RESUMEN
AIMS: In AMANDHA trial, the addition of manidipine, but not amlodipine, in diabetic patients with uncontrolled hypertension, microalbuminuria and preserved renal function resulted in a large decrease of urinary albumin excretion (UAE) despite similar blood pressure (BP) reductions. Factors associated with the reduction of UAE were analyzed. METHODS: For this purpose, a multivariable analysis was performed. RESULTS: Although after 6 months of treatment, manidipine and amlodipine decreased BP to a similar extent, reductions of UAE were higher with manidipine. The assigned treatment, changes in mean BP, sympathetic tone and glycemic control were associated with changes in UAE. CONCLUSION: The assigned treatment, changes in mean BP, sympathetic tone and glycemic control were independently associated with changes in UAE. Compared with amlodipine, manidipine reduced UAE to a higher extent, independently of BP reduction.
Asunto(s)
Albúminas/metabolismo , Albuminuria/tratamiento farmacológico , Amlodipino/farmacología , Antihipertensivos/farmacología , Angiopatías Diabéticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Dihidropiridinas/farmacología , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/orina , Angiopatías Diabéticas/orina , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/orina , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Nitrobencenos , PiperazinasRESUMEN
Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors should be considered as the first-line therapy in the treatment of patients with hypertension and diabetes. However, most of the diabetic subjects with hypertension require at least two drugs to achieve blood pressure targets. The ACCOMPLISH trial suggested that the best combination in the treatment of high-risk hypertensive patients should include a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor and a dihydropyridine. However, not all dihydropyridines block the same receptors. Those dihydropyridines that block T-type calcium channel blockers may provide additional advantages. A number of studies suggest that compared with amlodipine, manidipine have the same antihypertensive efficacy, but with a lesser risk of ankle edema. In addition, manidipine, but not amlodipine, significantly reduces urinary albumin excretion rates.
Asunto(s)
Amlodipino/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus , Dihidropiridinas/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Presión Sanguínea , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Nitrobencenos , PiperazinasRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of adding manidipine 20 mg versus amlodipine 10 mg to the treatment of diabetic patients with uncontrolled hypertension and microalbuminuria despite full-dose treatment with a renin-angiotensin system blocker for at least 6 months. Patients were randomized to receive manidipine (n = 61) or amlodipine (n = 30) in a 2:1 ratio for 6 months and monitored for microalbuminuria for an additional extension phase of 18 months. Manidipine and amlodipine decreased blood pressure values to a similar extent. Urinary albumin excretion was reduced by 65.5% with manidipine versus 20% with amlodipine (p < 0.01) at 6 months and 62.7 versus 16.6% (p < 0.01) at the end of the extension phase. Manidipine was better tolerated than amlodipine. Thus, the addition of manidipine, but not amlodipine, resulted in a large reduction in the urinary albumin excretion rate despite similar blood pressure reductions.