Allergen immunotherapy at university health services and allergist's reasons for guidelines nonadherence.

BACKGROUND: Our previous pilot study conducted at the University of Michigan Health Services showed that fewer than 25% of the non-university allergen immunotherapy (AIT) prescribers adhered to AIT labeling guidelines which impacted both patients and healthcare personnel involved in AIT administration. OBJECTIVES: We expand our study to characterize AIT labeling compliance and impact of practice variability at the "Big 10" University Health Services, and investigate prescribers motives for nonadherence to practice parameter guidelines. METHODS: Three online surveys were distributed: AIT Administrator and Manager surveys for healthcare personnel at the "Big 10"; University Health Services and Physician Survey for physician members of the AAAAI. Data were analyzed using frequency/bivariate analysis and logistic regression. RESULTS: 21 AIT administrators from 10 University Health Services responded. 90.4% (20/21) felt labels containing all recommended practice parameter guidelines, components would decrease error; and standardization of labels, buildup and missed dose schedules would increase workflow efficiency (76%; 16/21). 90% (17/19) felt standardized protocols for treatment of systemic reactions would increase patient safety, workflow efficiency and comfort level of administrators. Only 28.6% of AIT extract vial labels at University Health Services were in accordance with practice parameter guidelines. Despite familiarity with the guidelines (91.5%; 697/762), only 64% (488/762) of surveyed physicians had practice parameter adherent AIT extracts labels with higher odds of a complete label when physicians were in group practice (odds ratio 1.51; [95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.15]; P=0.02). Reasons for nonadherence included having personalized labeling systems (55.4%, 174/314), unfamiliarity (14%, 44/314) and disagreement (9%, 29/314) with practice parameter guidelines. CONCLUSION: Poor adherence with AIT practice parameters labeling guidelines is an important concern in nonallergy offices. It is imperative that allergists comply with the highest recommended standards to provide the best clinical outcomes and ensure excellent and efficient care in both allergy and non-allergy offices.

Adherence with allergen immunotherapy labeling guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the adherence rate to allergen immunotherapy (AIT) labeling guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To assess adherence to labeling guidelines of AIT Practice Parameter 2011 at University of Michigan Health Service. METHODS: AIT vials of 320 patients who received their care at the University of Michigan Health Service were reviewed. Data collected looked at patient identifiers (PI), concentrations in volume/volume (v/v) format, color coding, allergen content, expiration date and instructions about AIT dosing, and systemic reaction treatment. Data were analyzed by using χ(2) test and the Fisher exact test and logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 238 non-university formulated labels, 65% had 2 PIs, 62% had a v/v concentration, 41% had color coding, 71% had the content listed, and 100% had a recorded expiration date. Only 21% had all 5 recommended components. All 82 University vials had 5 components. Labels with 2 PIs were more likely to have a v/v concentration with its corresponding color coding (odds ratio [OR] 3.84 [95% CI, 1.9-7.7]; P < .001). Labels that specified the extract's content were more likely to be color coded or to have a v/v concentration listed (OR 6.3 [95% CI, 3.4-11.8]; P < .001). For all AIT vials, complete labels were significantly more likely to have a clear buildup schedule (OR 9.6 [95% CI, 4.2-23.2]; P < .001), dosing adjustment after a missed dose (OR 8.2 [95% CI, 3.4-19.8]; P < .001) or after a reaction (OR 13.7 [95% CI, 7.8-2.1]; P < .001), and clear systemic reaction treatment instructions (OR 9.7 [95% CI, 7.8-24.1]; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Fewer than 25% of the nonuniversity prescribers adhered to AIT practice parameters 5 years after publication. Recording 2 PIs, the v/v concentration, or the color coding increased the likelihood of having a complete label. Complete label contents were associated with clear instructions about AIT dosing and reaction treatment and/or dose adjustments.

Systemic reactions to inhalant immunotherapy using 1:1 target dosing.

BACKGROUND: The 2007 immunotherapy practice parameters advocate maintenance dosing at 1:1 (1:20 maintenance concentrate). There is limited literature exploring the effect of 1:1 dosing on the rate of systemic reactions to subcutaneous immunotherapy (SRITs). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of 1:1 dosing on SRITs in a large, academic practice. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all nonvenom and noncluster SRITs that occurred between 2005 and 2011. SRITs that occurred from August 2008 through December 2011, postparameter dosing (post-PD) was initiated, were compared to SRITs that occurred from January 2005 to July 2008 with preparameter dosing (pre-PD) using 1:50 as a maintenance concentrate. RESULTS: A total of 269 SRITs occurred in a 7-year period. Significantly more post-PD SRITs (131 of 38,548 injections) occurred than pre-PD SRITs (132 of 52,833 injections) (0.34% vs 0.25%, P = .01). However, when excluding 44 SRITs that occurred in established pre-PD patients transitioned to post-PD, there was no significant difference in SRIT rate (0.25% vs 0.22%), World Allergy Organization (WAO) grade, or SRIT time to onset. Nonred (non-1:1) vials accounted for a significantly larger proportion of all post-PD SRITs compared with all pre-PD SRITs (50.7% vs 31.1%, adjusted P = .009). Prior SRITs were reported less frequently among persons with post-PD SRITs (29.2% vs 70.8%, adjusted P = .009). In an adjusted logistic regression model, male sex (odds ratio, 7.9; 95% CI, 2.4-26) and longer time to reaction onset (odds ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.89-0.99) were associated with higher WAO severity grade reactions. CONCLUSION: Pre-PD vs post-PD SRIT rates were not significantly different, adjusting for patients transitioned from established pre-PD to post-PD. This finding suggests that post-PD is as safe as pre-PD. Male sex and faster time to reaction onset were associated with higher WAO grade reactions.

Prevalence of comorbidities and their influence on blood pressure goal attainment in geriatric patients.

Hypertension in elderly patients is common and is associated with unique challenges. This study examines the prevalence of comorbidities in elderly hypertensive patients and evaluates the association between comorbidities and other covariates with blood pressure goal attainment. Data were collected through retrospective review of medical records and included patient characteristics, comorbidities, treatment-related variables, and blood pressure goal attainment. At least 1 comorbidity was present in 88% of patients, and 61% had multiple comorbidities. The most common comorbidity was isolated systolic hypertension. The presence of diabetes or isolated systolic hypertension at initial visit and treatment with a thiazide diuretic at the final clinic visit were associated with significantly higher odds of patients not achieving blood pressure goal. A diagnosis of heart failure was associated with lower odds of not achieving blood pressure goal. These issues should be given special consideration during the evaluation, treatment selection, and long-term monitoring of this population.