Macular pigment optical density and visual quality of life.

PURPOSE: There is robust evidence that higher macular pigment concentrations help reduce both veiling and discomfort glare in patients with or without ocular disease. We investigated whether there was also a relationship between macular pigment optical density (MPOD) and patient surveys about glare or ocular discomfort. METHODS: We measured MPOD psychophysically in 23 healthy subjects and administered the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VFQ-25). Responses for each survey question were sorted from low (no limitation) to high (very severe limitation). The median response for each question was determined, and independent t-tests were performed on the mean MPOD values for survey responses above and below the median. We also performed a non-parametric correlation analysis between MPOD and survey responses. RESULTS: While the median response was "no limitation" for most (22 of 25) survey questions, responses were slightly higher for two questions concerning ocular discomfort and one question related to driving at night. MPOD levels were significantly higher in subjects that reported no discomfort in or around their eyes than in those that reported mild discomfort. There was also a trend toward higher MPOD levels in subjects who reported that pain in or around their eyes never limited their activity as well as in subjects who reported no difficulty driving at night. CONCLUSION: These preliminary findings are consistent with the well-established discomfort and glare hypotheses for MPOD. The current findings on subjective ocular discomfort in the absence of glare deserve further study.

Effects of Oral Antihistamines on Tear Volume, Tear Stability, and Intraocular Pressure.

The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of two commonly used oral antihistamines-diphenhydramine and loratadine-on tear volume, tear breakup time, and intraocular pressure. Placebo, diphenhydramine, and loratadine were administered for one week to 33 subjects experimentally blind to the treatment given. All the subjects received all three treatments over a period of six weeks. The outcome measures were the change in phenol red thread test (PRT), the tear breakup time (TBUT), and the intraocular pressure (IOP) of both eyes evaluated by experimentally masked observers. Neither of the mean changes in TBUT or IOP depended on the treatment given, but there was a significant monocular decrease in tear volume from diphenhydramine use. While we used an adequate treatment washout period of seven days, our investigation was limited by the short treatment times and inclusion of only young healthy patients. Overall, however, these results suggest that systemic diphenhydramine use should be limited to increase the effectiveness of conventional therapies. Clinicians should have fewer reservations about recommending the use of loratadine concurrent with dry eye treatments.