RESUMEN
Interactions between the gut microbiota and host immunity are sophisticated, dynamic, and host-dependent. Scientists have recently conducted research showing that disturbances in the gut bacterial community can lead to a decrease in some metabolites and, consequently, to behaviors such as depression. Exposure to stressors dropped the relative abundance of bacteria in the genus Bacteroides while soaring the relative abundance of bacteria in the genus Clostridium, Coprococcus, Dialister, and Oscillibacter, which were also reduced in people with depression. Microbiota and innate immunity are in a bilateral relationship. The gut microbiota has been shown to induce the synthesis of antimicrobial proteins such as catalysidins, type C lectins, and defensins. Probiotic bacteria can modulate depressive behavior through GABA signaling. The gut microbiome produces essential metabolites such as neurotransmitters, tryptophan metabolites, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) that can act on the CNS. In the case of dysbiosis, due to mucin changes, the ratio of intestinal-derived molecules may change and contribute to depression. Psychotropics, including Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001, Clostridium butyricum CBM588, and Lactobacillus acidophilus, have mental health benefits, and can have a positive effect on the host-brain relationship, and have antidepressant effects. This article reviews current studies on the association between gut microbiota dysbiosis and depression. Comprehensively, these findings could potentially lead to novel approaches to improving depressive symptoms via gut microbiota alterations, including probiotics, prebiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Deficient DNA mismatch repair (MMR) can cause microsatellite instability (MSI) and is more common in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Understanding the carcinogenic mechanism of bacteria and their impact on cancer cells is crucial. Bacteroides fragilis (B. fragilis) has been identified as a potential promoter of tumorigenesis through the alteration of signaling pathways. This study aims to assess the expression levels of msh2, msh6, mlh1, and the relative frequency of B. fragilis in biopsy samples from CRC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the sequence of mlh1, msh2, and msh6 genes, B. fragilis specific 16srRNA and bacterial universal 16srRNA specific primers were selected, and the expression levels of the target genes were analyzed using the Real-Time PCR method. RESULTS: Significant increases in the expression levels of mlh1, msh2, and msh6 genes were observed in the cancer group. Additionally, the expression of these MMR genes showed a significant elevation in samples positive for B. fragilis presence. The relative frequency of B. fragilis in the cancer group demonstrated a significant rise compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest a potential correlation between the abundance of B. fragilis and alterations in the expression of MMR genes. Since these genes can play a role in modifying colon cancer, investigating microbial characteristics and gene expression changes in CRC could offer a viable solution for CRC diagnosis.
