RESUMEN
Introduction: Drug-induced tubulointerstitial injury is a common cause of renal impairment. Since the mechanisms of drug-induced tubular injury are diverse, various treatment approaches are needed according to the pathogenesis. Renal biopsy is indispensable to determine not only the pathological diagnosis, but also the underlying mechanism, and to guide appropriate treatment. Most recently, one of the red yeast supplements has been widely highlighted as a novel cause of tubular damage, mainly in Japan and Asia. However, neither detailed pathological findings nor the mechanism of renal impairment has been sufficiently reported. Case Presentation: Two cases of renal impairment after taking red yeast supplement internally are presented. Both cases showed renal dysfunction with low uric acid, potassium, and phosphorus levels, characteristic features of Fanconi syndrome. The renal biopsy findings of both cases showed severe injury to the proximal tubules with mild inflammatory cell infiltration. The proximal tubules exhibited diffuse loss of the brush border, flattening, and tubular lumen dilation. Immunofluorescence showed no deposition of immunoglobulin and complement in the glomeruli and tubules. Electron microscopic findings indicated proximal tubular damage without crystal deposition. Moreover, immunohistochemistry using the proximal tubular marker CD10 and a marker for distal tubules including the loop of Henle, E-cadherin, collectively demonstrated that the focus of renal injury in both cases was mainly the proximal tubules. Conclusions: The red yeast rice supplement itself, its metabolized product, or other unknown contaminant components might directly induce proximal tubulopathy rather than an allergic reaction-related tubulointerstitial nephritis.
RESUMEN
Recently, several target antigens of membranous nephropathy (MN), such as phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) and exostosin 1/exostosin 2 (EXT1/2), have been discovered. A 30-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with nephrotic range proteinuria and microscopic hematuria. She was first noted to have proteinuria before pregnancy, and her proteinuria worsened in the postpartum period. A renal biopsy showed MN. Immunofluorescence microscopy showed IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, C4, and C1q depositions in the mesangial area and glomerular capillary walls (GCWs). Regarding the IgG subclass, IgG1 and IgG3 were detected on glomeruli. Electron microscopy showed subepithelial electron-dense deposits (EDDs). EDDs were also detected in paramesangial and subendothelial areas. The diagnosis of membranous lupus nephritis (MLN) was suspected, but she did not fulfill the criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Neither anti-nuclear antibody nor hypocomplementemia were detected. We further evaluated glomerular EXT1/2 expressions, which were evident on GCWs. In addition, PLA2R was also detected on GCWs, although serum antibody for PLA2R was negative. She responded to immunosuppressive therapy with decreased proteinuria. In the present case, glomerular PLA2R expression implied the possibility of primary MN. However, pathological findings with a full-house staining pattern and glomerular EXT1/2 expressions were very similar to those of lupus-associated MN. Glomerular PLA2R expression appeared not to reflect immunocomplexes of PLA2R and autoantibody when considering the results for glomerular IgG subclass and the absence of serum anti-PLA2R antibody. Collectively, it is plausible that this was a case of a relatively young postpartum female who developed latent MLN rather than primary MN.
