Hartmann's Pouch Stones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: The Challenges and the Solutions.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Hartmann's pouch stones (HPS) encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) may hinder safe dissection of the cystic pedicle or be complicated by mucocele, empyema, or Mirizzi syndrome; distorting the anatomy and increasing the risk of bile duct injury. We studied the incidence, presentations, operative challenges, and outcomes of HPS. METHODS: A cohort study of a prospectively maintained database of LCs and bile duct explorations performed by a single surgeon. Patients were divided into two groups: those with HPS and those without. Patients' demographics, clinical presentation, intra-operative findings, and postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Of the 5136 patients, 612 (11.9%) had HPS. The HPS group were more likely to present with acute cholecystitis (27.9% vs 5.9%, P = .000) and more patients underwent emergency LC (50.7% vs 41.5%, P = .000). The HPS group had more difficult cholecystectomies, with 46.1% vs 11.8% in the non-HPS group being operative difficulty grade 4 and 5. Mucocele, empyema, and Mirizzi syndrome were more common in the HPS group (24.0% vs 3.7% P = .000, 30.9% vs 3.7% P = .000, 1.8% vs 0.9% P = .000, respectively). There was no significant difference in the open conversion rate or complications. CONCLUSION: HPS increase the difficulty of LC. Surgeons should be aware of their presence and should employ appropriate dissection strategies. Sharp or diathermy dissection should be avoided. Dislodging the stone into the gall bladder, stone removal, swab dissection, and cholangiography are useful measures to avoid ductal injury and reduce the conversion rate.

Diagnostic laparoscopy to investigate unexplained lactic acidosis in critically ill patients - A descriptive single centre cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Unexplained lactic acidosis (LA) in a critically ill patient often prompts investigations to rule out any reversible intra-abdominal cause. Equivocal results can lead to an emergency laparotomy (EL) with subsequent high morbidity and mortality rates. Our objective was to determine the clinical impact of urgent diagnostic laparoscopy (UDL) in such patients. METHODS: This was a descriptive single-centre cohort study. UDL on 28 consecutive critically ill patients with unexplained LA who were referred to a single surgeon over 16 years period were analysed. UDL was proformed either at bedside or in theatre without prior computerised tomography (CT) scan. Patient's demographics, ASA grade, referral route and intraoperative findings were analysed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients underwent bedside UDL in the critical care setting and further 10 had UDL in theatre. Fourteen patients had normal UDL, out of these 10 had LA secondary to low cardiac output states. Fourteen patients had positive UDL findings. Seven patients had features of mesenteric ischaemia, two had gangrenous gallbladder, two had hepatic ischaemia, one patient had acute pancreatitis, one had gangrenous uterus and one had gastric volvulus. Five of the 14 patients with positive UDL were converted to laparotomy for definitive management. In total, of the 28 patients in the cohort, 23 patients avoided EL. CONCLUSION: UDL is useful and feasible investigation for unexplained LA in the critically ill patients and it can avoid unnecessary EL in many patients. We would recommend the use of UDL as a safe and feasible investigation in such patients.