Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Interv Neuroradiol ; : 15910199241262851, 2024 Aug 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39109531

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neuroendovascular procedures, especially those involving significant vessel tortuosity, giant intracranial aneurysms, or distally located lesions, frequently necessitate exchange methods. However, exchange maneuvers pose a risk of inadvertent vessel injury. To address these challenges, a Stabilizer device was developed and evaluated for its efficacy and safety. This clinical trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the Stabilizer device in facilitating the navigation of neuroendovascular devices to target lesions in cases where the exchange technique was necessary. METHODS: This was a single-arm, prospective, open-label, multicenter clinical trial performed at nine different sites. It focused on investigating the use of the Stabilizer device for treating intracranial aneurysms and atherosclerosis. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients were enrolled across nine centers in Japan from July 21, 2022, to March 10, 2023. The study enrolled 24 (77.4%) patients with intracranial aneurysms and seven (22.6%) patients with intracranial artery stenosis. Majority of the target lesions were in the middle cerebral artery territory (83.9%). The Stabilizer device was used to exchange for 0.027-inch catheters, intermediate catheters, PTA balloons, and Wingspan stent system. The Stabilizer device demonstrated 100% technical success rate. While three complications related to the treatment were noted, there were no complications related to the device, including any vascular damage. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first multicenter clinical trial that investigated and demonstrated technical efficacy as well as overall safety profile of the Stabilizer device in neuroendovascular procedures where the use of an exchange method was necessary.

2.
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) ; 64(8): 309-315, 2024 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38839294

RESUMEN

We reported the main results of the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy (JR-NET) 4, a nationwide surveillance of therapy (NET) in Japan from January 2015 to December 2019. JR-NET 4 registered consecutive patients who underwent NETs by Japan Society of Neuroendovascular Therapy (JSNET) -certified specialists. The primary endpoint was functional independence (mRS score of 0-2) at 30 days post-NET, with secondary endpoints focusing on technical success and major adverse events within 30 days.A total of 63,230 patients and 60,354 NET procedures from 166 participating centers were analyzed. During the study period, NET cases have consistently increased, with an increase in the proportion of elderly patients. A significant trend shift was observed in the distribution of NET procedures, with endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke that showed a dramatic increase in 5 years. This trend aligns with key randomized clinical trials from 2015 that presented the efficacy of this treatment. Clinical outcomes at 30 days posttreatment revealed that endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke and other NETs maintained safety and effectiveness despite varying prevalence of functional independence between target diseases. The study also observed a steady increase in emergency treatment cases, reflecting the increase in acute ischemic stroke, a time-sensitive medical condition.This comprehensive surveillance highlights the trend of NET practices in Japan, driven by clinical evidence and advancements in treatment devices. Although these findings were specific to Japan, they offer valuable insights into the broader trends in NETs and acute stroke care.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Japón , Procedimientos Endovasculares/tendencias , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pueblos del Este de Asia
3.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 17(9): 1148-1159, 2024 May 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749596

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness and safety of carotid artery stenting (CAS) are comparable to those of carotid endarterectomy in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis, but real-world outcomes are not well-known. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the real-world clinical outcomes of CAS in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide retrospective registry study of 156 centers between January 2015 and December 2019. We enrolled consecutive patients with CAS managed by certified specialists from the Japanese Society of Neuroendovascular Therapy. Outcomes between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients were compared. The primary outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke and all-cause death at 30 days after CAS. Secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke, all-cause death, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and procedural complications. RESULTS: We analyzed 9,792 patients (symptomatic, n = 5,351; asymptomatic, n = 4,441). The mean age was 73.5 years, and men were dominant (86.4%). Embolism protection devices were used in 99% of patients. The primary outcome was not significantly different between the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups (120 [2.2%] vs 65 [1.5%]; adjusted OR: 1.30; 95% CI: 0.92-1.83). The incidences of symptomatic ICH, any ICH, acute in-stent occlusion, and hyperperfusion syndrome were significantly more prevalent in the symptomatic group (47 [0.9%] vs 8 [0.2%], aOR: 4.41 [95% CI: 1.68-11.6]; 73 [1.4%] vs 12 [0.3%], aOR: 3.56 [95% CI: 1.71-7.39]; 45 [0.8%] vs 19 [0.4%], aOR: 2.18 [95% CI: 1.08-4.40]; and 102 [1.9%] vs 36 [0.8%], aOR: 1.78 [95% CI: 1.17-2.71], respectively). Other secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The complication rate after specialist-involved CAS at 30 days was low in real-world practice.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Asintomáticas , Estenosis Carotídea , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Sistema de Registros , Stents , Humanos , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/terapia , Estenosis Carotídea/mortalidad , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Tiempo , Factores de Riesgo , Japón , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Medición de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/etiología , Hemorragias Intracraneales/etiología
4.
J Neurol Sci ; 461: 123062, 2024 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38797138

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Existing evidence is inconclusive on whether women after carotid artery stenting (CAS) experience worse outcomes than men. METHODS: The outcomes of women and men were compared using the data from nationwide retrospective registry between 2015 and 2019. The primary outcome was the incidence of ischemic stroke and all-cause death. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of ischemic stroke, all-cause death, acute occlusion, and acute myocardial infarction. Functional outcomes were the achieving an mRS score of 0-1 and 0-2. Outcomes were assessed at 30 days after CAS. RESULTS: In total, 9792 patients (1330 women, 8862 men; mean age, 73.8 vs 73.5 years, p = 0.17) were analyzed. Symptomatic stenosis was common in men (52.0% vs. 55.1%; p = 0.03), while ≥50% stenosis after CAS was common in women (3.2% vs. 2.0%; p = 0.005). The primary outcome was no significantly difference in women and men (2.0% vs. 1.9%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 0.75-1.88).The incidence of all-cause death was higher in women (0.9% vs. 0.5%; aOR, 2.45; 95%CI, 1.11-5.39). Functional outcomes were significantly less common in women than in men (mRS0-1, 72.6% vs. 74.8%; aOR, 0.77; 95%CI, 0.63-0.95; mRS0-2, 82.1% vs. 85.6%; aOR, 0.76; 95%CI, 0.60-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that there was no significant sex differences in the incidence of ischemic stroke and all-cause death at 30 days. However, women have higher rate of all-cause death and poorer functional outcomes at 30 days than men.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea , Caracteres Sexuales , Stents , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Sistema de Registros , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores Sexuales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/epidemiología , Incidencia
5.
J Neurosurg Case Lessons ; 7(16)2024 Apr 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38621299

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In mechanical thrombectomy for tandem occlusions in vertebrobasilar stroke, distal emboli from the vertebral artery lesion should be prevented. However, no suitable embolic protection devices are currently available in the posterior circulation. Here, the authors describe the case of a vertebral artery lesion effectively treated with a closed-tip stent retriever as an embolic protection device in the posterior circulation. OBSERVATIONS: A 65-year-old male underwent mechanical thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusion, with tandem occlusion of the proximal vertebral artery. After basilar artery recanalization via the nonoccluded vertebral artery, a subsequent mechanical thrombectomy was performed for the occluded proximal vertebral artery. To prevent distal embolization of the basilar artery, an EmboTrap III stent retriever was deployed as an embolic protection device within the basilar artery to successfully capture the thrombus. LESSONS: A stent retriever with a closed-tip structure can effectively capture thrombi, making it a suitable distal embolic protection device in the posterior circulation.

6.
World Neurosurg ; 187: e453-e459, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38663734

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In carotid artery stenting (CAS) for internal carotid artery stenosis, the stent is often selected according to the plaque properties and arterial tortuosity. In our institute, an open-cell stent is used as the first-line stent regardless of the characteristics of the lesion. This study was performed to examine the outcome of CAS with an open-cell stent as the real-world results. METHODS: In total, 811 CAS procedures using open-cell stents were performed for internal carotid artery stenosis from April 2002 to December 2019. Of these patients, we excluded those with hyperacute conditions for which CAS was performed within 3 days of onset, those in whom acute mechanical thrombectomy was performed simultaneously with CAS, and those with stenosis due to arterial dissection. Thus, 734 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Perioperative and long-term outcomes and risk factors for perioperative infarction were investigated. RESULTS: The periprocedural stroke rate and mortality rate were 3.7% (27/734) and 0.4% (3/734), respectively. Low-echoic plaque was a significant risk factor for periprocedural stroke in both univariate (P < 0.03) and multivariate (odds ratio, 2.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-6.66; P = 0.02) analyses. Cerebral infarction and high grade restenosis were observed in 15 (2.0%) and 17 (2.3%) patients during a median 50-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: CAS with open-cell stents showed good results in terms of both the postoperative stroke incidence and long-term severe restenosis rate. However, low-echoic plaque was a risk factor for perioperative stroke incidence, which should be considered when deciding on the indication for CAS with an open-cell stent.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea , Stents , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/cirugía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Arteria Carótida Interna/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación
7.
J Neurol Sci ; 460: 122978, 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599028

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy (EVT) reduces functional disability in patients with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, the early neurological change after EVT may be limited in patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). METHODS: We analyzed the Japanese Registry of NeuroEndovascular Therapy (JR-NET) 4 which was a retrospective, nationwide, multicenter registry of patients with LVO between 2015 and 2019. We compared the early neurological change, efficacy and safety of EVT for acute LVO in ICAD and other etiologies. The primary outcome was NIHSS improvement ≥10 points, and secondary outcome were NIHSS worsening ≥4 points 7 days after EVT, effective reperfusion rate, 30-day functional outcomes, and safety outcomes. RESULTS: Among the 6710 enrolled patients, 610 (9.1%) had ICAD. The ICAD group was younger (mean 72.0 vs. 75.8 years) and predominantly male (63.4% vs. 56.0%), had lower NIHSS scores before EVT (median 16 vs. 18), and underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting more frequently (43.0% vs. 4.4%, 12.3% vs. 4.4%). In the ICAD group, NIHSS improvement was significantly lower (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) [95% confidence interval (95%CI)] 0.52 [0.41-0.65]), NIHSS worsening was significantly higher (aOR [95%CI] 1.76 [1.31-2.34]), and effective reperfusion was significantly lower (aOR [95%CI] 0.47 [0.36-0.60]). Fewer patients with ICAD had modified Rankin scale 0-2 at 30 days (aOR [95%CI] 0.60 [0.47-0.77]). The risk of acute reocclusion was more prominent in the ICAD group (aOR [95%CI] 4.03 [1.98-8.21]). CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in neurological severity after EVT was lower in patients with LVO and ICAD.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Arteriosclerosis Intracraneal , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Arteriosclerosis Intracraneal/cirugía , Arteriosclerosis Intracraneal/terapia , Arteriosclerosis Intracraneal/complicaciones , Arteriosclerosis Intracraneal/diagnóstico por imagen , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/cirugía , Japón/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/cirugía , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/complicaciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...