Genomic and transcriptomic landscape of HER2-low breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Novel agents have expanded the traditional HER2 definitions to include HER2-Low (HER2L) Breast Cancer (BC). We sought to evaluate the distinct molecular characteristics of HER2L BC to understand potential clinical/biologic factors driving resistance and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed on 13,613 BC samples, tested at Caris Life Sciences via NextGen DNA/RNA Sequencing. BC subtypes were defined by IHC/ISH. CODEai database was used to access clinical outcomes from insurance claims data. RESULTS: Overall, mutational landscape was similar between HER2L and classical subsets of HR+and HRneg cohorts. TP53 mutations were significantly higher in HRneg/HER2L group vs. HR+/HER2L tumors (p<0.001). A higher mutation rate of PIK3CA was observed in HRneg/HER2L tumors compared to TNBC subtype (p=0.016). PD-L1 positivity was elevated in HRneg/HER2L tumors compared to HR+/HER2L tumors, all p<0.01. Patients with HR+/HER2L tumors treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors had similar OS compared to pts with HR+/HER2-0 (HR=0.89, p=0.012). 27.2% of HR+/HER2L pts had activating PIK3CA mutations. Among HR+PIK3CA mutated tumors, HER2L pts treated with alpelisib showed no difference in OS vs. HER2-0 alpelisib-treated pts (HR=1.23, p=0.517). 13.9% of HER2L TNBC pts were PD-L1+. Interestingly, pts with PD-L1+ HER2L/HRneg (TNBC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) showed improved OS than HER2-0 TNBC (HR=0.61, p=0.046). CONCLUSION: Our findings expand the understanding of the molecular profile of the HER2L subgroup and comparison to the classically defined breast cancer subgroups. Genomic risk assessments after progression on novel therapeutics can be assessed to better define implications for mechanisms of resistance.

Imlunestrant, an Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, as Monotherapy and in Combination With Targeted Therapy in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Phase Ia/Ib EMBER Study.

PURPOSE: Imlunestrant is a next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader designed to deliver continuous ER target inhibition, including in ESR1-mutant breast cancer. This phase Ia/b trial determined the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of imlunestrant, as monotherapy and in combination with targeted therapy, in ER-positive (ER+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) and endometrial endometrioid cancer. The ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) ABC experience is reported here. METHODS: An i3+3 dose-escalation design was used, followed by dose expansions of imlunestrant as monotherapy or in combination with abemaciclib with or without aromatase inhibitor (AI), everolimus, or alpelisib. Imlunestrant was administered orally once daily and with the combination partner per label. RESULTS: Overall, 262 patients with ER+/HER2- ABC were treated (phase Ia, n = 74; phase Ib, n = 188). Among patients who received imlunestrant monotherapy (n = 114), no dose-limiting toxicities or discontinuations occurred. At the RP2D (400 mg once daily), patients (n = 51) reported grade 1-2 nausea (39.2%), fatigue (39.2%), and diarrhea (29.4%). Patients at RP2D had received previous cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i; 92.2%), fulvestrant (41.2%), and chemotherapy (29.4%) for ABC and achieved a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 7.2 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 8.3). Among patients who received imlunestrant + abemaciclib (n = 42) and imlunestrant + abemaciclib + AI (n = 43), most (69.4%) were treatment-naïve for ABC; all were CDK4/6i-naïve. Patients treated with imlunestrant + everolimus (n = 42)/alpelisib (n = 21) had received previous CDK4/6i (100%), fulvestrant (34.9%), and chemotherapy (17.5%) for ABC. No new safety signals or interactions with partnered drugs were observed. The mPFS was 19.2 months (95% CI, 13.8 to not available) for imlunestrant + abemaciclib and was not reached for imlunestrant + abemaciclib + AI. The mPFS with imlunestrant + everolimus/alpelisib was 15.9 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 19.1)/9.2 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 11.1). Antitumor activity was evident regardless of ESR1 mutation status. CONCLUSION: Imlunestrant, as monotherapy or in combination with targeted therapy, had a manageable safety profile with evidence of preliminary antitumor activity in ER+/HER2- ABC.

Genomic landscape of malignant phyllodes tumors reveals multiple targetable opportunities.

BACKGROUND: Malignant phyllodes tumors (MPT) are rare fibroepithelial breast cancers with no known effective systemic therapy; metastatic progression portends a dismal prognosis. We sought to describe the genomic landscape of MPTs through genomic profiling and immunotherapeutic biomarker analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cases of sequenced MPT were identified from a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified, College of American Pathologists-accredited laboratory (Foundation Medicine). All cases underwent genomic profiling using adaptor ligation-based, next-generation sequencing assay of 324 genes. Tumor agnostic immunotherapy biomarkers, microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression were evaluated. Fisher's Exact Tests and analysis of variance were used to test for differences between groups and for continuous variables as appropriate. RESULTS: Of 135 MPT cases identified; 94 (69.6%) were localized/locally recurrent and 41 (30.4%) were metastatic. Median age was 54 years (range 14-86). The median TMB was 2.5 mut/Mb and 3 were TMB-high (≥10 mut/Mb). 21.4% were PD-L1+ via Dako 22C3 assay (CPS ≥1). Most commonly altered genes included TERT-promoter (69.7%), CDKN2A (45.9%), TP53 (37.8%), NF1 (35.6%), CDKN2B (33.3%), MED12 (28.9%), MTAP (27.7%), KMT2D (22.2%), PIK3CA (20.0%), PTEN (18.5%), and RB1 (18.5%). Several tumors harboring genomic alterations with US Food and Drug Administration-approved indications in other tumor types were found including NF1, PIK3CA, EGFR Exon 19/20 insertions, and BRAF V600E mutations. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest genomic evaluation of MPT to date, multiple clinically actionable mutations were found. Routine sequencing of metastatic MPT may provide additional information to guide treatment decisions and clinical trial enrollment.

Impact of systemic disease on CNS disease control after stereotactic radiosurgery to breast cancer brain metastases (The SYBRA Study).

The objective of the study is to assess impact of systemic disease (SD) status on overall survival and brain metastasis (BM) control, adopting a novel landmark approach to categorize SD among breast cancer (BC) patients. This single institution retrospective study included BCBM patients who have received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to brain. Separate endpoints [CNS failure-free survival (cFFS), overall survival (OS)] were analyzed from each Landmark (LM): LM1 (3-months), LM2 (6-months). Patients were categorized into early and non-early progression (EP, NEP) groups depending on SD status before LMs. Median survivals from LM were assessed with Kaplan Meier plots, compared with Log-Rank test. EP was associated with worse median cFFS and OS vs NEP in both LM analyses (cFFS- LM1: 3.6 vs. 9.7 months, p = 0.0016; LM2: 2.3 vs. 12.5 months, p < 0.0001; OS- LM1: 3.6 vs. 24.3 months, p < 0.0001; LM2: 5.3 vs. 30.2 months, p < 0.0001). In multivariate analyses, EP was associated with shorter cFFS [LM1: Hazard Ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.16, 1.46-6.83, p = 0.0034; LM2: 5.32, 2.33-12.15, p = <0.0001] and shorter OS (LM1: HR with 95% CI 4.28, 1.98-9.12, p = 0.0002; LM2: 7.40, 3.10-17.63, p = <0.0001) vs NEP. Early systemic disease progressions after 1st SRS to brain is associated with worse cFFS and OS in patients with BCBM.

Analysis of HER2 expression changes from breast primary to brain metastases and the impact of HER2-low expression on overall survival.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data regarding HER2-low expression dynamics between matched primary tumors and brain metastases (BrMs) in breast cancer. HER2-low expression has emerged as a new therapeutic biomarker for highly active antibody-drug conjugates with emerging intracranial activity. METHODS: Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and BrMs seen at an NCI-designated center between 2003-2023 were identified. HER2 expression was defined as HER2-positive (3+,2+/ISH amplified), HER2-low (1+,2+/ISH negative), or HER2-0 by ASCO-CAP guidelines. Estrogen receptor (ER) status was defined as ER≥1%. Multivariate survival analyses by Cox proportional hazard models were determined from time of BrM resection to death or last follow-up between the 3 subtypes, controlling for ER and age. RESULTS: Among 197 matched primary and resected BrMs, 81% exhibited HER2 expression in the brain:61% HER2-positive, 20% HER2-low, and 19% HER2-0. Concordance was high in HER2-positive primary tumors with 100% retaining HER2 expression (97% retained HER2+ expression and 2.7% switched to HER2-low). HER2-0 primaries frequently showed HER2 gain in BrMs to HER2-low (35%) or HER2-positive (5.4%) status. Among 48 HER2-low primary tumors, 52% were discordant for HER2 status in the brain with 21% testing HER2-positive and 31% testing HER2-0. In adjusted analyses, patients with HER2-positive BrMs had significantly lower death risk than patients with HER2-low BrMs (HR=0.41, P=0.0006); no difference was observed between HER2-0 and HER2-low. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, HER2 expression is common in breast cancer BrMs, emphasizing the need for improved, non-invasive diagnostics. Patients with HER2-low and HER2-0 BrMs face inferior survival, presenting an unmet clinical need.

Checkpoint inhibition for early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Most patients with breast cancer have early-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative disease. Even though the prognosis for most of these patients is good, there is a need to identify patients at risk for poor outcomes and to develop strategies to mitigate this risk. AREAS COVERED: The addition of immunotherapy to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy represents a promising option for select patients with HR-positive early breast cancer. Three randomized clinical trials have shown favorable results to date. In this review, we discuss the findings of I-SPY2, CheckMate 7FL (NCT04109066), and KEYNOTE-756 (NCT03725059). EXPERT OPINION: Despite the promising results of these trials, there are unanswered questions that need to be considered before incorporating neo/adjuvant immunotherapy in the treatment paradigm of early-stage HR-positive breast cancer. One example of an unanswered question is patient selection. Because the regimens used in these protocols are associated with long-term toxicities, identifying the patients who are more likely to derive a benefit from these agents, such as through the use of biomarkers, is critical. A second example is the optimal integration of adjuvant therapies that improve invasive disease-free survival, such as abemaciclib and ribociclib, which are not safely administered concurrently with immunotherapy.

Unique genomic alterations in the circulating tumor DNA of patients with solid tumors brain metastases.

Background: Although serum circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is routine, data from patients with brain metastases (BrMs) is limited. We assessed genomic alterations in ctDNA from patients with solid tumor BrMs in 3 groups: Isolated BrMs with stable extracranial disease (iCNS), concurrent brain and extracranial progression (cCNS), and extracranial progression with no active BrMs (eCNS). We also compared ctDNA alterations between patients with and without BrMs. Methods: Patients with a Guardant360 ctDNA profile with (n = 253) and without BrMs (n = 449) from the Duke Molecular Registry between January 2014 and December 2020 were identified. Actionable alterations were defined as FDA-recognized or standard-of-care biomarkers. Disease status was determined via investigator assessment within 30 days of ctDNA collection. Results: Among the 253 patients with BrMs: 29 (12%) had iCNS, 160 (63%) cCNS, and 64 (25%) eCNS. Breast (BC; 12.0%) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; 76.4%) were the most common tumor types. ESR1 (60% vs 25%, P < .001) and BRCA2 (17% vs 5%, P = .022) were more frequent in BC BrMs. In NSCLC BrMs, EGFR alterations were most frequent in the iCNS group (iCNS: 67%, cCNS: 40%, eCNS:37%, P = .08) and in patients with BrMs (36% vs 17%, P < .001). Sequencing from both brain tissue and ctDNA were available for 8 patients; 7 (87.5%) had identical alterations. Conclusions: This study illustrates the feasibility of detecting alterations from ctDNA among patients with BrMs. A higher frequency of actionable mutations was observed in ctDNA in patients with BrMs. Additional studies comparing ctDNA and alterations in BrMs tissue are needed to determine if ctDNA can be considered a surrogate to support treatment decisions.

Axillary nodal disease burden is not associated with an elevated 21-gene recurrence score in post-menopausal women presenting with a clinically negative axilla.

BACKGROUND: The predictive and prognostic value of the recurrence score (RS) has emphasized the importance of tumor biology and has reduced the prognostic implications of limited nodal burden in post-menopausal women with HR+/HER2-invasive breast cancer (IBC). It is unclear whether routine axillary staging has a continued role in the management of small, clinically node negative (cN0) HR+/HER2- IBC. We sought to estimate the association of RS with pN stage. METHODS: Patients >50yo diagnosed with cN0, HR+/HER2- IBC (2015-2019) with an available RS were identified from the National Cancer Database. The clinicopathologic characteristics and rates of pN-stage (pN0, pN1, pN2/3) were compared for RS of ≤25 vs. >25. RESULTS: The median patient age was 64.1 (IQR 58-69) and the majority (75%) of tumors displayed ductal histology. Most (81.6%) were cT1 on presentation and pT1 (74.7%) on final pathology. There were 130,568 (86.2%) with a RS â€‹≤ â€‹25 and 20,879 (13.8%) with a RS â€‹> â€‹25. On final pathology, 128,995 (85.2%) were pN0 and 21,991 (14.5%) pN1. Of the pN1, 2699 (12.3%) yielded a RS â€‹> â€‹25. There were 461 (0.3%) patients with pN2-pN3 disease. Of those, 57 (12.4%) had RS â€‹> â€‹25. CONCLUSION: In our analysis, pN0 and pN1 tumors are biologically similar by gene expression assay in postmenopausal patients with similar proportions of high RS. These data support the notion that tumor biology examined via RS may have more prognostic and predictive value than metastatic dissemination to limited lymph nodes. These findings support the ongoing evaluation of routine axillary staging in postmenopausal patients with HR+/HER2- IBC.

Phase II DORA Study of Olaparib with or without Durvalumab as a Chemotherapy-Free Maintenance Strategy in Platinum-Pretreated Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: We explored the efficacy of PARP inhibition with or without programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) blockade as chemotherapy-free maintenance therapy for advanced triple-negative breast cancer (aTNBC) sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the phase II non-comparative DORA trial (NCT03167619), patients with ongoing stable disease (SD) or complete/partial response (CR/PR) to first- or second-line platinum-based chemotherapy for TNBC (≤10% estrogen/progesterone receptor expression) were randomized 1:1 to receive olaparib 300 mg twice daily with or without durvalumab 1,500 mg on day 1 every 4 weeks. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) versus a historical control of continued platinum-based therapy. RESULTS: 45 patients were randomized (23 to olaparib alone, 22 to the combination; 3 with estrogen/progesterone receptor expression 1%-10%). At 9.8 months' median follow-up, median PFS from randomization was 4.0 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.6-6.1] months with olaparib and 6.1 (95% CI, 3.7-10.1) months with the combination, both significantly longer than the historical control (P = 0.0023 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Clinical benefit rates (SD ≥24 weeks or CR/PR) were 44% (95% CI, 23%-66%) and 36% (95% CI, 17%-59%) in the monotherapy and combination arms, respectively. Sustained clinical benefit was seen irrespective of germline BRCA mutation or PD-L1 status, but tended to be associated with CR/PR to prior platinum, particularly in the olaparib-alone arm. No new safety signals were reported. CONCLUSIONS: PFS was longer than expected with both regimens. A patient subset with wild-type BRCA platinum-sensitive aTNBC had durable disease control with chemotherapy-free maintenance.

Tumor Mutational Burden in Breast Cancer: Current Evidence, Challenges, and Opportunities.

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) correlates with tumor neoantigen burden, T cell infiltration, and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in many solid tumor types. Based on data from the phase II KEYNOTE-158 study, the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab was granted approval for treating patients with advanced solid tumors and TMB ≥ 10 mutations per megabase. However, this trial did not include any patients with metastatic breast cancer; thus, several questions remain unanswered about the true role of TMB as a predictive biomarker of benefit to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in breast cancer. In this review, we will discuss the challenges and opportunities in establishing TMB as a predictive biomarker of benefit to immunotherapy in metastatic breast cancer.

Concurrent predictors of an immune responsive tumor microenvironment within tumor mutational burden-high breast cancer.

Background: Data supporting high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H) as a lone biomarker for an immune-responsive tumor microenvironment (TME) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are weak, yet tumor agnostic approval in TMB-H advanced tumors provides immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) as a clinical option. We evaluated concurrent predictors of immune-responsive and non-responsive TME within MBC. Methods: Tumor samples from patients with MBC (N=5621) were analyzed by next-generation sequencing of DNA (592-gene panel or whole exome) and RNA (whole transcriptome) at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ). TMB-H threshold was set to ≥ 10 muts/Mb. PDL-1 was evaluated using SP142 antibody. Gene expression profiling and RNA deconvolution were used to estimate immune and stromal cell population abundance in the TME, and transcriptomic signature of immunotherapy response (T cell-inflamed score). Results: 461 (8.2%) TMB-H MBC samples were identified. Consistent with prior studies, TMB-H tumors exhibited significant dMMR/MSI-H enrichment (7 vs. 0%, p<0.0001) and PD-L1+ expression (36 vs. 28%, p<0.05) compared to TMB-L. Across all samples, T cell-inflamed scores were weakly correlated with TMB. TMB-H was not associated with significantly increased immune responsive cell types (CD8+ T-cells, NK cells, or B cells) or immune response gene signatures (e.g. antigen presentation), yet positive trends were observed, while immunosuppressive fibroblasts were significantly decreased in TMB-H tumors (0.84-fold change compared to TMB-L, P<0.05). HR+/HER2- breast cancer was the only subtype in which TMB-H tumors exhibited increased T cell-inflamed scores vs. TMB-L. Concurrent PD-L1+ or dMMR/MSI-H with TMB-H was associated with high T cell-inflamed scores in both HR+/HER2- and TNBC. Among several associated biomarkers, B2M mutations and CD274 amplifications were positively associated with T-cell inflamed scores in TMB-H tumors; CDH1 and ERBB2 mutations were negatively associated. Conclusion: High TMB alone does not strongly correlate with immune infiltrate or immune-related gene signatures in MBC. TMB-H predicts T-cell inflamed signature compared to TMB-L in HR+/HER2- tumors only. Along with MSI-H and PD-L1+, several biomarkers, including B2M mutation and CD274 amplification, may help predict ICI benefit amongst TMB-H tumors. Co-occurring biomarkers within TMB-H breast cancer warrant evaluation in larger cohorts for response or resistance to ICI to develop composite predictive biomarkers in MBC.

Available Systemic Treatments and Emerging Therapies for Breast Cancer Brain Metastases.

OPINION STATEMENT: In 2023, breast cancer brain metastases (BCBrM) remain a major clinical challenge gaining well-deserved attention. Historically managed with local therapies alone, systemic therapies including small molecule inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have shown unprecedented activity in recent trials including patients with brain metastases. These advancements stem from efforts to include patients with stable and active BCBrM in early- and late-phase trial design. Tucatinib added to trastuzumab and capecitabine improves intracranial and extracranial progression-free survival and overall survival in stable and active human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+)-positive brain metastases. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has both shown impressive intracranial activity in stable and active HER2+ BCBrMs challenging historical thinking of ADCs' inability to penetrate the central nervous system (CNS). T-DXd has shown potent activity in HER2-low (immunohistochemistry scores of 1+ or 2+, non-amplified by fluorescence in situ hybridization) metastatic breast cancer and will be studied in HER2-low BCBrM as well. Novel endocrine therapies including oral selective estrogen downregulators (SERDs) and complete estrogen receptor antagonists (CERANs) are being studied in hormone receptor-positive BCBrM clinical trials due to robust intracranial activity in preclinical models. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) brain metastases continue to portend the worst prognosis of all subtypes. Clinical trials leading to the approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors have enrolled few BCBrM patients leading to a lack of understanding of immunotherapies contribution in this subgroup. Data surrounding the use of poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in patients with germline BRCA mutation carriers with CNS disease is hopeful. ADCs including those targeting low-level HER2 expression and TROP2 are under active investigation in triple-negative BCBrMs.

Filling the Gap after CDK4/6 Inhibitors: Novel Endocrine and Biologic Treatment Options for Metastatic Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer.

The rise of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors has rapidly reshaped treatment algorithms for hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer, with endocrine treatment (ET) plus a CDK4/6-inhibitor currently representing the standard of care in the first line setting. However, treatment selection for those patients experiencing progression while on ET + CDK4/6-inhibitors remains challenging due to the suboptimal activity or significant toxicities of the currently available options. There is also a paucity of data regarding the efficacy of older regimens, such as everolimus + exemestane, post-CDK4/6 inhibition. In this setting of high unmet need, several clinical trials of novel drugs have recently reported encouraging results: the addition of the AKT-inhibitor capivasertib to fulvestrant demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS); the oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) elacestrant prolonged PFS compared to traditional ET in a phase 3 trial, particularly among patients with detectable ESR1 mutations; finally, PARP inhibitors are available treatment options for patients with pathogenic BRCA1/2 germline mutations. Overall, a plethora of novel endocrine and biologic treatment options are finally filling the gap between first-line ET and later line chemotherapy. In this review article, we recapitulate the activity of these novel treatment options and their potential role in future treatment algorithms.

Durable responses in patients with HER2+ breast cancer and leptomeningeal metastases treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan.

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are a devastating complication of HER2 + metastatic breast cancer (MBC), with no effective treatments. In a case series of 8 patients with heavily pretreated HER2 + MBC and progressing LM, all 8 patients (100%) derived clinical benefit from Trastuzumab deruxtecan (TDXd), and 4 patients (50%) had an objective partial response based on formal neuroradiology MRI reads using the EORTC/RANO-LM Revised-Scorecard. T-DXd warrants further study in LM in HER2 + MBC and solid tumors where T-DXd may be active.

Preclinical and Clinical Efficacy of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases.

PURPOSE: Brain metastases can occur in up to 50% of patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Because patients with active brain metastases were excluded from previous pivotal clinical trials, the central nervous system (CNS) activity of the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is not well characterized. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We studied how T-DXd affects growth and overall survival in orthotopic patient-derived xenografts (PDX) of HER2-positive and HER2-low breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). Separately, we evaluated the effects of T-DXd in a retrospective cohort study of 17 patients with stable or active brain metastases. RESULTS: T-DXd inhibited tumor growth and prolonged survival in orthotopic PDX models of HER2-positive (IHC 3+) and HER2-low (IHC 2+/FISH ratio < 2) BCBMs. T-DXd reduced tumor size and prolonged survival in a T-DM1-resistant HER2-positive BCBM PDX model. In a retrospective multi-institutional cohort study of 17 patients with predominantly HER2-positive BCBMs, the CNS objective response rate (ORR) was 73% (11/15) while extracranial response rate was 45% (5/11). In the subset of patients with untreated or progressive BCBM at baseline, the CNS ORR was 70% (7/10). The median time on treatment with T-DXd was 8.9 (1.3-16.2) months, with 42% (7/17) remaining on treatment at data cutoff. CONCLUSIONS: T-DXd demonstrates evidence of CNS activity in HER2-positive and HER2-low PDX models of BCBM and preliminary evidence of clinical efficacy in a multi-institution case series of patients with BCBM. Prospective clinical trials to further evaluate CNS activity of T-DXd in patients with active brain metastases are warranted. See related commentary by Soffietti and Pellerino, p. 8.

Brain metastasis as the first and only metastatic relapse site portends worse survival in patients with advanced HER2 + breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Current systemic therapy guidelines for patients with HER2 + breast cancer brain metastases (BCBrM) diverge based on the status of extracranial disease (ECD). An in-depth understanding of the impact of ECD on outcomes in HER2 + BCBrM has never been performed. Our study explores the implications of ECD status on intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and overall survival (OS) after first incidence of HER2 + BCBrM and radiation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 151 patients diagnosed with initial HER2 + BCBrM who received radiation therapy to the central nervous system (CNS) at Duke between 2008 and 2021. The primary endpoint was iPFS defined as the time from first CNS radiation treatment to intracranial progression or death. OS was defined as the time from first CNS radiation or first metastatic disease to death. Systemic staging scans within 30 days of initial BCBrM defined ECD status as progressive, stable/responding or none (isolated brain relapse). RESULTS: In this cohort, > 70% of patients had controlled ECD with either isolated brain relapse (27%) or stable/responding ECD (44%). OS from initial metastatic disease to death was markedly worse for patients with isolated intracranial relapse (median = 28.4 m) compared to those with progressive or stable/responding ECD (48.8 m and 71.5 m, respectively, p = 0.0028). OS from first CNS radiation to death was significantly worse for patients with progressive ECD (16.9 m) versus stable/responding (36.6 m) or isolated intracranial relapse (28.4 m, p = 0.007). iPFS did not differ statistically based on ECD status. Receipt of systemic therapy after first BCBrM significantly improved iPFS (HR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.25-0.81, p = 0.008) and OS (HR: 0.43 (95% CI: 0.23-0.81); p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: OS in patients with HER2 + isolated BCBrM was inferior to those with concurrent progressive or stable/responding ECD. Studies investigating initiation of brain-penetrable HER2-targeted therapies earlier in the disease course of isolated HER2 + intracranial relapse patients are warranted.

APOBEC Mutational Signatures in Hormone Receptor-Positive Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancers Are Associated With Poor Outcomes on CDK4/6 Inhibitors and Endocrine Therapy.

PURPOSE: APOBEC mutagenesis underlies somatic evolution and accounts for tumor heterogeneity in several cancers, including breast cancer (BC). In this study, we evaluated the characteristics of a real-world cohort for time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival on CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) plus endocrine therapy (ET) and immune checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS: Comprehensive genomic profiling results from 29,833 BC samples were analyzed for tumor mutational burden and APOBEC signatures. For clinical outcomes, a deidentified nationwide (United States-based) BC Clinico-Genomic Database (CGDB) was evaluated with log-rank and Cox models. Patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) BC who received first-line ET and CDK4/6i were included. Eligible patients from Mayo Clinic and Duke University were HR+ HER2- BC with sequencing data between September 2013 and July 2020. RESULTS: Of 29,833 samples sequenced, 7.9% were APOBEC+ with a high rate in invasive lobular carcinoma (16.7%) and in metastatic tumors (9.7%) relative to locally biopsied BC (4.3%; P < .001). In CGDB, 857 patients with HR+ HER2- BC received ET plus CDK4/6i in the first line. APOBEC+ patients had significantly shorter TTD on ET plus CDK4/6i than APOBEC- patients, 7.8 (95% CI, 4.3 to 14.6) versus 12.4 months (95% CI, 11.2 to 14.1; hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.39; P = .0036). Clinical benefit to immune checkpoint inhibitors was observed in HR+ HER2-, APOBEC+, tumor mutational burden-high patients, with four of nine CGDB patients (TTD 0.3-11.3 months) and four of six patients in Duke/Mayo cohorts (TTD 0.9-40.5 months) with a TTD of ≥ 3 months. CONCLUSION: APOBEC+ HR+ HER2- patients had shorter TTD on first-line ET plus CDK4/6i relative to APOBEC- patients. Further research is needed to optimize the treatment of APOBEC+ HR+ HER2- BC and to investigate the efficacy of immunotherapeutic strategies in this population.

Efficacy, safety and toxicity management of adjuvant abemaciclib in early stage HR+/HER2- high-risk breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The majority of the over 250,000 new cases of invasive breast cancer diagnosed in the United States are driven by hormone receptor signaling (HR+). Since 2015, cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have become the standard in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) for patients facing HR+ metastatic disease. AREAS COVERED: There are now three approved agents in the HR+ metastatic setting such as abemaciclib, ribociclib, and palbociclib. Due to the almost doubling of progression-free survival (PFS) and improvement in overall survival (OS) in the metastatic setting, studies were conducted to examine the benefit of adding CDK4/6i in the adjuvant setting for those patients at high risk for recurrence. Despite negative results of PALLAS (palbociclib) in this setting, monarchE (abemaciclib) showed an improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) at the 3-year time point for patients with high-risk tumor characteristics leading to its approval. Herein, we discuss the data, the population studied and for which abemaciclib is approved as well as safety, tolerability, and dose reductions for practical management of these patients. EXPERT OPINION: Abemaciclib is appropriate and beneficial for those patients with high-risk, node-positive, hormonally driven, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer.

Systemic management of brain metastases in HER2+ breast cancer in 2022.

Up to half of all patients with metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer will eventually acquire brain metastases (BrMs), which are associated with reduced overall survival and decreased quality of life. Although the median overall survival was previously less than a year, novel systemic treatments have significantly extended life expectancy in patients with HER2+ breast cancer BrMs. The current first-line standard of care for all patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, regardless of BrMs status, is dual HER2 antibody therapy with pertuzumab/trastuzumab plus a taxane. Second-line systemic therapy has recently evolved, with the option of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) or tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine. T-DXd has shown dramatically superior progression-free survival in comparison with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with stable BrMs in the second-line setting. Patients who have untreated or locally treated/progressive BrMs may benefit from a regimen with robust intracranial response rates, such as tucatinib in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine. Third-line therapy and beyond includes multiple options that require careful selection, with the patient's BrMs status, comorbidities, and performance status taken into account. In this review, we focus on current management and evolving strategies for the treatment of patients with HER2+ breast cancer BrMs.

Utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk, node-negative early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the optimal sequence of chemotherapy among women with operable node-negative breast cancers with high-risk tumor biology. We evaluated national patterns of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) use among women with early-stage HER2+, triple-negative (TNBC), and high-risk hormone receptor-positive (HR+) invasive breast cancers. METHODS: Women ≥18 years with cT1-2/cN0 HER2+, TNBC, or high recurrence risk score (≥31) HR+ invasive breast cancers who received chemotherapy were identified in the National Cancer Database (2010-2016). Cochran-Armitage and logistic regression examined temporal trends and likelihood of undergoing NACT versus adjuvant chemotherapy based on patient age and molecular subtype. RESULTS: Overall, 96,622 patients met study criteria; 25% received NACT and 75% underwent surgery first, with comparable 5-year estimates of overall survival (0.90, 95% CI 0.892-0.905 vs 0.91, 95% CI 0.907-0.913). During the study period, utilization of NACT increased from 14% to 36% and varied according to molecular subtype (year*molecular subtype p < 0.001, p-corrected < 0.001). Women with HER2+ (OR 4.17, 95% CI 3.70-4.60, p < 0.001, p-corrected < 0.001) and TNBC (OR 3.81, 95% CI 3.38-4.31, p < 0.001, p-corrected < 0.001) were more likely to receive NACT over time, without a change in use among those with HR+ disease (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.88-2.87, p = 0.13, p-corrected = 0.17). CONCLUSION: Among women with early-stage triple-negative and HER2+ breast cancers, utilization of NACT increased over time, a trend that correlates with previously reported improved rates of pCR and options post-neoadjuvant treatment with residual disease. Future research is needed to better understand multidisciplinary decisions for NACT and implications for breast cancer patients.