RESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with cognitive impairment; however, the underlying mechanisms remain incompletely understood. OSA is characterized by periods of interrupted ventilation ("ventilatory burden (VB)"), leading to hypoxemia ("hypoxic burden (HB)") and/or arousal ("arousal burden (AB)") from sleep. While hypoxemia is considered a key mechanism underlying white matter injury, its measurement has been limited. In our primary analysis, we assessed the association of HB, a quantitative measure of hypoxemia, with white matter hyperintensity volume (WMHv), a marker of small vessel disease, and compared with that of VB and AB (quantitative measures of ventilatory deficit and arousals). METHODS: Data from participants in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis with full polysomnograms (PSG) and brain MRI were analyzed. HB was defined as the total area under the oxygen desaturation curve per hour of sleep, while VB was defined as the event-specific area under the ventilation signal and AB was defined as the normalized cumulative duration of all arousals. The primary outcome was WMHv, with other MRI measures considered secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The analysis included PSGs from 587 participants (age: 65.5±8.2 years). In the fully adjusted model, each 1 standard deviation (SD) increase in HB was associated with a 0.09 SD increase in WMHv (p=0.023), after adjusting for demographics, study site, and comorbidities. In contrast, VB, AB, and conventional OSA measures were not associated with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Hypoxic burden was associated with white matter hyperintensity volume in a racially/ethnically diverse cohort of older individuals with a high prevalence of OSA.
RESUMEN
Importance: Mouth breathing is associated with increased airway resistance, pharyngeal collapsibility, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity. The common belief is that closing the mouth can mitigate the negative effects of mouth breathing during sleep. However, mouth breathing may serve as an essential route to bypassing obstruction along the nasal route (eg, the velopharynx). Objective: To investigate the role of mouth breathing as an essential route in some patients with OSA and its association with upper airway anatomical factors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nonrandomized clinical trial included participants diagnosed with OSA who underwent drug-induced sleep endoscopy. Patients were stratified into 3 quantiles based on oral-breathing level (quantile 1: oral airflow < 0.05 L/min; quantile 2: oral airflow 0.05-2.2 L/min; quantile 3: oral airflow > 2.2 L/min). Interventions: Closing the mouth during sleep during alternating breaths by applying pressure to the mentum until teeth are in occlusion. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was total inspiratory flow defined as the change in airflow in the transition from mouth relaxed to mouth closed, analyzed overall and by 3 oral-breathing quantiles. The association of velopharyngeal obstruction on the change in total inspiratory airflow was also investigated. Results: Of 66 enrolled patients with OSA, 12 were excluded due to insufficient baseline airflow. The analytic cohort consisted of 54 patients (39 [72%] male; median [IQR] age, 55 [46-64] years; apnea-hypopnea index, 26.9 [17.6-39.9] events/h; and body mass index calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, 28.9 [27.1-31.6]). Mouth closure increased total inspiratory flow by 27.8 percentage points overall (ß, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.4-1.9] L/min). However, outcomes varied based on the degree of baseline oral breathing. No association was found for 10 patients with near-zero mouth breathing (0.9 [95% CI, -0.2 to 2.1] L/min). Airflow improved with mouth closure in 32 patients with moderate levels of mouth breathing (2.0 [95% CI, 1.3-2.7] L/min), whereas it worsened in patients with high levels of mouth breathing (-1.9 [95% CI, -3.1 to -0.6] L/min). Velopharyngeal obstruction was associated with increased mouth breathing (0.6 [95% CI, 0.1-3.0] L/min) and reduced airflow with mouth closure (-1.9 [95% CI, -3.1 to -0.7] L/min). Conclusion and Relevance: Although mouth closure increased inspiratory airflow in the overall cohort of this nonrandomized clinical trial, the outcomes were heterogeneous. In patients who breathe primarily through their mouth during sleep and have velopharyngeal obstruction, airflow worsens with mouth closure. Hence, personalized approaches to treating mouth breathing should be considered. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06547658.
RESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is more prevalent in men and older adults. Few studies have explored variations in pathological endotypic traits by age and sex using a large patient sample, offering insights into the development of the disease. Our study aims to examine how endotype characteristics of obstructive sleep apnea vary across age in different sex. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted, enrolling 2296 adult patients referred for in-laboratory diagnostic polysomnography at a single sleep center in Taiwan. Among them, 1374 had an apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 5. Using the "Phenotyping Using Polysomnography" method, we estimated four endotypic traits-arousal threshold, upper airway collapsibility, loop gain, and upper airway muscle compensation. Demographic and polysomnographic characteristics were compared between sexes and age groups. Generalized linear regression and generalized additive models were employed to explore the associations of sex and age with endotypic traits. RESULTS: Men with OSA exhibited higher collapsibility and lower compensation than women (difference: 4.32 %eupnea and 4.49 %eupnea, respectively). Younger patients with OSA had a higher prevalence of obesity, more snoring symptoms, and lower loop gain compared to older patients. For men, age was correlated with increased collapsibility, increased loop gain, and decreased arousal threshold after 37 years old. Whereas in women, endotypic traits were not associated with age, except for an increase in loop gain with advancing age. CONCLUSIONS: Personalized treatment options for OSA should take into consideration age and sex. Reducing loop gain could be a treatment objective for older patients with OSA.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) therapy is limited by obstruction of the oropharyngeal lateral walls (OLWs). Our objective was to investigate the effect of palatine tonsillectomy on HGNS efficacy in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients with OLW collapse. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study of patients with moderate-to-severe OSA, complete-or-partial OLW collapse, and small tonsils (1 - 2+). Concomitant palatine tonsillectomy and HGNS (HGNS+T) were compared against a control group of patients who underwent HGNS alone. SETTING: Single academic institution. METHODS: Study outcomes were measures of HGNS efficacy defined as a %reduction in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (primary) and successful treatment response (50% AHI reduction to <15/h, logistic regression), respectively. Regression analyses quantified the additional effect of tonsillectomy (HGNS+T vs HGNS alone, independent variable) on HGNS efficacy. Analyses were adjusted for OLW collapse severity (complete vs partial), tonsil size, age, sex, body mass index, and baseline AHI. RESULTS: Nineteen patients underwent HGNS+T and had follow-up sleep testing for the current analysis. The control group (HGNS alone) consisted of 78 patients. Baseline demographics and OSA severity were similar between the groups, except HGNS+T group had increased prevalence of complete OLW collapse. Linear regression demonstrated that adding tonsillectomy resulted in an additional 22.9% [7.5, 35.2] reduction in AHI [95% confidence interval, CI] (P = .006), and 8.6 [1.7,43.4] (P = .010) greater odds [95% CI] of a successful treatment response with HGNS. CONCLUSION: Compared to historically poorer outcomes of HGNS in patients with OLW collapse, these early results suggest combining tonsillectomy with HGNS may represent a promising strategy to improve success rates.
RESUMEN
Surgical interventions, like barbed reposition pharyngoplasty (BRP), are a valuable alternative for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who are unable to tolerate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). However, predicting surgical success remains challenging, partly due to the contribution of non-anatomical factors. Therefore, combined medical treatment with acetazolamide, known to stabilize respiratory drive, may lead to superior surgical results. This double-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled trial evaluates the efficacy of acetazolamide as an add-on therapy to BRP in OSA. A total of 26 patients with moderate to severe OSA undergoing BRP were randomized to receive either acetazolamide or placebo post-surgery for 16 weeks. The group who was treated with BRP in combination with acetazolamide showed a reduction in AHI of 69.4%, significantly surpassing the 32.7% reduction of the BRP + placebo group (p < 0.01). The sleep apnea-specific hypoxic burden also decreased significantly in the group who was treated with BRP + acetazolamide (p < 0.01), but not in the group receiving BRP + placebo (p = 0.28). Based on these results, acetazolamide as an add-on therapy following BRP surgery shows promise in improving outcomes for OSA patients, addressing both anatomical and non-anatomical factors.
RESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent disorder with serious health consequences but limited therapeutic options. For a subset of those with OSA, a key underlying mechanism is hypersensitive chemoreflex control of breathing. There is no approved therapy that targets this endotypic trait. Here we determine whether the P2X3 receptor antagonist gefapixant, which is predicted to attenuate hypersensitive carotid chemoreflexes, reduces OSA severity in patients with chemoreflex-dependent OSA. METHODS: In a randomized placebo-controlled cross-over study, 24 patients with moderate-to-severe OSA (aged 39-68 years, non-CPAP users) whose disorder was partially responsive to supplemental oxygen (chemoreflex-dependent OSA) were treated with gefapixant 180 mg (or placebo) administered as tablets taken orally before bedtime for 7 days and assessed via overnight polysomnography. The primary analysis examined whether gefapixant treatment resulted in a greater reduction in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) from baseline than placebo. RESULTS: Gefapixant did not lower the AHI significantly more than placebo; the estimated ratio of the AHI on gefapixant versus placebo was 0.92 [90% CI: 0.73, 1.17]. Notably, nocturnal hypoxemia was increased (ratio of total sleep time with SpO2 <90% on gefapixant versus placebo = 2.08 [90% CI: 1.53, 2.82]), consistent with reduced chemoreflex output. Commonly reported adverse events with gefapixant included ageusia, dysgeusia, oral hypoaesthesia, nausea, somnolence, and taste disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Gefapixant, while generally well tolerated, did not reduce OSA severity in patients with chemoreflex-dependent OSA. P2X3 receptor antagonism is unlikely to provide an avenue for therapeutic intervention in OSA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Safety and Tolerability of Gefapixant (MK-7264) in Participants With Obstructive Sleep Apnea (MK-7264-039); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03882801; Identifier: NCT03882801.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the primary therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); however the effectiveness of CPAP remains suboptimal. We describe the Novel PhysIologiC prEdictors of Positive Airway Pressure Effectiveness (NICEPAP) study. Its purpose is to determine whether physiological traits of OSA contribute to CPAP effectiveness. METHODS: NICEPAP (NCT05067088) is a prospective, observational cohort study conducted at an academic sleep center. Adults newly diagnosed with OSA (n = 267) are assessed for OSA traits of loop gain, arousal threshold, pharyngeal collapsibility, and muscle compensation from baseline polysomnography. We perform a comprehensive assessment of covariates relevant to CPAP adherence, efficacy, and patient-centered outcomes. Participants are followed for 12 months. Primary outcomes include (1) CPAP adherence (hours/night), (2) CPAP efficacy (apneas-hypopneas/hour), and (3) quality of life at six months measured by objective CPAP data and Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include sleep quality, sleepiness, insomnia, and neurocognitive function. RESULTS: Data on covariates, including demographics, sleep symptoms, medical history, medications, sleep quality, OSA and treatment self-efficacy, decisional balance, and socio-economic and social and partner support, are collected using validated instruments. The analysis for primary outcomes includes a generalized linear mixed model for an outcome (e.g., CPAP adherence) with OSA traits as exposures followed by the addition of relevant covariates. CONCLUSION: The findings of the NICEPAP study will inform research aimed to enhance CPAP effectiveness. Understanding the role of physiological OSA traits in CPAP effectiveness is a crucial step toward a precision medicine approach to OSA.
Asunto(s)
Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Humanos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Polisomnografía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios de Cohortes , Cooperación del PacienteRESUMEN
RATIONALE: Low arousal threshold and poor muscle responsiveness are common determinants of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Hypnotics were hypothesized as an alternative OSA treatment via raising the arousal threshold and possibly genioglossus responsiveness. OBJECTIVES: Effect of common hypnotics on arousal threshold, OSA severity and genioglossus responsiveness. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized clinical trials, and ran meta-analyses to determine the effect of oral hypnotics on arousal threshold, OSA severity and genioglossus responsiveness. GRADE was used to rate the quality of evidence (QoE). The association between post-treatment AHI and arousal threshold percent reductions was explored in individual patient data (IPD) metanalyses (overall sample and low arousal threshold subgroups). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Based on our analysis (27 studies; 25 for AHI, 11 for arousal threshold, 4 for genioglossus responsiveness), hypnotics minimally raised arousal threshold (mean difference [95% CI]: 2.7 [1.5, 3.8] cmH2O epiglottic pressure swings; moderate QoE), but did not change OSA severity (ï1.4 [ï3.5, 0.7] events/h; moderate QoE). IPD meta-analysis (N=114) showed no association between changes in arousal threshold and AHI, independent of low arousal threshold subgrouping. However, people with very-low arousal threshold or those who exhibited 0-25% arousal threshold increase from placebo experienced the greatest-yet still modest-post-treatment AHI reductions (ï¾10%). Hypnotics did not affect genioglossus responsiveness (high QoE). CONCLUSIONS: Further research testing or clinical use of hypnotics as OSA alternative treatments should be discouraged, unless in the presence of comorbid insomnia or as part of combination therapy in individuals with very-low arousal threshold.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea is characterized by disordered breathing during sleep and is associated with major cardiovascular complications; excess adiposity is an etiologic risk factor. Tirzepatide may be a potential treatment. METHODS: We conducted two phase 3, double-blind, randomized, controlled trials involving adults with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea and obesity. Participants who were not receiving treatment with positive airway pressure (PAP) at baseline were enrolled in trial 1, and those who were receiving PAP therapy at baseline were enrolled in trial 2. The participants were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the maximum tolerated dose of tirzepatide (10 mg or 15 mg) or placebo for 52 weeks. The primary end point was the change in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI, the number of apneas and hypopneas during an hour of sleep) from baseline. Key multiplicity-controlled secondary end points included the percent change in AHI and body weight and changes in hypoxic burden, patient-reported sleep impairment and disturbance, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) concentration, and systolic blood pressure. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean AHI was 51.5 events per hour in trial 1 and 49.5 events per hour in trial 2, and the mean body-mass index (BMI, the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) was 39.1 and 38.7, respectively. In trial 1, the mean change in AHI at week 52 was -25.3 events per hour (95% confidence interval [CI], -29.3 to -21.2) with tirzepatide and -5.3 events per hour (95% CI, -9.4 to -1.1) with placebo, for an estimated treatment difference of -20.0 events per hour (95% CI, -25.8 to -14.2) (P<0.001). In trial 2, the mean change in AHI at week 52 was -29.3 events per hour (95% CI, -33.2 to -25.4) with tirzepatide and -5.5 events per hour (95% CI, -9.9 to -1.2) with placebo, for an estimated treatment difference of -23.8 events per hour (95% CI, -29.6 to -17.9) (P<0.001). Significant improvements in the measurements for all prespecified key secondary end points were observed with tirzepatide as compared with placebo. The most frequently reported adverse events with tirzepatide were gastrointestinal in nature and mostly mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Among persons with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea and obesity, tirzepatide reduced the AHI, body weight, hypoxic burden, hsCRP concentration, and systolic blood pressure and improved sleep-related patient-reported outcomes. (Funded by Eli Lilly; SURMOUNT-OSA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05412004.).
RESUMEN
There are multiple mechanisms underlying obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) development. However, how classic OSA risk factors such as body mass index (BMI) and sex portend to OSA development has not been fully described. Thus we sought to evaluate how obesity leads to OSA and assess how these mechanisms differ between men and women. The San Diego Multi-Outcome OSA Endophenotype (SNOOzzzE) cohort includes 3,319 consecutive adults who underwent a clinical in-laboratory polysomnography at the University of California, San Diego, sleep clinic between January 2017 and December 2019. Using routine polysomnography signals, we determined OSA endotypes. We then performed mediation analyses stratified by sex to determine how BMI influenced the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) using OSA pathophysiological traits as mediators, adjusting for age, race, and ethnicity. We included 2,146 patients of whom 919 (43%) were women and 1,227 (57%) were obese [body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2]. BMI was significantly associated with AHI in both women and men. In men, the adjusted effect of BMI on AHI was partially mediated by a reduction in upper airway stiffness (ßstandardized = 0.124), a reduction in circulatory delay (ßstandardized = 0.063), and an increase in arousal threshold (ßstandardized = 0.029; Pboot-strapped,all < 0.05). In women, the adjusted effect of BMI on AHI was partially mediated by a reduction in upper airway stiffness (ßstandardized = 0.05) and circulatory delay (ßstandardized = 0.037; Pboot-strapped,all < 0.05). BMI-related OSA pathogenesis differs by sex. An increase in upper airway collapsibility is consistent with prior studies. A reduction in circulatory delay may lead to shorter and thus more events per hour (higher AHI), while the relationship between arousal threshold and OSA is likely complex.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our data provide important insights into obesity-related obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) pathogenesis, thereby validating, and extending, prior research findings. This is the largest sample size study to examine the relationships between obesity and gender on OSA pathogenesis. The influence of obesity on sleep apnea severity is mediated by different mechanistic traits (endotypes).
Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Obesidad , Polisomnografía , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Obesidad/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/fisiopatología , Polisomnografía/métodos , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Mediación , Factores Sexuales , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios de Cohortes , AncianoRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Opioid medications are commonly used and are known to impact both breathing and sleep, and are linked with adverse health outcomes including death. Clinical data indicate that chronic opioid use causes central sleep apnea, and might also worsen obstructive sleep apnea. The mechanisms by which opioids influence sleep-disordered breathing pathogenesis are not established. METHODS: Patients who underwent clinically-indicated polysomnography confirming sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) (AHI≥5/hr) were included. Each patient using opioids was matched by sex, age, and BMI to three control individuals not using opioids. Physiology known to influence SDB pathogenesis were determined from validated polysomnography-based signal analysis. PSG and physiology paramters of interest were compared between opioid and control individuals, adjusted for covariates. Mediation analysis was used to evaluate the link between opioids, physiology, and polysomnographic metrics. RESULTS: 178 individuals using opioids were matched to 534 controls (median [IQR] age 59 [50,65] years, BMI 33 [29,41] kg/m2, 57% female, daily morphine equivalent 30 [20,80] mg). Compared with controls, opioids were associated with increased central apneas (2.8 vs 1.7 events/hr; p=0.001) and worsened hypoxemia (5 vs 3% sleep with SpO2<88%; p=0.013), with similar overall AHI. Use of opioids was associated with higher loop gain, a lower respiratory rate and higher respiratory rate variability. Higher loop gain and increased respiratory rate variability mediated the effect of opioids on central apnea, but did not mediate the effect on hypoxemia. CONCLUSIONS: Opioids have multi-level effects impacting SDB. Targeting these factors may help mitigate deleterious respiratory consequences of chronic opioid use.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pharyngeal flow limitation during pregnancy may be a risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes but was previously challenging to quantify. Our objective was to determine whether a novel objective measure of flow limitation identifies an increased risk of pre-eclampsia (primary outcome) and other adverse outcomes in a prospective cohort: Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study Monitoring Mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b). METHODS: Flow limitation severity scores (0%=fully obstructed, 100%=open airway), quantified from breath-by-breath airflow shape, were obtained from home sleep tests during early (6-15â weeks) and mid (22-31â weeks) pregnancy. Multivariable logistic regression quantified associations between flow limitation (median overnight severity, both time-points averaged) and pre-eclampsia, adjusting for maternal age, body mass index (BMI), race, ethnicity, chronic hypertension and flow limitation during wakefulness. Secondary outcomes were hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and infant birthweight. RESULTS: Of 1939 participants with flow limitation data at both time-points (mean±sd age 27.0±5.4â years and BMI 27.7±6.1â kg·m-2), 5.8% developed pre-eclampsia, 12.7% developed HDP and 4.5% developed GDM. Greater flow limitation was associated with increased pre-eclampsia risk: adjusted OR 2.49 (95% CI 1.69-3.69) per 2sd increase in severity. Findings persisted in women without sleep apnoea (apnoea-hypopnoea index <5â events·h-1). Flow limitation was associated with HDP (OR 1.77 (95% CI 1.33-2.38)) and reduced infant birthweight (83.7 (95% CI 31.8-135.6)â g), but not GDM. CONCLUSIONS: Greater flow limitation is associated with increased risk of pre-eclampsia, HDP and lower infant birthweight. Flow limitation may provide an early target for mitigating the consequences of sleep disordered breathing during pregnancy.
Asunto(s)
Preeclampsia , Resultado del Embarazo , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Adulto , Preeclampsia/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven , Modelos Logísticos , Diabetes Gestacional/fisiopatología , Sueño/fisiología , Peso al Nacer , Análisis Multivariante , Paridad , Polisomnografía , Índice de Masa Corporal , Faringe/fisiopatología , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/fisiopatología , Recién NacidoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Weight reduction is a standard recommendation for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment in people with obesity or overweight; however, weight loss can be challenging to achieve and maintain without bariatric surgery. Currently, no approved anti-obesity medication has demonstrated effectiveness in OSA management. This study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide for treatment of moderate to severe OSA in people with obesity. METHODS: SURMOUNT-OSA, a randomized, placebo -controlled, 52-week phase 3 trial, is investigating the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide for treatment of moderate to severe OSA (apnea hypopnea- index ≥15 events/h) in participants with obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2) and an established OSA diagnosis. SURMOUNT-OSA is made of 2 intervention-specific appendices (ISAs): ISA-1 includes participants with no current OSA treatment, and ISA-2 includes participants using positive airway pressure therapy. Overall, 469 participants have been randomized 1:1 to receive tirzepatide or placebo across the master protocol (ISA-1, n = 234; ISA-2, n = 235). All participants are also receiving lifestyle intervention for weight reduction. RESULTS: The primary endpoint for the individual ISAs is the difference in apnea hypopnea- index response, as measured by polysomnography, between tirzepatide and placebo arms at week 52. Secondary endpoints include sleep apnea-specific hypoxic burden, functional outcomes, and cardiometabolic biomarkers. The trial employs digital wearables, including home sleep testing to capture time to improvement and accelerometry for daily physical activity assessment, to evaluate exploratory outcomes. CONCLUSION: SURMOUNT-OSA brings a novel design to investigate if tirzepatide provides clinically meaningful improvement in obesity-related OSA by targeting the underlying etiology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05412004.
Asunto(s)
Obesidad , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Masa Corporal , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua/métodos , Método Doble Ciego , Obesidad/complicaciones , Polisomnografía , Proyectos de Investigación , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/tratamiento farmacológico , Pérdida de Peso/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with increased blood pressure (BP). Obstructive sleep apnea treatment reduces BP with substantial variability, not explained by the apnea-hypopnea index, partly due to inadequate characterization of obstructive sleep apnea's physiological consequences, such as oxygen desaturation, cardiac autonomic response, and suboptimal treatment efficacy. We sought to examine whether a high baseline heart rate response (ΔHR), a marker of high cardiovascular risk in obstructive sleep apnea, predicts a larger reduction in post-treatment systolic BP (SBP). Furthermore, we aimed to assess the extent to which a reduction in SBP is explained by a treatment-related reduction in hypoxic burden (HB). METHODS: ΔHR and HB were measured from pretreatment and posttreatment polygraphy, followed by a 24-hour BP assessment in 168 participants treated with continuous positive airway pressure or nocturnal supplemental oxygen from the HeartBEAT study (Heart Biomarker Evaluation in Apnea Treatment). Multiple linear regression models assessed whether high versus mid (reference) ΔHR predicted a larger reduction in SBP (primary outcome) and whether there was an association between treatment-related reductions in SBP and HB. RESULTS: A high versus mid ΔHR predicted improvement in SBP (adjusted estimate, 5.8 [95% CI, 1.0-10.5] mmâ Hg). Independently, a greater treatment-related reduction in HB was significantly associated with larger reductions in SBP (4.2 [95% CI, 0.9-7.5] mmâ Hg per 2 SD treatment-related reduction in HB). Participants with substantial versus minimal treatment-related reductions in HB had a 6.5 (95% CI, 2.5-10.4) mmâ Hg drop in SBP. CONCLUSIONS: A high ΔHR predicted a more favorable BP response to therapy. Furthermore, the magnitude of the reduction in BP was partly explained by a greater reduction in HB.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Humanos , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Hipoxia , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , OxígenoRESUMEN
Rationale: Moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI], >15 events/h) disturbs sleep through frequent bouts of apnea and is associated with daytime sleepiness. However, many individuals without moderate-severe OSA (i.e., AHI <15 events/h) also report sleepiness. Objectives: To test the hypothesis that sleepiness in the AHI <15 events/h group is a consequence of substantial flow limitation in the absence of overt reductions in airflow (i.e., apnea/hypopnea). Methods: A total of 1,886 participants from the MESA sleep cohort were analyzed for frequency of flow limitation from polysomnogram-recorded nasal airflow signal. Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) was defined by an Epworth Sleepiness Scale score ⩾11. Covariate-adjusted logistic regression assessed the association between EDS (binary dependent variable) and frequency of flow limitation (continuous) in individuals with an AHI <15 events/h. Results: A total of 772 individuals with an AHI <15 events/h were included in the primary analysis. Flow limitation was associated with EDS (odds ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-3.54; per 2-standard deviation increase in flow limitation frequency) after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, race/ethnicity, and sleep duration. This effect size did not appreciably change after also adjusting for AHI. Conclusions: In individuals with an AHI <15 events/h, increasing flow limitation frequency by 2 standard deviations is associated with a twofold increase in the risk of EDS. Future studies should investigate addressing flow limitation in low-AHI individuals as a potential mechanism for ameliorating sleepiness.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva , Polisomnografía , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/fisiopatología , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/fisiopatología , Anciano , Modelos Logísticos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Factores de RiesgoAsunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos , Ácidos Docosahexaenoicos , Nacimiento Prematuro , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Ácidos Docosahexaenoicos/administración & dosificación , Método Doble Ciego , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Nacimiento Prematuro/prevención & control , Nacimiento Prematuro/etnología , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , BlancoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Differences in the pharyngeal site of collapse influence efficacy of non-continuous positive airway pressure therapies for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Notably, complete concentric collapse at the level of the palate (CCCp) during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is associated with reduced efficacy of hypoglossal nerve stimulation, but CCCp is currently not recognisable using polysomnography. Here we develop a means to estimate DISE-based site of collapse using overnight polysomnography. METHODS: 182 OSA patients provided DISE and polysomnography data. Six polysomnographic flow shape characteristics (mean during hypopnoeas) were identified as candidate predictors of CCCp (primary outcome variable, n=44/182), including inspiratory skewness and inspiratory scoopiness. Multivariable logistic regression combined the six characteristics to predict clear presence (n=22) versus absence (n=128) of CCCp (partial collapse and concurrent tongue base collapse excluded). Odds ratios for actual CCCp between predicted subgroups were quantified after cross-validation. Secondary analyses examined complete lateral wall, tongue base or epiglottis collapse. External validation was performed on a separate dataset (ntotal=466). RESULTS: CCCp was characterised by greater scoopiness (ß=1.5±0.6 per 2sd, multivariable estimate±se) and skewness (ß=11.4±2.4) compared with non-CCCp. The odds ratio for CCCp in predicted positive versus negative subgroups was 5.0 (95% CI 1.9-13.1). The same characteristics provided significant cross-validated prediction of lateral wall (OR 6.3, 95% CI 2.4-16.5), tongue base (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4-7.3) and epiglottis (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.5-12.4) collapse. CCCp and lateral wall collapse shared similar characteristics (skewed, scoopy), diametrically opposed to tongue base and epiglottis collapse characteristics. External validation confirmed model prediction. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides a means to recognise patients with likely CCCp or other DISE-based site of collapse categories using routine polysomnography. Since site of collapse influences therapeutic responses, polysomnographic airflow shape analysis could facilitate precision site-specific OSA interventions.