The Role of Risk Tolerance in a Patient's Decision to Undergo Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: A patient's decision-making process to undergo surgery is crucial for surgeons to understand for patient-counseling purposes. Total knee and hip arthroplasty, like any other major surgery, is associated with serious, sometimes life-threatening, complications. Using the results of discrete choice experiments (DCEs), we aimed to understand the relationship between a patient's risk tolerance and choosing to undergo surgery in real life. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected DCE results for 142 potential knee or hip arthroplasty clinic patients from October 2021 to March 2022. The DCE presented the patient with 2 scenarios, each of which was made up of different combinations of attributes and levels. A hierarchal Bayesian model was used to obtain a risk score that reflected the risk attributes chosen by each patient. Logistic regressions were then used to evaluate the association between a patient's willingness to incur risk and their decision to undergo a total joint arthroplasty. RESULTS: Of the 142 patients enrolled in the DCE, 89 (62.3%) underwent a total joint arthroplasty. Risk score (odds ratio [OR] = 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 6.6, P = 0.04), men (OR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.9, P = 0.028), and patients who have hip osteoarthritis (OR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.5, P = 0.036) increased the odds of undergoing arthroplasty, whereas physical function of at least 75% at the initial visit (OR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.7, P = 0.004) decreased these odds. CONCLUSIONS: We found that a patient's willingness to incur risk, lower baseline physical function, and men were all independently associated with undergoing total knee arthroplasty. We believe that these findings prompt much-needed future studies that focus solely on the relationship between patients' inherent risk behavior and surgical and patient-reported outcomes.

Acetabular Distraction: Promising 5-Year Outcomes for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Discontinuity.

BACKGROUND: Severe acetabular bone loss encountered during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) poses a clinical challenge. In cases involving pelvic discontinuity, where the ilium is separated superiorly from the inferior ischiopubic segment through the acetabulum, acetabular distraction may be used to restore the biomechanics of the hemipelvis. This technique allows for correct sizing of the acetabulum, and the subsequent peripheral distraction and medial compression at the discontinuity provide initial mechanical stability and biological fixation as bone in growth occurs. Accordingly, this study aimed to assess long-term 5-year outcomes following acetabular distraction across 2 institutions. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients who underwent revision THA in which the acetabular distraction technique was performed for the treatment of chronic pelvic discontinuity between 2002 and 2018. Demographic, operative, and clinical postoperative data were collected. Clinical endpoints included postoperative radiographic outcomes, complications requiring additional surgery, and reoperation for all causes. Only patients who had a minimum 5-year follow-up were included in this study. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients (Paprosky IIC: one patient, 6.7%; Paprosky IIIA: 5 patients, 33.3%; Paprosky IIIB: 9 patients, 60%) who had a mean follow-up time of 9 years (range, 5.1 to 13.5) were analyzed. Porous tantalum augments were used in 11 (73.3%) cases to primarily address posteriorsuperior defects (100%). There were 4 (26.7%) patients that required reoperation, only 2 of which were for indications related to the acetabular construct, leading to an overall survivorship of 86.7%. Both patients had a prior revision THA before the implementation of the distraction technique. Evidence of bridging callus formation was reported radiographically for 14 (93.3%) patients at the time of the last clinical follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: For patients who have chronic pelvic discontinuity, acetabular distraction shows promising long-term outcomes. Even so, larger multi-center studies are needed to better support the efficacy of this technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Time to Achieve the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Surgical Approaches.

BACKGROUND: Controversy remains over outcomes between total hip arthroplasty approaches. This study aimed to compare the time to achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form (HOOS-PS) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-Physical for patients who underwent anterior and posterior surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Patients from 2018 to 2021 with preoperative and postoperative HOOS-PS or PROMIS Global-Physical questionnaires were grouped by approach. Demographic and MCID achievement rates were compared, and survival curves with and without interval-censoring were used to assess the time to achieve the MCID by approach. Log-rank and weighted log-rank tests were used to compare groups, and Weibull regression analyses were performed to assess potential covariates. RESULTS: A total of 2,725 patients (1,054 anterior and 1,671 posterior) were analyzed. There were no significant differences in median MCID achievement times for either the HOOS-PS (anterior: 5.9 months, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.6 to 6.4; posterior: 4.4 months, 95% CI: 4.1 to 5.1, P = .65) or the PROMIS Global-Physical (anterior: 4.2 months, 95% CI: 3.5 to 5.3; posterior: 3.5 months, 95% CI: 3.4 to 3.8, P = .08) between approaches. Interval-censoring revealed earlier times of achieving the MCID for both the HOOS-PS (anterior: 1.509 to 1.511 months; posterior: 1.7 to 2.3 months, P = .87) and the PROMIS Global-Physical (anterior: 3.0 to 3.1 weeks; posterior: 2.7 to 3.3 weeks, P = .18) for both surgical approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The time to achieve the MCID did not differ by surgical approach. Most patients will achieve clinically meaningful improvements in physical function much earlier than previously believed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

AAHKS Surgical Techniques & Technologies Award: Inferior Screw Fixation Decreases Acetabular Component Failure Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Adjunctive screw fixation has been shown to be reliable in achieving acetabular component stability in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of inferior screw placement on acetabular component failure following revision THA. We hypothesized that inferior screw fixation would decrease acetabular failure rates. METHODS: We reviewed 250 patients who had Paprosky Type II or III defects who underwent acetabular revision between 2001 and 2021 across three institutions. Demographic factors, the number of screws, location of screw placement (superior versus inferior), use of augments and/or cup-cage constructs, Paprosky classification, and presence of discontinuity were documented. Multivariate regression was performed to identify the independent effect of inferior screw fixation on the primary outcome of aseptic rerevision of the acetabular component. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 53.4 months (range, 12 to 261), 16 patients (6.4%) required re-revision for acetabular loosening. There were 140 patients (56.0%) who had inferior screw fixation, all of whom did not have neurovascular complications during screw placement. Patients who had inferior screws had a lower rate of acetabular rerevision than those who only had superior screw fixation (2.1 versus 11.8%, P = .0030). Multivariate regression demonstrates that inferior screw fixation decreased the likelihood of rerevision for acetabular loosening when compared to superior screw fixation alone (odds ratio: 0.1, confidence interval: 0.03 to 0.5; P = .0071). No other risk factors were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Inferior screw fixation is a safe and reliable technique to reduce acetabular component failure following revision THA in cases of severe acetabular bone loss.

Acetabular Distraction Technique: A Multicenter Study With a Minimum 2-Year Radiographic Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pelvic discontinuity is a challenge during revision total hip arthroplasty due to the loss of structural continuity of the superior and inferior aspects of the acetabulum from severe acetabular bone loss. Acetabular distraction provides an alternative surgical treatment by stabilizing the acetabular component through elastic recoil of the pelvis, which may be supplemented with modular porous augments for addressing major acetabular defects. This study reports 2-year radiographic findings following acetabular distraction for the treatment of chronic pelvic discontinuity. METHODS: Patients undergoing acetabular distraction performed by 5 surgeons from 2002 to 2021 were identified across 5 institutions. Demographic, surgical, and postoperative outcomes, including radiographic component stability, were recorded. There were 53 of 91 (58.2%) patients (5 deceased, 33 lost to follow-up) consisting of 4 Paprosky IIC (7.5%), 8 Paprosky IIIA (15.1%), and 41 Paprosky IIIB (77.4%) defects included, with a mean follow-up time of 4.8 years (range, 2 to 13.5). Modular porous augments were used in 33 (62.3%) cases. Failure was defined as a subsequent revision of the acetabular construct. RESULTS: Among the 13 (24.5%) patients who returned to the operating room, 6 (46.2%) had a prior history of revision total hip arthroplasty before undergoing acetabular distraction. Only 5 (9.4%) patients underwent acetabular revision following acetabular distraction, leading to an overall cup survivorship of 90.6%. Of the remaining 48 patients, 46 (95.8%) had evidence of radiographic bridging callus of the chronic pelvic discontinuity at their last clinical follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, in the largest series to date, acetabular distraction has proven to be a viable treatment for acetabular bone loss with a chronic pelvic discontinuity, with excellent early survivorship and radiographic evidence of bridging callus. Future studies with longer follow-ups are needed to further monitor the efficacy of this technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

Diagnostic Test Performances for Identifying Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip Hemiarthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) that is not well-represented in the literature. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate diagnostic markers for identifying PJI in patients after HHA and compare them with the most recent 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection criteria. METHODS: A total of 98 patients (64 PJIs, 65.3%) were analyzed. Patients were identified by relevant Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases-9/10 codes from 2000 to 2021 across a single healthcare system. Preoperative or intraoperative synovial fluid nucleated cell (NC) count, synovial polymorphonuclear (PMN) percentage, serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum C-reactive protein (CRP), and serum white blood cell count were compared with Student t -test between aseptic and septic cohorts. Diagnostic utility and laboratory cutoff values were determined using receiver-operating characteristic curves and Youden index, respectively. RESULTS: Mean values were significantly higher in the septic cohort for synovial NC count (120,992.2 versus 1,498.0 cells/µL, P < 0.001), synovial PMN percentage (91.3% versus 56.2%, P < 0.001), serum ESR (75.6 versus 36.3 mm/hr, P < 0.001), serum CRP (20.2 versus 125.8 mg/L, P < 0.001), and serum white blood cell count (8.5 versus 11.5 cells/µL, P < 0.001). Synovial NC count, synovial PMN percentage, and serum CRP had excellent PJI discriminatory ability with an area under the curve of 0.99, 0.90, and 0.93, respectively. Optimal cutoffs were 2,700 cells/µL for synovial NC count (100% sensitivity and 94% specificity), 81.0% for synovial PMN percentage (96% sensitivity and 89% specificity), 52.0 mm/hr for serum ESR (75% sensitivity and 80% specificity), and 40.0 mg/L for serum CRP (85% sensitivity and 92% specificity). CONCLUSION: Our findings support the continued use of routine serum and synovial fluid tests for diagnosing PJI in HHA patients. Optimal cutoff values for both synovial fluid biomarkers were very close in alignment with the 2018 International Consensus Meeting criteria. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Mental Health Effects on the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: The effect of mental health on patient-reported outcome measures is not fully understood in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Thus, we investigated the relationship between mental health diagnoses (MHDs) and the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Improvement (MCID-I) and Worsening (MCID-W) in primary TJA and revision TJA (rTJA). METHODS: Retrospective data were collected using relevant Current Procedural Terminology and MHDs International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes with completed Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form, Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Physical Function Short Form 10a, PROMIS Global-Mental, or PROMIS Global-Physical questionnaires. Logistic regressions and statistical analyses were used to determine the effect of a MHD on MCID-I/MCID-W rates. RESULTS: Data included 4,562 patients (4,190 primary TJAs/372 rTJAs). In primary total hip arthroplasty (pTHA), MHD-affected outcomes for Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form (MCID-I: 81% versus 86%, P = 0.007; MCID-W: 6.0% versus 3.2%, P = 0.008), Physical Function Short Form 10a (MCID-I: 68% versus 77%, P < 0.001), PROMIS Global-Mental (MCID-I: 38% versus 44%, P = 0.009), and PROMIS Global-Physical (MCID-I: 61% versus 73%, P < 0.001; MCID-W: 14% versus 7.9%, P < 0.001) versus pTHA patients without MHD. A MHD led to lower rates of MCID-I for PROMIS Global-Physical (MCID-I: 56% versus 63%, P = 0.003) in primary total knee arthroplasty patients. No effects from a MHD were observed in rTJA patients. DISCUSSION: The presence of a MHD had a prominent negative influence on pTHA patients. Patients who underwent rTJA had lower MCID-I rates, higher MCID-W rates, and lower patient-reported outcome measure scores despite less influence from a MHD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Patients Consistently Report Worse Outcomes Following Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between primary TKA (pTKA) and revision TKA (rTKA) have not been well-studied. Therefore, we compared pTKA and rTKA patients by the rates of achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Improvement (MCID-I) and Worsening (MCID-W). METHODS: A total of 2,448 patients (2,239 pTKAs/209 rTKAs) were retrospectively studied. Patients who completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Short Form 10a (PF10a), PROMIS Global-Mental, or PROMIS Global-Physical questionnaires were identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Patient-reported outcome measures and MCID-I/MCID-W rates were compared. Multivariate logistic regression models measured relationships between surgery type and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Patients who underwent rTKA (all causes) had lower rates of improvement and higher rates of worsening compared to pTKA patients for KOOS-PS (MCID-I: 54 versus 68%, P < .001; MCID-W: 18 versus 8.6%, P < .001), PF10a (MCID-I: 44 versus 65%, P < .001; MCID-W: 22 versus 11%, P < .001), PROMIS Global-Mental (MCID-I: 34 versus 45%, P = .005), and PROMIS Global-Physical (MCID-I: 51 versus 60%, P = .014; MCID-W: 29 versus 14%, P < .001). Undergoing revision was predictive of worsening postoperatively for KOOS-PS, PF10a, and PROMIS Global-Physical compared to pTKA. Postoperative scores were significantly higher for all 4 PROMs following pTKA. CONCLUSION: Patients reported significantly less improvement and higher rates of worsening following rTKA, particularly for PROMs that assessed physical function. Although pTKA patients did better overall, the improvement rates may be considered relatively low and should prompt discussions on improving outcomes following pTKA and rTKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Does the Primary Surgical Approach Matter When Choosing the Approach for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Multiple surgical approaches are used for primary total hip arthroplasty (pTHA) and revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). This study sought to investigate prevalence of discordance of pTHA and rTHA surgical approaches and to evaluate how approach concordance impacts postoperative outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent rTHA from 2000 to 2021 was conducted at 3 large urban academic centers. Patients who had minimum 1-year follow-up post-rTHA were included and grouped based on whether they received pTHA via a posterior (PA), direct anterior (DA), or laterally based (DL) approach, and by concordance of index rTHA approach with their pTHA approach. Of the 917 patients studied, 839 (91.5%) were included in the concordant cohort and 78 (8.5%) in the discordant cohort. Patient demographics, operative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Discordance was most prevalent in the DA-pTHA subset (29.5%), compared to the DL-pTHA subset (14.7%) or PA-pTHA subset (3.7%). Discordance varied significantly between primary approaches among all revisions, with DA-pTHA patients having the highest discordance rate for patients revised for aseptic loosening (46.3%, P < .001), fracture (22.2%, P < .001), and dislocation (33.3%, P < .001). There were no differences between groups in dislocation rate, re-revision for infection, or re-revision for fracture. CONCLUSION: The results of this multicenter study showed patients who received pTHA via the DA were more likely to receive rTHA via a discordant approach compared to other primary approaches. Since approach concordance did not impact dislocation, infection, or fracture rates after rTHA, surgeons can feel reassured using a separate approach for rTHA. LEVEL III EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Perceptions of social media utilization among orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons.

BACKGROUND: The growing social media presence in healthcare has provided physicians with new ways to engage with patients. However, foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons have been found to underuse social media platforms despite their known benefits for patients and surgeons. Thus, this study sought to investigate the reasons for this phenomenon and to identify potential barriers to social media utilization in clinical practice. METHODS: A 19-question survey was distributed to active attending physicians identified through the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society membership database. The survey included demographic, practice characteristics, and social media use questions assessed by a 5-point Likert scale. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of positive attitudes toward social media. RESULTS: Fifty-eight surgeons were included. Most respondents were male (n = 43, 74.1%), in private practice (n = 31, 53.5%), and described their practice to be greater than 51% elective procedures (n = 46, 79.4%). The average years in practice was 14.8 years (standard deviation, SD: 10.0 years). A total of 32.8% (n = 19) of surgeons reported using social media as part of their clinical practice. Facebook (n = 19, 32.8%), a professional website or blog (n = 18, 31.0%), and LinkedIn (n = 15, 25.9%) were the most used platforms-primarily for practice marketing or brand development (n = 19, 32.8%). A total of 58.6% (n = 34) of surgeons reported they did not use social media. The primary reasons were the time commitment (n = 31, 53.5%), concerns about obscuring professional boundaries (n = 22, 37.9%), and concerns regarding confidentiality (n = 11, 19.0%). Many surgeons reported that social media positively influences foot and ankle surgery (n = 23, 39.7%), although no individual predictors for these views could be identified. CONCLUSIONS: Foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeons tended to view social media use positively, but the time investment and concerns over professionalism and confidentiality pose challenges to its use. Given the influence of a surgeon's social media identity on patient satisfaction and practice building, efforts should be made to streamline social media use for foot and ankle surgeons to establish their online presence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, cross-sectional study.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Demonstrate Less Improvement and Significantly Higher Rates of Worsening Compared to Primaries.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide the patient's perspective following total hip arthroplasty (THA), although differences between primary THA (pTHA) and revision THA (rTHA) remain unclear. Thus, we compared the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Improvement (MCID-I) and Worsening (MCID-W) in pTHA and rTHA patients. METHODS: Data from 2,159 patients (1,995 pTHAs/164 rTHAs) who had completed Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short Form (HOOS-PS), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Short Form 10a (PF10a), PROMIS Global-Mental, or PROMIS Global-Physical questionnaires were analyzed. The PROMs and MCID-I/MCID-W rates were compared using statistical tests and multivariate logistic regressions. RESULTS: Compared to the pTHA group, the rTHA group had lower rates of improvement and higher rates of worsening for almost all PROMs, including HOOS-PS (MCID-I: 54 versus 84%, P < .001; MCID-W: 24 versus 4.4%, P < .001), PF10a (MCID-I: 44 versus 73%, P < .001; MCID-W: 22 versus 5.9%, P < .001), PROMIS Global-Mental (MCID-W: 42 versus 28%, P < .001), and PROMIS Global-Physical (MCID-I: 41 versus 68%, P < .001; MCID-W: 26 versus 11%, P < .001). Odds ratios supported rates of worsening following revision for the HOOS-PS (Odds Ratio (OR): 8.25, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 5.62 to 12.4, P < .001), PF10a (OR: 8.34, 95% CI: 5.63 to 12.6, P < .001), PROMIS Global-Mental (OR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.41 to 3.34, P < .001), and PROMIS Global-Physical (OR: 3.69, 95% CI: 2.46 to 5.62, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients reported higher rates of worsening and lower rates of improvement following rTHA than pTHA, with significantly less score improvement and lower postoperative scores for all PROMs after revision. Most patients reported improvements following pTHA, with few worsening postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Postoperative Outcomes in Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty for Patients Who Have Multiple Myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Advancements in oncologic care have increased the longevity of patients who have multiple myeloma, although outcomes beyond the early postoperative period following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain unknown. This study investigated the influence of preoperative factors on implant survivorship following THA and TKA after a minimum 1-year interval for multiple myeloma patients. METHODS: Using our institutional database, we identified 104 patients (78 THAs, 26 TKAs) from 2000 to 2021 diagnosed with multiple myeloma before their index arthroplasty by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions (ICD-9 and ICD-10) codes 203.0× and C90.0× and corresponding Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Demographic data, oncologic treatments, and operative variables were collected. Multivariate logistic regressions assessed variables of interest, and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate implant survival. RESULTS: There were 9 (11.5%) patients who underwent revision THA after an average time of 1,312 days (range, 14 to 5,763), with infection (33.3%), periprosthetic fracture (22.2%), and instability (22.2%) being the most common indications. Of these patients, 3 (33.3%) underwent multiple revision surgeries. There was 1 (3.8%) patient who underwent revision TKA at 74 days postoperatively for infection. Patients treated with radiotherapy were more likely to require revision THA (odds Rratio (OR): 6.551, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.148-53.365, P = .045), but no predictors of failure were identified for TKA patients. CONCLUSION: Orthopaedic surgeons should know that multiple myeloma patients have a relatively high risk of revision, particularly following THA. Accordingly, patients who have risk factors for failure should be identified preoperatively to avoid poor outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Visceral Fat as a Risk Factor for Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Visceral obesity, a strong indicator of chronic inflammation and impaired metabolic health, has been shown to be associated with poor postoperative outcomes and complications. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between visceral fat area (VFA) and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients. METHODS: A retrospective study of 484 patients who had undergone a total hip or knee arthroplasty was performed. All patients had a computed tomography scan of the abdomen/pelvis within two years of their TJA. Body composition data (ie, VFA, subcutaneous fat area, and skeletal muscle area) were calculated at the Lumbar-3 vertebral level via two fully automated and externally validated machine learning algorithms. A multivariable logistic model was created to determine the relationship between VFA and PJI, while accounting for other PJI risk factors. Of the 484 patients, 31 (6.4%) had a PJI complication. RESULTS: The rate of PJI among patients with VFA in the top quartile (> 264.1 cm2) versus bottom quartile (< 82.6 cm2) was 5.6% versus 10.6% and 18.8% versus 2.7% in the total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty cohorts, respectively. In the multivariate model, total knee arthroplasty patients with a VFA in the top quartile had a 30.5 times greater risk of PJI than those in the bottom quartile of VFA (P = .0154). CONCLUSION: VFA may have a strong association with PJI in TJA patients. Using a standardized imaging modality like computed tomography scans to calculate VFA can be a valuable tool for surgeons when assessing risk of PJI.

A Matched Comparison of the Rates of Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference Following Conversion and Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are often lower following conversion total hip arthroplasty (cTHA) compared to matched primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) controls. However, the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for any PROMs are yet to be analyzed for cTHA. This study aimed to (1) determine if patients undergoing cTHA achieve primary THA-specific 1-year PROM MCIDs at comparable rates to matched controls undergoing primary THA and (2) establish 1-year MCID values for specific PROMs following cTHA. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted using 148 cases of cTHA which were matched 1:2 to 296 primary THA patients. Previously defined anchor values for 2 PROM measures in primary THA were used to compare cTHA to primary THA, while novel cTHA-specific MCID values for 2 PROMs were calculated through a distribution method. Predictors of achieving the MCID of PROMs were analyzed through multivariate logistic regressions. RESULTS: Conversion THA was associated with decreased odds of achieving the primary THA-specific 1-year Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement PROM (Odds Ratio: 0.319, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.182-0.560, P < .001) and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Short-Form-10a PROM (Odds Ratio: 0.531, 95% Confidence Interval: 0.313-0.900, P = .019) MCIDs in reference to matched primary THA patients. Less than 60% of cTHA patients achieved an MCID. The 1-year MCID of the Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement and Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Short-Form-10a specific to cTHA were +10.71 and +4.68, respectively. CONCLUSION: While cTHA is within the same diagnosis-related group as primary THA, patients undergoing cTHA have decreased odds of achieving 1-year MCIDs of primary THA-specific PROMs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Utility of Diagnostic Markers in Late Periprosthetic Joint Infection Workup for Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Who Received Antibiotics 48 Hours Before Aspiration.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains challenging despite recent advancements in testing and evolving criteria over the last decade. Moreover, the effects of antibiotic use on diagnostic markers are not fully understood. Thus, this study sought to determine the influence of antibiotic use within 48 hours before knee aspiration on synovial and serum laboratory values for suspected late PJI. METHODS: Patients who underwent a TKA and subsequent knee arthrocentesis for PJI workup at least 6 weeks after their index arthroplasty were reviewed across a single healthcare system from 2013 to 2020. Median synovial white blood cell (WBC) count, synovial polymorphonuclear (PMN) percentage, serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum C-reactive protein (CRP), and serum WBC count were compared between immediate antibiotic and nonantibiotic PJI groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Youden's index were used to determine test performance and diagnostic cutoffs for the immediate antibiotics group. RESULTS: The immediate antibiotics group had significantly more culture-negative PJIs than the no antibiotics group (38.1 versus 16.2%, P = .0124). Synovial WBC count demonstrated excellent discriminatory ability for late PJI in the immediate antibiotics group (area under curve, AUC = 0.97), followed by synovial PMN percentage (AUC = 0.88), serum CRP (AUC = 0.86), and serum ESR (AUC = 0.82). CONCLUSION: Antibiotic use immediately preceding knee aspiration should not preclude the utility of synovial and serum lab values for the diagnosis of late PJI. Instead, these markers should be considered thoroughly during infection workup considering the high rate of culture-negative PJI in these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Sarcopenia is an independent risk factor for failure to achieve the 1-year MCID of the KOOS, JR and PROMIS PF-SF10a after TKA.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia, which is a progressive and multifactorial condition of decreased muscle strength, has been identified as an independent predictor for falls, revision, infection, and readmissions following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but its association to patient reported outcomes (PROMs) is less studied. The aim of this study is to determine if sarcopenia and other measures of body composition are correlated with ability to achieve the 1-year minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the KOOS JR and PROMIS-PF-SF10a following primary TKA. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective case-control study was performed. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients over the age of 18 undergoing primary TKA, body composition metrics determined by computed tomography (CT), and available pre- and post-operative PROM scores. Predictors of achievement of the 1-year MCID of the KOOS JR and PROMIS PF-SF-10a were determined through a multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: 140 primary TKAs met inclusion criteria. 74 (52.85%) patients achieved the 1-year KOOS, JR MCID and 108 (77.41%) patients achieved the 1-year MCID for the PROMIS PF-SF10a. Sarcopenia was independently associated with decreased odds of achieving the MCID of both the KOOS, JR (OR 0.31, 95%CI 0.10-0.97, p = 0.04) and the PROMIS-PF-SF10a (OR 0.32, 95%CI 0.12-0.85, p = 0.02) CONCLUSIONS: In our study, sarcopenia was independently associated with increased odds of failure to achieve the 1-year MCID of the KOOS, JR and PROMIS PF-SF10a after TKA. Early identification of sarcopenic patients may be beneficial for arthroplasty surgeons so that targeted nutritional counseling and exercises can be recommended prior to TKA.

Trabecular metal augments in severe malignancy-associated acetabular bone loss.

INTRODUCTION: Acetabular reconstruction is a challenging problem in orthopaedic oncology, especially in extended defects (Paprosky Type 3A and Type 3B). In revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), 1 option is trabecular metal (TM) augments with a porous metal acetabular component. This study evaluated the use of TM augments in periacetabular malignant bone disease. METHODS: 15 patients were identified from our institutional database from 2000 to 2020 with either Paprosky Type 3A or Type 3B acetabular bone loss due to periacetabular malignancies that underwent at least 1 complex THA reconstruction with TM augments. Postoperative complications were documented, and clinical and radiographic outcomes were analysed. Radiological loosening or revision of the acetabular component were defined as endpoints. RESULTS: There were 7 primary and 8 metastatic cancer patients. 5 were Type 3A and 10 were Type 3B defects after tumour resection. The average follow-up time was 23.8 (range 1.5-47) months. 1 patient required revision for acetabular component loosening after 7 months from the initial implantation. An additional 4 patients required surgical intervention for infection, they had stable TM augments at latest follow-up. CONCLUSION: TM augments with a porous metal acetabular component may be an alternative to the traditional cemented constructs.

Dislocation After Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Periprosthetic Joint Infections of the Hip.

BACKGROUND: Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a common treatment option for hip periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, noninfectious outcomes of DAIR such as instability are not well reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate risk factors for hip dislocation post-DAIR for PJI of both primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified all patients who underwent DAIR of a primary or revision THA over a 20-year period with a minimum 1-year follow-up. A total of 151 patients met inclusion criteria, 19.9% of whom had a post-DAIR dislocation. Demographic and intraoperative variables were obtained. Patients who had modular components exchanged during DAIR to those with increased offset, increased "jump distance", or a more stable acetabular liner were defined as patients who had "components exchanged to increase stability." Predictors of hip dislocation post-DAIR were inserted into a multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: Post-DAIR dislocation rates were 16.3% in primary THAs and 25.4% in revision THAs. In patients who had "components exchanged to increase stability" during hip DAIR, there was at least an 11-fold reduction (1/odds ratio (OR), 0.09) in dislocation risk compared to patients who had no components altered during modular component exchange during hip DAIR (OR, 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.44; P < .001), while a 13-fold increased dislocation risk was seen in patients with a history of neuromuscular disease (OR, 13.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.73-104.09; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: During DAIR of hip PJI, surgeons should consider prophylactically exchanging components to increase stability even if components appear stable intraoperatively.

The Performance of Diagnostic Tests for Identifying Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Failed Partial Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and patello-femoral arthroplasty are expanding. Despite the lower published infection rates for UKA and patello-femoral arthroplasty than total knee arthroplasty, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a devastating complication and diagnostic thresholds for commonly utilized tests have not been investigated recently. Thus, this study evaluated if diagnostic thresholds for PJI in patients who had a failed partial knee arthroplasty (PKA) align more closely with previously reported thresholds specific to UKA or the 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection. METHODS: We identified 109 knees in 100 patients that underwent PKA with eventual conversion to total knee arthroplasty within a single healthcare system from 2000 to 2021. Synovial fluid nucleated cell count and synovial polymorphonuclear percentage in addition to preoperative serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum C-reactive protein, and serum white blood cell count were compared with Student's t-tests between septic and aseptic cases. Receiver operating characteristic curves and Youden's index were used to assess diagnostic performance and the optimal cutoff point of each test. RESULTS: Synovial nucleated cell count, synovial polymorphonuclear percentage, and serum C-reactive protein demonstrated excellent discrimination for diagnosing PJI with an area under the curve of 0.97 and lower cutoff values than the previously determined UKA specific criteria. Serum erythrocyte sedimentation rateESR demonstrated good ability with an area under the curve of 0.89. CONCLUSION: Serum and synovial fluid diagnostic thresholds for PJI in PKAs align more closely with the thresholds established by the 2018 International Consensus Meeting as compared to previously proposed thresholds specific to UKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.