Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS One ; 17(4): e0267242, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35439247

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This article describes the Personalized Reimbursement Model (PRM) program methodology, limitations, achievement and perspectives in using real-world data of cancer drugs use to improve and personalize drug pricing and reimbursement in France. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PRM platform aggregates Electronic Pharmacy Records (EPR) data from French medical centers (PRM centers) to build retrospective cohorts of patients treated with injectable cancer drugs in a hospital setting. Data extracted on January 1st, 2020, from breast cancer (BC) patients who received trastuzumab, trastuzumab emtansin or pertuzumab since January 1st, 2011, and from lung cancer (LC) patients who received bevacizumab or atezolizumab since January 1st, 2015, enabled recovering their injectable cancer drugs history from diagnosis date until December 30th, 2019, and served as dataset for assessment. RESULTS: 123 PRM centers provided data from 30,730 patients (25,660 BC and 5,070 LC patients respectively). Overall, 20,942 (82%) of BC and 4,716 (93%) of LC patients were analyzed. Completion rate was above 98% for patients characteristics, diagnostic and treatment related data. PRM centers cover 48% and 33% of BC and LC patients in-hospital therapeutic management in France, respectively. Distribution of BC and LC patients therapeutic management, by medical center category and geographic location, was similar in PRM centers to all French medical centers, ensuring the representativeness of the PRM platform. CONCLUSION: PRM Platform enabled building a national database generating on demand Real-World Evidence based on EPR. This enabled the first performance-based risk-sharing arrangements based on PRM data, between the CEPS and Roche, for atezolizumab cancer immunotherapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer indication.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias de la Mama , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trastuzumab/uso terapéutico
2.
Eur J Cancer ; 141: 209-217, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33176232

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a growing need for real-world data on cancer treatments usage, especially to assess compliance with recommendations. We developed a French project using hospital data to analyse evolution in the therapeutic strategies implemented in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressed (HER2+) breast cancer (BC) and exposed to injectable HER2-targeted therapies, i.e. trastuzumab, pertuzumab or trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 26,350 women with BC were extracted in September 2018 from the Electronic Pharmacy Record systems of 120 French randomly recruited hospitals. Evolution in the treatments used, and combination regimens were described from 2011, in accordance with the BC stage and treatment line. RESULTS: Overall, 21,119 patients treated since 2011 were analysed: 16,398 patients with early BC (eBC) and 6030 patients with metastatic BC (mBC) including patients treated at both stages. In eBC, 89.2% of patients received trastuzumab combined with at least taxanes (trastuzumab-taxane-anthracycline: 62.6%). Patients with mBC were treated in the first line (80.3%) and/or the second line (40.1%) and/or ≥ the third line (28.3%). After its approval in 2014, pertuzumab was first used in first-line therapy combinations in 67.4% of the total cases, while trastuzumab-taxane decreased from 47.2% to 9.2%. Similarly, T-DM1 was used as the second-line treatment in 53.8% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Given recent changes in available treatments for patients with HER2+ BC, this large French project provides robust information on real-world evolution in therapeutic strategies. Our data suggest there is room for significant improvement in optimal drug utilisation. Such data will be useful to build drug-related indicators for future value-based pricing solutions.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/tendencias , Trastuzumab/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/métodos , Receptor ErbB-2/antagonistas & inhibidores , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
3.
J Hepatol ; 57(3): 564-71, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22613001

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed at determining the effect of maintenance therapy with ribavirin alone, after a year of combined peginterferon-alfa 2a (PegIFNα-2a) and ribavirin therapy, on viral response and liver histology after liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: Hundred and one patients with recurrent HCV and a minimum of stage 1 fibrosis (METAVIR scoring), 1-5years after LT, were enrolled. PegIFNα-2a and ribavirin were initiated at 90 µg/wk and 600 mg/d, respectively, then increased or adjusted as a function of tolerance. At 12 months, combination therapy was discontinued and patients were randomized to ribavirin or placebo for a further 12 months. Growth factor use was permitted. RESULTS: At 18 months, a sustained virological response (SVR) was obtained in 47.9% of patients in Per Protocol (PP) analysis, and was higher in patients with genotype 2 or 3 than in patients with genotype 1 or 4, in patients with genotypes 1+4 receiving ciclosporine than in those receiving tacrolimus, in patients with worse renal function, in those having received EPO, in patients with lower weight, and in those with lower viral load at 3 months. Using logistic regression, only the early viral response, recipient weight and renal function were independently associated with better SVR. SVR, viral load, activity, and fibrosis scores were similar, at M18 and M30, in patients randomized to ribavirin, or to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: A PP SVR was achieved in 47.9% of patients with established recurrent hepatitis C after LT. Maintenance therapy with ribavirin alone does not improve the virological response or the histological parameters.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Interferón-alfa/uso terapéutico , Polietilenglicoles/uso terapéutico , Ribavirina/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Femenino , Genotipo , Hepacivirus/fisiología , Hepatitis C/complicaciones , Hepatitis C/patología , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Interferón-alfa/efectos adversos , Riñón/fisiología , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/patología , Trasplante de Hígado , Modelos Logísticos , Quimioterapia de Mantención , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Placebos/uso terapéutico , Polietilenglicoles/efectos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes/efectos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia , Ribavirina/efectos adversos , Tacrolimus/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Viral
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...