Early Clinical Outcomes of the Active Seal Technology of the AFX Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm System With the VELA Cuff for Patients With a Conical Proximal Neck.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of the Active Seal technology employed in the AFX endovascular aortic aneurysm system (AFX), during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) having a conical proximal neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the EVAR for AAA with a conical proximal neck using the AFX was performed at 17 Japanese hospitals between January 2016 and August 2020. The conical proximal neck was defined as a cone-shaped proximal neck, with more than 10% diameter increase within a 15 mm length at the proximal landing zone. All anatomical analyses were performed in the core laboratory, and cases with parallel walls within the proximal neck adequate for the landing zone were excluded from the study. RESULTS: This study included 53 patients, but only 39 patients (mean age, 76.6 ± 6.7 years; 87.0% males; mean aneurysm diameter, 52.0 ± 8.0 mm) were analyzed after being characterized as having a pure conical neck by the core laboratory. The mean proximal neck diameters at the lower renal artery and proximal edge of the aneurysm were 20.0 ± 2.9 mm and 27.5 ± 4.9 mm, respectively. The mean proximal neck length was 21.5 ± 6.0 mm. Instructions for use violations other than the conical neck were observed in 15 patients (38.5%). The VELA cuff was used in all cases; however, additional proximal cuff was required in 9 more cases (23.1%). The Active Seal technology was able to significantly extend the proximal sealing zone from 21.5 ± 6.0 to 26.0 ± 12.2 mm (p = .047). Thirty-six patients completed the 12-month follow-up (one patient was lost to follow-up, and 2 patients died from causes unrelated to the aneurysm), and there were no type-1a and 3 endoleaks with only one reintervention (2.6%) related to type 1b endoleak in the 12-month period. Furthermore, there was no significant enlargement of the proximal neck diameter at 12 months (at 1 month: 20.6 ± 3.4 mm and at 12 months: 21.3 ± 3.8 mm; p = .420). CONCLUSION: The Active Seal technology of the AFX significantly extended the proximal seal zone and no type-1a endoleak and proximal neck dilation was observed in patients with conical proximal neck at 12 months.

Outcomes of embolization procedures for type II endoleaks following endovascular abdominal aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the mid-term outcomes of embolization procedures for type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic repair, and clarify the risk factors for aneurysm enlargement after embolization procedures. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter registry study enrolling patients who underwent embolization procedures for type II endoleaks after EVAR from January 2012 to December 2018 at 19 Japanese centers. The primary end point was the rate of freedom from aneurysm enlargement, more than 5 mm in the aortic maximum diameter, after an embolization procedure. Demographic, procedural, follow-up, and laboratory data were collected. Continuous variables were summarized descriptively, and Kaplan-Meier analyses and a Cox regression model were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: A total of 315 patients (248 men and 67 women) were enrolled. The average duration from the initial embolization procedure to the last follow-up was 31.6 ± 24.6 months. The rates of freedom from aneurysm enlargement at 3 and 5 years were 55.4 ± 3.8% and 37.0 ± 5.2%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed that a larger aortic diameter at the initial embolization procedure and the presence of a Moyamoya endoleak, defined as heterogeneous contrast opacity with an indistinct faint border, were associated with aneurysm enlargement after embolization management. CONCLUSIONS: The embolization procedures were generally ineffective in preventing further expansion of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with type II endoleaks after EVAR, especially in patients with a large abdominal aortic aneurysm and/or a presence of a Moyamoya endoleak.

Branched versus fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair in the aortic arch: A multicenter comparison.

OBJECTIVE: For thoracic endovascular aortic repair of the arch, branched and fenestrated endografts are available with different limitations regarding anatomy and extent of the pathology. Comparisons are lacking in the literature. The aim of this study was to compare the results of 2 currently commercially available devices for branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair and fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair. METHODS: In a retrospective, multicenter cohort study, a consecutive patient series treated with branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair or fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic arch pathologies was assessed. Baseline characteristics, procedural fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and outcome were analyzed. Furthermore, the potential anatomic feasibility of the respective alternate device was assessed on the preoperative computed tomography scans. RESULTS: The branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair and fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair cohorts consisted of 20 and 34 patients, respectively, with similar comorbidities; indication was aneurysm in 65% and 79%, penetrating aortic ulcer in 20% and 9%, and dissection in the remaining procedures, respectively. Technical success was achieved in all but 1 patient. Perioperative mortality and major stroke rate were both 10% in branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair and 0% and 3% in fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair, respectively. During follow-up of 31 and 40 months, 1 branch occlusion occurred in the branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair cohort, and 2 late endoleaks occurred in the fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair group. One aortic death occurred. Although 35% of patients undergoing branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair were anatomically suitable for fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair, 91% of those undergoing fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair were suitable for branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair. CONCLUSIONS: Both branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair and fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair show excellent technical success and acceptable complication rates, whereas branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair tends toward higher morbidity, especially stroke rates. By offering fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair along with branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair, aortic centers could potentially lower complication rates and simultaneously still treat a wide range of anatomies.

Comparison of Outcomes and Complications Among Patients with Different Indications of Acute/Subacute Complicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection Treated by TEVAR: Data from the JaPanese REtrospective multicenter stuDy of ThoracIc Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection (J-Predictive Study).

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationships between indications for thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute/subacute complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection and clinical outcomes, and complications specific to thoracic endovascular aortic repair. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The J-predictive study retrospectively collected data of patients treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair for complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection at 20 institutions from January 2012 to March 2017. From the database, those treated for acute/subacute complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection were extracted (n = 118; 96 men; average age, 66.1 years; standard deviation, ± 13) and classified into groups 1, 2, and 3 according to thoracic endovascular aortic repair indications (rupture, superior mesenteric artery malperfusion, and renal or lower extremity malperfusion, respectively). Primary and secondary measures were mortality (overall and aortic-related) and complications related to thoracic endovascular aortic repair, respectively. For each outcome, the risks of being in groups 1 and 2 were statistically compared with that of being in group 3 as a control using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Mortality rate (odds ratio, 5.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-20.53) and prevalence of paraparesis/paraplegia (odds ratio, 30.46; confidence interval, 1.71-541.77) were higher in group 1 than in group 3. Compared to group 3, group 2 showed no statistically significant differences in mortality or complications related to thoracic endovascular aortic repair. CONCLUSIONS: Rupture as an indication for thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection was more likely to result in worse mortality and high prevalence of spinal cord ischemia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4, Case series.

Surgical Treatment for Primary Mycotic Aneurysms Using Endovascular Therapy, Focusing on Patient Selection: Single-Center Experience.

Background: Mycotic aneurysms (MAs) are relatively rare but life-threatening. Some recent reports have described the use of endovascular therapy for their treatment; however, this still is a controversial treatment, and a definite target population has not been determined. Methods: We performed surgery on 34 patients with MAs from March 2005 to March 2019. Twenty patients who underwent open surgery (OS) first comprised the OS group, and 14 patients who underwent endovascular therapy first comprised the stent-graft (SG) group. We analyzed between-group differences, long-term outcomes, and risk factors for death retrospectively. Patients in the OS group had a higher initial white blood cell count than those in the SG group (p = 0.047). The SG group had more patients with a low albumin concentration (≤2.0 mg/dL) than did the OS group (p = 0.026). Results: There were no significant differences in the operative mortality rates between the groups (p = 0.773). Additional procedures were required more often in the SG than the OS group (p = 0.0013). The overall survival rate as estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method was 88% at 1 month, 67% at 1 year, 57% at 3 years, and 45% at 10 years. In the univariable analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was a risk factor for death (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Endovascular therapy for MAs produced reasonable outcomes when patient selection was based on the activity level, nutritional condition, and degree of inflammation. Endovascular therapy may become an option for patients with a low albumin concentration or COPD despite the fact that additional procedures may be needed.

Management of Renal Arteries in Conjunction with Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complicated Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection: The Japanese Multicenter Study (J-Predictive Study).

Background Management of abdominal branches associated with Stanford type B aortic dissection is controversial without definite criteria for therapy after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). This is in part due to lack of data on natural history related to branch vessels and their relationship with the dissection flap, true lumen, and false lumen. Purpose To investigate the natural history of abdominal branches after TEVAR for type B aortic dissection and the relationship between renal artery anatomy and renal volume as a surrogate measure of perfusion. Materials and Methods This study included patients who underwent TEVAR for complicated type B dissection from January 2012 to March 2017 at 20 centers. Abdominal aortic branches were classified with following features: patency, branch vessel origin, and presence of extension of the aortic dissection into a branch (pattern 1, supplied by the true lumen without branch dissection; pattern 2, supplied by the true lumen with branch dissection, etc). The branch artery patterns before TEVAR were compared with those of the last follow-up CT (mean interval, 19.7 months) for spontaneous healing. Patients with one kidney supplied by pattern 1 and the other kidney by a different pattern were identified, and kidney volumes over the course were compared by using a simple linear regression model. Results Two hundred nine patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 66 years ± 13; 165 men and 44 women; median follow-up, 18 months) were included. Four hundred fifty-nine abdominal branches at the last follow-up were evaluable. Spontaneous healing of the dissected branch occurred in 63% (64 of 102) of pattern 2 branches. Regarding the other patterns, 6.5% (six of 93) of branches achieved spontaneous healing. In 79 patients, renal volumes decreased in kidneys with pattern 2 branches with more than 50% stenosis and branches supplied by the aortic false lumen (patterns 3 and 4) compared with contralateral kidneys supplied by pattern 1 (pattern 2 vs pattern 1: -16% ± 16 vs 0.10% ± 11, P = .002; patterns 3 and 4 vs pattern 1: -13% ± 14 vs 8.5% ± 14, P = .004). Conclusion Spontaneous healing occurs more frequently in dissected branches arising from the true lumen than in other branch patterns. Renal artery branches supplied by the aortic false lumen or a persistently dissected artery with greater than 50% stenosis are associated with significantly greater kidney volume loss. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Conformability and Efficacy of the Zenith Spiral Z Leg Compared with the Zenith Flex Leg in Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) using the Zenith® Spiral Z abdominal aortic aneurysm iliac leg (ZSLE) versus the Zenith® Flex abdominal aortic aneurysm iliac leg (TFLE). METHODS: Patients undergoing EVAR using TFLE or ZSLE between October 2009 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical end points were freedom from limb-related complications and change in arterial tortuosity indexes. Limb-related complication was defined as limb stenosis or occlusion, stent kink, stent disconnection, and type 1b endoleak. Tortuosity indexes were measured on the preoperative and postoperative computed tomography and compared. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients (11 female, average age 78.5 ± 5.5 years), 111 limbs, were enrolled. One patient was treated using aortouni-iliac device. TFLE was deployed in 43 limbs (22 patients) and ZSLE in 68 limbs (34 patients). Average follow-up was 43.6 ± 27.6 months. During follow-up, 8 limb-related complications occurred in the TFLE group and 2 in the ZSLE group. Freedom from limb-related complications at 3 years was 84.4% in the TFLE group and 96.1% in the ZSLE group (P = 0.039). There was no statistically significant difference between the TFLE and the ZSLE group in the aortoiliac tortuosity change (TFLE versus ZSLE -6.1 ± 5.8 vs. -4.9 ± 6.4, P = 0.324). However, there was significance in the iliac tortuosity change (-7.4 ± 11.7 vs. -3.0 ± 7.9, P = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Spiral Z leg showed less occurrence of limb-related complications and less iliac artery tortuosity index change compared to Zenith Flex leg. The spiral Z leg provided better conformability as a stent-graft limb.

Renal Stent Migration Following TEVAR for Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection.

We describe renal stent migration following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection. A 68-year-old male presented with type B aortic dissection. His course was complicated by renal and lower extremity malperfusion. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed and completion angiogram showed no flow in the left renal artery. A renal stent was deployed with the proximal margin of the stent 1 mm into the aortic true lumen, providing improved renal perfusion. One week after TEVAR, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed that the renal stent had embolized to the aortic bifurcation. Additional endovascular therapy successfully crushed the renal stent against the iliac artery wall utilizing a larger bare metal stent. At 3 year follow-up, contrast-enhanced CT demonstrated good patency of the left renal artery and right iliac artery. This complication alerts physicians to consider subsequent aortic remodeling during endovascular intervention for acute aortic dissection with malperfusion.

Measuring the greater curvature length of virtual stent graft can provide accurate prediction of stent graft position for thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of predicting stent graft position for thoracic endovascular aortic repair by measuring three lengths of the virtual stent graft: smaller curvature (SC), center lumen line (CL), and greater curvature (GC). METHODS: From January 2012 to December 2016, patients treated at our institution were analyzed retrospectively. Patients who were treated with more than two devices, patients treated for aortic dissection, and cases without complete preoperative or postoperative computed tomography (CT) data were excluded. From the preoperative CT data, the virtual stent graft image based on the SC (SCVS) was created so that its SC length matched that of the stent graft actually used. In the same manner, virtual stent graft images based on the CL (CLVS) and GC (GCVS) were created. These virtual stent graft images were created using SYNAPSE VINCENT software (Fujifilm Co, Tokyo, Japan) and superimposed on the postoperative CT image to measure the misalignment between these virtual stent graft images and the actual stent graft. These misalignments were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank sum test. In addition, the actual length (AL) of the stent graft was measured on the basis of the CL from postoperative CT data and compared with its original length (OL). RESULTS: A total of 35 cases were analyzed. Twenty-six patients were men. The average age of the patients was 72.4 ± 13.0 years. The proximal landing zone were located at the descending aorta (n = 11) and the aortic arch (n = 24). The misalignment between SCVS, CLVS, and GCVS and actual stent graft position was -47.8 ± 18.1 mm, -21.5 ± 9.4 mm, and 5.3 ± 7.4 mm, respectively. The difference in means between the three groups was significant (P < .001). The relationship between the AL based on CL and OL was represented by the formula AL = OL * 0.92 - 0.05 (in the descending aorta) and AL = OL * 0.77 + 9.85 (in the aortic arch). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CLVS and SCVS, GCVS was the most accurate predictor of stent graft position for thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Distal Neo-Neck Formation for Chronic Type B Dissection: False Lumen Closure After TEVAR.

OBJECTIVES:: Patients with chronic aortic dissection often require repeat interventions due to enlargement of the pressurized false lumen or disseminated intravascular coagulation even after additional thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) to occlude the entry tear. Residual false lumen flow can persist even after performing the candy-plug technique or branched stent-graft placement in some cases. We have devised a new method for false lumen closure. METHODS:: From December 2010 to May 2017, 5 patients (mean age: 57 [13] years, range: 43-77 years) with chronic dissection at the aortic arch and descending aorta, who underwent initial TEVAR, required additional treatment. Using an open surgical approach, the endograft was fixed with an outer felt under cardiopulmonary bypass after the endograft with stent was expanded by fenestration. The false lumen was closed using this procedure, and the aortotomy was repaired by direct closure in 2 cases and by graft replacement in 3 cases. RESULTS:: No major operative complications occurred, such as respiratory failure or paraplegia. Postoperative enhanced computed tomography (CT) images showed that the false lumen flow disappeared in all cases. All patients were discharged under normal conditions. They were all followed up and their CT did not indicate any complications for a mean of 33.6 (20.3) months. CONCLUSIONS:: Our combined procedure was effective and provided a higher success rate compared with endovascular therapy alone. This staged treatment approach, using a combination of TEVAR and false lumen closure, is less invasive compared with open surgery alone and may represent a valid treatment option for chronic type B dissection.

Clinical outcomes of thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair using commercially available fenestrated stent graft (Najuta endograft).

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) for the aortic arch aneurysm is challenging because of its curved anatomic configuration and the presence of the supra-aortic branches. The Najuta fenestrated endograft (Kawasumi Laboratories, Inc, Tokyo, Japan) was developed to treat aortic arch diseases, offering maximal proximal landing length while preserving the blood flow to the supra-aortic branches. We evaluated the perioperative and midterm outcomes of this fenestrated endograft. METHODS: Between July 2007 and July 2013, 32 patients were treated with the Najuta endograft at three vascular centers. The mean age of the patients was 74.5 ± 9.8 years (23 patients were men). Technical success, complication, overall survival rate, freedom from aneurysm-related death, secondary intervention, aneurysm enlargement, device migration, and patency of supra-aortic branches were investigated retrospectively. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 2.5 years (range, 0.2-6.2 years). Seventy-one supra-aortic vessels (30 brachiocephalic arteries, 31 left common carotid arteries, 10 left subclavian arteries) were planned to be preserved with fenestrations. Technical success rate was 91% (29 of 32; three type I endoleaks were seen), and five perioperative complications (two Stanford A dissections, one cerebral infarction, one celiac artery obstruction, one spinal cord ischemia) were recognized. Perioperative death was not observed. Overall survival rate and rate of freedom from aneurysm-related death at 3 years were 67% and 97%, respectively. The rate of freedom from secondary intervention and the rate of freedom from aneurysm enlargement at 3 years were 84% and 85%, respectively. Device migration was not observed. There were two branch (left carotid artery and left subclavian artery) occlusions at 2 weeks after TEVAR due to the endograft's infolding. No other branch occlusion was seen in this follow-up period. As a result, the patency rate of the supra-aortic branch was 97% at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: The perioperative and 3-year outcomes of TEVAR using the Najuta precurved, fenestrated endograft demonstrated high freedom from aneurysm enlargement and patency rates of the supra-aortic branches.

[Successful endovascular repair of a ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with severe mural thrombus].

A 51-year-old man was transferred to our hospital on an emergency basis complaining of a sudden onset of severe left lumbar back pain. An emergency contrasted computed tomography showed a ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm( rTAAA:Crawford classification type III). The ruptured site was near the aortic bifurcation, and the aneurysm had a relatively narrow segment with an extensive mural thrombus just below the renal arteries. Considering the high mortality of open surgery for the rTAAA and the poor general condition of the patient, we decided to perform endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) as a rescue procedure using the narrowed segment by the thrombus for a proximal landing zone. The abdominal part of the thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) was successfully excluded with a stent graft to obtain complete hemostasis. The postoperative course was uneventful except for the need for hemodialysis. Even though there is a risk of developing late type 1 endoleak, this procedure can be a feasible option as a rescue procedure or a bridge to radical open surgery for ruptured TAAA in a specially anatomical setting like this case.

A decade of outcomes and predictors of sac enlargement after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using zenith endografts in a Japanese population.

PURPOSE: To present 10-year outcomes and risk factors for sac enlargement after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using the Zenith AAA Endovascular Graft (Cook, Inc, Bloomington, Indiana) in a Japanese population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During the period 1999-2011, 127 patients underwent elective EVAR using Zenith endografts at a single institution. A retrospective investigation looked at initial rates of technical success and complications, 10-year rate of freedom from all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality, freedom from secondary intervention and sac enlargement, and risk factors for second intervention and sac enlargement. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 78 years, and the median follow-up time was 43 months. The initial technical success rate was 98.4% (125 of 127 patients). Major adverse events occurred in 7 of 127 (5.5%) patients. Rates of freedom from all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 95%, 87%, 77%, and 39% (all-cause mortality) and 100%, 100%, 99%, and 93% (aneurysm-related mortality). Rates of freedom from secondary intervention at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 97%, 91%, 88%, and 70%. Rates of primary freedom from sac enlargement at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 99%, 87%, 75%, and 67%. Multivariate analysis revealed aneurysm sac diameter as an independent risk factor for a secondary intervention. Preoperative sac diameter combined with an angulated short (AS) proximal neck was a risk factor for sac enlargement. CONCLUSIONS: The 10-year results of EVAR using Zenith endografts in a Japanese population were comparable to results from Western countries. Larger aneurysms and AS neck were predictors of sac enlargement after EVAR.

Intravascular ultrasound assessment of acute expansion of the balloon-expandable stent in heavy calcified iliac artery lesions or in lesions resistant to dilation by a self-expanding stent.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the acute stent expansion of a balloon-expandable stent (BES) by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in lesions with heavy calcification or in lesions resistant to dilation by a self-expanding stent (SES). METHODS: Primary stent placement using the Express LD was performed for 72 limbs in 56 patients. The BES was deployed both for ostial lesions of the common iliac artery (CIA) in 63 limbs and for additional dilation of an SES using a stent-in-stent maneuver in 9 limbs. Of the CIA ostial lesions, 71% (45 of 63) had heavy calcification. The primary endpoint was an acute stent expansion as assessed by IVUS. The ratio of the IVUS-measured minimal stent diameter (MSD) to the diameter predicted by the manufacturer's compliance chart was used as a measure of the acute stent expansion. The ratio was compared between noncalcified and calcified CIA lesions and between before and after additional placement of the BES in the case of insufficient expansion of an SES. RESULTS: The BES achieved 81 ± 10% of the predicted MSD in noncalcified CIA lesions and 78 ± 12% of the predicted MSD in heavy calcified CIA lesions (P = 0.346). In the 9 limbs with insufficient expansion of an SES, deployment of the BES resulted in an improvement in MSD from 39 ± 16% to 77 ± 8% of the predicted MSD (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sufficient acute expansion of the BES was demonstrated in heavy calcified lesions or in lesions with insufficient expansion of an SES.

Successful hybrid treatment for a ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus.

A 49-year-old woman with a 27-year history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was admitted to our hospital with sudden-onset severe back pain. An emergency multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) revealed a ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) 80 mm in diameter. Considering her condition and comorbidities, we performed an emergency hybrid treatment: visceral reconstruction followed by endoluminal aneurysm exclusion. She recovered uneventfully, except for the need for temporary hemodialysis. TAAA complicated with SLE is extremely rare. To our knowledge, this is the first successful report in the English literature of a ruptured TAAA in a patient with SLE who underwent hybrid treatment.

Catheter-based bailout techniques for an interrupted deployment of the excluder endograft due to broken deployment string.

In this report we describe catheter-based bailout techniques for when the distal end of the ipsilateral leg of an Excluder endograft has remained undeployed due to a broken deployment string. We attempted to advance a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloon into an undeployed leg via the brachial artery, but were unable to do so. The delivery catheter was then pulled out through the undeployed leg while the main body was supported by a dilated touch-up balloon to prevent stent graft migration, which subsequently enabled insertion of the balloon via the ipsilateral femoral artery. Complete deployment was accomplished by balloon dilation. Although this is situation is extremely rare, it should be recognized and catheter-based strategies should be known for dealing with this complication.

Iliac artery stent placement relieves claudication in patients with iliac and superficial femoral artery lesions.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of iliac artery stent placement for relief of claudication in patients with both iliac and superficial femoral artery (SFA) lesions. METHODS: Stent placement for only iliac artery occlusive disease was performed in 94 limbs (74 patients) with both iliac and SFA occlusive disease on the same limb. All procedures were performed because intermittent claudication did not improve after continuation of antiplatelet medication therapy and home-based exercise for 3 months. Rutherford classification was 2 in 20 limbs and 3 in 74 limbs. Patients with critical limb ischemia were excluded. Median duration of follow-up was 40 months. Primary patency rates of the iliac stent, clinical improvement rates, and risk factors for requiring additional SFA procedures were evaluated. RESULTS: Primary patency rates of the iliac stent at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 97, 93, 79, and 79 %, respectively. The initial clinical improvement rate was 87 %. Continued clinical improvement rates at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 87, 81, 69, and 66 %, respectively. SFA Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II C/D lesion was a significant risk factor for requiring additional SFA procedures. CONCLUSION: Intermittent claudication was relieved by iliac stent placement in most patients with both iliac and SFA lesions. Thus, the indications for treatment of the SFA intended for claudicants should be evaluated after treatment of the iliac lesion.

Fracture and collapse of balloon-expandable stents in the bilateral common iliac arteries due to shiatsu massage.

We report a case of stent fracture and collapse of balloon-expandable stents caused by shiatsu massage. A 76-year-old man presented with complaints of intermittent claudication of the right lower extremity. Stenoses of the bilateral common iliac arteries (CIAs) were detected. Balloon-expandable stents were deployed in both CIAs, resulting in resolution of symptoms. Five months later, pelvis x-ray showed collapse of both stents. Despite the stent collapse, the patient was asymptomatic, and his ankle brachial index values were within the normal range. Further history showed that the patient underwent daily shiatsu therapy in the umbilical region, which may have triggered collapse of the stent. Physicians should advise patients to avoid compression of the abdominal wall after implantation of a stent in the iliac artery.

[Endovascular therapy for aortic aneurysm].

Recently minimally invasive endovascular therapy using a stent graft has made significant advances in the treatment of aortic aneurysm. Eventually, five kinds of stent grafts were commercial available in Japan for the thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysm with acceptable outcomes. Initial results of stent graft are superior than those of open surgery in many cases, but further investigation for endoleak and sac behavior should attempt to determine its efficacy over a longer follow-up period.