Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 8058, 2023 May 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37198400

RESUMEN

Bulk foam analysis (static test) is simple and fast, which makes it a cost-effective method for screening and ranking hundreds of surfactants being considered for foam applications. Coreflood tests (dynamic test) can also be used, but it is quite laborious and costly. However, previous reports show that ranking based on static tests sometimes differs from ranking based on dynamic tests. To date, the reason for such a discrepancy is not well understood. Some believe that it may be due to faulty experimental design while some others believe that there is no discrepancy if the right foam performance indices are used to describe and compare the results from both methods. For the first time, this study reports a systematic series of static tests conducted on different foaming solutions (with surfactant concentration ranging from 0.025 to 5 wt%) and duplicated in dynamic tests using the same core sample for all the surfactant solutions. The dynamic test was also repeated on three different rocks of a wide permeability range (26-5000 mD) for each of the surfactant solutions. Unlike previous studies, here multiple dynamic foam indices (limiting capillary pressure, apparent viscosity, trapped foam, and trapped to mobile foam ratio) were measured and compared with the performance indices measured from the static tests (foam texture and foam half-life). Dynamic tests were in total agreement with static tests for all the foam formulations. However, it was observed that the pore size of the base filter disk used in the static foam analyzer can be a potential source of conflicting results when comparing with dynamic test. This is because a threshold pore size exists above which some foam properties (apparent viscosity and trapped foam) significantly decreased compared to the properties before that threshold. Foam limiting capillary pressure is the only foam property that does not show such a trend. It also appears that such threshold occurs above a certain surfactant concentration (0.025 wt%). Apparently, it becomes imperative that the pore size of the filter disk used in the static test and the porous medium used in dynamic tests must be on the same side of the threshold point, otherwise there may be disparity in their results. The threshold surfactant concentration should also be determined. The role of these two factors (pore size and surfactant concentration) requires further investigation.

2.
ACS Omega ; 6(45): 30315-30326, 2021 Nov 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34805663

RESUMEN

The wettability of the rock-oil-brine system plays a major role in enhanced oil recovery (EOR), particularly in the harsh environments of carbonate reservoirs. Most of these formations were identified as strongly oil-wet, and sometimes a few are intermediate-wet. Hence, it is highly necessary to alter such an oil-wet rock matrix to a water-wet matrix in order to improve the oil production. Consequently, it is important to investigate the wetting and wettability dynamics of the rock-oil-brine system for both static and dynamic cases. Thus, in this study, we investigated the effect of four various imidazolium-based ionic liquids (ILs) on the wettability alteration of the rock-oil-brine system by measuring the contact angles. Herein, we have screened various parameters, such as the rock type (brine-saturated and oil-saturated), type of IL, IL concentrations (0-1000 ppm), temperature (25-100 °C), pressure (14.7-3000 psi), and salinity (TDS: 67,500-240,000 ppm). The measurement of the static contact angle was found to be altered from 85.5 to 49.4° with the addition of 500 ppm of ILs in the brine-saturated sample, and for the oil-saturated sample, it was altered from 150.9 to 99.2°. This indicates that ILs have a huge influence on shifting the rock wettability more toward water-wet, which in fact is more favorable for the EOR operation. Later, we studied the dynamic wettability alteration of the rock-oil-brine system, in which we measured the transient changes in the contact angle while displacing the brine with an IL solution in situ. It was observed that the oil droplet deformed slightly and was dragged toward the base fluid (IL solution) with time, and this implied the changes in the contact angle from 150.9 to 118.5° with 500 ppm of IL, [C12mim]+[Cl]-. Though this has a relatively lesser impact as compared to the static experiment, this could be considered to be more realistic to correlate with coreflood experiments. Further, to understand the mechanism of this wettability dynamics, we have measured the oil-water interfacial tension and the ζ-potential of various systems and observed that their results were backed up by our wettability studies. Overall, the combined forces of interfacial tension reduction, capillary alterations, and IL interactions with rocks and oils have caused this wettability alteration. Conclusively, the results of various experiments that are performed in this study are more meaningful, and it is evident that ILs favor the successful EOR implications.

3.
RSC Adv ; 11(47): 29711-29727, 2021 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35479573

RESUMEN

Foams are typically used as a divergent fluid for conformance control in order to divert the fluid flow from a high-permeable zone into a low-permeable zone. Nevertheless, the stability of the foam still remains a challenge due to the presence of antifoaming crude oil and the harsh environment of the reservoir, such as high-temperature, high-salinity, and high-pressure. In this study, we investigated the stability and efficacy of various surfactant generated foams with ionic liquid (IL) additives. Intrinsically, the study is targeted to represent the conditions of Arab-D reservoir formations, which are abundant in Saudi Arabian oilfields. In this, we have screened several parameters that influence foam stability like the type of foamer gases (CO2, N2, and air), type of ILs, type of surfactants (nonionic, anionic, cationic, and zwitterionic), concentration, salinity (formation brine, low salinity brine, and seawater brine), temperature, etc. The stability of the generated foams was analyzed in both bulk and porous scale media. The bulk foam study has demonstrated that only a very minor concentration of ILs (50-500 ppm) shows a greater improvement in both the foamability and foam stability. The stability of the foam in the presence of the studied ILs and surfactants increases by more than 50% compared to their neat surfactant solution. A similar response was also witnessed in the dynamic foaming experiments at high-temperature, high-pressure, and high-salinity. The current work also involves the determination of the foam morphology, including structure, size, shape, gas-water interface and the lamellae size for different systems with and without ILs, which helps to understand the stability mechanism of the foams with and without ILs. Confocal and optical microscopic images of the foam structure of various systems reveal that these ILs are successful in reducing the size of bubbles and increasing the lamellae size. It is very clear that the addition of ILs generates the surfactant layered-ILs, and they tend to arrange themselves in the lamellae, and at the liquid-gas interface, thereby decreasing the rate of film drainage at the lamellae and delaying the bubble rupture point. This led to the observed enhanced foam stability. Thus, we would like to conclude that the ILs investigated here improved the foam stability by their adsorption at the foam lamella which further helped in preventing liquid drainage and film thinning.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...