Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labor does not always improve maternal satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labor with bupivacaine and fentanyl provides more satisfaction to mothers than intermittent bolus epidural analgesia or patient-controlled epidural analgesia with plain bupivacaine. METHODS: Ninety mothers with term, uncomplicated pregnancies were randomized to receive intermittent bolus epidural analgesia (bupivacaine + fentanyl), patient-controlled epidural analgesia (bupivacaine + fentanyl), or patient-controlled epidural analgesia (bupivacaine). Pain during labor was evaluated with a visual analog scale. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were recorded. After delivery, the mothers were given a questionnaire covering the following themes: experience of labor pain, feeling of control, fears and expectations associated with pregnancy/with delivery/with becoming a mother, as well as pain, physical condition and emotions after delivery. To elaborate on these answers, 30 mothers were further randomized to a semistructured interview, in which the same topics were discussed. The main outcome measure was maternal satisfaction. RESULTS: The intermittent bolus epidural analgesia group felt they could influence labor most (p = 0.03), and in the interview they expressed most satisfaction. In this group, the total drug utilization was smallest (bupivacaine: p <0.0001 comparing all groups, fentanyl: p = 0.03 comparing the two fentanyl-receiving groups). No differences in pain occurred. Vomiting (p = 0.04) and pruritus (p <0.0001) were more common or more severe in the groups receiving fentanyl. CONCLUSIONS: We found no advantages for patient-controlled epidural analgesia over intermittent bolus epidural analgesia in terms of maternal satisfaction.

Pharmacokinetics of deramciclane, a novel anxiolytic agent, after intravenous and oral administration.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Deramciclane is a new compound that has shown anxiolytic effects in animal experiments and in human studies. The aim of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of deramciclane after intravenous and oral administration, and its oral bioavailability. METHODS: Deramciclane 30 mg was given intravenously and orally as a tablet and as solution in an open, randomised, crossover three-period trial to 12 healthy male volunteers. Oral bioavailability of deramciclane and the pharmacokinetic parameters of deramciclane and N-desmethylderamciclane, the principal metabolite, were determined after intravenous and oral administration of the parent drug. RESULTS: The first and second distribution half-lives (mean +/- SD) of deramciclane were 0.04 +/- 0.01 and 3.03 +/- 0.50h, respectively, and the half-life of the elimination phase was 26.6 +/- 5.5h. The clearance of deramciclane after an intravenous dose was 0.24 +/- 0.10 L/kg. The elimination phase half-life of N-desmethylderamciclane was 38.2 +/- 6.9h after intravenous and about 25 h after oral dosing of the parent compound. The mean oral bioavailability of deramciclane was 44% (range 27-58%) and 36% (23-50%) after administration of the oral solution and tablet, respectively. Deramciclane was well tolerated even after a 30 mg intravenous dose resulting in peak plasma concentrations 10 times higher than observed after its oral administration. CONCLUSIONS: After intravenous administration, the pharmacokinetics of deramciclane are adequately described by a three-compartment model. After oral administration its pharmacokinetics follow a two-compartment model with first-order absorption. The elimination phase half-life of the parent compound is similar after intravenous and oral administration, whereas the apparent half-life of N-desmethylderamciclane is longer after intravenous than after oral administration of the parent compound. The oral bioavailability of deramciclane is large and uniform enough to allow its clinical use as tablets.

The analgesic action of dexmedetomidine--a novel alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist--in healthy volunteers.

The analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine (DEX)--a novel alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist--was studied in man. Single intravenous doses of fentanyl (FEN; 2 micrograms/kg), DEX (0.25, 0.50 and 1.0 micrograms/kg) and placebo were administered to 5 healthy male volunteers in a double-blind, crossover study in randomized order. The analgesic effect of the different treatments was measured by determining the time course of pain threshold with dental dolorimetry and by quantitating subjective pain induced by a standard ischemic pain stimulus on the upper arm using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The drugs were generally well tolerated. FEN and DEX both had analgesic effects on ischemic pain, which was seen as a statistically significant decrease in subjective VAS ratings. FEN appeared to be more effective than DEX; the difference was not, however, statistically significant. Neither of the drugs affected the pain threshold measurements.