fibras Musculares Esqueléticas/citología , Fibras Musculares Esqueléticas/metabolismo , Músculo Esquelético/patología , Miastenia Gravis/tratamiento farmacológico , Miastenia Gravis/metabolismo , Miastenia Gravis/patología , Miosinas/aislamiento & purificación , Miosinas/metabolismo , Enfermedades Neuromusculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Neuromusculares/patología , Pirazinas/química , Pirazinas/uso terapéutico , Conejos , Ratas , Troponina/metabolismo , Troponina/fisiologíaRESUMEN
The objective of the study was to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of ispinesib, a kinesin spindle protein inhibitor. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had received only prior neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy were treated with escalating doses of ispinesib administered as a 1-h infusion on days 1 and 15 every 28 days until toxicity or progression of disease. Doses were escalated until dose-limiting toxicity was observed in two out of six patients during cycle 1. A total of 16 patients were treated at three dose levels: 10 mg/m (n=3), 12 mg/m (n=6), and 14 mg/m (n=7). Forty-four percent of the patients had locally advanced disease and 56% had metastatic disease; 50% were estrogen receptor positive, 44% were progesterone receptor positive, 25% human epidermal growth factor 2 were positive, and 31% triple (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor 2) negative. Sixty-nine percent of patients were chemo-naive. The maximum tolerated dose was 12 mg/m and dose-limiting toxicity was grade 3 increased aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase. The most common toxicities included neutropenia (88%; 38% grade 3 and 44% grade 4), increased alanine aminotransferase (56%), anemia (38%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (31%), and diarrhea (31%). No neuropathy, mucositis, or alopecia was reported. Among the 15 patients evaluable for antitumor activity, there were three partial responses, one confirmed by the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (7% response rate). Nine patients (60%) had stable disease lasting at least 42 days, with four (27%) lasting for at least 90 days. Disease stabilization (partial responses+stable disease) was observed in 11 (73.3%) patients. In conclusion, ispinesib was well tolerated when administered on days 1 and 15 every 28 days. Limited activity was observed with this schedule in patients with previously untreated advanced breast cancer.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Benzamidas/administración & dosificación , Benzamidas/farmacocinética , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinazolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinazolinas/farmacocinética , Adulto , Alanina Transaminasa/metabolismo , Anemia/inducido químicamente , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Aspartato Aminotransferasas/metabolismo , Benzamidas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Cinesinas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quinazolinas/efectos adversos , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Decreased systolic function is central to the pathogenesis of heart failure in millions of patients worldwide, but mechanism-related adverse effects restrict existing inotropic treatments. This study tested the hypothesis that omecamtiv mecarbil, a selective cardiac myosin activator, will augment cardiac function in human beings. METHODS: In this dose-escalating, crossover study, 34 healthy men received a 6-h double-blind intravenous infusion of omecamtiv mecarbil or placebo once a week for 4 weeks. Each sequence consisted of three ascending omecamtiv mecarbil doses (ranging from 0·005 to 1·0 mg/kg per h) with a placebo infusion randomised into the sequence. Vital signs, blood samples, electrocardiographs (ECGs), and echocardiograms were obtained before, during, and after each infusion. The primary aim was to establish maximum tolerated dose (the highest infusion rate tolerated by at least eight participants) and plasma concentrations of omecamtiv mecarbil; secondary aims were evaluation of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics, safety, and tolerability. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01380223. FINDINGS: The maximum tolerated dose of omecamtiv mecarbil was 0·5 mg/kg per h. Omecamtiv mecarbil infusion resulted in dose-related and concentration-related increases in systolic ejection time (mean increase from baseline at maximum tolerated dose, 85 [SD 5] ms), the most sensitive indicator of drug effect (r(2)=0·99 by dose), associated with increases in stroke volume (15 [2] mL), fractional shortening (8% [1]), and ejection fraction (7% [1]; all p<0·0001). Omecamtiv mecarbil increased atrial contractile function, and there were no clinically relevant changes in diastolic function. There were no clinically significant dose-related adverse effects on vital signs, serum chemistries, ECGs, or adverse events up to a dose of 0·625 mg/kg per h. The dose-limiting toxic effect was myocardial ischaemia due to excessive prolongation of systolic ejection time. INTERPRETATION: These first-in-man data show highly dose-dependent augmentation of left ventricular systolic function in response to omecamtiv mecarbil and support potential clinical use of the drug in patients with heart failure. FUNDING: Cytokinetics Inc.
Asunto(s)
Miosinas Cardíacas/metabolismo , Sístole/efectos de los fármacos , Urea/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Estudios Cruzados , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Dosis Máxima Tolerada , Persona de Mediana Edad , Contracción Miocárdica/efectos de los fármacos , Volumen Sistólico/efectos de los fármacos , Urea/administración & dosificación , Urea/farmacocinética , Urea/farmacología , Función Ventricular Izquierda/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many patients with heart failure remain symptomatic and have a poor prognosis despite existing treatments. Decreases in myocardial contractility and shortening of ventricular systole are characteristic of systolic heart failure and might be improved by a new therapeutic class, cardiac myosin activators. We report the first study of the cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil, in patients with systolic heart failure. METHODS: We undertook a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, dose-ranging, phase 2 trial investigating the effects of omecamtiv mecarbil (formerly CK-1827452), given intravenously for 2, 24, or 72 h to patients with stable heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction receiving guideline-indicated treatment. Clinical assessment (including vital signs, echocardiograms, and electrocardiographs) and testing of plasma drug concentrations took place during and after completion of each infusion. The primary aim was to assess safety and tolerability of omecamtiv mecarbil. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00624442. FINDINGS: 45 patients received 151 infusions of active drug or placebo. Placebo-corrected, concentration-dependent increases in left ventricular ejection time (up to an 80 ms increase from baseline) and stroke volume (up to 9·7 mL) were recorded, associated with a small reduction in heart rate (up to 2·7 beats per min; p<0·0001 for all three measures). Higher plasma concentrations were also associated with reductions in end-systolic (decrease of 15 mL at >500 ng/mL, p=0·0026) and end-diastolic volumes (16 mL, p=0·0096) that might have been more pronounced with increased duration of infusion. Cardiac ischaemia emerged at high plasma concentrations (two patients, plasma concentrations roughly 1750 ng/mL and 1350 ng/mL). For patients tolerant of all study drug infusions, no consistent pattern of adverse events with either dose or duration emerged. INTERPRETATION: Omecamtiv mecarbil improved cardiac function in patients with heart failure caused by left ventricular dysfunction and could be the first in class of a new therapeutic agent. FUNDING: Cytokinetics Inc.
Asunto(s)
Miosinas Cardíacas/metabolismo , Insuficiencia Cardíaca Sistólica/tratamiento farmacológico , Urea/análogos & derivados , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Ecocardiografía , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca Sistólica/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Cardíaca Sistólica/fisiopatología , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Volumen Sistólico/efectos de los fármacos , Sístole/efectos de los fármacos , Urea/administración & dosificación , Urea/efectos adversos , Urea/farmacocinética , Urea/uso terapéutico , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/complicaciones , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder is a recurrent illness that often requires maintenance antidepressant treatment. Escitalopram is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) that has shown efficacy in both acute and continuation treatment of major depressive disorder. The current trial examined the efficacy of maintenance escitalopram treatment in preventing depression recurrence in patients who responded to acute SSRI therapy. METHOD: Patients with recurrent DSM-IV-defined major depressive disorder (>or= 2 previous episodes; baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score >or= 22) who had responded (MADRS score